20/F/EU>About youim just looking for a long haired big man to shower with all my love and attention, bake him goods and make him cute gifts too!! (being hairy is a plus!), preferably european as well (nordic or anglo/scottish) i want to have a lot of kids so i if that's not something you're looking for im not for you/// im around 5'6 and i have asperger's I enjoy "grumpier" men, i think they're really cute and i could somehow help them soften their hearts a bit, im not looking for money, i just want someone to be happy with in terms of interests im into science, astrophysics to be specific, zoology, dinosaurs, baking, history, psychology, philosophy, working out, reading, moviesRight now i'm reading guenon's crisis of the modern world! i promise to love you a lot and listen to you as well :)>Discorddrop yours i'll talk to you!
Sure I'll bite, AshenElemental
>>35131009weilderofdestinydon't make me regret this ..wo..man . . . . . .
Another day, another foid looking for chad, and the long line of simps said foid will never hookup with.
Are you fat? And more importantly, are you white?
>>35131050no and no
>>35131058>not whitewas about to leave you my tag, but not anymore.
Give me an email to write to and I'll write you. But you better not be Danish. Or Dutch.
>>35131063okie!! have a great time either way
Oh interesting, i just read crisis of the modern world a while ago.Is 31 too old for you or not?
33yo 190cm height 110kg weight guy from Poland, living in NLalso into fitness and nerd shit hit me up.disc: ogar
Damn I overread the Guénon part, now I'm genuinely curious
>>35131086heheh
>>35131096Ok you're retarded, not anymore
>>35131086damn your hair looks amazing, you should post>>35062086
>>35131110oh my god, okay i'm sorry i have joy
If hairy is a good feature then you'll be interested in me...My disc is firuru_zawazawa
>>35131111I have>>35131115Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit
>>35131080it's okay!
>>35131070im neither!
>>35131009raptor8130
>>35131009You obnoxious cunt, you post an entire thread for yourself and demand that other people post their tags for you? Kill yourself
>>35131234you could just ask for my tag ouw
>>35131245this bitch lmfao
>>35131245Just post yours, god damn. You're going to have to filter anyway.
>>35131245egg056734
>>35131009Got a protonmail burner?
>>35131009your bio sounds lovely and so do you but you being european and me being american certainly makes things difficult. well, if you think love can surpass all obstacles, even distance, then my tag is lawnclipping
>>35131698no :/, i can make one!
>>35131009Thatcactuscommander. M 27 UK.
>>35131058What race are you?
>>35132727north and east african and a bit of european
>>35131019>>35131025>>35131085>>35131116>>35132627
>>35131009Steve457.Tell me what you like most about astrophysics
I will bite too 30 M from euDiscord steelangel0668
>>35132599do so
I wouldn't say it's a contradiction, a person who likes Guénon's philosophy and metaphysic does not necessarily like Guénon or accept all of his beliefs, but it is interesting that Guénon himself married a brown North African, and the prospect of doing the same is so unpalatable to so many fans of Guénonism. Again, not a contradiction, in any wise it is only interesting to me.I own essentially all of his translated works, but I wouldn't call myself knowledgeable on his philosophy any further than the shitposts, only on the critique of Modernity that is common to many similar writers. Modernism, of course, beginning its germination in the fairly recent period of around B.C. 400:>It should be remembered nevertheless that Greek thought was, in spite of everything, Western in its essence and that it already contained among its other characteristics, the origin and, as it were, the germ of most of those tendencies which developed much later among the modern Westerners.>...>It cannot even be said that Greek reasoning is distinguished by an exceptional strictness; it only appears stricter than other methods of reasoning to people who are them selves in the habit of employing it exclusively, and this illusion is due solely to the fact that it is restricted to a narrower and more limited field and is therefore more easily defined. On the contrary, the faculty most truly characteristic of the Greeks, but which is little to their advantage, is a certain dialectical subtlety, of which the dialogues of Plato provide numerous examples; there is an apparent desire to examine each question interminably, under all its aspects and in minutest detail, in order to arrive finally at a rather insignificant conclusion; it would appear that in the West the moderns are not the first people to have been afflicted with "intellectual myopia."If nothing else, this "dialectical tradition" is precisely what I would call the modern "condition." (I believe Guénon himself would disagree.)
This dialectic of critique can find itself manifested primarily, in the modern day, in critical theory; contrary to the mindless conservative view, leftist critical theory, and progressivism as a whole, is the culmination of Western "tradition" and the realization of its values, rather than its "enemy." When one considers those fronts upon which the use of the dialectic of critique are today employed, they find that same interminable examination of concepts until nothing remains but a very insignificant conclusion. For example, it is necessary to question what a woman is. What is a woman? A woman is a social construct. A social construct is defined socially; a woman is whatever is said to be a woman. This is not the profound conclusion it is thought to be, it is not even closer to accuracy or reality than before (and at most, no further), but rather the "termination point" of all interminable critique; it is to abolish meaning altogether. This is the laziest method of definition, the one which is most insignificant of all, and it is to say "whatever is convenient." While seeming to be the most steadfast of definitions, it is in fact the emptiest. The justification for the definition of women as self-identification rests on "social utility," as if it were not, then it would be selecting one entirely arbitrary definition over another. And as with "woman," utility may be broken and boiled down to its component parts, critiqued until the reality is (un)known: utility is whatever is convenient, whatever pleases the individual arguer, and the one who argues their subjective definition of woman over another, merely screams:>Woman is whatever I want it to mean. I demand your obedience, or your silence.There becomes no meaningful definition behind woman, utility, goodness, suffering, and so on.
The definition of "woman," either based on a biological "reality" (whatever that means) or "social utility," is merely a form of knowledge-power. It is the assertion of power and control, power and control simply put; one's own desire to be pleased and pleasured by the "utility" gained from one definition is no greater than the other, unless one wishes to assert another and greater objective Moral Truth, a truth which, like the critique of traditional Morality, can be viscously critiqued until nothing at all remains but the name. It is this tendency to critique and to abolish all "meaning" which defines what I see as the plague of modernity.Obviously, I am using a form of critique. My own definitions, I consciously assert, are my own and arbitrary no less. I am a product of Western Liberalism, and I cannot escape it. I wish to be "Christian," but I fear what comes after, to be "Traditionalist," but I believe in no Tradition; I am, in every way, inescapably Western. Cruel, isn't it?Yes, I used this thread as a launchpad for my unhinged ranting. But if I am to add something relevant, I doubt that you will find what you are looking for here. In fact, I doubt you know what you are looking for at all.
>>35134920viciously*
>>35134231girlbanana127@proton.me
