[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tg/ - Traditional Games

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Roll dice with "dice+numberdfaces" in the options field (without quotes).

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Untitled.png (2.36 MB, 997x1361)
2.36 MB PNG
It's a bit early, but here's a thread discussing the second wave of Cosmere RPG books, this time covering the setting of the Mistborn novels. The digital release of the Kickstarter pdfs drops some time tomorrow, but there's already plenty of old and new leaks on the internet.
I know there's at least one other person on /tg/ who plays this game, I see them requesting the same pdfs in the pdfshare thread.
>>
>>98605551
Personally, I only "played" it since the GM is a big fan of Sanderson, but she failed to run game by rules (which is 5e-based combat slop). I really can't see potential of this project other than being a convoluted merch.
>>
>>98605551
My group did try out the Stormlight game, though some of the members were more into those books.
I think it's a solid enough system. The talent trees allow for some decent customization, and it's simple enough to get a grasp of. Probably not worth it unless at least some of the players are interested in the base lore of the setting though.
>>
>>98605681
>I really can't see potential of this project other than being a convoluted merch.
There's certain people (myself included) who see Sanderson's complex magic systems, intentionally left with holes for theorycrafters to spend endless hours of debate on, who see this game as a vehicle to feed us nuggets of information while also serving as a functioning game. There's plenty of people who go to Sanderson book signings to have their questions answered, often receiving a RAFO (Read And Find Out) if Sanderson expects that the answer will be plot relevant in a future book.
>>
>>98605551
I bought in and I kinda regret it after finding out it was just gonna be a 5E mod. Oh well.
>>
Read the Stormlight rules the other day, there was some pretty neato-burrito stuff in there but I just personally couldn't care less about Stormlight, read the first two books way back in the day then lost interest and I haven't heard anything good about the rest of them
I have fond memories of Mistborn and I'll probably check out this release eventually, but I doubt I would ever want to play in any Cosmere setting
>>
>>98606425
There's a setting agnostic version called Plotweaver that's going through open playtesting right now
>>
A thread died for this OP.
You should feel shame for clogging up the board with your dead game.
>>
>>98605551
If it's lucky, it will be like daggerheart. No one really plays it but just be a book on their shelf. Maybe a few random players that are more fans of the IP than the book themselves. Think like the other IP based TTRPGS like Star Trek, Star Wars, Marvel, DC, Ninja Turtles, Power Ranger, etc
>>
>>98605551
It's a decent enough system and I've had a p.decent time running Stonewalkers, but I don't think it overall has strong enough bones to stand on its own without the support of Sanderson's fandom. The setting-agnostic release will die forgotten pretty fast.
>>
I really don't know what possessed them to do single d20 resolution aside from aping D&D (at which point, presumably someone should have asked "can we really overtake D&D")
>>
The only reason these books got funded was because it is also just an art book.
No one will play this garbage.
>>
Has anyone shared the new PDFs anywhere?
>>
That would imply people bought it so no.
>>
>>98606425
>read the first two books way back in the day then lost interest and I haven't heard anything good about the rest of them
Book three is decent, but after that it takes a nosedive in quality



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.