\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\iiint_V\rho\mathbf{u}\,dV=-\oint_S(\rho\mathbf{u}\cdot d\mathbf{S})\mathbf{u}-\oint_S p\,d\mathbf{S}+\iiint_V\rho\mathbf{f}_{\mathrm{body}}\,dV+\mathbf{F}_{\mathrm{surf}}Favourite equations thread. No arguing, just post your personal favourite and stfu
Always double check your LaTeX ffs. Anyway it's in the picrel
Euler's identity[math]e^{\pi i} + 1 = 0[/math]
>>17083518Who cares. All conservation laws in physics have that same structure anyways.
>>17083520>latexHot
>>17083518[math] \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\iiint_V\rho\mathbf{u}\,dV=-\oint_S(\rho\mathbf{u}\cdot d\mathbf{S})\mathbf{u}-\oint_S p\,d\mathbf{S}+\iiint_V\rho\mathbf{f}_{\mathrm{body}}\,dV+\mathbf{F}_{\mathrm{surf}} [/math]
>>17083518[eqn]-\frac{\partial V}{\partial t} = \max_{u\in U} \Big\{ r(x,u) + \mu(x,u) \frac{\partial V}{\partial x} + \frac{\sigma(x,u)^2}{2} \frac{\partial^2 V}{\partial x^2}\Big\}[/eqn]
>>17083548Before that meme there was pic.
0.999... = 1...999 = -1 (10 adic number)...999.999... = 0With >>17083548you have :[math]e^{\pi i} + 1 = ...999.999...[/math]
>>17083518[math] f_{xy}=f_{yx} [/math]Simple, yet amazing
>>17086329Nice...what's that equation about?
