Incel misanthrope thread:I decided that there is a lack of philosophic threads for people of like minded ideas to come together. This thread is for the social philosophy of the blackpill. The way I understand this philosophy is that genetics are heavily deterministic on your ability to get a quality gf. IQ, temperament, and the aesthetics of your body/face all hinge greatly on genetics.I state the quality of the gf your able to get because of the ooffy doofy theory. That is, once a girl has her fun, she can then settle down for a man of lower quality. But not because she loves him. She will settle down because the man has resources. This does not make the man high value. The man is only a resource to mine, and a thing to put up with. The ooffy doofy will have sex every once in awhile. Many go sexless. And the things the women will do for an attractive guy, she will not do for youOf course, on the female side, there are its own disadvantages. To say the least, she is on a biological timer to settle down for a mate of sufficient quality. She is physically weak, and in virtually all domains, men excel. She makes up for this by being naturally socially adept, even at manipulation. But there are no female incels. It is far easier for women to find a mate than a man, even if her pickings are not to her likingPerhaps the blackpill isn't the best name for these ideas. Biological realism seems more adept Of course, this is merely a social philosophy. It is not a deep cut into the true nature of things. If humans were rational, the far more contentious disagreements would be about metaphysics, epistemology, and ethics, rather than political and social philosophy. But as a creature who live in the present moment, we attribute more value on the things that are downstream of the core of philosophy
>>35564827So in finding people who share like minded ideas, this thread is for people who acknowledge the free will and agency of men. This thread is for people who acknowledge Aristotelian logic. This thread is not for whim worshipers or for people who do not see the innate value in truth. This thread is not for the unprincipled or the anti intellectual. This thread is not for the mass man nor the parasite. This thread is not for nominalist-sensualistsif you are interested, add me on discordtomoko318and take a look and my little website, under constructionhttps://rentry.co/ha7wxgxq/
>>35564827what are you doing dude you literally look fine get a gf that actually loves you or something idk
>>35565086being an incel also accounts for a persons temperament, politics, philosophy, ect as well as their looks. Women in general do not like certain character traits and the same goes for menAnd I never said I am an incel per say, but I do acknowledge biological reality, and thats all its takes for some people to lable you blackpilled
>>35565150so what's your ideal partner like
This topic was boring in 2014 but You're very smart and you deserve megan fox to do anal with you
>>35565210I have not put much thought into it. I have no idea
>>35565273not my type
I have no idea why the thread is so dead. I am bored and lonely. who would like to be friends?as an side note, i do not know why people have such a problem with the "tragedy of the commons" when applied to the idea of previously unowned scarce resources or nature. Why is it a good thing for there to be unowned reasorces to be homesteaded. Would it be a bad thing in some hypothetical world for every scarce resource to have an owner? not at all. Forests would still exist, but they would exist at the market rate that people value forests. The so called "commons" exist when things are made public by a state and other people wealth becomes open for looting. In such an affair, the productive class is made to be an open resourceto be exploited by the elite and an underclass of welfare parasites
>>35566579you should post in other threads if u havent
>>35570972for friends
>>35570972oh, thank you anon. I will do that
>>35565150What is biological reality, you're kinda dorky looking? Yeah man, so is most other humans. Have you, like, tried focusing on things that are fun and not this Darwinist bullshit people sell you to hate yourself and others? None of this shit matters, man. We are in 2026. The reason you don't have a mate is because you just spent 50 paragraphs talking like this and not "Hello, I'm anon. I like, hmm, video games and movies sometimes. What do you like?" Instead, I think about why other people have it better than me. Surely it's the fact that their skulls are different or they have money. It's not the fact they can have a conversation about the weather and I can't. Since I can't offer status or money, I might offer what? My personality? No wait, it's just talking points about why I can't find people. Nobody outside people who share your view world already will talk to you. You are not blackpilled you just feel for another version of a reality you like
>>35572180genetics are life. it is who we are. I decide to focus on the truth and accept it no matter what because that is what it means to be rational. The more you learn about biological reality the worse it gets. Nobody can deny the hypergamy that women display. A person who is already attractive will have the halo affect, plus positive reinforcement for their outgoing attitude. As well as easy mate selection
the current state of men is so fucked. i guess a man's accusing finger will certainly always find a woman. the internet has created sociopathy in men and has taught them that it's actually the world (women) who are like this, and who are to blame. shut the fuck with your autismo matter-of-fact speak and stop making the retarded deer in the headlights scowl. stop getting high off your own farts and stop trying to force others to sniff it. and for fucks sake stop ""philosophizing"" when all you do is parrot. squawk squawk goes the incel
>>35564827u look kind of like rainn wilson desu, id gladly have ur full load in me
>>35573793This is a man btw
>>35573782oh here we go again. I am not accusing women for following their nature. Certainly just as a rock falls to the ground, a women will always be heypergamous. I do not blame women for their nature, but for the state and modern feminism for exasperating their worst parts. You critique me for having a philosophy, but everyone has a philosophy. As contradictory and subliminal they may be
>>35573793uhh?
>>35573822probably
>>35574627wdym
