>AI slop in GW's latest promo imageDisgusting and lazy. Whoever did this should lose their employment.
>>98180480You could almost assume the machine spirits add these extra fingers as some kind of sick joke. Or a watermark. "I did that, silly fleshies!"
>>98180480I cant see it
>>98180480I don't see it. Those are 5 fingers
>>98180480You're supposed to shoot a bolter with your thumb.
>>98180480AIDS
>>98180606>>98180619>thumb around the other side presumably>one finger on trigger>4 more underneath the trigger guardEither AI or a rushed/lazy artist making a retarded mistake
>>98180723Yeah, you are right. I want to believe it's a dumb human error but desu even someone unfamiliar with guns wouldn't make such a mistake, it makes no sense. Big probability it's AI imo
>>98180723I think one guy does the lineart and another guy does the color; imo the "sixth finger" is supposed to be the bottom of the handle but the color guy derped out and made it look exactly the same as other fingers.
>>98180839That's possible too
This is a picture of a real miniature, with digital effects added. But I bet since AI became precedent that GW hasn't exactly been interrogating whether their digital artists are still doing these effects completely manually.
>>98180480This is not AI, i can usually instantly "feel" if its AI. This is not AI, just lazy work.
>>98180893I actually think it has been ran through an AI, the coils on the torso and the edges of the bolter have that kind of stark but slightly warped piss filter of earlier AI models
anti-ai tards are stuck in 2023 its so weird. ai solved the fingers thing years ago. You dumb faggots are fighting a losing war.
>>98180932If you say so. Also I hope we fucking lose faster, this ai garbage is still not good enough.
>>98180932you will not see the light of heaven>fighting a losing warI mean this was inevitable with it being the wishes of tech billionaires and their pliable human cattle like you. I'm happy to just go off and do my own thing with likeminded creatives
>>98180932saaar AI is future it can make cheap porn saaar glory to Israel
>>98180480Honestly the funniest part about this is it being concrete proof of just how fucking cheap GW are. I don't think I've seen an AI model spit out a six-fingered hand or other basic anatomical errors for well over a year now, so in order for this to have happened GW have to be using the most bargain-basement cheapass shitty genAI software they could find.A laughing stock because they wouldn't pay for Grok. Sheer comedy.
>>98181423Depends on the resolution you're initially generating in. Any model will completely cock up hands at low res, then when it gets upscaled the extra digits are just sharpened not fixed. So this suggests whoever they hired to do this is doing it in extreme bulk to keep generations under a minute and not even bothering to touch them up with inpainting after. So they probably have their own trained art models and almost everything they do is AI now. Hell the new starter pack promotional art looks exactly how you'd expect picrel to look after being ran through img2img with a model trained on newer designs. Truth is you can't actually tell good AI work is AI, so its better to assume most of it is.
>>98180480Why? It perfectly encapsulates the company.
>>98180723Yeah, likely rushed artist making Photoshop error.
>>98186118Not my pic but someone put together this and its fairly clear its ai enhanced work. You don't add fingers with photoshop on your own by accident.
Which gets more amusing given this release from GW.
>>98180942You create nothing.
>>98187503It's so clearly AI and all the GW subredd*ts either moderated the post out of existence or are filled with defenders saying it clearly isn't AI because Gw says they don't use AI. Embarrassing.
>>98187877maybe you should go back there and give them a piece of your mind instead of posting here
>>98187931Hi james. How's the damage control going elsewhere?
>>98180893 (me)Just seen the actual full photo, this is 100% AI enhanced
>>98187503Fucking disgusting
>>98187503I wonder if this was just one of the marketing team at GW tinkering with ai tools in Photoshop and being like "look what it did with these model photos, kinda neat, might look more into this later", and someone in the discussion chain decides it'd be great to use as an article banner without giving it a second look. Because that exact thing has happened to me.
