[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Additional supported file types are: PDF
  • Use with [math] tags for inline and [eqn] tags for block equations.
  • Right-click equations to view the source.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_20261109_125857.jpg (263 KB, 1982x605)
263 KB JPG
But they just keep adding more and more possible causes of aging and now the paper is worthless.
Now if a study finds checkers players live slightly shorter than the control group, they'll add checkers as a cause of aging. It's ridiculous
>>
>>17088231
If a paper can be ruined by adding more of the paper then the paper was always worthless.
>>
>>17088251
you don't know what you're talking about. A review is supposed to summarize. If you make it so long that it contains all the papers published in Nature since the 19th century, then it's not a review
>>
>>17088231
On the core it's divalent iron poisoning, chromium depletion, and cadmium deficiency.
>>
>>17088231

Jeez, if we only could identify a general underlying mechanism ... :)
>>
>>17088251
This.
>>17088294
If the papers are added as a pure citation then it makes no difference. More is better then fewer in that case. If the citation is added because the content was incomplete and a new notion must be added, then the original was fucked.

Anyway, 100% of aging research is bullshit scams so far. The only company I follow is Loyal, but only because they might fluke into the first discovery. Their science is trash.
>>
>>17088231
The body ages on purpose
That's really the only answer given that it's so ridiculously difficult to increase mammal lifespan. Also so many anti-aging tools the body has are artificially limited, to the point where something like liposomal spermidine is surprisingly effective at making you healthier by basically doing one single thing, stopping the body from limiting autophagy
>>
>>17088456
>Also so many anti-aging tools the body has are artificially limited
Only correct part of this post.
>>
>>17088456
We know the body ages on purpose. The hubris is in thinking we can play God and prevent cancer better than the body aging itself.
>>
>>17088480
>>>/x/
>>>/pol/
>>
>>17088481
Not sure what about that is paranormal or political.
>>
>>17088498
Go worship your magic sky daddy somewhere else.
>>
>>17088511
>>>/r/eddit please, that must be the only sensible explanation for getting this triggered upon a mention of God. I'm not even Christian lmao.
>>
>>17088522
>hurr durr we age cuz god said so waaah no stop trying to do science things waaah
>>>>>>>>>/r/eddit please, that must be the only sensible explanation for getting this triggered upon a mention of God. I'm not even Christian lmao.
>>
>>17088534
>no stop trying to do science things
Never said this. I welcome us trying but it's not easy or we'd have anti-aging drugs by now.
>>
>>17088481
>>17088511
>>17088534
Hybris



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.