tfw epistolary Amerifat

File: 1758042392778541.jpg (212 KB, 1024x1024)

212 KB JPG

>>35461411
>tries too hard to make proper sentences and appear in a way he never would normally
>uses punctuation in a non natural way thinking it'd appease foids
That's just how I talk! Stop being mean to me!

File: Bs2SMEGhw3.png (83 KB, 295x214)

83 KB PNG

>>35462993
>Stop being mean to me!

>>35461411
>download this shit app
>nobody lives close to me
>full of bpdemons and weirdos
very cool

File: Where do you think we are.jpg (35 KB, 700x509)

35 KB JPG

>>35465030
>complaining about weirdos

File: IMG_7782.jpg (225 KB, 1156x2039)

225 KB JPG

>ASL
21. Boytoy Waifu

>Sexuality
Femboy (Dom) Switch

>About you/toxic traits
I'll make you gay as fuck

>What you're looking for
I'm looking for Sugardaddies and those that have always wanted a little femboy secret in their life. I'm looking for married men, or young & older people alike. I have a thing for people cheating on their partners & picking me over them, especially full time straight men. I love obedience & expect daily worship. What happens between us stays between us. I'm interested in doing stuff online & IRL meetups. I love to travel and I've found that it's a good way to do so.

I also enjoy teasing simps & dominating your sex life, it gets me hard knowing you're worshipping my ass & genuinely devoted. I have a footfetish and I'm always looking for more foot slaves :3

>What you're NOT looking for
Sad, lonely, rambling in-celibate men who expect something for nothing. Idiots who message me pretending they don't know what I am and haven't read this or "were not expecting this and that". Or weird larpers who insist they're going to meet up with me in real life upon immediately messaging me. I will block you if you annoy me.

>Discord/contact
Discord: itsyaboijess
Telegram: itsyaboijess

I miss the genuine, unaware autists. Nuke all of the fuckboy normie zoomer guys that are (poorly) attempting to fit in and look like one of us who have flooded this website.

It has been like 2~ years bros. I don't think it's working out for me.

None of those guys are me except maybe epistolary, phew.

I just made my (probably 10th) account like 2 days ago and I’m getting no views. I have a verified profile with pictures of myself and am female. Has everyone abandoned the app or has there been some recent algorhythmic change?

File: Capture.png (7 KB, 562x544)

7 KB PNG

>>35468994
Don't forget that people can view your profile invisibly.

>>35469001
Oh shit, that’s scary. But that’s one of the paid features, isn’t it? So you’re saying more people pay for this app than not? Because when I say I’m getting no views, I quite literally mean 1-2 a day, and I’m not from THAT bad of a shithole.

File: shondo schizo.jpg (141 KB, 1041x789)

141 KB JPG

>>35461411
Got an apartment and a steady job, so I guess I'm all out of excuses
Surely there's someone out there capable of falling in love with my balding ass

File: Capture.png (15 KB, 574x501)

15 KB PNG

>>35469008
>But that’s one of the paid features, isn’t it?
I don't know which features are paid, since I'm grandfathered in from before payments were added.

>So you’re saying more people pay for this app than not?
I don't know how many people are grandfathered in, but I would estimate that there are a fair number.

>Because when I say I’m getting no views, I quite literally mean 1-2 a day, and I’m not from THAT bad of a shithole.
Maybe you've got something unpopular that many users filter out (e. g., "has kids"). Maybe you've set your own search parameters very narrowly (e. g., a narrow age range or a small radius), which will hide you from people who have set their own two-way filters to respect your preferences. Maybe you just have an ugly profile image.

>>35465087
I already told you fucking faggot your genetics are good enough to not be a faggot tier so stop being a faggot
you have a good looking face, so go be straight you dont have to dwell in faggotry

>>35469061
he looks like a tomboyish woman with short hair. i think he’s better off this way.

>>35469058
>Maybe you've got something unpopular that many users filter out
Nope
>Maybe you've set your own search parameters very narrowly
No, I don’t believe so.
>Maybe you just have an ugly profile image
It’s a baby animal, I wouldn’t call that ugly personally kek.

>>35468994
email duodaddy

I was on this app for less than two weeks and I've found a woman who feels like she may end up being wife material. she was on the app for barely 6 hours before she deleted her account to just text me instead after sharing contact information.
I didnt even intend to get seriously messaging anyone until my truck got repaired so I could drive a few hours out to meet if needed and instead I found what may be almost my perfect match with less that 15 attempts at starting a conversation.
as an autistic 30 year old virgin with such lacking social skills I can barely manage functional communication with my own family this is amazing for me.
I'll post again later if things are still working out between me and this woman to confirm my thanks to the apps creator.

>>35470124
Dont get your organs harvested

>>35461411
Now do a female version of this where all the women are Indian larpers.

>>35468994
Since this is your tenth account it's possible everyone now recognizes your particular kind of crazy on sight and knows not to bother.

>>35470224
if a woman manages to harvest my organs thats just the way it is, weakness is weakness.

>>35475318
>woman

>>35471342
No, definitely not the case. Using a different name, my profile picture is something I’ve never used before, it’s an animal, not me. They can’t know who I am without checking my profile first, so I don’t get why they won’t take a look at it. I go out of my way to humiliate myself by looking at guys’ profiles multiple time in hopes they’ll look back at mine, and to no avail. The ones that rarely do don’t say anything to me, which also sucks, but at least they looked.

Duodaddy, I will absolutely never forgive you for letting this app get raided by normies. Not only have all the original autistic men left and got replaced by disgusting sex pests who might as well be aliens, but now it’s also full of tiktok e-girls who obviously mog me to oblivion. I hate this, I’m going to die alone, how many more years will this take? IT’S ALMOST BEEN 3.

>>35478610
Lul, I think I just found your profile

Good luck in a new country femanon

>>35478798
Oh, that’s embarrassing. Well, thank you dude, hopefully I do get there eventually.

>>35461411
I deleted my account last because its full of egirls

M22 I have a job house and a car I dont know if I have autism put people say I do.

I like precision shooting hunting, I watch anime sometimes but not as much as I used to same with gaming. I really love hiking I go hiking as much as my body can handle id like to take on the 1100 mile ice age trail here in Wisconsin as soon as possible.

I wont post face on here but im 5'11 girls say im average or good looking if im your type If you add me ill send you some pictures.

I dont want to travel because I have property but im willing to bring you to me or have long distance for the time being. I used to be a pastry chef id like to be one again I want to bake for my family and learn to sew so I can make my wife and kids well fitting tailored clothes. I plan to have enough money to be a house husband so we can both stay home with the kids.

I have alot of love to give and a strong desire to provide for a nice girl who will go to church with me.

>>35478946
I forgot you can email me at
mailpolarredlegolas@proton.me (burner)
I have discord but im trying to phase it out of my life fewf43r34

women of all ages +18 welcome.

>>35478610
>disgusting sex pests
Duodaddy here posting without a trip. Would a word filter for intros help?

There used to be a rude message filter which completely blocked degenerate messages. (i.e. The sender immediately got a response from Duolicious saying "that intro's too rude".) Sending a rude message also reduced the sender's daily intro limit lol

That was removed at the start of May to increase the number of users. Unfortunately it's also worsened the gender ratio

The middle ground might be to let senders send degenerate shit but give recipients filters, sensitive content warnings, etc

>normies
Not sure what to do about the normies. Have you tried joining 4chan-related clubs then sorting your matches by "similar clubs" the search filters? I designed the system to find people in related clubs, even outside the ones you're in. So even if you just join a few 4chan boards, it should give okay results. Unfortunately you can only sort intros by match percentage or timestamp. But I could add an option to order by similar clubs in the inbox too, if you prefer those search results

Another thing that could help with normies is removing the app from Google Play and the App store, but it'd reduce users. desu, this project isn't as financially sustainable as I was hoping. Ironically the normies help pay for 4chan ads lol

>>35478956
I had to change my discord user because of some creep just email me for my new one thanks

My nothinguationship with an avoidant from this app has been hell. If any foids or lonely fembots read this, DO NOT GIVE THE AVOIDANT SCROTE A CHANCE.

>>35479791
but i'm an avoidant and i want foids and lonely fembots to give me a chance

>>35478610
If it's been three years and you haven't found anyone despite being a woman, it seems as though the biggest hurdle is yourself.

>>35480784
How wise, I feel enlightened.

>>35481054
you should be fucking three years and you haven't found a man on this planet that wants to fuck you? the fuck?

Why is every woman so boring?

>>35461411
i'm none of those
where my qt3.14 at?

Asked a guy to talk to me about Karelian history in an intro and he viewed my profile but didn't respond.... Why won't anyone infodump to me? :(

>>35478999
Create a seperate and mandatory basic autism/4chan knowledge test and display this score next to the main percentage.

>>35482140
KEK brilliant. Unfortunately, since normies aren’t autistic but desperately want to be for some unknown reason, they’ll just dishonestly pick whichever answer makes their score higher. However, it would be a fun feature.

>>35468994
Couldn't find it. Damn, the femanon poster's profile still eludes me. 11th time's the charm?
>>35481156
Those are carefully guarded secrets, miss. A man of the tribe would not divulge such things to a woman who doesn't have the keys to his house. It's akin to asking for "tits or GTFO" when introing a woman!

>>35461411
Too many cutters
Feel like lightning has struck me twice
Girl messaged me about how good it felt
Deactivated for a bit

>>35461411
somebody using the image I posted a few threads ago as the main one now is fucking frying me

If a guy doesn’t text you unless you do, doesn’t ask you questions unless you ask him first, seems completely neutral even after you two have spoken the whole day, and doesn’t hint at the two of you ever being together, is it a lost cause? I don’t want to be straightforward and ask if he’s into me, as it would be creepy since I don’t think he finds me attractive, but I just don’t understand what I’m supposed to think or do in this situation. Not the first time this happens, it’s very frequent actually, but I wish it could stop. Why even talk to me if you’re not into me, what’s the point? I did ask him if he minds me talking to him and to let me know if I’m being obnoxious my talking to him, and he said it was fine, so I don’t understand.

I just want to complain into the void.
When duo just launched, I had a plenty of good chats and even found a few with romantic potential quite easily, but left the place for reasons not related to duo itself.
Recently I created two accounts (I know, ban me, I don't care), one ultra-degen one semi-normal and it feels like a barren wasteland on both. I get more interaction with sellers than with anyone remotely interesting.
I didn't change that much in the meantime, but the quality of this place surely did. I can't blame duodaddy for that, but I find it disappointing.

>>35484240
>Why even talk to me if you’re not into me, what’s the point?
Lots of folks are there just out of boredom, people can talk for the sake of talking yk.
Possible cases that come to mind:
- youre talking to guys who are socially inept, what else did you expect from place for autists
- you're too talkative and they get tired of you, which doesn't mean they don't want to talk with you, just that it drains energy faster than they recover
- you're too sensitive and misreading them
>I don’t want to be straightforward and ask if he’s into me, as it would be creepy
No it won't.

>>35484298
If they claim they’re looking for long-term relationships, and I am also looking for that, and they’re not degenerate freaks looking for sexual stuff only, then I don’t see why they’d be on here to cure their boredom by casually talking to the opposite sex, that is beyond inadequate. No, it’s not related to autism. I have spoken to actual autists from this app before, even dated one, and they would write humongous paragraphs about whatever they were interested in. I’m more socially inept than almost every single person I’ve ever met, yet I can make conversation. I am the only one making conversation, since otherwise the chatting would end, so yes, I do HAVE to talk a lot and ask many questions. I don’t believe I’m misreading them, no.

>>35484313
if he's interested enough to talk the whole day as long as you're the one instigating then i guess he could be really nervous and he's afraid he'd be creepy if he expressed any feelings of attraction too. but if that's the case then i'd expect him to be crawling over glass to simp when prompted, instead of just telling you it's "fine" if you talk to him.

>>35484286
Was asked if I was a sugar daddy recently
Replied "am I fuck", never want to hear those words uttered ever fucking again
Bitch was 19 as well cheeky bitch.
Why on God's green earth would I pay a girl in gifts for compliments?
In my first world European country I could shag a 14 year old with very little issue

>>35484443
>am I fuck
Did you mean to say
>Am I? Fuck.
?
Punctuation is important for communication.

>>35484470
no they are definitely fuck

So what are some sure signs of scammers on here besides the obvious like using pornstar's pics? If I move off platform and talk to someone for a couple weeks and they haven't asked me for money am I in the clear that they're legit? Also has anyone actually had any success on here?

>>35484568
Ask them to verify, make them do something very unique, if they refuse, scammer.

File: wtf.png (16 KB, 475x126)

16 KB PNG

This is a new low. How do you stay on duo for 2 years and not reply to anyone? She doesn't have really a bio btw just mirror selfies.

>>35486003
Validation

>>35486003
Honestly? Based. Considering how the majority (I’m not saying all because I still need to cope that I might find someone) of men on this app behave, might as well not put yourself through that humiliation. Especially if she’s a Stacy, good for her for humiliating all of those men, she’s my hero.

>>35486402
Is it really that bad now? I've known of duo for years but never used it before. I really don't want to die alone and I can't bear normie dating apps so this was my last hope.

>>35486424
Yes, the only messages I get are from : 1) creepy sex pests normies who don’t evenuse 4chan and think that being attractive makes it okay to be weird as fuck; 2) men who completely disregard everything you are looking for and who just say some random shit in their intro; 3) guys who seem okay at first, but once the conversation moves to Discord, they start getting weirder and weirder and making disturbing comments, then extensively stalking and harassing you if you do not wish to communicate anymore; 4) time wasters, guys who you wouldn’t mind being with, you talk to them for a long ass time, and you just keep on talking and talking and talking and trying your best to keep the conversation going, only for it to lead nowhere, leaving you wondering why the fuck did they talk so much to you. Now, maybe it’s because I don’t look white enough despite being white, perhaps if you’ve got blue eyes and very bright skin it’ll work out better, I don’t know, I’m truly at a loss as to why these men behave the way they do.

File: 1673200299938535.png (87 KB, 550x400)

87 KB PNG

is it a bad idea to try and find a roommate on this website

>>35486446
Damn this is super blackpilling...I thought I'd only have to worry about sex pests and people who ignore everything about you on normie apps. As a fellow not e-girl struggling in the non-normie dating scene in current year let me know if you need a friend, god knows I could use someone to commiserate with

>>35486599
Yeah, it’s been increasingly more and more full of normies as the years passed. I can’t say it was ever good even back in it’s first months, but it was far less humiliating than it is now. Sure, you can email me at reasons.to.go.on@proton.me, let me know what your email starts with on here in case any impersonators email me.

File: Screenshot 2026-10-07 215840.png (1.88 MB, 1802x832)

1.88 MB PNG

Is there any point in making a duo as an autismal moid who isn't a sex pest or a adonis looking mf in the big 2k26?

>>35486623
Modern dating feels like one big humiliation ritual. My email starts with d and ends in g, I'll send you one.

>>35486636
>My email starts with d and ends in g
dillydallying

>>35486446
> 4) time wasters, guys who you wouldn’t mind being with, you talk to them for a long ass time, and you just keep on talking and talking and talking and trying your best to keep the conversation going, only for it to lead nowhere, leaving you wondering why the fuck did they talk so much to you. Now, maybe it’s because I don’t look white enough despite being white, perhaps if you’ve got blue eyes and very bright skin it’ll work out better, I don’t know, I’m truly at a loss as to why these men behave the way they do.

This shit seems like your fault too. If you want to move it forward and feel interested just fucking ask them on a date

>>35461411
I started chatting with a girl on there, she was perfect, but then she hurt herself horribly and after being admitted to a psych ward started having sepsis and vomiting blood, and presumably died in the hospital. Only know hwr full name but no location so no way to confirm if she's really dead.

>>35486720
This has to be fake

>>35486809
Never seen any proof in pictures but seemed convincing, the ranting and mental breakdows are hard to fake.

>>35461411
What the fuck is this "network blocked, are you using a VPN?" Error I keep getting? I'm never using a VPN when I used this app so I'm assuming it's a ban thing? If so I hope duodaddy suffers for eternity, I've done nothing ban worthy and you're getting like a dollar and 5 cents from me so you better fix this shit.

File: duolicious error 460 gene(...).png (11 KB, 642x323)

11 KB PNG

>>35486943
Option 1: You've been rangebanned, because "residential VPNs" like to use IP addresses in your area.

Option 2:
>I'm never using a VPN when I used this app
If you have a """free""" VPN installed on your computer, it's possible that the VPN has been using your IP address, resulting in a ban. (At least, I think that's how it works.)

File: duolicious error 460 user(...).png (8 KB, 522x269)

8 KB PNG

>>35486981

>>35486981
Doing this on my phone so I guess I'm rangebanned, very cool. What a waste of fucking time.

>>35486997
Duodaddy here. Using a VPN doesn't result in a ban. If you're trying to log into your account and see "Network blocked", it means that your account still exists but you appear to be using a VPN. Just changing networks will let you log into your account.

If you're sure it's a false positive, can you give me your ASN or IP address so I can remove it from the block list? You can email it to support@duolicious.app

>>35481119
they dont like you. women who like you will find time and be interesting

>>35486627
if youre looking for friends sure. As long as you reach out first because almost nobody is reaching out to normie looking moids, unless you put pansexual as your sexuality

>>35486446
>4) time wasters, guys who you wouldn’t mind being with, you talk to them for a long ass time, and you just keep on talking and talking and talking and trying your best to keep the conversation going, only for it to lead nowhere, leaving you wondering why the fuck did they talk so much to you.
If I had to pick one of the mentioned examples to relate with, it would be this. I can only speak for myself but I'm a slow burner. It took me a almost 2kk to develop a fondness for a girl to the point I made her a book by hand from an author she liked as a gift and missed talking to her when she stopped communicating. It's a sad thing since she felt very compatible but I wouldn't even qualify the feelings I have for her as a crush, though they might have became such with time.

Don't know your profile, don't know the people who message you or who you reply to, so I can't say much more than that. I wish you luck though, miss.

>>35486446
1)
Every single woman on this app has ateast ONE horny tag. "Pervert" has 2600 users. MOST have MORE than one, it took my autistic brain like 3 weeks to realize this is bait to get men to talk to them.
"Add me pls pls pls, please talk to me I'm lonely" with 6 please fuck me tags and a response rate of 12%. The horny men adding you are just trying to get a response out of you.

2)
Respond to them wtf. Men have to come up with completly original intro messages dozens of times until they get a match, and if they do get a match it's one that lasts 1 message exchange. They want to talk to you, who cares what their intro is, be interesting and respond. That's what a message intro IS, it's a guy who WANTS to talk to you. Are you capable of learning more about them with a follow-up message like a normal person?

3/4)
Guys you talk to for a long time are interested in you, why the fuck would that not be worth it. Keep talking to them, it takes time to form a relationship. You want a normie boring guy in 4) but the schizo (probably more interesting) men from 3) you dislike.

It's not about being white, it's about being at least 1% interesting because women online are the most difficult to talk to uninteresting people on the planet.

You say you're at a loss and you have men in THIS THREAD EMAILING YOU

PLEASE tell me how a woman's brain works I've sifted through probably 40 women by now and have never unadded anybody, I'm left with 0. That means the vast vast majority of women will ghost at some point USUALLY within a few days.

>>35488305
women always have unrealistic expectations even when they are a 2/10. They expect nothing but perfection from the guy and a small slip up in the talking stage (could be as retarded as a typo) is enough to give them the """""ick""""" and ghost you

Add that to the fact that gen z doesnt understand the concept of delayed gratification and think that if they dont connect to you in the first message its doomed.

Women in general are retarded, only a a handful of them are worth it

>>35461411
You can tell an actual woman made this because the complaints all boil down to

>Uses punctuation which makes me feel dumb so it's fake and I hate it!
>Has beliefs I don't share, so he's larping and I hate it!
>Takes time to think out replies which dwarf my one or two word responses and remind me how terrible I am at conversation so I hate it!
>Loses interest in talking to me after a few messages, this means there's something wrong with him, not me!
>Has interest in sex and heterosexual fetishes, and that makes me feel insecure SO I HATE IT!
>He's really hot but he clearly puts zero effort into his messages which makes me feel unimportant so I hate it!
>He messaged me like six months ago and I finally replied back and he didn't then immediately respond again so now I'm in the spot I put him in and I hate it!
>He's too energetic and enthusiastic, that doesn't match my SRI-addled energy so I hate it!

>>35488305
Bait used to be believable, though it is impressive that you typed so much for the sake of a low quality bait.

>>35488524
No wonder you're still alone if you act like this. The guys aren't the issue.

>>35488305
Furthermore
>You say you're at a loss and you have men in THIS THREAD EMAILING YOU
Are you retarded? I mean, clearly you are based on the insane niggerbabble paragraph you left there, but are you not even capable of reading? The person I exhanged emails with was a female, you complete and utter aboriginal low IQ faggot ape. It’s one thing to be pathetic, but when your intelligence is also this subhuman, it become unbearably cringe. Losers like you should be sent to the gulag.

>>35488533
No wonder YOU’RE still alone when you believe absolutely retarded bullshit like that and lack reading comprehension. Go jerk off your buddies some more, eh little faggot?

>>35488541
Maybe the autistic simps that have never had a taste of pussy let you talk to them that way, but i'm just telling you like it is. You've got options and you complain that someone is moving too fast, but you also complain that someone is moving too slow. Here's an idea if you have an issue speak up and steer it in the direction you want it to go instead of ghosting and quietly simmering over something small.

>>35488569
Well then you’re basically admitting to being a degenerate. Good for you, but unfortunately I am not into soulless, porn-addicted pests that begin talking about sex-related stuff right away. Moving slowly in of itself isn’t a problem, what IS a problem is when you clearly have no intention of forming a relationship, but you refuse to state that you don’t, and therefore waste the other person’s time who does want a relationship.
>ghosting and quietly simmering over something small.
Over something small? Oh sorry, I will make sure to be the man and be forceful and push the conversation in whichever direction I want, while the man simply follows, because that’s how things should be!

File: 1763595161562348.png (170 KB, 458x518)

170 KB PNG

>>35488580
Again you're complaining about both men moving too fast and men moving too slow without ever defining what too slow even is. I know your type just from what you've shown and you're never pleased with anything and expect the man to carry the conversation and relationship without putting in any actual effort of your own. I don't know why you're pretending that you're gonna find some sort of confident alpha male that also moves at just the right speed on fucking duo of all places. Probably 90% of these guys on here have never had a girlfriend, been with a woman, know what the proper timing for anything is. The fact that they're talking to you is them showing interest in and of itself. Stop acting like a child that's not capable of moving things forward yourself.

>>35461411
Can't find myself in this picture
Which probably means I'm fully oblivious and/ or a combination of these ;n;

>>35488590
>you're never pleased with anything and expect the man to carry the conversation and relationship without putting in any actual effort of your own
Buddy, I literally am the one to put in the effort, you would’ve known that if you read my posts. Furthermore, I dated someone from this shithole before, and let me tell you it was not a “Chad” kek, yet he actually conversed with me, we’d send paragraphs to each other and actually get to know each other, something that modern users simply do not do.

>>35488623
I read your post and all you did was complain that the men you were talking to weren't perfect. I'm sure you're no longer with that guy for good reasons.

>>35488538
Yeah whatever I misread
Don't hyper fixate on that one comment. Post your discord tag rn and you'll get 30 adds
All it takes is a 20s/f post and you'll be fine

>>35489469
But what about the other thing?

>>35488425
Well yea it came from that offshoot discord where it’s full of batshit crazy women and their orbiters

>>35486446
Okay? Then go on Hinge or Tinder? U will get 500 likes over the weekend and u can pick ur choosing for mostly sane people.

File: 1712000047498376.jpg (27 KB, 281x227)

27 KB JPG

fuck. i met a normal girl on this app, we dated for about a month but i broke up because i felt like the distance was too much since she was on a different continent.

i'm so sick of this app but i'm hoping surely there must be some hope if i managed to actually find a relationship right?

File: I did it.png (266 KB, 374x524)

266 KB PNG

> send a low-intensity intro to a girl, just something goofy regarding our shared interests
> she visits my account
> her account immediately disappears

awh shit, is my game truly so weak?

>>35489994
if she's not a citizen of your country then she does not exist cause you will never be together due to immigration laws
why would you do that to yourself might as well be dating chatgpt at that point cause it's basically the same fantasy

>>35490286
You do realize that people can immigrate through marriage, right, anon?

>>35490173
Nah, that girl was retarded. Women dont know what they want most of the time.

Can the guy who works on this add a search filter for reply rates

>>35488648
anon please listen to me I am talking directly into your ear. I am going to need you to find the biggest knife you have in your kitchen and stab yourself with it. If once doesn't do the trick, do it again. Continue this process until you are no longer living. Your cooperation with this task is most appreciated.

test

There are no real lesbians on this app. All of them are either troons, looking for women AND troons (why not just set yourself to being bisexual then you fucking retards), or “gooners” into hentai and shit. Is being “twansphowbic” not allowed on this shithole? Really? Makes sense when most of your users are 4chin failmales who trooned out in hopes of getting some pussy. Fucking pathetic ass app, kill yourselves you disgenic creeps. You prioritise the feefees of some perverted, disgusting pedophiles instead of letting women use this fucking app peacefully. I suppose “duodaddy” is trooning out soon, doesn’t the “daddy” part give you “dysphoria”? Omg should I stop calling you that??? I am sooo sorry kveen for invalidating you omg I’ll call you “duomommy” instead!!! KILL YOURSELVES, ALL OF YOU FUCKING PIECES OF SHIT, DIE

>>35492287
To add to that, why the FUCK are you letting males view the profiles of lesbians? I’m not even lesbian, I’m bisexual, but I don’t want to date males or be seen by them, I don’t want ANY interaction with them, yet you let men see our profiles? What the actual fuck kind of logic is that?

>>35492287
>>35492292
Sounds frustrating. Would a privacy setting that only shows you to people of your preferred gender solve the problem? If I understand properly, you don't want to be seen by men because you don't want unwanted messages from them?

>>35491313
Okay, I'll add it to the web app in a few hours

>>35492287
angry ass dyke

>>35491313
The reply rate filter is available on the web app now

>>35492287
>>35492292
Also, have you used the app for more than a week? If you have, did you notice a recent increase in messages from dispreferred genders?

>>35492292
>I’m not even lesbian, I’m bisexual
translation... I am a lesbian

>I don’t want to date males or be seen by them
>I don’t want ANY interaction with them
of course not... because you're a flaming lesbian

>>35492292
Two-way filters used to be default and then Duodaddy decided to undo those entirely for reasons...?

>>35489994
Where was she from anon? Surely its not too far?

>>35492857
They're currently the default. Though during the past two-ish days, I was trialling a new UI for browsing clubs. The new interface was/is only visible to some users. Some of those users could've been shown members they wouldn't have seen with two-way filters enabled. I've now enabled two-way filters for that experimental UI, because I think that's what might've prompted that femanon's posts. Though it'd still be useful to get more info from her.

>>35461411
I haven't had any luck here so I think I am going to try going outside to talk to people.
Where do I go and what do I say?

>>35480784
Where do you live?

>>35492956
I thought there was a filter somewhere to only have verified profiles appear in your search. Did you remove it? Might be a mandela effect

I dont like talking to unverified profiles. That shit gives me the male ick

File: image_2026-10-11_122119838.png (38 KB, 800x535)

38 KB PNG

>foid's only picture is a close up of her face/eyes
>no body weight listed
>if its listed it says "average"

I know what you are

>>35492898
I'm from Southeastern Europe, she's from the US. It's not like it was impossible but I already had a serious long distance relationship with someone from the US before that failed precisely it was long distance and I felt like I wasn't ready for that again.

>>35492969
In the US of A.

File: Untitled.png (959 KB, 1302x1250)

959 KB PNG

>>35461411
Just the highlighted ones are me, am I "cooked" as the zoomers say

>>35493635
East coast or west coast?
How many kids do you want?

Many years ago I tried this and all the women just had memes as their photographs.
Is that still the case?

File: Capture.png (997 KB, 561x826)

997 KB PNG

>>35495445
Mostly.

File: Untitled.png (3 KB, 330x66)

3 KB PNG

>>35495457
Well I guess between that, being blocked for using a VPN (but not told to turn it off) and my old account having apparently been deleted but when I try to remake it getting this (I just typed my real, normal, generic white American name), I'll just give up. Thanks for the response.

>>35495470
>being blocked for using a VPN (but not told to turn it off)
I've raised a ticket to make the message clearer:

https://github.com/duolicious/duolicious/issues/1782

>when I try to remake it getting this
What's your name? There's a filter for offensive words but it sounds like your name's triggered a false positive

File: Screenshot_2026-09-08-21-(...).jpg (494 KB, 2340x1080)

494 KB JPG

>>35461411
I was thinking of making a revenge image of this for foids, but I realized that foids are so cookie cutter that it would be 4 types total.

1. "Trad" wife that can't fucking work or be self-reliable. Usually can't cook or wash for shit and still wants the man to pay for everything. Basically resorted to being a willing glorified incubator, except her genes are so shit she's not even good at that aingular function.

2. Leftoid literal fucking O'Hare haircut, wearing a septum.

3. "Philosopher reader" type that blatantly copies and agrees with every point of a given philosopher, thinking this will in turn make herself a philosopher (it doesn't).

4. "I like cooking, hiking, traveling".

>>35495580
>revenge image
OPs image was made by a guy.

File: images.jpg (40 KB, 474x646)

40 KB JPG

>>35495494

>>35495457
Wow, its like 90% anime-fans, as a non-anime fan it would be cool to find someone that other things are their main interests because it wouldn't be anything we could bond over..

>>35488524
>>35486402
>>35486446 esp 4)
You seem like a very toxic red-flag person, cheering for humiliating the entirety of the other sex.. work on yourself

>>35493770
East and none. Kids are spontaneous and I'd prefer not to be subjected to that as much as possible anymore.

>>35492287
Cooked with this one sis. Im bi but would rather date women in my area and e-date moids off this app.

>>35481105
Why do you people always fixate so much on the fucking when what we want is to be perceived as fully fleshed out human beings? Anyone can fuck, not everyone is marriage or partner material. We're looking for partners not a fuck, you brain dead gooner scrote rape ape retard. I hope you forget how to breathe soon.

Im a guy in my mid 30s, whats the age range of women on here?

File: Capture.png (9 KB, 526x436)

9 KB PNG

>>35498346
t. too lazy to click on the FAQ
>But I asked specifically about women
The FAQ doesn't give gender-specific age statistics.

>>35498264
You're posting on a porn website complaining about horny men messaging you. You lack self awareness. She just wants a naive simp from soc she can treat like shit
I wouldn't want to waste my time talking to a lot of the women on here unless I knew she wanted to fuck.
1/10 women have any onlyfans.

>>35498352
Thanks, hopefully I can find a younger autistic cutie there

File: 1389887782000-soup-nazi-5(...).jpg (29 KB, 617x348)

29 KB JPG

>>35497376
>NO HAPPY FAMILY FOR YOU

the best defense is a good offence. if you want to be better prepared against the unpredictable, you must train in it

>>35492534
I'm 33, male, and I've gotten nothing but very very short conversations (not for lack of trying on my part), regardless if I was the one approaching or vice versa.
It's getting to the point where I should probably give up.
>going on little adventures and cooking together and playing games and watching TV
Also the kind of life I'd enjoy. Nothing wrong with having a simple, happy life.

>>35498512
You sound like a predictable sitcom

>>35498492
I've already experienced life with a baby brother, not something I'm thrilled about going through again as a primary caregiver.

>>35499614
Post discord and lets not shit this thread up anymore

File: IMG_8819.jpg (447 KB, 1170x2419)

447 KB JPG

>see ugly mutt
>open his profile for teh shits and giggles
>27
>looking for women aged UP to 18
Cinema, lads.

Who's your favorite duo troon?

>>35499690
Based
No one wants old hags

>>35500136
Cope, baldie.

i'm not on this list, am i a chud?

>>35461411
The worst one is the one who spent time making such a dumb, boring "chart."

>>35499690
Now post your face

Do ugly autistic unemployed retards ever find love? I could squeeze out my heart and warm you with the blood, if my love is not enough.

>>35500567
I too am a faggot, so I want to kill you with mercy. get a job no matter what. be as human as you can. People won't ever have the due consideration, because they don't have to.

>>35461411
I am the polterguyst, it's pretty simple.
>I message a foid
>she responds
>her response is boring dogshit
>I don't care to get banned so rather than insulting her I just move on

>>35500757
I noticed you didn't post proof

>>35500757
you're just a schizo afraid of consequences

>>35478610
>how many more years will this take? IT’S ALMOST BEEN 3.
It's been almost 3 years for me as well and there's a certain charm to your rants about normies, so fuck it. If you're interested in a long term relationship and eventual children, send a link to your profile: duo.grouped272@passinbox.com

>>35499671
I refuse to use that service on principle, just how it goes.

>>35501894
Based
t. email enjoyer

>>35501894
then your online direct message method of choice

>>35501726
>duo.grouped272@passinbox.com
If you use weird emails I'm gonna assume you're a pedophile

>>35502940
Back when we made real human beings, people would have called you a "tool"

>>35503238
you type like a faggot with your pedophile email

>>35502940
@passinbox.com is a relay address for Proton Mail. A privacy feature that you can use to receive mail without giving your actual address.

>>35492287
Cringe for thinking that lesbians are real but based for tranoid hatred

>>35469001
They need to remove this crap

>>35498512
Feels like too many people are focused on these giant dreams of being so rich you cant ever spend all your money.
Not many are just trying to live simple lives where you are lucky enough to have a home and someone you wanna spend all your time with

File: Capture.png (9 KB, 633x181)

9 KB PNG

Reminder: Scanning the Github commits is a good source of entertainment.

File: Capture.png (10 KB, 736x179)

10 KB PNG

>>35505101

Once again asking how it is possible to barely get one or two profile views a day when my profile picture isn’t even of my face and I’m a female. Is there something I’m doing wrong? Is there some sort of algorhythm that was introduced? I completed more Q&A questions thinking it maybe has to do with that, nope. I added more pictures of myself on my profile (aside from the profile picture), nope. What is going on?

>>35505237
Previous discussion: >>35468994
The obvious solution to your problems is to post a link to your profile and let us judge it.

>>35504272
>>35502940
Stop thinking about sex with kids you faggot

>>35505237
Have you considered actually looking for men who interested you and approaching them? This isn't the 1950s anymore. Women have the same agency as men do now.

>>35505237
Two profile views per day sounds low for a woman. Did you set your age, gender, and location correctly? Do you have any of your privacy settings enabled? If I recall, hiding when you were last online removes you from the feed. If all those things seem fine, you can contact support@duolicious.app

>>35504452
It shouldnt be possible to notify you when you see someones profile in the first place
That only adds fuel to the schizos here
The "seen" open messages was enough

>>35492287
trvth nvke holy shit
>>35498250
i wish i could abandon places like this entirely and date other women in real life since trying to look for a bi/lesbian girl on 4chan is already like trying to find a needle in a haystack but i'm legit mentally stunted from autism and untreated bpd (plus i'm a neet that lives off allowance so i really don't bring much to the table as a potential partner) so in a way i still see spaces like this as better to find a partner because i can be totally honest about all of my neuroses and controversial/not woke opinions

I finally got banned after 2 years of calling women niggers

>>35506376
No you got banned for being black, nigger

>>35506798
>black ID

Duodaddy can you pretty please stop banning me just cause I relentlessly ask women for nudes? I swear they like it deep down

File: no.jpg (37 KB, 441x205)

37 KB JPG

>>35508492
>I relentlessly ask women for nudes
My advice: Don't bother. There's a little language model which automatically hides coomer and gooner intros now. Intros flagged by the model produce no notifications and appear at the bottom of the recipient's inbox. This anon's screencaps show training data >>35505108 >>35505101

to nona,
please check your email
- from a friend

File: Screenshot (223).png (19 KB, 552x135)

19 KB PNG

Never imagined seeing this in a woman profile
What the fuck do you have to write for you to even creep out the incels

>>35513255
>to even creep out the incels
That's assuming she's messaging men and not other women.

>>35514172
Women almost always reply to other women intros unless you text just like an incel

H

How would one find out if they’re considered to be an ugly woman on this app? How do you interact with ugly women on this app? Asking for a friend, of course.

>>35516586
>>>/soc/rate
>>35448959
>>35392978
>>35500423

If you don't want to post yourself a /soc/ rate thread, then I guess theoretically you could explicitly put in your Duolicious bio:
>In your intro, please give me a rating from 1 to 10.
But any such intros that you get probably will be filtered out as "rude" by the autojanny. >>35505101 >>35505108
"Rude" intros aren't blocked, but they do get sent to the bottom of your inbox, so you may miss them if you get a lot of intros. >>35478999

>>35516616
That isn’t what I’m asking, I’m asking what would give it a way. For example, perhaps men look at our (as in, potentially ugly women) profiles and don’t message us even if we look back at yours. Or perhaps you don’t respond to our messages, and if you do, you’re as dry as possible. You know, stuff like that, I’m asking how the men on here approach dealing with women they perceive as unattractive. I wouldn’t post myself on /soc/ even if you paid me, and I’m not interested in ratings, I simply want to know why this app has been so terrible and worthless so far.

>>35516644
I personally am ugly, so I don't bother to send any intros (except to remind people who have answered literally zero questions to answer some, so that the algorithm can determine their compatibility with others). But, if I were hot enough to send intros, then I obviously would send them only to hot women (and to women with no photos at all so their hotness is ambiguous), not to ugly women.

File: IMG_9180.jpg (124 KB, 810x804)

124 KB JPG

>>35516692
I see, thank you for your input. To make things even more demoralising, I just got this intro lol.

>>35516644
>I simply want to know why this app has been so terrible and worthless so far.
It was made for people who in reality aren't all that pleasant. Just look at these threads. Lot of Incels (and few femcels) bitching about how there's few to no redeeming qualities about them that would enable a relationship. A broad generalization for sure given some dudes and galls here and on Duo are on the level but the overall point stands.

That said, why the emphasis on looks? Men who spam inboxes will do it regardless of what you have on your profile. The standard user might send you a casual intro due to a shared taste in anime or other gay shit kids are into. The coomers are self-explanatory and the few hidden lurkers or men with acquired tastes will intro you due to the content of your profile and not the looks. Idk but you might be overthinking stuff

>>35516644
I don't message women whose images are mostly of themselves in the first place, no matter whether I find them attractive or not. I want someone who is a good emotional match first and foremost and I think the vast majority of women look attractive enough where I would date them if we're compatible in most other aspects. I don't want someone who prioritizes physical appearance because that's just not important to me

>>35516644
Ugly would almost never put me off personally, fat on the other hand every time. I dont mind if someone's overweight but if you are obese or beyond I have zero interest in knowing you

Ive been obese. I know that unless youre disabled you chose to get there and stay there

>>35520297
>Ugly would almost never put me off personally, fat on the other hand every time.
You probably should specify "ugly face would almost never put me off". Obviously, all fat people are ugly, but not all ugly people are fat.

>I've been obese. I know that unless you're disabled you chose to get there and stay there.
Are you referring to all tiers of obesity (for an average-height 5'4" woman, starting at 175 lb or 79 kg), or just to class 3 (morbid) obesity (233 lb or 106 kg)?

>>35499690
if you think he's ugly idk what your genuine thoughts on humanity and human reproduction and statistics are. he's as average as average is. and 68% of people will necessarily be average.
do you think you deserve a 99.9 percentile mate? you're delusional

>>35520317
You can have ugly aspects that aren't your face but it is probably the largest contributor. Maybe they have weird hands, maybe they have unfortunate scars or so on so forth.

As for weight, different people carry weight differently so putting a solid number on is difficult. I use obese in the medical sense as BMI in excess of 30 is more likely than not to be too fat to be attractive to me

>>35516644
>men look at our profile and don't message us
I don't care enough to try anymore, I know it's futile
Now I mostly use the app to steal memes, or I'll see a cute non-whorish photo and daydream for a moment

>>35516692
>>35518317
> I personally am ugly so I don't bother to send any intros
> people who in reality aren't all that pleasant ... there's few to no redeeming qualities about them that would enable a relationship
Literally me

>>35523858
Acknowledging a problem is the first step in correcting it and an optimist has a change at being right at sometimes while a pessimist always ends up eating shit. Have faith, Anon

File: 1000010747.jpg (307 KB, 1759x1412)

307 KB JPG

>>35461411
im prob a combo of the cares too much and gooner guy