File: EX13-066_webp.png (530 KB, 430x600)

530 KB PNG

>>98723410
>Favorite card art in EX13?
We finally got her bros

>BT-26 devolved into TS Zooslop
Well, it was fun until it lasted, waiting patiently for BT-27

File: HR_2gLKXQAMgIV8.jpg (620 KB, 951x1295)

620 KB JPG

>TQ
For me it was my Chronicle boys but mostly Grademon. I'd say Alpha but one of my buddies pointed out the head looks super tiny and i can't unsee it lol

>>98723586
Fight evil with evil and play RaveRose

>>98723586
>Ceres and Glowing Dawn very efficiently go into effect immune bosses
>also the only decks that have multiple dual cards and can use them for extremely low cost
Masters of game design

File: Cute Aho.jpg (195 KB, 881x1200)

195 KB JPG

>>98723410
>TQ
Alphaputas. Mëin Nigger is mah nigga.

>>98723565
>Be a nun but dress like SLUT
Why so contradictory?

File: Screenshot_20260923-133117.png (2.76 MB, 1920x1080)

2.76 MB PNG

>>98724107

>>98723565
My nigga. For far too long we're we denied Noir. Bandai, all I ask for in relation to Sistermon Ciel and Noir is that one day we get a card which is them both on the card at the same time with the name [Sistermon Noir & Ciel].

With the new Pumpkinmon that gives Execute and Ascension, if I digivolved into BT10 Minervamon, would I still maintain the keywords even though I'm no longer Iliad?
Also if she does keep the keywords and I Execute her to attack, delete her to summon the new Mervamon from the trash, I can choose whether to Assembly the deleted Minervamon under the Mervamon OR choose to use Ascension, right?

>>98725601
>absolute chaotic mess of a board
vs
>one big stack
Just as the game should be

>>98725857
>would I still maintain the keywords even though I'm no longer Iliad?
Yes
>I can choose whether to Assembly the deleted Minervamon under the Mervamon OR choose to use Ascension, right?
Mervamon's [On Deletion] and <Ascension> trigger at the same time and you choose the order.
On Deletion effects activate in the trash, which means if either effect removes the Mervamon from the trash before the other is activated, the second effect does not activate.

>>98725889
>one big stack
>that
That slop board fucking circumcised him.

>>98725932
Banger. Thank you.

>>98725601
Xherioh needs his shit slapped by his mother. Look at the state of that fucking board. Look how unorganized that shit is. He must be a homosexual with how allergic he is to having his shit straight.

>>98726061
Look anon, they're trying their best against that nightmare of a deck

>>98725601
genuinely how do you even address this besides rotation
just never print a vegetation or green TS card again?

File: NSp.jpg (161 KB, 971x419)

161 KB JPG

Baboogamon when

>>98726319
Ban/limit cards. Sadly, by the time the next list comes out that board will have been powercrept.

>>98726319

depending on your resources, chaining Dianas back to back could answer the board.

>>98726408
It's painful seeing NSp reduced to this. 80% all new cards when NSp of all field decks was about variety.

BT-25 was genuinely fun despite the powercreep, BT-26 just feels like slop

>>98726319

they're gonna print a huge digimon that can battle 3-4 times to rip that board apart.

probably for 7 memory cost too.

>>98726471
I admit that I prefer the original NSp lineup of Digimon (though I like all these guys too), but the deck sucked.
EX7 was two years ago. It was time for a glowup.
>>98726498
Merciful Mode is an 8 drop and can battle 3 times, so basically.
But I think with its current cards Adventure would lose before that could ever happen.

>>98726542
Two years ago? It's concerning that it still feels new to me.

Hear me out. Given over half the OXII have alternate forms, we should finish the job by giving Marsmon, Vulcanusmon, Neptunemon, Venusmon and Merukimon slide digivolves or upgrades like how we have Wrath Mode, Hysteric Mode, Crapulence mode, Ceresmon Medium, Mervamon or Gracenovamon.

>>98726319
deck is working at intended (selling product)
just wait for next designated paypig archetype to be stronger

>>98726707
Vulcanus should have that omega arms as a outer form the same way magnagaruru does but instead we get it as a fucking super strong option so im okay with that.

>>98726319
DP reduction is the easiest removal to power creep because you just release something with more DP.

>>98726707
Dont forget that apollomon has whispered. (Does he still have the O12 trait in that form?)

>>98727488
Probably not, it was a one-off from Xros Wars and one of the Big Death Stars anyway.

>>98727488
>(Does he still have the O12 trait in that form?)
Hes in the oxii pendulum but he may also just be a barga army support.

So when it comes to deck building do I just pick my favorite mons and go from there? Like, if I like Lilithmon or just the seven demon lords in general, I can just go for broke on them?

>>98727902
Yes and No.
Generally yeah you pick a big digimon you like and make a deck that enables them. There are very few that are specific to a certain group with no version that works for themselves.

Buuuuut..... Some of them only have cards that are legitimately years old and wont really function well as a modern deck.
So depending on the digimon, you might just legitimately be shit out of luck.
Wargreymon is a great example, basically every printing of him in the last like bit over 2 years has been incorporating him in something else, and not been suitable for playing a "greymon" deck, be it as apart of omnimon or things like virus busters and metal empire.
In the past you could play wargreymon or blackwargreymon (or mix them together, and gaiomon, etc), and while we have gotten a blackwargreymon ace like a year ago, and it was for actual greymon style decks, it was a definitely not the more aggressive wargreymon style and wasn't really enough to make it even close to relevant.

So you might be in a situation where the digimon you want to build a deck around WAS viable to do so before, but its been so long since then and for various reasons hasn't gotten support so it just makes for an awful deck.

>>98727932
Damn. Uh, so as someone new to the game what would you recommend? Should I just look up whatever the newest sets are and see what I can build from there?

>>98728193
It's probably a good time to get stuff for Lilithmon, she hasn't gotten love in a while but there is a set coming out next year specifically for the seven demon lords. I think the most recent good demon lord deck was daemon/creepymon

>>98728193
Yeah I think I would take a look at some recent stuff that has come out and things that are coming out, or things that have relatively recently gotten support.
Right now we are about to get the royal knight set in like a week, which is a bit half baked until bt27 fleshes out some of the decks in it, but its also mostly supporting existing RK decks (like gallant is very playable and just has more cards, even if it isn't crazy strong, its at least quite a cheap deck that got fully reprinted just a few months ago). After bt27 we have ex14 coming out which is a "villain" set and mostly focused on the 7gdl (as anon mentions >>98728355 ) which depending on how they split it might be support for individual members decks, or it might be for the greater 7gdl megazoo archetype (or both at once, which is highly likely).
So lilithmon very much might be playable in like march, she is a fan favourite so I wouldn't be surprised.

The meta right now for serious competitive decks is quite diverse, with 20+ different decks getting top 8's at various events and a lot that is strong.
Let alone if you just want something reasonably playable that is good enough for locals, there is a loooot of decks that are on that level, many of which have associated starter decks as well.

>>98728355
The Heroine Set Lilithmon is only slightly more expensive than the original EX6 base rarity, but even the base version is pretty expensive (at 12USD) for a card that's likely to get power crept out of its deck when the next one comes out.

The rest of the stuff you want for 7GLD is pretty cheap though, aside from maybe rookie Lucemon at around $5 (he was like $2 back in March until the AD1 reprint of Chaos Mode increased demand, but he's still down from his $8 peak) and the definitely-going-to-get-power-crept Ogudomon at $14 minimum. Beelzemon Ace is also around $18 but you don't want him for 7GDL anyway.

>>98728355
>>98728515
Alright thanks guys. Currently don't have anyone to play with locally so I'll probably be sticking to the simulator for now. Especially since I'm still learning. Right now I'm trying out a Vulcanusmon deck I found online and this linking stuff is pretty cool. I'll definitely keep an eye out for the EX14 set though.

File: HSZhZcpW4AAYcwS.jpg (412 KB, 951x1295)

412 KB JPG

Titan/Demon gods will we be running either of the new promos

>>98729054
You have enough trash from hand effects that you aren't desperate for it on your egg, so probably not.

>>98729054
This is more of a generic purple slop card to replace the old discard Pagumon
I've been brewing but I need to brew more

>>98729054
Both the trashing and the deletion effects are utterly redundant in titans.
In fact, the only good cards from plutomon's line are the level 5s and 6s

>>98729330
>In fact, the only good cards from plutomon's line are the level 5s and 6s
Salamon is alright, it lets you digivolve all the way to Mega out of cards from the trash.

File: HS9jW8SWoAA9SrJ[1].jpg (333 KB, 800x600)

333 KB JPG

Official confirmation of ST-25/ST-26/BT-27 release dates

File: HS9jW8SXcAAqLyX[1].jpg (344 KB, 800x600)

344 KB JPG

>>98729502

File: HTDFNpaXgAAj4On[1].jpg (277 KB, 800x600)

277 KB JPG

>>98729504

>>98729507
I know prerelease gives them effectively the same release date but it is funny to imagine people buying the starter decks for the packs of BT27 early

>>98729330
Is it possible to run plutomon, zombiepluto, titamon, and tita+skullbaluchi in same deck?

>>98723410
Haven't played since bt13, is ulforce veedramon playable?

>>98729968
New support in EX13 next month

>>98729973
sweet, some of the new cards look cool
might be a good excuse to go back to my local scene

>>98729054
ogre x is pretty nice and will probably get run at 1-2 of
he allows you to not NEED to run the -1 cost rookie and sala maxed out, so the deck can be a little more flexible and you can run a bit more search (I would still run x4 -1 cost, x4 snowgobli searcher, x2 sala at a minimum).
He has some interesting tools that you can use to make bigger boards and extend combos out with

the rookie is kind of rough
basically all our 4's already have when attacking trash, especially if you want the evo from trash inheritable consistency, so its kinda ehh
and our best 5 already has a when attacking (cerb), so its nice if you put skullballuchi in the back I guess? Its nice if you need to pop a smaller body while climbing to double delete a 6 or something I guess? but fuga already does that and it isn't usually that required because of how many times you can delete

It might make more sense in the future who knows, ogre seems worth running but the egg is lot more ehh

>>98730174
Since Nyaromon is Pluto's digitama I assume it is a When Attacking trash so that Dobermon has a way to Digivolve up without killing itself if there's no targets on your opponent's side
It also lets you use the Titan 4's and 5's that don't trash cards so could be good for a Pluto bug build

>>98730259
yeah actually that is a really good point
it does make dober a lot more viable and being able to run the insect 4's and 5's would be very nice.
I found the insect 5's inheritable to be hard to make use of since you needed some really specific setups to be able to pierce through, evo, and get value, but with this egg its a lot better.

Will have to try it out as I might be able to finally cut the skullballuchis and not run the titamon+skull package and can go back to the cherubis

>>98729403
Its a 1-2 of at most.
You only realistically triggering the effect on your 3rd and 4th eggs.

>>98729949
Yes.
I personally took out zombie off my current list.
He's only good if you're going the cherubimon route.
I think its best to either go pluto / zombie / cherubi or pluto / tita / tita+.
For eggs I like the ts tokomon or bt6 tsunomon. You would need all the draws you can get going into ravemon or chronomon.

>>98725601
Xenobros...???

File: 1000019365.jpg (2.95 MB, 3000x4000)

2.95 MB JPG

got a box from 2000

What the hell is even left from TS to make into cards? More rando central town NPCs?

>>98730734
All the major characters again but now they're from all the off-shoot bad timelines

>>98730734
They could make a card of every single digimon in the game. Like if they really wanted to.

But the next TS set will probably be about the expansion releasing next year.

>>98730734
Enbarrmon and Craniamon + Enbarrmon

>>98730818
That is going to come in bt27 and not be TS traited

>>98730722
Anything cool? I remember getting an AeroVeeedramon as my first booster foil. Think foil Wargrey was in a starter deck? Imperialdramon (Dragon) was the only gold lettering I got.

File: IMG_20260925_145910~2.jpg (1.61 MB, 2871x3073)

1.61 MB JPG

>>98730961

>>98730734
All the mons featured in the DLC, New stuff from the upcoming expansion after it releases.

>>98730734

pretty sure the Paradise Colosseum had an exvee and stingmon NPCs

>>98730734
Rosemon Gear Forest still needs to show up and we can't forget Justimon.

>>98731266
You also fight a rapidmon and pharomon, who have a side quest dedicated to them joining central town and who show up in the final stretch to help you if you did the quest
But we haven't had either printed in TS

Lots of digimon just didn't get cards because they didn't fit in neatly with what they wanted to do and were just a single form without a matching line showing up.

>>98729502
>>98729504
does this mean Alysion is actually releasing soon?

>>98731919
I would guess they hit around the same time since they were said to have special codes for the game. Unless that has been dropped

>>98731919
Well they already confirmed there are codes in the starter decks for alysion.
So uh, at the latest I would say some time in december, but I doubt the starter decks are releasing BEFORE alysion and they release it near christmas time.

Some time in October - November would make more sense

File: 1759927423740049.png (476 KB, 350x700)

476 KB PNG

>>98730505

>>98731986
I definitely could see them releasing the starters a bit before Alysion as a bit of incompetence, but even then I don't think it'll be later than mid-December. October, even late October, feels way too early if the starters are coming in early December, so I'm thinking sometime between November and mid-December.

Despite Master Duel having a pretty successful launch at the end of January, I do think a before-Christmas release window would be more effective just to make sure that they can get a slice of kids' Christmas (Western) or New Years' (Eastern) money.

>>98732165
You are assuming the starter decks are meant to release alongside alysion.
What if their plan is to release alysion, get some players interested, and then tell them "hey you can play in person as well! here are some decks you might have gotten familiar with!" and use it as a ramp into the physical card game with codes for stuff in it so that even if they don't stick with paper they still feel like they got something out of buying them.

I think trying to figure out when it will released based on the starter decks is tough because what alysion even IS (simulator that is a little behind, alternate mode, reboot, etc) hasn't been confirmed.
I don't think they will release in early October, there hasn't been any recent marketing, but if we start seeing information about it in the coming days, then I wouldn't be surprised by a release that is still in October.

>>98732254
It's also Bamco and they are really good at making really bad decisions regarding Digimon

>>98732261
yeah
turns out alysion is a fucking vn with battle in between and a small fixed card pool, but yeah, you can vs your friends with that card pool, no matchmaking of course either

I am not expecting anything crazy out of it.

Phone-only Alysion
The Dragon Ball TCG's app might have gotten a PC release but Digimon won't

>>98732283
A VN story mode would be kind of fun though.

>>98732295
I see them making that mistake, but emulators exist for a reason.

>>98732743
It has a story mode.
The alpha test had you meeting the girl with the renamon and after beating her you run into the dark shoto
Its definitely going to have that as an introduction to the game and its a continuation of the liberator stuff

>Playing DCGO
>Hit an opponent's suspended GrandGalemon with Dual Ceresmon's can't unsuspend effect
>next turn he evolves into Vortexdramon
>unsuspends
???

>>98733671
They call him Hoang Zero because zero of his cards work as intended.

>>98733671
That means DCGO is working

>>98733671
It's not a very good fan client. It's gotten much much better since they started letting other people fix it.

>>98733671
When a DCGO bug works against a retarded deck like Ceresmon, it's actually a feature. Play a real deck next time.

>>98733671
So its working as it should you TSfreak.

>>98734704
Vortexdramon would correctly gain Digimon effect immunity by suspending a Digimon, but should not be able to unsuspend with its All Turns because the suspend lock is on Famis, not Ceresmon

>>98733671
>dcgo bugged
yeah and waters wet
I just expect shit to be wrong, but we don't have much choice

Just wait till alysion I guess :^)

>>98734711
My mistake, I will admit when i am wrong. Iforgot he is just immune to digimon effects. My rage against TS has clouded my vision

File: Spoiler Image (217 KB, 1080x758)

217 KB JPG

Gekkomon's final form is a jogress, honestly one of the ugliest designs in the franchise.

>>98736931
This is one of those rare Digimon designs that looks absolutely dogshit regardless of its depiction. The card artists are going to have to work really fucking hard to make that look good.

>>98736931
I like the uncloaked forms of Atratusmon and Albatusmon at least.

No, on second thought, "like" is maybe too strong a word. "Tolerate?" Yeah, "tolerate."

>>98736931
I think the final form looks fine with its helm down. The dna is just boring though.

>>98736931
This shit is just discount Omnimon if it was filtered through Gammamon. I'm so fucking tired of Yin-Yang DNAmons like Proxima, Exmaquina and now this cunt.
We've reached a point where DNA forms are just one line fusing with itself.

>>98736931
These are really boring in lots of ways

>>98737043
The other two DNAs you mentioned at least looked more unique than this.

I hate TS so fucking much bros

>>98736931
They should have stuck with the cloaks baka
had the two different cloaks dna into a cloak digimon that is one cloak inside of another and just made of layers of black and white cloaks
would have been kino

>>98738157
That sounds retarded

>>98738178
More retarded than what we got?

>>98738406
No less retarded. I don't like the design but I do like the lore of this jogress, in that it was the entity that introduced change and thus Digivolution into the stagnant primordial Digital World. I don't think a ball of rags would really work as the embodiment of change.

>>98736931
It's amazing just how shit every show-original mon is, they're all fucking hideous.

File: HTNA1ZRWMAAIECs.jpg (101 KB, 1280x720)

101 KB JPG

>tfw waiting for Kunlun to drop in price so I can pick it up for dirt cheap before they start making Shambala dual cards

>>98739210
>drop in price
bro he's already super cheap?
He wasn't expensive on release and has just all but cratered

>>98739435
I believe it will go cheaper!

>>98739141
>NightChiropmon
>Bearcatmon
>Wolvermon
>Murasamemon
>Armalizamon
Come on now anon

>>98739544
SAME, HOLD OUT BROTHER.

File: 1687450338203576.png (115 KB, 349x360)

115 KB PNG

>>98736931
>not a single good looking level 6 in the entire protag line up
actually unreal
thank god they designed the deck around playing the cool looking level 5s instead
and god bless the dude who drew the Atratus card art and tricked everyone into thinking the design was good

>>98736931
>DNA deck that gets zero inheritables because because the entire top end is dual cards
>DNA deck that can't drop a second body to DNA because the entire top end is duals

>>98740497
>DNA deck that gets zero inheritables because because the entire top end is dual cards
They will just make duals with inheritables, i dont remember anything saying you can only have one. Or give it succession
>DNA deck that can't drop a second body to DNA because the entire top end is dualswe had a nondual habakirimon, they can just make atratus and albatus that are not dual

Today meta what lv3 floodgate is still worthy to play, dont let your opponent gain memory, reduce digi cost, reduce play cost or dont let play for effect?

>>98740666
>dont let play for effect
That, provided the digimon can survive.

>>98740497
Who needs inheritables when the jogress can just have Succession <Atratusmon> Succession <Albatusmon>

File: 1775077608442325.png (200 KB, 1070x1029)

200 KB PNG

>>98740497
>Assembly -8 : cards w/ beatbreak trait.

>>98739544
Do you think it will get cheaper than moonmilleni? Because I hope you don't try to wait that long.....

>>98740666
Can't play by effect is very strong vs a lot of decks
Can't reduce play costs is pretty good to slam down after you clear the opponents board because no assembly plays coming out then

Can't gain mem/Can't reduce digi costs are okay, but are not really hitting enough to be valuable

>>98740666
No reduce playcost and no play by effect are the best. The issue is it's just too easy for any modern deck to snipe rookies while doing their usual plays for them to be effective. The big exception is Plant tribal can protect Pomumon for a turn with Ceresmon.

The year is 2028
Every deck has a /black card that DeDigivolves, a /green card that battles an opponent's Digimon, a /blue card that prevents that Digimon from being deleted in battle and a /red card that returns their archetype from trash
Purple of course will still give Draw 1 Trash 1

>>98743245
Everything will have Assembly so that Draw 1 Trash 1 will actually be pretty potent.

>>98743245
>red
I can do anything as long as I have enough DP.
>blue
I can do anything, but better.
>green
I can do anything as long as something suspends.
>yellow
I can do anything as long as I kill myself.
>purple
I can't do anything as long as I neg myself.
>black
I can do anything as long as it involves not doing anything.
>white
I can't do anything.

File: twitter_でじのげんちゃんネル：デジカまとめ(...).jpg (490 KB, 1170x1623)

490 KB JPG

page in shounen jump or something

>>98743347
White does everything

heres a interaction i had yesterday
>playing magneticdramon deck vs ceresmon/bacchusmon
>digivolve to proganomon by black scramble while bacchusmon in field
>trash landramon and dedigivolve bacchusmon bt26 to bacchusmon bt25
my question is, does bacchusmon sees the evolve by effect?

>>98745273
bacchus 26 sees the effect
bacchus 26 is not on the board to resolve the effect
bacchus 25 aint seen shit

succession is just copy pasting the text from the card underneath its not a singular floating instance of that effect, its why succession can trigger once per turns again because its a new copy of the effect

>>98745273
What's your list?

>>98745273
Seconding what that guy said. The top stack saw the trigger but the bottom stacks effect wasnt there to see the trigger activate so it whiffs

While I know Imperial isn't going to be that meta, I'm still going to have a bit of fun using Ken and Davis to strip sources and turn off succession

>>98747598
Imperial will be very meta

File: blinking-confused.gif (211 KB, 220x258)

211 KB GIF

>>98747598
>While I know Imperial isn't going to be that meta

>>98747648
He's an imperial downplayer.
Getting started early.

>>98747718
Or he's just retarded.

>>98747762
at my locals theres a autistic dude, he behaves like him

>>98747762
True.
Maybe he is just a casual player and doesn't really understand why it will be so strong too.

>>98747598

The deck is getting its own on brand medievalgallant. it has the tools to deal with the current meta. it only loses cause players don't see DK early enough.

>>98748351
they should make a Stingmon that plays a Ken in name, but no equivalent ExVeemon

>>98748614
This would be funny
But it would team imperial is tier 1 for fucking ages, probably strong enough that it would cause it to get hit (again)

How do you beat a Bacchus Ceres Siren board without a scramble and a Digimon in raising

>>98750094

hardslam dianamon

>>98750094
Assembly Dantemon, have another Weatherdramon in trash for Copipemon to copy.

>>98748755
I wish Red Puple Imperial got some love as well

>>98750644
virus imperial... my beloved....
if only....

>>98739210
Ur poor lol

>>98740497
They should just go the Proximamon and old Alpha Ouryuken route and just have its evo count be discounted if you have both in sources, then make Albatus and a new Arcturus that add a source from trash or under a tamer.
The gay and sadly more likely route is they go like Looga Takemikazuchi and just print a lvl6 that does all the work for you.

Has anyone checked out https://aegis-digi.online/ ?
Just found it randomly and it already looks like it BTFOs DCGO (not hard). EX13 stuff is working as well.

>>98752390
Auto or Manual?
Since drasil exists if you just want a manual sim.

>>98752468
Auto

>>98752390
Yeah pretty solid
Everything in one row is a little awkward and cluttered, but otherwise solid
A little annoying to see the exact cards in inheritables, but the inheritable text is listed under so its not bad to see the inherits themselves

>>98752390
Anyone want to play on this?

>>98752788
I can play in an hour or 2. Playing with an IRL friend atm

File: e94bf16258986f4caab8834.jpg (138 KB, 850x1202)

138 KB JPG

>play against DS Rosemon
>stuns my entire field
>I still manage to DNA 3 times into Mastemon and go for the kill
unc still got it

>>98753894
please just give us a new egg and some sensible lvl 3's bandai
maste is so close and it just gets the weirded cards printed for it

>>98752788
Still up for a few games?

File: Spoiler Image (280 KB, 1920x1080)

280 KB JPG

Spoiler from Digimon Eggs.

>>98753560
>>98754215
yeah sure. i just finished watching anime

>>98754478
That looks legally actionable by the Pokemon Company.

>>98754053
>maste is so close
I love her but that's cope.

>>98754478
>>98754583
it looks like kyaromon merged with a kuramon desu. not really seeing the pokemon comparison.

File: 0433Chingling.png (144 KB, 497x497)

144 KB PNG

>>98754786
I know they're both independently based on Shinto bells, but given that they already tried to sue Palworld I wouldn't be surprised if they did anyway.

>>98754841
The comparison didn't even come to mind when I first saw it. I'd dare say it doesn't even when I have them right next to each other to compare

>>98754689
shes pretty solid rn with the tamer removal
a new line, mainly a good 3 and egg, as well as a dual card, she be cookin again

>>98754954
I feel like it would be kinda awkward to try and fit a dual card into Mastemon unless it's like a Gatomon X that plays one of your level 5s for you, or something that would go on top of Mastemon like Ordinemon. Unless of course they just make Arts DNA Digivolve for her like they did with Blast DNA Digivolve, but that mechanic wasn't particularly successful.

>>98754954
Tamer removal Maste is only good against bad/slow decks. Good decks will laugh at you for spending turns building a digimon that ends up removing a tamer and do nothing else.

>>98755014
yeah I am not sure what they will do with the deck or what would work well, arts dna is obv not a thing and it would be awkward unless it also played out a body
the deck just desperately needs a better low end though

>>98755128
>spending turns building a digimon that ends up removing a tamer and do nothing else
Which digimon does this?
That maste plays out bodies and setups another DNA as well after you do some damage and remove a tamer
Not to mention how many decks right now just hard lose if you remove their tamers. Removing 1 tamer is incredibly backbreaking for them, removing 2 is basically game fucking over.

Or are you going to try to say if you remove beatbreaks and data squads tamers they don't crumble?
Or if you remove homeros and inori from a jupiter player they don't just fall turns behind?
Or if you remove homeros and kanan from other TS slop decks?
Or removing asuna vs 3m?
Or removing daiken in the upcoming imperial meta?

Tamer removal is really really really good right now.
There just isn't a deck that can do it right now without huge gaping flaws elsewhere.
Tamer removal isn't the weak part

>>98754841
They won't because bandai can actually fight back.

Is there anything more to building royal knights than coolboy/liberator omekamon, CS drasil, bt13 omnimon, and then the rest is just royal knights with on plays?

File: HTcq_9cbMAADg2H.jpg (235 KB, 1307x735)

235 KB JPG

Seems to be 4x gold RKs/case

>>98755718
Purge, The Last Guardian, and of course Omni X. You're probably not stupid enough to skip Omni X but it's such a key card that it's worth reiterating. CS Drasil wasn't actually seeing much play last time the deck was popular, but that was a very different format.

>>98755820
>You're probably not stupid enough to skip Omni X
No. I just forgot to mention it separately as its part of the liberator omekamon stuff. Also did not mention bt13 drasil for obvious reasons.
>The Last Guardian
So i suppose there should be more omnis than other knights?
>CS Drasil wasn't actually seeing much play last time the deck was popular, but that was a very different format.
Is it worth to run it at all then?

>>98755828
>>The Last Guardian
>So i suppose there should be more omnis than other knights?
Technically yes since you're running 3-4 of your finisher Omni and 4 Omni X, but the purpose of that Delay is to keep Drasil from eating Omni X for a turn so your next RK can also get Rush. CS Magnamon is your only other definite 4-of because he's cheaper, a blocker, and draws you back a card; and Alphamon Oryuken Ace has traditionally been a 3-4-of because Overflow doesn't trigger off of Drasil, but he might be a liability against Susanoo.


>>CS Drasil
>Is it worth to run it at all then?
Shit it's probably not worth running RK at all or else people would already be doing it. Or maybe having a source of Rush Reboot and Blocker is something it desperately needs to stay competitive in the current meta. Try it if you want, ditch it if it sucks.

>>98755858
>but the purpose of that Delay is to keep Drasil from eating Omni X for a turn
I thought it would not stop drasils start of turn from taking it, for the same reason why drasil does not activate overflow?

>>98755864
Nope, Drasil doesn't trigger Overflow because you're moving the Ace from the field directly to under a card, the two areas that are specifically exempt from triggering Overflow.

>>98755873
But last guardian can stop being put under drasil? Can it stop a omnimon being put as a security card?

>>98755873
This has nothing to do with why it works.
Overflow doesn't trigger because they changed aces from leaving the battle area to leaving the field.
They literally changed how aces work at the start of 2025 and you can look at aces printed before it and ones after, they literally have a different rules text.

yggdrasil doesn't trigger overflow because bandai wanted RK to be able to use aces.
Its as simple as that.

File: 041cbd68.jpg (82 KB, 850x850)

82 KB JPG

>>98755388
Let’s be real, nobody really cares about the extra body she puts on the field or the single security damage she can do in 2026. While you’re spending turns building Maste to control your opponent and pull off cute plays like that, your opponent is most likely just building their Digimon to straight-up OTK you. Yes, tamer removal is effective, but it’s not nearly as effective when you have to spend multiple turns setting up a brick like Mastemon just to get there. And even after you finally play her, it’s not that difficult for your opponent to remove her or simply play around her effect. Once she’s gone, you’re back to square one, trying to rebuild Mastemon while your opponent is already progressing toward their win condition. There’s a reason the deck hasn’t consistently topped tournaments for the past three sets. Maste is simply too slow for the current game. On top of that, losing BT14 Patamon and Blinding Ray makes the deck even slower and less consistent than it was before. You need to stop coping, bro.

genuinely why would anyone play mastemon when TS angels exists

>>98757089
>she's my wife
>I already own the cards
>I'm a unc thats too lazy to learn to play newer decks
I will learn to play DS Rosemon someday.

>>98757180
Rosemon is WG, not DS

>>98757228
Data Squad or DATS.

>>98756442
They did change the text from "battle area" to "field" and "another area" to "area other than those" in English, but the Japanese text only changed "battle area". The latter change was clarification of intent, not an actual mechanical change.

Ragnalord support next year trust the plan, Jessiecucks your days are numbered

>>98756527
>nobody really cares about the extra body she puts on the field or the single security damage she can do in 2026
No, its very good.
>your opponent is most likely just building their Digimon to straight-up OTK you
What deck OTK's you right?
What deck even OTK's you this entire year?
What are you even fucking talking about?

>There’s a reason the deck hasn’t consistently topped tournaments for the past three sets
This has nothing to do with promo mastemon being a weak card?
That has a lot to do with the rest of the deck.
Are you trying to suggest that if your archetype is half bad cards that its the fault of the good ones the deck isn't good enough? Like what are you fucking talking about?
>Maste is simply too slow for the current game.
Again, this has nothing to do with promo mastemon being valueable enough or not? That has to do with the rest of the deck, you know, the lower end of it?
How does the rest of deck being too slow and inefficient mean that making a promo maste and removing tamers isn't good? It just means it isn't cheap or fast enough to get into, not that the effect is not good enough
which is the thing you said, you didn't say the deck isn't good enough, you said the card itself doesn't do anything
Or are you suggesting that isn't what you said in >>98755128 with
>a digimon that ends up removing a tamer and do nothing else.
Or are you retarded because you were responding to a post talking about how it needs a better low end despite the top end being very good and think bringing up the low end is somehow saying something?

>On top of that, losing BT14 Patamon....
Again, noting to do with promo mastemon being a bad card.


Like wtf are u talking about?
Are you completely illiterate
You are responding to a post that said maste has a really bad low end despite its top end being strong against a lot of the current meta.

Sounds to me like you realized you have said something completely retarded and are trying to move the goalpost.

File: overflowrulechange.png (99 KB, 845x727)

99 KB PNG

>>98758544
>but the Japanese text only changed "battle area".
That is the only thing that needed to change
Battle area to Field.

>not an actual mechanical change.
Okay, then why did they say its a rule change?

https://world.digimoncard.com/rule/revised/
Go down to the 2.0 CRM manual change and read the section where they say they are changing how overflow works mechanically.
It was the same time DP reduction on deletion effects were changed to not happen at a later period because of the rule check, but at the same time, so it was identical to other removal instead of a special case to kill with -DP, prior it effectively interrupted your opponents effects.

Why are you suggesting the rules didn't change when they call it a rule change and it mechanically plays differently?
You not knowing it happened doesn't mean it didn't happen.

>>98758699
>bro crashed out
Even with a better low-end, the deck would be shit. Maste Promo was good a year+ ago, now it's just a shit Digimon. What can't you understand?

>>98758749
THAT change has to do with the change from Battle Area to Field, because the Breeding Area is part of the latter but not the former. By "the latter change" I meant the change from "another area" to "area other than those."

>>98758784
Yes
That is the change that means RK can play aces.

You said
>Drasil doesn't trigger Overflow because you're moving the Ace from the field directly to under a card
No, Drasil doesn't trigger overflow because the card is staying on the field.
This change SOUNDS like it has to do with cards in the breeding area being trashed and triggering overflow
But it means that when they leave the battle area to go under drasil they don't trigger overflow and only trigger overflow when they get trashed from under drasil

>I meant the change from "another area" to "area other than those."
Yeah because its clarifying how the rule works because it would go against how the rules changed, as you said, but overflow still had a mechanical change.
It was correct when it was just battle area, if you went to any other area, you would overflow, including breeding.
But now its referencing the field and and the "area other than those" is talking about the field rather than just any other area.

>>98758774
>Sounds to me like you realized you have said something completely retarded and are trying to move the goalpost.
Guess I was spot on with this one

>>98758856
I don't have a rulebook pdf from before the 2.0 rewrite but I'm fairly certain cards under other cards (digivolution cards, stacks under Tamers, or stacks under Yggdrasil) have NEVER counted as being on the field/battle area. It explicitly doesn't count now: rule 4-7-7.

It doesn't matter if the card that it's under is in the breeding area or the battle area, because the "area" (that isn't really an area) that's being referenced is simply "under a card."

>>98759002
I don't think you understand what overflow is saying.
It isn't making an exception for when it goes from under this card to another area, its saying that triggers overflow.

Drasil doesn't overflow with the change when they go under it because they are still in the field, which is the change that made.
If drasil pops itself to play them and there is a duplicate that goes to the trash, that does trigger overflow

"As this card moves from the field"
So if its the top card and goes from the field to outside of it
"Or under a card to an area other than those"
So if its under something and goes from the field to outside of it
"lose X memory"
trigger overflow

The only difference was that you replace field with battle area before, so you couldn't overflow from breeding, but you would overflow from being put into breeding.
You are misunderstanding the under a card thing and trying to read too much into it, it just means if this is the top card or under any other card, not that its some extra condition as way to avoid it. Its irrelevant to the change made to make RK work with aces.

>>98759070
>>Drasil doesn't overflow with the change when they go under it because they are still in the field, which is the change that made.
Cards under other cards ARE NOT ON THE FIELD, regardless of where the card they are under is.

>>98759149
mf you don't understand the difference between a card and a digimon
yes, cards are on the field
aces are not talking about your stack
they are not talking about the digimon
they are talking about the CARD

the physical card itself is what the rule is tied to
the stack doesn't matter, that isn't what is being references
the CARD, CARD nigger CARD read the fucking text and learn the rules of the game

not what happens to the digimon
not what happens to the stack
what happens to the CARD

>>98758879
Not really. Mastemon Promo is shit and so is the entire deck and that includes the low-end. There was no goalpost moving, you're just a schizo.

>>98759149
Thats just incorrect anon. If you use SAVE to make an Ace go under a tamer you dont suffer overflow untill it goes from there to trash/deck/security

>>98759166
Motherfucker that IS WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT

RULE 4-7-7
"The bottom cards of a stack are treated as part of the information on the top card. They aren't considered to be placed on the field. (Example: When "[When Digivolving] Place one of your opponent's level 3 or lower Digimon under another of your opponent's Digimon as its bottom digivolution card or under an opponent's Tamer" is used to place a Digimon under a card, that card is considered to be removed from the field.)"

It's removed from the field ("battle area" before the change), BUT before the change, we had cards like Astral Snatcher and Arresterdramon: Superior Mode (BT12) that could move a card from being a Digimon to being under another Digimon, which did NOT trigger overflow when used on an Ace. Same as moving an Ace card from under a Digimon to the battle area, such as with Kaiser Nail. The SAME RULE would have applied to Yggdrasil IF there were any Royal Knight Aces before the rule update (which there technically was in JP for like a week).

>>98759180
Save is explicitly an On Deletion effect, as printed on every card that has the effect, so it triggers in the trash. You may be mistaking it for how EX19 X4 and X5, or BT21 DX, or AD1 X7 work, but actual Save and Material effects trigger in the trash. Not that it functionally matters, because there are no Aces with Save, no Aces that count as material for Material Save, nor any way to give Save to an Ace.

The effects that Save and also put another card under a Tamer also explicitly place the other card FROM THE TRASH.

Question for you guys who tested the ex13, how is the Gallantmon and Lordknightmon decks?
Do you guys have deck list to use as reference for them?

>>98759452
>RULE 4-7-7
This is about stacked cards of digimon you dickhead
Like I said, CARD isn't digimon, we aren't talking about a digimon stack
we are talking about an individual card and its rules, not what constitutes a stack.

>4-7. Stacked Cards
>4-7-1. "Stacked cards" refers to all of the 1 or more cards in a stack of cards on the field.
Overflow isn't an inheritable, it doesn't pass effects to the top of the stack.
Overflow is a rule.
And this is what overflow is saying when it says from under a card you fucking retard, its talking about stacked cards, when this card is removed from under another card, overflow.

Absolute fucking retard

File: 44a88a0f075d214991acae7fd(...).jpg (264 KB, 1200x1200)

264 KB JPG

Recently decided to get into the game, any cool decks I can make based around Alphamon? He's my favorite RK.

>>98760020
Boy do I have good news for you about the next set coming out this Friday

>>98760020
Yeah he's getting a bit of a revamp for a deck focused around him releasing tomorrow.
And in december we are getting an x antibody set with him on the cover, presumably with ouryuken mode and more support for the deck

>>98759829
>when this card is removed from under another card, overflow.
"Another area" in the old text is ambiguous, it could have either mean any other area or an area besides "the battle area" or "under a card." What it ACTUALLY meant was the latter, as evidenced by the fact that moving an Ace card from "under a card" that was on the field to "the battle area" by means of Kaiser Nail, or from "the battle area" representing a Digimon entity to "under a card" also in the battle area (representing a different Digimon or a Tamer) by means of Astral Snatcher, didn't trigger Overflow before they rewrote the rules.

>>98760070
The Oryuken mode IS the card that's on the December set's cover.

>>98760070
>>98760036
Oh shit!? Damn that's amazing timing on my end.

File: 1784825049782501.png (2.03 MB, 951x1295)

2.03 MB PNG

>>98760122
Good luck on your pulls if you are going to open some packs and have fun with the deck.

How the FUCK do you deal with Ceresmon

>>98760155
Damn he looks so cool. Also, I'm pretty new so are there ways to Digivolve during your opponent's turn to get that first effect off properly? Seems kind of hard from what I've seen so far.

>>98760197
You would digi while passing your opp to 5 or more memory

>>98760111
>ambiguous
No it isn't
It means an area except the area it is currently in
>actually meant
Is what it said, to another area, except for the one its in, which is the battle area, since this only applies in the battle area (from the battle area to another area)
Which is why it needed to be changed when they changed it to field.

>didn't trigger Overflow before they rewrote the rules.
It didn't trigger overflow and it STILL doesn't trigger overflow.
Its only when it leaves the field.
Being played out from a source, or put under a tamer, doesn't cause overflow and NEVER caused overflow

You keep misunderstanding what it says
The "from under a card" isn't a separate clause, its the same fucking statement
Its [when this would leave the battle area or from under a card] [overflow x], it isn't [when this leaves the battle area] or [from under a card] [overflow x], it was STILL talking about the battle area and the new version is STILL talking about the field
Its the same fucking clause
The from under a card is STILL talking about the battle area in the old version

The new version is just changed to field, and because in Japanese how its worded didn't require more changes, but in English it did because it was about the field which has multiple areas so it needed to be clear it meant other than the ones its in, which constitutes the battle area and breeding area

At this point I am quite certain you are just deliberately misunderstanding and trying to find new ways to misunderstand it because even the things you say contradict each other.

>>98760197
There are, but that's not what Alphamon wants you to be doing. Memory works like a number line with 0 in the middle, so when you spend more memory than you have your turn is supposed to end and your opponent starts their turn with that much memory. But your turn doesn't ACTUALLY end until you've finished processing whatever effects you triggered off of your last play, plus any End of Turn effects; so if your last play triggers an effect that lets you continue to pay memory to do things as part of the effect, you get to keep doing those things before the turn finally passes.

>>98760213
I see.

>>98760231
Ooh okay. That makes way more sense. I've been using the sim to learn the game with Vulcanusmon and I've been afraid to use too much memory so my opponent doesn't get much back in return.

File: ST15-12_webp.png (612 KB, 430x600)

612 KB PNG

>>98760230
>You keep misunderstanding what it says
>The "from under a card" isn't a separate clause, its the same fucking statement
>Its [when this would leave the battle area or from under a card] [overflow x], it isn't [when this leaves the battle area] or [from under a card] [overflow x], it was STILL talking about the battle area and the new version is STILL talking about the field
>Its the same fucking clause
>The from under a card is STILL talking about the battle area in the old version
All of this is wrong. It doesn't say "LEAVE the battle area," it says "MOVE FROM the battle area." It literally is [move from the battle area] or [move from under a card] because the cards literally said the word "MOVE FROM THE BATTLE AREA OR UNDER A CARD"

LOOK AT THE FUCKING CARD

Being put under a Tamer IS leaving the battlefield (try Astral Snatcher-ing a Galacticmon with Vemmon to burn and they can and always could stop it), and it never triggered overflow.

>Rosemon and Ceresmon fucking synergize
Plants have got to go

>>98760251
This is old ace rule.
And no, its [when this card would from the battle area or under a card] [to another area] [lose 4 memory]
It isn't moving to another area when its getting put under something or being played out
>Being put under a Tamer IS leaving the battlefield
battlefield isn't an area
and no, being put under a tamer isn't leaving the battle area

Exact same problem I described to you earlier.
You think overflow is talking about a digimon, it isn't
Overflow isn't an inheritable
Overflow doesn't care about the stack

Overflow is a rule for that INDIVIDUAL card.
When this CARD
this CARD
CARD

Not digimon

Overflow has NEVER triggered by being put under a tamer, tamers are IN the battle area.

It was changed to field SPECIFICALLY for yggdrasil so that when it tucks their turn doesn't immediately end by ace overflow because they have left the battle area, as the breeding area is not the battle area.

Are you so retarded that now you are trying to argue that tamers aren't in the battle area lmao?

>>98760284
>battlefield isn't an area
My bad, that was supposed to be Battle Area, my (very) old YGO programming is leaking out.

Anyway, other than that, no, you're still wrong. Being put under a Tamer or another Digimon is explicitly cited as "THAT CARD is considered to be removed from the field" in the current 4-7-7.

I fully understand there is a difference between a card and a Digimon, but that difference isn't relevant here, because wherever a Digimon moves, the card representing it moves, and when you "play" a digimon card, it moves from whatever area it's in (including "under" another card) to the battle area where it begins representing a Digimon (4-3-1: "Digi-Egg cards and Digimon cards placed on the field are treated as Digimon.")

anyone want to play a few games?

>>98760367
>Anyway, other than that, no, you're still wrong. Being put under a Tamer or another Digimon is explicitly cited as "THAT CARD is considered to be removed from the field" in the current 4-7-7.
Feel free to go ask another judge about this and get told you are retarded.
You are still pointing to the CRM talking about what constitutes a digimon and stacked cards, which is irrelevant to overflow.
>I fully understand there is a difference between a card and a Digimon,
No, you don't
Because you keep talking about rules relating to stacks of digimon, which are irrelevant to overflow, overflow isn't a digimon effect, overflow isn't an inheritable, overflow is a game rule talking about specific cards and their state.

>but that difference isn't relevant here,
Then stop fucking trying to point to rules about digimon stacks if you know this.
Which is why I keep saying that you don't understand, because you are just saying it isn't the case because the digimon leaves the battle area, but the digimon isn't fucking relevant, the card is.
Being put under a tamer means that DIGIMON leaves the battle area, which has nothing to do with overflow, which is why you don't overflow if the CARD gets put under a tamer, because overflow isn't tied to a digimon or anything to do with it, its tied to the CARD


Getting put under a tamer isn't the card leaving the battle area or the field.

>>98760443
>Example: When "[When
Digivolving] Place one of your opponent's level 3 or lower Digimon under another of your opponent's
Digimon as its bottom digivolution card or under an opponent's Tamer" is used to place a Digimon under a card, that card is considered to be removed from the field.

>>98760452
>digimon
We aren't talking about digimon
Didn't you say
>I fully understand there is a difference between a card and a Digimon, but that difference isn't relevant here
Seems like no, you don't understand the difference if you don't know the difference between a card and a digimon

retard

File: trashedcards.png (15 KB, 410x264)

15 KB PNG

>>98760452
You are literally quoting it from 4-7-7 where its saying the stack of cards are trashed (except the one representing it) when the digimon leave.
Which has nothing to do with an individual card being put under a tamer

Again, you don't understand the difference between a card and a digmon

Very simple solution to this problem, because you keep insisting it.
Go
Ask
Another
Judge

There are plenty of groups online you can ask questions to judges in
So go post, because I know you will not believe a ruling from me or a picture
So go Ask
Go ask what happens to an ace if it gets put under a tamer
Does it trigger overflow or not?

The answer is no, it doesn't
Because you don't understand

Unless your next post is a picture of the response
I accept your concession
Because you straight up can't even read

>>98760478
>where its saying the stack of cards are trashed (except the one representing it) when the digimon leave.
The example makes no mention of any cards under the Digimon being placed under another card. What other cards does "that card" in the example, that is being considered removed from the field, refer to when the example makes no mention of any cards beyond "a Digimon" and "a card (which that Digimon is being placed under?"

If this rule is irrelevant, then what IS the rule that dictates where a "card" that represents a Digimon goes when the Digimon is put under a Tamer, or any other card?

I accept your concession

File: Kishibe_rie.jpg (34 KB, 360x700)

34 KB JPG

>>98759796
Man, I wish there was more art of Rie Kishibe...
I wish there was an alt art of her ex-13 card

i dont get why the mame and ete stuff is so shit when they just printed all the TS trait stuff that played twice as many bodies with way better effects for half the cost and 4 layers of better protection

would is really rape the meta that hard if princemamemon could hit a second prince princemamemon? what's the point in a gamba deck if there's no big hit?

>>98730734
BT27 Hiroko implies we might be getting the Bancho DLC.

I will play the shit out of BanchoLilymon regardless of power level.

>>98761588
BT26 I meant.

File: HTi32vNacAAZ9eX.jpg (2.27 MB, 3539x4096)

2.27 MB JPG

Royal Knights:

- EX12 Omnimon
- BT13 Yggdrasil_7D6
- BT20 Alphamon
- BT23 Kentaurosmon
- P-186 Gallantmon
- BT23 Magnamon
- BT11 UlforceVeedramon
- AD1 LordKnightmon
- AD1 Dynasmon
- BT23 Examon
- BT23 Jesmon
- BT23 Gankoomon
- BT23 Craniamon
- BT13 Leopardmon

Demon Lords:

- EX10 Creepymon
- EX6 Ogudomon
- EX10 Belphemon: RM
- EX6 Lilithmon
- EX10 Lucemon: CM
- ST22 Barbamon
- EX6 Beelzemon
- EX5 Leviamon
- EX6 Gate of Deadly Sins

>>98761925
OOOOMMMMEEEEGGGAAAAA

>>98761925
>yet another waifumon tax

>>98761925
these random ass choices, many of which are already unplayable

>>98761925
The box and sleeves it comes with looks nice wish it came with a fucking playmat instead of a goddamn memory tracker and sleeve. This is literally a perfect opportunity for a fucking mat.
Its gonne be like 80 each wont it?

File: HTi5ICQbwAA9-jB[1].jpg (307 KB, 1166x972)

307 KB JPG

>>98762052
Of course it will.

>>98762052
A memory tracker is at least new
Or at least a proper one, not the shitty little cards or a hard plastic one that you can't store in anything.

We got one at the last nats with the looga + kazuchi, but if you didn't go to nats then well you wouldn't have one like this
Not that I have ever used it or want it, I have memory gauges printed on my playmats, but its still neat.

idk I have a lot of mats from stuff and I dislike that they use the smaller gauges for official mats.

File: HTi5ICSa4AAMkSp[1].jpg (302 KB, 1139x949)

302 KB JPG

>>98762245

>>98762248
I mean they gave us one during one of the older pban set (the one where all the protag digimon final forms are together) and i never used it once since the day i got it. That was like rears ago.

>>98759796
Any deck lists?

hurry up and make a single dual for a deck I care about
no amphimon does not count that card is whack as hell

Been using Saiyu Warriors and holy shit, why did people sleep on this when it came out in EX-12?
>Takutoumon shuts down a LOT of decks (including the superannoying G/P Savers) with the funny "attack me and I'll de-digivolve you twice and give you -6k DP after summoning a free blocker that will destroy itself whenever I'm targeted by an effect" effect
>Erlangmon bottom decks stuff every time something is played (either by its effect or after Takutoumon uses his), if he gets targeted then he can just shits out something underneath him, which will trigger the option, giving you another Lv 6 on the field
>Nezhamon closes games and can become effect immune
>If you have three JttW doods on the trash, then you can just shit out SeitenGokuwmon and attack for game if you're lucky enough
This is such a fun cohesive deck, can't wait for Shakamon

>>98759796
Gallanantonfag here, I have been brewing a few variations but im waiting for my cards to arrive. This is however what im leaning the most https://digimoncard.io/deck/ex13-gallantmon-166190
However I will throw out EX2 takato and anal boy for omni X and at least one x antibody. I feel like this is the best to lean into. Maybe one wargrowlX because of his inherit, however i feel this Gallantmon has a bigger failsafe if the otk doesnt work when you just have constant threat of warp over an OTK strategy.

>>98763534
Drop the old takato setters, add the gren red training and crimson blaze and ur good to go

>>98763427
Deck wasn't slept on, it's that Susan is that insane and TB has an easier time of turboing into him. You can use it with SW but you need slightly more setup to get anywhere near the same amount of value TB gets out of Susan.

>>98763793
Susanoo can literally attack after playing in TB, seiju its so inferior bc of that

>>98763809
You can attack with Susan in SW after being assembled, you need a level 4 with the egg underneath and a any of Sanzo's disciples in hand.

>>98763787
Uuu crimson blaze yess, good idea anon.

>>98763793
Honestly I don't think you need Susan in SW

>>98764258
Surely it's nice to have when the deck has so many "this/one of your Digimon may digivolve" effects.

>>98763427
It isn't slept on, its quite good.
The problem is that at the same time TB released, and lots of people played TB.
Do you know what deck loses very heavily to getting -18k'd? That's right, SW.

The meta has just been hostile to it if you want to play it competitively.
Great deck to play casually.

>>98754841
Ah yes, the most racist of Pokémon names to insult Chinese.
Ching Ling.
Incredible naming because it apparently sounds like a bell when we know those go jingle jingle. Fucking cunts, Xi will deal with them soon once he’s finished converting the idiot American leader.

>>98764258
>Supposed to be the main shambala guy
>Effect clearly favors TB more than SW

>>98764923
to be fair SW gets seitengokuu who is basically the same role and even more flexible in their deck
he's just not as strong, because hes a UR not a SEC I guess
SW can get susanoo out for cheap, but just at how high his cost is its difficult, while seiten does a similar thing and is way cheaper and thus more useable

SW has a different gameplan as well

>>98764923
I mean he's Susanoomon, not some-chink-war-godmon.

>>98764923
SW is owed like 4 different lvl7's. Just a matter of when do they finally get around to them.

>>98765226
I have no idea why you people are so convinced the mode changes are going to be level 7s (which would be able to digivolve off of any of the SW level 6s) and not level 6s that only digivolve off of their base forms (and level 5s).

Spoilers from Eggs: an evil version of Suzumon with tentacles and Suzumon evolution: a Growlmon with a sword.

File: Captura de pantalla 2026-(...).png (438 KB, 932x854)

438 KB PNG

Kill TS and every faggot that runs it with fucking hammers

>>98766033
Just delete it twice bro?
What's the big issue?

>>98766033
Have you tried to devolve him?

>>98766168
He can't,
No trashing stacked cards

So no dedigivolve, no source strip.

File: Salam Aleikum.mp4 (516 KB, 936x720)

516 KB MP4

>>98766033
No chaos degradation bro? Also Mastemon make him on kneel.

how tf do you niggers not know what jupiter does?
what are these posts

>>98766033
Ulforce has me worried that they'll be rolling out this "I WILL get to use my protection" protection to everything they want to be meta
Making source strip worse when it is already bad, instead of just protecting against DP- and DeDigivolve like a normal card would

>>98766291
delete twice kills ulforce

>>98766298
>delete twice kills ulforce
No anon, you must understand. Nobody can't defeat Ulforce, the face of the franchise and 1st bro of the Chadest google Tamers, Rina and Taichi.

>>98766338
idk man, if it dies to a single leviamon on evo its probably shit lmao

>>98766349
leviamon my beloved....

>>98766298
AeroVeedramon inherit unsuspends, so it's delete thrice
And if it unsuspends they can proc Rina to activate When Digivolving, and no doubt Succession Ulforce X will have a "when this Digimon unsuspends" effect just like Wrath Mode's All Turns working with Jupiter's protection

File: Protection B00BA.png (1.09 MB, 725x1011)

1.09 MB PNG

>>98766349
Anon, UlforceCHAD will keep Standing and raping you.

>>98766360
>>98766381
Only if he can unsuspend before I delete him the 2nd time...
You for example can't restand vs levia as its a single effect that deletes you twice.
Or any dual card that has an option side removal + on evo removal, like atratus, beelstar, jupiter, bacchus, etc or any that suspends/stuns then removes you, like rosemon, zephaga, diarabbit, etc
Or anything that double triggers to kill first, like titamon, or... well fuck a million cards actually but I can't think of too many examples off the top of my head that do it so cleanly by themselves

>effect just like Wrath Mode's All Turns working with Jupiter's protection
Yeah and he still dies to getting deleted twice the exact same lmao

>>98766403
Leviamon has always been a cancer card that somehow kept dodging the banlist
Dual Cards are unironically an awful decision but it's an unfortunate side effect of having so many Digimon that are just outright immune to everything nowadays
You're also forgetting that worst of TS is the swarm decks that are shitting out a million little dudes who will either redirect the destruction effects or grant the big guys extra layers of protection
On a vacuum yeah, Leviamon will pop most of everything
In an actual match? there's ten million little guys doing stuff and preventing you from attacking in the first place, and that Leviamon is dying next turn anyways because the new Kanan lets you play the "fuck you die" Jupitermon dual for basically free at turn end

>>98766403
Oh that's what you mean by delete twice
Sure

>>98766503
>Leviamon has always been a cancer card that somehow kept dodging the banlist
This is a weird thing to say.
>Dual Cards are unironically an awful decision
lmao
>"but levia would lose"
idk if ur just retarded
but I am not calling levia good
I am saying your protection is bad if you are dying to a single leviamon
Which is what jupiter and wrath mode do, which is what ulforce does
its weak protection
>On a vacuum yeah, Leviamon will pop most of everything
No, he fucking wont
He in fact kills very little
The things he kill have, say it again with me, weak protection

idk why ur getting hung up on leviamon when I used it as an example of a 2 year old card that single handedly annihilates your entire own its own
delete twice isn't a crazy removal effect
its just a lot of stacks have very weak protection right now
I am not even going to get into the fact you think "TS" is a deck and that bt24 jupiter and wrath mode are ran in this "TS" deck alongside kanan and other cards that are making bodies. Its just a pretty glaring lack of understanding on what different decks there are being played to try to argue this point on your part lmao

>>98766519
Well, I mean
What else would I mean by delete twice?
Not delete and then delete again, delete you twice

Ex13 survey is up

>>98766234
>Mastemon
The cope is insane.

File: file.png (337 KB, 437x437)

337 KB PNG

I may make examon since the new topend looks fun. What other cards besides that one OP option from outside this set do i need?

>>98768993
BT20 Draco and Dragon Gene
BT21 Draco X
BT23 Examon
BT3 Davis
Alexandrite Memory Boost

I've seen people include EX3 Slayerdramon but I think it is overkill. BT20 Groundramon also has a better suspend effect but no Fortitude so up to you

>>98769186
>15 dollars for those cards alone.
Fuck, sorry about wasting your time, ill just use that money elsewhere than anon. I shouldve bought them earlier.

>>98769248
yeah the price on bt23 exa shot up like crazy
He went from like $2 to $15 lol

File: file.png (9 KB, 390x180)

9 KB PNG

>>98769308
>yeah the price on bt23 exa shot up like crazy
Fuck, i didnt even know that. I mean everything else in the list besides the mem and exa. I already had 4 exas since i played alpha cs. Also apparently some also ran wingramon bt20.

>>98769370
Okay nevermind i bought the pieces. it ended up being 15 after some bs moving around. im looking forward to this deck because i love DNA decks.

>>98762052
>>98762245
>>98762249
Man hope next year we get a box for the pendulum decks and the field card and memory card get a new art...

>>98769553
>Pendulum P-Bandai set
I love the way you think anon, but let's be real. Bandai would sooner do 10 more Royal Knights/Adventure/Time Stranger/Waifu sets before they'd even bother.

File: customDeck (2).jpg (314 KB, 1350x705)

314 KB JPG

Redpill me on Cyborg/Invisimon deck?

what effects are they supposed to give to black cards when nothing has a play cost anymore and half of the game is immune to dedigivolve

>>98769890

>"if this effect didn't delete/de-digivolve, you may punch your opponent in the face instead"

what effects are they supposed to give to red blue yellow purple cards when nothing has a play cost anymore and half of the game is immune to delete/bouncing/stuns/dp minus/trash hate?

>>98769890
>Delete everything but your opponents highest play cost digimon
No play cost? Get deleted
>Delete your opponents highest play cost digimon or tamer
No play cost? Your tamers get sniped

Not to mention the taunt/blocker stuff and benefits for redirection that black has

Black also IS the immunity colour

any of you guys want to play a few games?

File: file.png (637 KB, 482x673)

637 KB PNG

In pure CS omni, how many of this is ran? i dont use matt tai in my build so i have room.

>>98770415
probably 4
since you want nokia in name to be able to do the 6 cost warps
maybe 3:3, but even 3 mem set:4 ex13 is very reasonable
I would run 6 or 7 nokia, either 2:4, 3:3, or 3:4

>>98770519
The problem is the cs nokia is way too good too, its hard as shit to settle on the ratios. Also fuck outta here with these seller selling it at 4 each for a R on release date.

>>98770564
I think what else you are running is important.
If you are running the eot attack matt and tai, then probably go down
If you are running alternative way to warp, then you don't need as many
but if you are CS maxxxing and running the CS omni as your main omni then yeah, you can just play more nokia

Personally I will be running alter-s as the main omni and ad01 as the secondary
Which means I will be running 3 matt & tai with eot attack
and I will be running dgos

but if you are more CS focused then you run more bt23 grey/garu to get nokias out rather than dgo
that means you now need to consider what you are doing with miraculous mega knight and if you run it and how many copies, since its security effect is basically turned off with no matt & tai
and you need to consider what egg to run, if you run the CS egg or koro and roughly how many draws

I think when you figure out what type of omnimon deck you want to play you will know the ratios for nokia pretty easily.
There are a lot of other questions you need to decide first before you need to worry about the number of nokias.

File: 1759588289406387.png (203 KB, 751x409)

203 KB PNG

>>98770519
>6 or 7