For leftist anons to meet other lefties
>>35447226There's already plenty of other cuckold/BNWO/LGBT threads
>>35447226Can I post if I jerk off with my left hand?
>>35447226>genuinely trying to organize on the 4chan sex boardNigga.
I wish leftist females would lower their standards and settle for short ugly unmasculine undominant unconfident autistic shy awkward boring stupid male feminist nice guy progressive incels. But even the most "leftist" women are still extremely conservative in their dating, only wanting very masculine men who perform the aspects of traditionalism that they like. And modern feminism is headed towards the "reactionary feminism" of explicitly embracing gender roles and just wanting to tweak them to benefit women rather than men, while rejecting egalitarianism. Plus a growing number of leftists only embrace the economic stuff while rejecting social liberation as a wholeSadly too many "we need universal healthcare, paid family and medical leave, tariffs, high taxes, and reducing immigration so that regular men can afford to be single income earners and have a family again, and so women can afford to be homemakers without needing to be some girl boss who has it all" types on the left these days (Also free trade and immigration are good, and not at all incompatible with anticapitalist politics, the modern populist "left" is shit)
>>35447877hope this isn't baityou need to stop justifying being a loser by blaming capitalismyes capitalism sucksbut alot of those things you have power over, retarddoes a woman deserve less because she picks the nice guy? or should good behavior actually be rewarded?if you don't reward good behavior, nobody will do it.So stop acting like your ugly ass is entitled to a nice tolerant leftie girl or whatever, because you aren't. As far as I'm concerned a nice tolerant and open-minded female deserves a massive fucking cock.
>>35447895>but alot of those things you have power overIdgaf. Females should lower their standards and accept dating equality. I shouldn't need to make any effort to adhere to their unfair bullshit conservative traditional standards. Women don't need to adhere to traditional gender roles or beauty standards anymore and can still be loved, so the same should apply to men too, and if women won't apply it to men, they are oppressing us. It's that simple.
>>35447906just stop going for immature women dumbass
>>35447914Women no matter how mature or immature just want hypermasculine dominant confident trad chads and refuse to settle for nice guy male feminist leftist incels like me. No women have low standards anymore
>>35447940has to be bait at this point
>>35447996Not bait, just acknowledging reality. Women are too picky and it's not fair.
>asl21/Male/Europe>interestsHi I'm a leftist twink and I like gamedev and video games (milsims, weird indie games, coop horror)coding (in C!)tinkering with computers (BSD and Linux)DIY electronicsmusic (metal, rock and classical),sports (swimming and basketball)history and literaturecamping/foraging>looking forCTF teammateRelationship/FriendshipGenuine/interesting people that I can connect with>not looking forDry peoplePeople that forget why they add mePassionless people with no hobbiesGooners>contactackee205pic is me >:3
>>35450532Being a rape ape nigger will surely make me want to fuck you, yes. It's not like you'd a dime a dozen on here. >>35447237Who's gonna tell him...
https://discord.gg/RRJaye938Posting this here because left pol is dead
>>35447996He's been posting for years whining and begging for a gf. You'd probably know that if you weren't a newfag>>35451528>Who's gonna tell him...Totally bro, all the nigger dick spam on this site is because right wing chuds are into it, not because Jewish bot farms constantly slide any meaningful discussion on other red boards. And on /soc/, if you actually had the misfortune to open the other fetish threads like that, they're full of cuck and tranny leftists. You're a retard AND ywnbaw
>>35447996He's the new brandon of soc, his discord is lacktoastntolerant, look him up in the archives. I guarantee you he's just an average looking white guy and doesn't realize that his disdain for women while definitely being too afraid to approach (or even see them as human, just calling them "females" kek) is the reason why they all steer clear. Also he's weirdly sexually impotent and okay with being a cuck. A guy like that should already be in a polycule but then you see how he talks and quickly realize why he's alone. He's a fascinating little bug
>>35451528Racist slurs are bad, you shouldn't say shit like that. There's nothing wrong with people who aren't white. Also calling me a rapist is funny, I hate sex because sex is stupid conservative bullshit, I think Dworkin was right about that (and about most things). But even "leftist" females would still rather go for trad, masculine abusechads than settle for nice guys like me>>35451801Nah, "cuck" is a specific fetish, not just any sort of polyamory. Cuck stuff also repulses me. I just don't want to have to do the horrid patriarchal sex that women want, and if that means the female does it with someone else, I'd just be happy that I don't have to do it. Also gender roles are bullshit and men shouldn't need to be the ones to approach, that's sexist bullshit. Sucks that so many females only want the parts of equality that benefit them, while picking and choosing the aspects of tradition they like. All the feminism leaves women's bodies when it comes to dating lol
>>35451801>>35457648oh no you are right, there is so much to disect, i kinda know the type irl but not in this particular type of way, fascinating
Where are the leftist chads I was promised by clicking into this thread? All I want is to drown in my own drool on progressive cock.
>>35457824Leftist females should lower their standards and settle for me rather than wanting to dissect me
>>35466276well 1 not a woman2 it is not a standards thing to not be into someone who seems like they dont know right from wrong unless it falls within their arbitrary rule set
>>35466095idk just go to your local zoo and find a staff member to give your phone number to
I’m “left-leaning” but I would genuinely love nothing more than for people like OP and /pol/tards to put each other out of my misery. You faggots trying on bootlicking radical chic pseudo-politics in place of a personality are so fucking exhausting.
>>35468840>people calling me centrist are so stupid look at my comic>spouts literal radical centrist horseshoe theory copeit's also very funny you call authoritarian beliefs "pseudo-politics", as opposed to mainstream parties where you can vote for either the red or blue edition of unlimited immigration, uppity faggots and women, uncontrolled monopolies, and groveling to israel
>>35468902It’s funny because I can’t tell from this post alone whether you’re into Stalin or Hitler, the grievance shit gets so interchangeable
>>35468967ah yes the people who legalized no fault divorce and abortion and pushed for girl boss shit by mid 20th c. were totally the same as Hitler. it's not muh horseshoe theory, you're just legitimately low iq like everyone who thinks they're making a statement with "principled" individualist bullshit
>be me>leftist>click into lefty thread>it's just some braindead faggot whining over why women don't want himthe problem is not the politics here
>>35468991hey man you want a beer everyone gets one here? we are gonna get those horses for you collectively
>>35468991Wait are you implying that social liberals are leftists? I think you’re a little confused.
>>35469535no, I'm talking about the ussr. again, legitimately low iq
>>35447226I'm socialist but I'm right wing socialistThe internationalism, faggotry, femininism and antireligion and antinationalist aspects of leftism are cancerous
>ASL19/M/Asia>Interestsleftist political economy, grand strategy brainrot (stellaris, hoi4, war thunder), history, art, anime, gaming.>Looking forleftists/anons to banter with, people who actually enjoy talking without getting argumentative. text first, open to vc later if we click.>Not looking forIRL meetups, Debate, Virtue signallers, Sectarianism.>ExtraRerouting from my usual boards because finding other lefties who actually use 4chan and aren't normies is rare enough to break the lurk. P.s ML-leaning/tankie. Keep the reformist cope in the main threads.>ContactDiscord: tostacel
there’s normie leftists who post on here? >>35472930
>>35473276> normie leftistlmao
>>35471094I see, so your issue with the USSR is that they were socially liberal sometimes. Like normal people my issue is more with the totalitarian dictatorship, police state purges, imperialism, mass death, ethnic cleansing etc. so the justifications people make up for that stuff end up sounding pretty similar whether they prefer the Stalin or Hitler flavor. You and your comrades are made for each other!
>>35469274>the problem is not the politics hereYes it is. Left wing women aren't being consistent with their politics, women don't need to adhere to traditional gender roles and beauty standards anymore but still only accept men who adhere to their own ones. It's unequal and unfair.
>>35447817ur not allowed to have social threads on any boards other than soc btw
Looking for people to help a communist org in CA, we're mobile mechanics and welders who are trying to look for a shop. I'm trying to start a mobile welding crew and I'm planning to teach workshops for our members. Let me know if you're interested in chatting, I want to share what I've done on my Subaru and chat about cars generally. discord: millenium_cheesepuff
Hello, I'm leftist.
>>35475815for how long have the same 3 thoughts been spinning in your head? for how long have you been able to dismiss everything happening around you in order to try and maintain your feeling of being a victim of others?
>>35468840This but unironically. Its also been pretty amazing to me just how utterly retarded these e-commies actually are to the ideology they obsess over. None of them even know how things like the Soviet Union, Cuba, or Communist China actually function.
>>35474043>like normal people (nonsentient goys) my problem is this list of things that are really cool in the right hands, lib "representative" government is BASED and would never do any of these things to me thoughthanks for sharing about your disability
>>35475815>>35477685no brodie's on to something. we leftists should all accept that we're unmasculine undominant beta males that women will never settle for and chop off our little clits and be eunuchs. it's actually kinda reactionary if you don't so please dont try to sneak any fash shit into our movement by refusing, ok?
>>35480887i guess you are right, let me just go ahead and stick my dick in the toaster and get anally violated by a hyaena
>>35477685I quite simply AM a victim. For women to deny incels like me dating equality, it just IS oppression, even if you and females REALLY don't want to accept and admit it. I am right, and will remain bitter and angry about females' unfair and oppressive exclusion of me and men like me from dating for the rest of my sad little life. And there's nothing wrong with my anger, it is justified by the unfairness women subject me to by excluding me.
>>35485160if you think women are so unfair and generalize them so much what do you even like in women?
>>35478699>None of them even know how things like the Soviet Union, Cuba, or Communist China actually functionTrue, but neither do libs like you.
>>35485365People in general are nice, especially when they embrace fairness and equality rather than rejecting these values. I don't think women are INHERENTLY evil, it's just the popular trend in society these days and something where many women choose to resist being fairer and embracing decency. But they don't need to be like that.
>>35491666Women are inherently bourgeoisie in the Marxist sense because it is an inescapable biological reality that the female controls the "means of reproduction of the means of production" within her body. And because the cost of reproduction is so high for female bodies, they are more selective of mates and drive sexual competition in males. Thus materialism is born. In a fair and equal society, women will mate with an extremely sma number of men, and the rest of men will be naturally funnelled to labor in solitude for women and their consorts, receiving nothing in return.
i hate leftists but the only women who read books written by men from before 1900 are leftist. huge bummer
>>35491737Nah that's stupid reactionary garbage. We should have genuine equality instead. Also I don't give a shit about reproduction, I just want a woman to date me, more and more women don't want kids at all so they should be able to get over themselves and stop being so picky.
>>35491755What do you mean when you say "genuine equality"? I must sleep soon. I may answer before I sleep or I may think it over tomorrow. I just want to know whatever genuine equality is supposed to be.
>>35491764Getting rid of all the gender role crap, the demand that men have to fit themselves into an arbitrary and narrow set of norms (and then insist that it is natural and biological and therefore necessary, even tho it isn't). Including in the world of dating where even the most otherwise leftist women will still strongly insist that men keep performing traditionally masculine gender roles being the stoic strong provider and shit like that, with women being so unwilling to appreciate simple egalitarian companionship and romance contrasted to the brutal hypercapitalist transactional sort of relationships they insist on
I'm far-right and a former leftist, I find leftists to be fun to be around and chat with. If you are interested in my perspective or generally just wanna talk with someone in the far-right feel free to talk to me. I'd consider myself fairly educated and respectful, but for more details I'll wait to see if someone contacts me. Anyways my discord is dorkycrusader1
>>35491806If biology and human psychology themselves lead to substantive inequality, to what extent do you believe that a just Marxist State should control human biology?And do you consider happiness to be a right which a just Marxist State should provide?
>>35492790>If biology and human psychology themselves lead to substantive inequalitydangerous can of worms to be opening for a commie...
>>35492790>If biology and human psychology themselves lead to substantive inequalityI just think this is wrong. Men and women are equal. It's become so trendy across the spectrum to cringe at the 2010s-era "bread rolls not gender roles" style of feminism, and the idea of gender roles as unnecessary social constructs, but those ideas were right no matter how much disgust the masses have for them. Just like how essentialism has been used to justify every other inequality that is now rightly recognized as unnecessary nonsense, the same is done here. We don't need that shit.
>>35493959I am not critiquing you and you probably have very fine and reasonable interpretations of the facts to support your view, but keep in mind the following:There are substantive biological differences between males and females and substantial reason to believe there are different tendencies in the psychology of both sexes, and these differences show up prior to gendered socialization. The degree to which these differences appear is somewhat irrelevant, and only establishing that there are differences in the averages between sexes is enough to show that a substantive difference can be established between two classes, male and female, broadly speaking. A Marxist should be amenable to empirical facts. When he loses empiricism, he becomes a religious fanatic.
I'm pretty far left(CCP-pilled) but I got banned from leftypol again recently for advocating treating government assigned gf's as a viable idea because it's "incel shit". But I think this kind of idea genuinely falls within the framework of Marx/Lenin with The Party being the dominant force for cultural and societal change. It bothers me that modern leftists just stand for liberal civil rights shit(don't get me wrong that's important too) when collectivism is just as important for ensuring the best outcome for the majority of citizens. I have some leftist 4channer friends but they also hate leftist spaces online so I genuinely don't know where to "meet" other leftists everyone feels so isolated.Anyway m/32/cali heterosexual anime fan with a huge fetish for cosplayers/vtubers and (2D) lolis and (3D) chubby girlsdiscord: nanashi.deathlooking for leftist gf or at least female friend to talk to about leftist stuff or debate feminism/marxism or whatever. no trans girls sorry you're valid but not my type.
>>35450805>200+ postsHoly shit, Kys at this point faggot
>Leftists seeking Leftists>thread is full of leftist in-fighting
>>35485431Wrong. I come from a pretty well-off middle-class background, so I received a good education and in general grew up in an atmosphere that fostered the idea that being politically minded was part of my civic duty. As such I have better understanding of civics than you or any other pajama pants loser and/or terminally online schizo freaks whos personal politics are little more than mass murder revenge fantasies and LARPing. Heres the Soviet Unions constitution btw which clearly lays out that the STATE (not workers, proles, the poor ect) owns and controls the means of production.
>>35447340>actual lefty at birthNo stop larping you filthy righty
>asl20 / M / MENA>about meI am a go-getter of sorts. I'm in university majoring in software engineering and am pursuing two minors in political science and mathematics. I'm considered pretty normal, just into strange hobbies and whatnot. I try to talk and be approachable when I can even though I'm often described as mean or at least unwelcoming.>interests / hobbieshistory, music, and I do read Wiki articles religiously. I also play games. Tekken has been my most recent obsession.regarding my knowledge in those interests:I involve myself in literature a lot. I’m very good with my English lit, much to the point that one of my like freelance jobs include writing academic papers for people for money; I’ve even written master's theses for people.I’m a historytard at heart. I wanna be a history professor or at least in social sciences in general and ive geared my life towards that eventually.I’m a musician. I am a pianist since I was 5 and ive also recently joined a band where we perform gigs and actually earn very respectable money doing so. I also have a huge FLAC digital music collection on my computer that amounts to over 120 GBssome of my favorite games are Disco Elysium and life is strange, I also play some games extensively like hack and slashes (DmC n Bayonetta) and map painters. I'm also GoD in Tekken (Asuka main)>looking forhonestly anybody? I'm bi and it kind of doesn’t matter too much.>not looking for>ContactDiscord: hail.thornsEmail: housesofgoldenlove@protonmail.com
>>35493969Nah, it's far from clear that these differences are actually biological and inherent. It's very common for folks to see differences and just assume right from the start that they must be inherently, and also to simply overstate the extent to which differences, natural or otherwise, even exist to begin with. Observed diversity within one gender is much wider than the average differences between the genders. There's a growing shift against the old social constructivist ideas and in favor of "acknowledging the reality that men and women are different" but it's mostly based on common sense rather than reality
>>35503333Class interests converge even where there are only very minor similarity between individuals. We use "class" in this case to refer to social classes as in early Marx. A simple biological tendency for women to select one type of mate due to evolutionary pressures, even if this tendency is only biased by about 5% from male mate selection, is enough to create a distinct class of individuals with a distinct class interest. While in a roughly pre-Capitalist society, or one in which these mate selective choices are unavailable (as, when a parent chooses a mate) then it is not on its own enough to turn women into a separate social class. But one in which there is substantive equality between males and females regarding economics and political power, the female burden during childbirth is enough, at minimum, to create a class distinction between humans whose mate investment is high, and whose mate investment is low, even disregarding all other differences between sexes. The reason being that if males contribute an exactly proportionate amount and receive an exactly proportionate amount, as with females, then there will be one present inequality: Women have to physically bear the pregnancy, and have a risk of loss of health or life which men necessarily do not bear.The solution to this is, perhaps, increasing male mate investment. But this only means that men have an extra burden, even males who do not reproduce, to support males who do. And if the solution is to reduce female burden by increasing what they receive in labor value, males lose a proportionate amount of labor value again, and the non-Capital losses (health, life) are not made up for. The female also does not have any more inventive to mate with less valuable males, because what she receives is the same either way.But what remains are two classes whose needs necessarily remain different and whose goods necessarily remain different, on the whole, regardless of individuating factors.
>>35503333>>35507027I.e., women have a special class interest to advance their needs over men's interests. The reason is as intrinsic, perhaps, as the motivation for a tradesman to support guild interests within a mercantile state, or a disabled person to support disability funds within a liberal one. Biology simply constitutes another oppressive system which is necessarily unequal, and biological differences will need to be addressed and perhaps abolished to maintain a truly equitable state, even if we cannot be sure what that means yet. Biology itself can be abstracted as an oppressive and arbitrary system.
>>35503333Perhaps I wasn't so clear. Remember, that the capitalist class is at constant and vicious competition with each one against another, but despite this, the system within which they operate enables these highly individual people to have a unified class interest. There is, of course, more difference between a liberal Jewish banker and a conservative White tech oligarch than capitalists in general; though they may be at competition for who can trump whom, they are nevertheless united in the oppression of the working class. Marx:>Thus the capitalist would have won nothing by his own exertions but the obligation to supply more in the same labour time, in a word, more difficult conditions for the augmentation of the value of his capital. While, therefore, competition continually pursues him with its law of the cost of production and every weapon that he forges against his rivals recoils against himself, the capitalist continually tries to get the better of competition by incessantly introducing new machines, more expensive, it is true, but producing more cheaply, and new division of labour in place of the old, and by not waiting until competition has rendered the new ones obsolete.>.. >... the industrial war of the capitalists among themselves; this war has the peculiarity that its battles are won less by recruiting than by discharging the army of labour. The generals, the capitalists, compete with one another as to who can discharge most soldiers of industry. ...In other words, the greater difference between individuals matters much less than the system and the raw distinction of the individuals. Male biologies and female biologies are different. They are as arbitrary as that of two capitalists, or two aristocrats, or two workers. They nevertheless may be members of distinct classes with distinct needs.Some groups sought to eliminate these distinctions through other means. The Fascists, for example. They were not successful.
How do people here feel about Marx's critique on stirner?
>>35480887>>35494215>Letftist moids in the past:We should strengthen our bodies and minds! We can't let the capitalists turn us into weak and demoralized slaves! Also women should have rights, including reproductive ones, they are our comrades and are workers too!>Leftists moids in our dayYou have to date me, leftist woman! Who cares about the current problems the workers face? AI is destroying a lot of jobs from the proletariat, hunger, unemployment and sickness are rampant even though we live in one of the most industrialized and technology driven societies, colonialism and the right wing is rising again, and perhaps we could get into recession again and a nuclear war, but we should only care about MY dick not getting wet! Also I am a flabby lazy piece of shit who denies dialectical materialism and want males in dresses in your restrooms and type about the blackpill and hypergamy like a chud! How dare you don't like me when I want to turn you, foid, into a commodity?>>35472930>AsianIf you are Japanese, that would be interesting kek. I have never seen a Japanese leftist, only chuds. I think they are mythical creatures at this point.
Please, no Trotskyists, Titoists, Juchists, or any anti-Stalin Marxist nonsense. I accept Leninists, Hoxharians, Maoists/Gonzalists, and non-Marxist socialists such as anarchists, Blanquists, social democrats, Bonapartists (laborists), Blanquists, and the like.I am affiliated with a clandestine Latin American party that has saved over 60,000 women from domestic violence, over 100 occupations, and is currently dominating the unions.I work in a factory and I am a Hoxharian, 22 years old, poor, and I have dedicated my life to the revolution, which means many run-ins with the police and zero relationships.I'm looking for someone to talk to during my work, to distract me a little from the hell that is the industry.I can talk about pretty much anything, but 90% of the time I'm so tired from work that I'm bad at starting conversations, although I have a pretty extensive knowledge about my Amazonian indigenous ancestry.t.me/OyamiNartok
>>35492502Bumpigger.
