STEMchads keep winning, arts chuds in shambles
>>17084847I'm guessing they measure "scientific creativity" by number of ChatGPT-written toilet papers published.
Scientific creativity is an oxymoron.
>>17084850Low-IQ take.
>>17084847have you seen what modern art used to produce before ai? im honestly surprised any of those artists could function in the modern world.
>have you seen what modern art used to produce before ai? im honestly surprised any of those artists could function in the modern world.
>>17084855>modern art>before AIif it was made before AI, it's not modern art, it's classical art
>if it was made before AI, it's not modern art, it's classical artMost imbecilic board on the entire site, hands down.
Then explain the behaviour in the stem career general
>>17084868They're all modern artists, obviously.
>>17084864>>17084873damn, you got triggered real bad by my post huh?
>>17084847STEMclitties do not have the right to self-proclaim being STEMchad if they aren't mentally ill
>>17084881
>>17084881https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334842889_Mental_Health_in_the_Mathematics_Community>>17084997I am too stupid to post. Good night.
>>17084847>scientific creativityI would not trust ithttps://www.bitchute.com/video/hvRoX959WIBH
But how do you explain TempleOS? A STEM masterpiece made with poor mental health.
twin studies is a reification fallacy.