How will the scientific community react when there is irrefutable evidence that contradicts the last 50 years of science?will they try to ignore it or pretend that knew all along?
>>17089598deny defend depose
>>17089598irrefutable evidence that contradicts the last 50 years of technological advancements?
>>17089598the vatican will have a talk with them. I'm sure they'll be able to work out an agreement.https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MPHyR92MQic&ra=m
thinly veiled aether thread
the scientific community will publish and peer review irrefutable evidence to settle the conflict between the irrefutable evidence that contradicts the last 50 years of irrefutable evidence and the last 50 years of irrefutable evidence
>>17089598the tenured professors will resign in shame and everyone in the conference room will clap as a bald eagle named Freedom flies in and etc etc, that's what you wanted to hear, right?
>>17089720Yes.
>>17089721are you satisfied?
Future people would try and hunt down the ISP of the aether guy and find his Facebook photos and praise what he did,
>>17089598The last 50 years of science is a bunch of contradictory theories that haven't quite panned out because each one requires a scale of ultra-precise sub-nano measurement that we still won't be able to achieve for another 50 years if ever.
>>17089896What are you referring to in terms of “the last 50 years of science”? String theory started in 1968 so that is 8 years over your deadline. Please be specific on what you are referring to that came about since late 1976
>>17089929yeah more like over 100 years because even with Bell's theory in 1964, it's a direct mathematical expansion of Albert Einstein’s 1935 thought experiment regarding quantum entanglement.
>>17089933so you think all science over the last 100 years has been nothing? and you ate typing this on what, a telegraph or something?
>>17089929>String theory started in 1968 so that is 8 years over your deadline.Yes and the various models of Quantum Science have also still been going on for the past 50 years despite starting before the deadline.>came about since late 1976I never said that, I said "The last 50 years of science is a bunch of contradictory theories that haven't quite panned out because each one requires a scale of ultra-precise sub-nano measurement that we still won't be able to achieve for another 50 years if ever." Learn to read more closely and stop trying to editorialize and insert a bunch of hallucination while you read.
>>17089936That is a result of engineering, not science, ancient peoples could also engineer marvels and migrate across the globe despite their scientific knowledge being completely retarded.
