RIP king. Rest easy knowing you were right
>>17086647On average Americans are richer than Africans, yet you’re still a poor fag
F
>In his 2007 memoir, Avoid Boring People: Lessons from a Life in Science, Watson describes his academic colleagues as "dinosaurs", "deadbeats", "fossils", "has-beens", "mediocre", and "vapid".Wtf I love this guy now
Notice how the statement at the end has nothing to do with the veracity of his worlds but only the "values" they undermine?
I know the chan loves IQ tests but half you guys wouldn't survive in the african wilderness. Different types of intelligence guys. IQ tests seem to be best at filtering office workers and people who will sit at desks for 8 hours a day.
S
FTruth will someday prevail over social engineers, consequences be damned
>>17086733No, we are all adapted to wilderness. But i would have gotten infant moratilitied if i was born in Africa. Different types of intelligence is not really a thing, it's general intelligence.
I use to believe in Race and IQ but after seeing the mass chimpouts against artificial intelligence, humans are actually dumber than they look.
>>17086733Take an African child from a small village right after was born, raise him as any other American, and when he is 18 return him back. I can guarantee you he will not survive in the African wilderness.
>>17086733The Australian government hasn't been able to stop Abos from sleeping on the freeway no matter how many warning signs they put up
>>17086647>there is no genetic component to the black-white IQ gap>how do you know?>it's the scientific consensus, most scientists agree with the idea so that means evidence supports it>what happens if a scientist disagrees with that idea?>well we get him fired and end his entire career of courseF to a real scientist
>>17086733>wouldn't survive in the african wildernessthe smart thing to do is avoid the african wilderness in the first placecheckmate
>>17086666who is 100x richer
>>17086647Right on what? His Nobel Prize?>>17087157>>what happens if a scientist disagrees with that idea?He literally just use "because I said so silly :^)" and his rep from decades ago as the crutches of his arguments. Why do you think this is some popularity contest or some corporate BS where seniority trumps everything and everyone has to kiss geriatric dick?
>>17087010>I use to believe in Race and IQYou only cared when it benefitted you as a tool to justify being a myopic git.>>17087406"Rich" Americans are dying to easily preventable diseases and conditions and getting denied health coverage and care. No point in having some of the "best" hospitals and care if you still get priced out of it.
He was literally the equivalent of a witch kek And they say science isn’t a religion! Bahahaha
>>17086647It's true that genetics have a say on intelligence, in a very convoluted way (individuals with tendency for autistic fixations prolly get ahead of everyone else a lot), but there are both stupid people and smart people in every population, so caring about the average is kind of pointless.Since he said average, he's not wrong ig.
>>17087515>so caring about the average is kind of pointless.Holy shit, we got a midwit.>averageAsspulls, nor anecdotes can contribute to a meaningful interpretation of a proper
>>17087523>Holy shit, we got a midwit.Yeah, that would be you. >Asspulls, nor anecdotes can contribute to a meaningful interpretation of a properLearn english
>>17086647>1:03>The statements he made [...] are completely and utterly incompatible with out mission, values, and policiesbut you didn't say they were incorrect
>>17087515half the population is dumber than average start at the global level take out the bottom half
>>17088169Look. There are some things that are true, but you just can't like...say them. For example, everyone knows your mother is a whore, but I would never say that.
>>17086733>half you guys wouldn't survive in the african wildernessNeither would at least half of fucking Africans that's why they all stick together and reproduce like rabbits for insurance policies when they're inevitably crippled by being in a developing nation.
>>17086733Africans generally don't survive the African wilderness either if it wasn't for European medicine. You take a 100 average white city folk and they will fair better than most African villages.
>>17087010>mass chimpouts against artificial intelligenceMost people do not want loud gas turbines built right next to their house
>>17086647Polygenic scores adjusted for stratification accurately predict race differences in IQ, and genetic ancestry is a superior predictor of cognitive ability to self-ID race.https://www.mdpi.com/2624-8611/1/1/17https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373840894_Income_and_Education_Disparities_Track_Genetic_Ancestryhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/371695470_A_Genetic_Hypothesis_for_American_RaceEthnic_Differences_in_Mean_g_A_Reply_to_Warne_2021_with_Fifteen_New_Empirical_Tests_Using_the_ABCD_Datasethttps://www.emilkirkegaard.com/p/sasha-gusev-wont-answer-basic-questions?utm_source=publication-search>>17086733>bait>>17087010>I used to believe in aggregate genetic differences for g between groups, but then I saw that some humans are dumb, and this somehow disconfirmed aggregate genetic differences for g between groups>>17087157>consensusThey don't have the consensus. That's just something they want you to believe.Only 15% of intelligence researchers say they believe the Black-White IQ gap is 0% genetic. The mean response is ~50%.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NmwcjBTL_fohttps://ideasanddata.wordpress.com/2019/08/22/expert-surveys-on-race-and-iq/https://archive.li/TDZemhttps://www.emilkirkegaard.com/p/expert-opinion-on-race-and-intelligence?utm_source=publication-search>>17087515>caring about the average is kind of pointlessObviously, this is untrue.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366691469_Smart_Fraction_Theory_A_Comprehensive_Re-evaluationhttps://menghu.substack.com/p/national-iq-papers-must-be-retracted?utm_source=publication-search
I honestly don’t understand why biofags think that discovering the particular molecule responsible for genetics is all that hyped up. OK, it is DNA and that has a double-helix structure. So what? Genetics was already hypothesized to have a molecular origin and so what if it’s some particular shape. If it turned out to be a quadruple toroid that did the same thing , then what would be the difference? and if it wasn’t ACTG but instead BRNLT then we would have mapped the genome in a similar way anyhow. What really did Watson and Crick really contribute?I think Watson and Crick (and Franklin) are vastly overhyped just like, take for example, the EHT collaboration and Katie Bouman. Who cares if you got the first picture of something everybody already knew about?
>>17088223>half the population is dumberStupid. There's no way of knowing if there's extremely stupid individuals dragging everyone down or extremely smart individuals dragging everyone up. Using averages is just not very useful, a proper overview would catalog which groups are dragging everyone down. You can't do eugenics by generalizing stuff with averages.>>17089351I'm sorry, but I really don't have the time to read all that right now.
>>17087010Your post has a Hindu accent.
>>17086647Reminder he live long enough to watch all his high IQ people he championed bury themselves Trillions in debt, priced out their young out of homes and plummeting birthrates.Yeah, rest easy.
