[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tg/ - Traditional Games

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Roll dice with "dice+numberdfaces" in the options field (without quotes).

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 7806_in_800x800.jpg (99 KB, 574x800)
99 KB JPG
"Do you think this is a game" edition

Previous: >>98553923

>News
https://magic.wizards.com/en/news/announcements/commander-banned-and-restricted-february-9-2026
https://magic.wizards.com/en/news/announcements/commander-brackets-beta-update-february-9-2026

>Current Banlist
https://magic.wizards.com/en/banned-restricted-list#commander-banned

>Bracket Information
https://files.catbox.moe/4tbvzw.png
https://files.catbox.moe/r62yfy.png

>Former Commander Website: Learn the basics, and read the format philosophy laid down by the rules committee
https://mtgcommander.net

>Card Search
https://scryfall.com

>Card Statistics: See what everyone else puts in their Commander decks based on what is posted to the Internet
https://www.edhrec.com

>Deck List Sites: You can search for decks that other people have made. Authors often have comments that explain their deck strategy and card choices
https://www.archidekt.com
https://www.moxfield.com

>Gay Bolas
https://files.catbox.moe/823tpq.png

>Manabase Information: Find out what lands you can add to your deck, sorted by category, based on a chosen color identity
https://managathering.com

>Proxy Guide
https://pastebin.com/9Xj1xLdM

>Precons
https://magicprecons.com

>tq
what're your opinions of the EDHRec Top 100?
>>
>>98559801
>what're your opinions of the EDHRec Top 100?
I don't think it's very accurate
>>
>TQ:
I'm feeling more and more like once you get past the top ten it stops being representative of how commonly you'll actually see any given commander. I don't see Pantlaza nearly that much.
>>
File: unknown-282.png (927 KB, 828x767)
927 KB PNG
>>98559801
>TQ
Exponential slop dropoff. Top 10 is very slop while by Top 100 you're generally not slop (slop outliers like Magda exist though)
>>
>TQ
>what're your opinions of the EDHRec Top 100?
People like to hypothetically brew a lot of hypothetically boring stuff.
>>
>TQ
Complete UB Victory
>>
card just straight up fucking disappeared with dockside banning.
>>
File: 20210228_085416.jpg (198 KB, 828x974)
198 KB JPG
>>98559801
I don't believe in data science. In the real world, MtG is flourishing, bursting with players that only brew unique decks/commanders with no UB cards. Anyone trying to say otherwise is lying.
>>
File: Wife 1.png (614 KB, 488x680)
614 KB PNG
>TQ
All I care about is that my wives Azula and Toph are in the Top 20
>>
File: 1758821657842441.png (916 KB, 672x936)
916 KB PNG
>>98559866
It's honestly funny to see how Dockside disappearing caused multiple cards to completely evaporate from the game yet people were still willing to argue that it wasn't that good.
>>
File: mtg embrace pain.png (249 KB, 403x650)
249 KB PNG
>tq
literally never went to that shit. hate netdecking
>>
>>98559875
azula will be top 10 very soon btw
>>
>>98559896
It's gonna be beautiful to see especially since I hate Ms.Bumbleflower
>>
>>98559880
Now imagine whatd happen if Rhystic got banned
>>
>>98559880
Those bans caused an extinction level even in CEDH.
I think we need to ban more fast mana cards.
>>
File: halana and her side piece.png (3.3 MB, 1488x1040)
3.3 MB PNG
Finally picked up both commanders for the monogreen control deck I've been threatening to build. Any cards I may not know about that I should consider?
>>98559866
Adding it to my list.
>>
>>98559905
>if
When
>>
>>98559884
>>
>>98559915
Honestly man at this point I dunno. Everyone's begged for it for so long and they still haven't. I think it'll take a change in leadership.
>>
>>98559857
how much do they pay you?
>>
>>98559906
There's a reason rituals stopped getting put into Standard and any mana-positive effect generally has some atrocious condition attached rendering it unplayable (e.g. Mox Jasper requiring you to already control a win condition)
>>
>>98559906
>yes we need more slop so games drag to a crawl with copy enchantment running around copying rhystics and tithes and everyone just agrees to a draw
you don't actually play cedh
>>
>>98559951
This is a problem caused by Rhystic.
>>
>>98559951
>Tithe
YOU don't play cEDH
>>
File: file.png (1.29 MB, 672x936)
1.29 MB PNG
>>98559909
I like her so put her or don't it's your call
>>
>>98559972
there's always another birthing pod card i didnt know about.
>>
>>98559928
Wotc wishes you paid them, UW shitter
>>
>>98559801
I've never played against y'shtola, but looking at the top 10 I've went against Kaalia a few times, Teval a fuckton, and Ms. Bumbleflower the most. I don't know who is playing most of these top 100 commanders because I never see them and I play a lot against a variety of people...
>>
Hello, I am building mable, heir to cragflame. I'm going to put all the valiant creatures in there. Does anyone remember an ancient artifact that used to be pretty common in deck, I think it said at the beginning of your upkeep draw a card and it had tap deal one damage to any Target. I just can't remember the name of it.
>>
File: pcy-77-rhystic-tutor.png (1.65 MB, 745x1040)
1.65 MB PNG
>>98559960
>he thinks rhystic is played in cedh
Roru rumao
>>
>>98559982
>my identity is that I start arguments over UB cards being better
>I chose this identity out of maximum contrarianism
>I also do this every single thread
faaaaaaaaaaag
>>
>>
File: file.png (891 KB, 672x936)
891 KB PNG
>>98560047
>>
>>98560081
That's not, thanks
>6 cmc
SOVL
>>
>>98560081
Yeah, that's it, thanks.
>>
>>98560057
Reminder that you had an autistic fit all because of UB secret lair
>>
File: file.png (1.01 MB, 672x936)
1.01 MB PNG
Cool
>>
>>98560081
>This was not an uncommon sight back in the day.
Where did it all go so wrong bros?
>>
>>98560126
>This was not an uncommon
I mean yeah, it's a rare
>>
>>98560072
Meant for >>98560057
>>
>>98559801
>what're your opinions of the EDHRec Top 100?
I don't think about it at all. I'm an EDH hipster. I've only had 3 decks ever that were in the top 100. My average is 1000+.
>>
>>98560126
Every Pre-Edh list I see seems to imply that the ramp packages of the day back then were mostly the same quality it's just there were fewer good draw engines. 6 mana wasn't that hard actually when you could just land a thran dynamo consistently on turn 2 or 3. Creature toughnesses were also smaller and there were more important things you could start beaming. Everything really did just become do-thing, draw card, including the 3-4 mana creatures with growing stats.
>>
>>98560167
It's also from a time where every single color didn't have 100,000 card advantage engines. Now literally every single color has plenty of draw, albeit some of it with caveats. Staff of nin isn't even strong enough to be an uncommon now.
>>
>>98560212
This was a flaw, not a feature. Blue's power relative to every other color was enormous on a fundamental level, ignoring how as an eternal format with an extremely poor banlist blue was also benefitting disproportionately from many designs that were overtuned or would be pie breaks in the present day.
>>
>>98559801
>what're your opinions of the EDHRec Top 100?
Meh.
I have 14 decks I usually tote to the LGS. I'm scum because 3 of the commanders are in the top 10 (Edgar, Kaalia, Vivi) with one more in the top 20 (Yuriko), but then it takes all the way until #633 for another commander (Grimgrin) then #634 (Torbran), #651 (Avacyn, Angel of Hope), and Ranar the Ever Watchful at #751 are the last commanders I have in the top 1000.
>>
what are the "budget" versions of gamechangers like Rhystic, Smothering, Demonic Tutor? Surely these won't cost more than 20$.
>>
>>98560343
Sharpie + basic plains.
>>
Thirty (30) starting life is objectively superior to fourty (40)
>>
>>98560343
I think gleaming splendor costs more than some printings of smothering now, which is just hilarious.
>>
is Expropriate fine as a one-off for Bracket 3 games? I'm looking for options for the Rootha that wants big spells and it's currently the biggest bomb I have on the list. Open for suggestions
>>
>>98560418
I have never seen Expropriate not win the game.
>>
>>98560255
I never really noticed a huge disparity back in the day, but maybe that was probably just because my local scene was ultracasual shitter edh. No one took the format very seriously back then.
>>
File: 1365396503555.png (361 KB, 1000x762)
361 KB PNG
>>98560343
>budget demonic tutor
Diabolic Tutor
>budget rhystic
Chart a Course
>Smothering Tithe
Solemn Simulacrum. he even draws a card :^)
>>
>>98560343
insight engine
monologue tax
diabolic tutor
>>
>>98560343
>Rhystic
lol
>Smothering
Monologue Tax, Gay Dragon Agenda
>Demonic Tutor
Like a billion options at 3-4 mana.
>>
>>98560403
But /edhg/ told me this card was bad and that Hobbit was going to fail like all UB sets!
>>
File: brr-33-mind-s-eye.png (1.46 MB, 745x1040)
1.46 MB PNG
>>98560343
>Budget rhystic
Why yes, I will pay the 1
>>
>>98560506
>But the dead containment thread told me this card was bad and that Hobbit was going to fail like all UB sets!
ftfy
>>
>>98560506
This general said it was overrated.
And it still is. Retards gobbling it up doesn't make it not overrated, infact it supports it.
>>
>>98560506
how much is the Gandalf's Bane book cover card version atm?
>>
>>98560524
>edh is just do thing draw card
>but a card that rewards you for people doing do thing draw card is le bad
>>
>>98560523
But they're never wrong! All UB sets fail (except the ones that set blatantly obvious record-breaking sales that no other set even comes close to, which don't count). They said black Aragorn and gay Smaug would cause everyone to boycott the set.
>>
>>98560538
>Le bad!
Go read a book, troglodyte.
>>
File: dft-70-transit-mage(1).png (320 KB, 744x1040)
320 KB PNG
>>98560560
>They said black Aragorn and gay Smaug would cause everyone to boycott the set.
they only reveal their projection, as UW is unmatched in pure faggotry
>>
>>98560571
>no intelligent rebuttal
your resignation is accepted
>>
>>98560560
NTA but black Aragon did stop me from running him in like any deck which is a shame since I like the character but I'll never be able to separate him from Viggo
>>
>>98560579
>He has once again opened his folder of gay cards, that he is not obsessed with, or obsessed for having to prove how gay everything but he is.
>>
>>98560587
You don't understand what is being said to you to begin with, what would be the point in arguing with a chattering monkey?
Again, go read a book.
>>
>>98560597
garbage collecting is honest work and saves lives
>>
>>98560610
>go pick up le book
go pick up a correct take why don't you lmao
>>
>>98560669
As I said, chattering monkey.
>>
File: file.png (984 KB, 678x960)
984 KB PNG
>Called Bow, Master Archer
>Isn't an Archer
>>
File: 1786423778326444.jpg (49 KB, 735x708)
49 KB JPG
>>98560675
>As I said, chattering monkey.
>>
>>98560701
Yes, portraying yourself as a low IQ black person in a smug demeanor because he has no reading comprehension is very apt.
>>
File: grave-pact-39393.jpg (139 KB, 298x431)
139 KB JPG
>TQ
EDHrec killed the spirit of the format.
>>
File: james-doakes-james.gif (2.18 MB, 374x336)
2.18 MB GIF
>>98560724
>he can't defend his shit take
>obfuscates and insists 'le reading comprehension'
>>
>>98560741
Most people I know don't even check it or know it exists.
>>
File: file.png (955 KB, 677x920)
955 KB PNG
Why did they choose The Gitrog for this?
>>
>>98560751
>Mischaracterize the position
>"Why won't you defend the thing you didn't say?!"
Not dodging the low IQ accusations.
>>
File: images.jpg (18 KB, 554x554)
18 KB JPG
>>98560769
still waiting why gleaming splendor is le bad and le overrated in do thing draw card edh btw
>>
>>98560741
EDHrec represents a larger inevitability of information becoming more widespread over time. The average player getting better (or more accurately, being given more resources to learn how to build a strong deck) is a byproduct of this. You were never going to have this forever the same way you weren't always going to be able to dunk on MTGO challenges by virtue of just knowing the meta. In many regards MtG is still insulated against this information because the average player is terrible and unwilling to do any learning.
>>
>>98560776
Gay furfags inflating the price with fake listings and sales.
>>
>>98560785
>black lotus costs more than my car, so it's bad
you do know you can just fake wotc cardboard right?
>>
>>98560790
>Overhyped card is good because it's expensive!
>Presented with irrefutable evidence that the price is inflated by fake sales
>"All cards are fake!"
Proxyfags, everyone.
>>
>>98560776
>Le bad
Again with the mischaracterizon.
It's overrated because 1 or 2 treasures an entire turn rotation actually isn't that impactful of an ability.
>But I can put them ahead to make a treasure by paying 3!
Whoa man, so good.

It's overrated and not worth the price tag, retards just think it's "bracket 2 smothering!" When it's not.
>>
>>98560762
Who gives a shit? It's just some arbitrary reskin to get people to buy blorbo they know from their childhood.
>>
>>98560810
you completely miss out that splendor is basically heliod's infinite mana dump + guild artisan (a card that also generates 2 treasures) but w/o the extra hoops of having to attack with your commander and looking at life totals, *in white btw*, and the main driver of the price is its performance in cedh; a card that is playable in lower bracket but very good in cedh is bound to have a high price tag, doubly so if it's a mythic carrying a set
so yeah thanks for showing your lack of card evaluation and market evaluation skill
>>
File: sddefault (4).jpg (31 KB, 640x480)
31 KB JPG
>>98560781
>>98560752
While I understand that by virtue of the kitchen table audience we will theoretically never actually interact with is actually the driving force of MTG sales, the homogenization of deckbuilding within EDH is a lot worse than other formats by virtue of being eternal.
And we saw how that one dude literally just spammed Gran gran decks to throw a number curve, shows that popularity is a false metric that just causes its own eternal issue of measuring becoming an oroborous of ''it gets more popular' like Yshotal did.
So someone terminally online who goes to an lgs which makes up who gets interacted with about this shit and deckbuilding in general for EDH, EDHrecreally grinds my gears
>>
>>98560810
NTA but dropping it on curve in a multiplayer format and pulling even a single treasure from it is solid. Tithe is more expensive and more powerful, but Splendor as an early drop it puts the brakes on a lot of strategies that crave a full grip and can continue to be useful in a format where people are constantly bitching about everything drawing you cards.

It's not the same card as Tithe for sure, but the use case is solid. I expect it to drop in value, but it's mythic, so it's going to take a while for supply to catch up. Its a bit of a soft counter for Esper Sentinel openings and things like that at an economical mana cost.
>>
File: 20110523-Jb-hBWkG@2x.jpg (506 KB, 2100x1052)
506 KB JPG
>>98560878
The main difference I notice between EDHrec and IRL (not online) games is that precon commanders/cards have higher IRL representation than on EDHrec, but aside from that it's pretty accurate. EDHrec is pretty much 1:1 with MTGO, XMage, Cockatrice, Spelltable, and TTS.
>>
>>98560876
>Whoa, this card is great when its paired with X, Y, and Z
The Millennium Calendar is great when paired with All Will Be One, but shit otherwise. Not a great argument there. but because it works with some things doesn't mean its great overall.
>But CEDH though!
99% of the playerbase doesn't play CEDH. Also not a worthwhile argument.
I've been my reasons and your response was "CEDH AND MY DECK THOUGH" which are worthless. You have no disproved its overrated. You're just a chattering retard jumping on what tiktok is telling him and it shows.
>>
>>98560810
>It's overrated because 1 or 2 treasures an entire turn rotation actually isn't that impactful of an ability.
It's the exact same as rhystic. The worse case scenario for the card is a scenario where your opponents are doing the thing that wins games. If rhystic draws you no cards you played an asymmetric sphere of resistence, which would be a really strong card in its own right. If Splendor gives me no mana, I played an asymmetric Spirit that's also a mana sink/wincon.
>>
>>98560105
reminder that there are more than you and one other person on this board, schizoid
>>
File: GS2.png (1 MB, 744x1038)
1 MB PNG
>>98560785
I googled it to see what popped up on the first page and holy shit, 80 dollars as the first printing that anyone sees.
Put whatever you want on it though.
>>
>>98560785
>>98561090
Are you guys trying to suggest Gay Bolas is directly responsible for this?
>>
>>98560920
>lol X card isn't good without Y
>but wait didn't i just say edh is do thing draw card (Y)?
>so X card is good because there's always Y, which is do thing draw card
>so doesn't that mean i'm a retard?
yes, yes you are
>cedh doesn't count!
roru rumao you're the only fag itt that thinks splendor is shit i can definitely count that haha
>>
>>98561040
you can only wish there was a soul out there who thought like you
>>
>>98561124
>U dumb lol
Yeah, your opinion means nothing when you don't have the intelligence to convey it.
>Ur the only one!
The reply chain proves otherwise.
Cope at the end of a rope, you clear genetic dead end troon.
>>
>>98561182
>The reply chain proves otherwise.
what reply chain? the ones you don't even bother to reply to?
hahaha run away now or else i'll laugh at you when splendor becomes a bona fide b2 staple in 2 months and people clamor for a reprint or 'an obvious powerhouse'
>>
>>98561113
Yes furfag, just because you flood the market with fake listings doesn't mean people are actually paying $80 for your furfag card.
>>
>>98560517
kek
>>
>>98561312
not a joke though. that was the colorless card draw back in the day
>>
>>98561367
Insight engine is a better budget card, though you need blue for it
>>
>>98560762
>a fucking cat
>frog
This is Monster Hunter SL level retardation.
>>
I am struggling with my desire to open sealed product. I found out a store near me still has a couple of those foily alara boosters and despite knowing better I very badly want to buy them and open them.
>>
>>98561375
The he-man cats scream saddle but there are only so many of them that are good + fit panthor
>>
>>98561373
well yes nowadays every color has better draw than Mind's Eye so I don't think anyone should run it over that 2025 card you just mentioned

but in all seriousness yeah Insight Engine is pretty alright for a dollar, especially if your game plan involves stalling or manipulating counters. it's a great suggestion for a budget rhystic in a lot of decks, and definitely a better analogy than my answer which was Chart a Course lol
>>
File: darien-king-of-kjeldor.jpg (170 KB, 672x936)
170 KB JPG
Post Chad commanders.
>>
File: file.png (1.92 MB, 745x1040)
1.92 MB PNG
>>98561643
Hell yeah.
Love slamming down an angels trumpet when playing Darien.
>>
>>98561656
I also like using this with him. It wins me so many games.
>>
>>98561656
List? Been wanting to make a mono white deck
>>
File: file.png (847 KB, 672x936)
847 KB PNG
>>98561656
I spent like 5 fucking years trying to convince my friend to add that trumpet to his Lavinia deck and he finally did it and it was awesome
>>
File: Darien 6.4.26s.jpg (3.81 MB, 5888x3326)
3.81 MB JPG
>>98561706
Not him >>98561656 but here is mine.
>>
>order custom mat
>mailed 2 hours later
That seems suspiciously fast
>>
>>98561762
Consider yourself lucky. I've ordered shit off TCGplayer so many times that gets shipped like 2 weeks later
>>
>>98561774
This was off etsy
>>
Building a bracket 3 dragonstorm deck with Smaug, Wicked Worm. Should I make dragonstorm lead to an infinite or no?
>>
https://archidekt.com/decks/25375090/chrono_shenanigans

the only time this deck has lost, is against 3 players countering/removing every card I play, and I still almost won because I got to 5 lands and a boseiju.
apparently it's the most oppressing thing anyone at my lgs has seen outside of bracket 5
>>
>>98561803
>5mana
>no white so it doesn't have the majority of flicker spells
>better commanders out there for spamming suspend/speeding up the removal of counters
Very surprising it did so well, honestly
>>
File: file.png (1.71 MB, 1332x936)
1.71 MB PNG
Can you still have an opponent blight an opponent that doesn't have any creatures?
Is this the infinite I think it is with something like nest of scarabs?
>>
>>98561750
>Arid Mesa in mono-white
For what purpose??
>>
>>98561890
Deck thining.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.