Does time dilate?Will time ever be a 4th dimension?
Only in the sense that you can speed up or slow down the rate at which you interact with space containing information.
>>17090015no such thing. you can never do that, under any circumstance. because you are always in the same frame. thus relative to you everything happens at the same rate, in your own frame.you will never ever see the clock on the wall next to you tick faster or slower. that just isn't something you can ever do.if "the rate of change" happens faster in your own frame, so does everything inside you, all of your own processes, thus you end up in the same old rate of change for shit around you in your own frame, as far as you are concerned.you will always notice time passes at 1s/s in your own frame, no matter what happens to your own frame. because anything that affects shit in your own frame, also affects you, thus no relative change between you, your perception, and the changes around you in your own frame (wall clock ticking rate for example).regardless of anything your perception is always stuck at 1s/s
>>17090025I didn't say the rate of change is affected, the rate of time is defined by some coincidence of information>you will always notice time passes at 1s/s And what is a second? What do you measure to define a second by?
>>17090026>What do you measure to define a second by?the rate of change of a cesium atom.>the rate of time is defined by some coincidence of informationnani the fuck?
>>17090032>the rate of change of a cesium atomWhich part of it? I'd say it's simpler to see time as merely the rate of information exchange between two points in space, the faster this information exchange occurs the more "sped up" the rate of change appears and on the opposite spectrum if you slow down information exchange enough, until no information is received, then the notion of time vanishes as nothing would appear to change.
>>17089989Time needs a definition and the Einstein definition is retarded. It has no deeper meaning, thats why his spacetime is just math. Since we know the universe is non local we need a master clock, and then all these effects are just slowing of processes.
>>17089989>Does time dilate?You will NEVER be a spatial dimension.
>>17089989Time is illusory. You believe in time because the Sun rises. in the sky, but the Sun is not 'moving'. The planet is spinning. That's why you believe in time.All that is is sequence.
>>17090288This is what jewish quackery gets you: Denying shit you can see with your own two eyes.
>>17090302Top fucking kek. You're non-scientific.
>>17090316Better than a jew lover.
>>17089989If I follow people's spirits into space then I can travel their time line into the future separate to the universes.
>>17090032Why do we assume that the atomic clock is an accurate measurement of time in different settings? People repeatedly claim that Relativity has been proven by taking atomic clocks to space and then comparing them to atomic clocks left on earth.The definition of a second states that it is the measurement of cesium oscillations in an "unperturbed ground state".But exposing an atomic clock to less gravity or higher velocities would certainly be breaking the "unperturbed" criteria.Therefore we cannot claim that time slows down relatively when an object experiences high velocity or higher gravity, only that the measurement device is effectively slowed down.An analogy to this would be like having a 1000 mm steel ruler at room temperature in London and then taking it Antarctica where the ruler would now be 999 mm. After this discovery the time-dilators would now claim that the very definition of length is different depending on temperature! Instead of realising that the ruler was simply inaccurate.
>>17089989Yes, time dilates it's neo-vagina.
>>17090636they account for it during measurementshttps://youtu.be/eyZEqSPeMwg
