Ding Dong Bioware Is Dead EditionPrevious: >>98857159>Newshttps://magic.wizards.com/en/news/announcements/commander-banned-and-restricted-february-9-2026https://magic.wizards.com/en/news/announcements/commander-brackets-beta-update-february-9-2026>Current Banlisthttps://magic.wizards.com/en/banned-restricted-list#commander-banned>Bracket Informationhttps://files.catbox.moe/4tbvzw.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/r62yfy.png>Former Commander Website: Learn the basics, and read the format philosophy laid down by the rules committeehttps://mtgcommander.net>Card Searchhttps://scryfall.com>Card Statistics: See what everyone else puts in their Commander decks based on what is posted to the Internethttps://www.edhrec.com>Deck List Sites: You can search for decks that other people have made. Authors often have comments that explain their deck strategy and card choiceshttps://www.archidekt.comhttps://www.moxfield.com>Manabase Information: Find out what lands you can add to your deck, sorted by category, based on a chosen color identityhttps://managathering.com>Proxy Guidehttps://pastebin.com/9Xj1xLdM>Preconshttps://magicprecons.comTQ: what trek card caught your eye? bonus points you don't mention replicator
>>98862049>another UB spam thread
>>98862057you lost -ub fagback to your containment
>>98862049I'm honestly wondering if Sisko can be cedh viable as an alternative to Nick Fury. Doesn't immediately die to bowmasters and has abilities that might actually do something, even if it's just giving you bodies for cradle mana.
>>98862064since rogsi does the free commander for free spells thing better i can see mr. sisko being better than fury *provided that* there's a cedh that uses a lot of modal spells
They should make a coinciding Secret Lair drop for Trek season
>>98862069That's part of what makes me interested. He's 5 color slop, but with something that also can push the deckbuilding in a sort of unique direction. Test of Courage at least looks like it would make the cut.
>>98862076alan rickman getting in means we get a little bit closer to HP and i'm all for it
What should I take out for Smaug the Magnificent and The Sackville Bagginses?https://archidekt.com/decks/16689238/tax_evasion
>>98862078I'm tired of gimped witnesses
>>98862049>TQ: what trek card caught your eye?This is unironically going to be the best commander of the set
>>98862107oh damn I didn't realize it said EACH
>>98862096From what we've seen so far it'll probably be a mythic uncommon in limited. I would like it to be cheaper for constructed play, but I understand that if it was it would probably have a disgusting winrate in draft.
>>98862107>hey bro can i copy your homework>alright bro but dont make it obvious
>>98860542That San Fransisco land and the dude with the dog might finally make my Volo deck decent. Hope there is more stuff with that gimmick.
>>98862148https://moxfield.com/decks/yD8_ExIOJUKUE0QbK9bY9wr8 my volo
>>98862059which is the first one? Final fantasy?
>>98862251>FF>LotR>Avatar>Hobbit
>>98862254>Avatarwait for real?I thought Marvel sets were 3rd or 2nd place
>>98862079surely even the most jowling kowling rowling hater-pilled person can't deny that rickman put in a hell of a performance
What's a good Dimir commander and deck that really emphasizes the sneaky, gaslighting, deceptive nature of the guild?
>>98862309The Etratas are fun build-around Commanders.
>>98862309Unironically pic rel but he's in non-legal jail sadly.
>>98862309dee kay
>>98862376DONKEYKONGHE'S THE LEADER OF THE BUNCH
>>98862309If you really want to gaslight, use Silas Renn and then pick any random partner of colors you aren't even running in the deck.
>>98862049Mythic khan, as much as I hate Star Trek golgari food chain that can draw your deck is interesting.
>>98862107I notice the devs are starting to sneakily make "super sets" where they're dropping cards that are stupidly good for specific commanders every 1-2 sets after that Commander releases.
>>98862383OOOOOO BA-NA-NAH
getting ready for friday's commander at my lgs. I got some cards and made some tweaks according to the meta. Got more multicolor removal spells but reduced some protection cards. This is not an issue because there are rakdos/golgari decks lurking around in my lgs who use edict effects and -X/-X boardwipes instead of target/destroy effects.
>apparently casual format>every deck is a synergistic value engine
Thirty (30) starting life is objectively superior to fourty (40)
>>98862561is this rokirric anon? good luck, we're rooting for ya
>>98862561what's the point of running tocasia's welcome with only 8 creatures of 3cmc of less in your entire fucking deck?
Once again I am asking how to play Slivers but not as 5cgoodstuff.dek
>>98862590Play Rukarumel and name Vampires then run Grixis Slivampires
>>98862588too bad his commander doesn't create creatures with 0 cmc huh... it'd be really good if that were the case but I guess not
>>98862567Why should a casual deck be a usless fuck pile, anon? Can you answer me that?
>>98862608>the only two forms a deck can exist in is OTK or useless fuck pile
>>98862590The issue I can see with slivers is people get really worried when all your slivers are buffing each other. It can make you into a target. I have a shit bracket 2 sliver deck that uses Iron to give other people slivers too. But I give them the ones that give the global buffs and keep the ones that give player only buffs for myself. It's playing the politics game instead.
>>98862578>is this rokirric anon?Yes, it's me. I am trying to improve my deck since my goal right now is to get enough credits to buy an elspeth, storm slayer (some cards on my lgs can only be bought with store credits>>98862588>retarded people asking retarded questionsthe little fella on the left helps me with that
>>98862611Where or when did I say that a deck can only exist in two forms, anon? I'm literally only say that just because a deck is casual doesn't mean it can't have synergistic value engines that relate to its themes. Seems like you have brain worms.
