>>11847899Finally, some good fucking food
>>11847902Jada sucks ass
>>11847899Interesting, let's see how they look at SDCC.>>11847902Jada should make every domestic toy, quality wise, but that isn't feasible and they're just really slow, which not every licensor would be happy with. And plus, the others are catching up. Chronicles from Mattel are a few iterations from being just as good (they really need to work on the range of articulation), and at least personally I feel theyre at least as good as Jada's wave 1 SF. Hasbro can make good products, they just tend to rest on their laurels. The occasional hit from ML proves it. Some solid figures in Classified as well. I'm sure they could make good Zelda figures, just a matter of if they will.
>>11847902On one hand, they'd likely be better figures. On the other, you'd be waiting till 2028 for the first wave which wouldn't even include both Link and Zelda.
>>11847899Nice. I want to see Hasbro doing more collabs like this and Tomb Raider. I've collected a lot of different brands domestic and import and for some reason Hasbro figures remain my favorite. But with their current pricing, they need to step it up a little bit and standardize things like ball jointed hands, extra hands and heads, and toe hinges. Also their butterfly joints are rarely useful so some improvement in things like that would be good.
>>11847915Jada isn't fit to lick shit off Hasbro's ass.
>shilling for hasbro of all companies the fuck is wrong with you niggas
>>11847902If it was Jada you'd need to sleep 7 years just to deal waiting for wave 2.
>>11847899>Hasbro
>>11847899I love Zelda up to before Skyward Sword. Hated Hasbro since...fucking...forever after being burned on power rangers and the flaws of modern transformers. And wharever the hell they did with Tron. So fuck.
>>11847899I love my figmas but if this gets me a decent Hero of Time I am fucking in.>>11847902And have them take my entire lifetime just to do the seven sages? No thanks. I like Jada's products but I'm not the biggest fan of how slow they are.>>11847928>Their marvel figures are awfulReally? Cuz it's one of the most popular toy lines to ever exist. And no, it's not relying on name recognition from the ToyBiz days 20 fucking years ago. Hasbro has had the Marvel Legends license longer than ToyBiz has at this point.>star wars figures peg warm and arent that good.The figures themselves actually tend to be pretty good imo. It's just that Star Wars is a dead brand, that's why it rots, not because the toys are good or bad.Hasbro is fine for what it is and Jada is far too slow to keep up with a bigger license like Marvel. Get over yourself shill.
>>11847965>Jada>Kinda slowIt's been almost two years since they announced the 2nd wave and they still haven't even solicited it. They just now solicited Invincible figures from a season that came out more than a year and a half ago. Jada is so slow it makes Mafex seem fast.Like I said though, I am a fan of their products, the SF figures I have are really nice and the Cyberpunk 2077 figures are fantastic, I was initially on the fence about them but didn't regret my purchase when I got them in hand. Great figs. But I got them like a year ago now and they still haven't even solicited Rebecca. Shit's annoying.
Makes sense since they have the movie coming out, wouldn't want to leave a big merchandising opportunity like that to Jakks.
>>11847965>'m just gonna not by Hasbro's slop anyway because its overpriced and looks like shit with terrible bodiesGood for you, no one asked. >They are just retooling shitty old bucks with news heads and sometimes new boots or some shit for 30$.>dollar sign after the number.Ah, you're a smoothbrain. No wonder your opinions are so trash.
Official /emm ell pee/ epona with a little triforce brush confirmed
they're all gonna be actor likeness figures that look wrong
>>11847965You're a moron
>>11847928Legends, Classified, etc. All better than Jada.
>>11847928I don't follow marvel too closely so can't comment on that but their star wars figures are great when they don't half ass them or reuse molds. The hate boner for hasbro is so forced. Maybe not all their products are good because they often cheap out and cut corners but they are absolutely capable of making great figures and have done so many times. If you look at the sculptwork and how they do textures or overlay pieces, it's actually quite good and realistic and what everyone should be doing. Their joints are also a good balance of maintaining enough articulation without compromising aesthetic. I don't think you guys pay attention to things like that. I'm not sure what metrics you guys are using to call figures shit but it's probably something retarded and reflective of bad taste. Also on Jada, they are probably better in some regards but honestly it doesn't even matter. They do not put out enough product in a timely manner. There is absolutely no point in wishlisting things for Jada because they almost do not make toys at this point. Waiting for Jada to make X figure is about the same as waiting for god to perform a miracle so I'm not sure what is even the point of hoping for Jada to make something because you will never get it.
>>11847985As someone who is pretty critical of Jada, I wouldn't say that's the case. I'd say that currently engineered MLs and most Classifieds are on par with Jada figures. They're not better.
Jakks…betrayed…
>>11847957>if this gets me a decent Hero of Time I am fucking in.It'll probably just be movie tie-in stuff. Nintendo has made it pretty clear they have no interest in farming for nostalgia when it comes to action figures. They're just looking to put "CURRENT THING" on the pegs for more visibility. The partnership with Hasbro was probably just in the name of bigger production and distribution.
>>11847996A guy can hope, can't he?
>>11847996Crap I forgot about the movie...
You are all aware this is for the movie right
>>11847998Sure, but as the ol' saying goes: "Hope in one hand and shit in the other, and see which piles up faster.">>11848005The fact that the movie is live action automatically kills any possible enthusiasm I could have had for the toys. I don't want a Link figure with a shitty face-scult that looks like some gay actor. I just want Link.
Doesn't sound like they're talking about the movie or at least not solely the movie.>PAWTUCKET, R.I.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Hasbro, a leading games, IP and toy company, today announced a new licensing partnership with Nintendo to create products based on the popular Legend of Zelda franchise. This multi-year collaboration is set to begin in 2027, starting with the first reveals of three 6" scale figures at San Diego Comic Con (July 23-26, 2026).>“For decades, The Legend of Zelda franchise has captivated fans through its deep lore, unforgettable characters and enduring sense of discovery,” said Billy Lagor, President Toys and Board Games at Hasbro. “By combining Nintendo’s iconic storytelling with Hasbro’s leadership in action and role-play, we’re delivering toys that invite fans to play, explore and forge their own epic adventures.”>Ever since its first title, released in the US in 1987, the Legend of Zelda series has mixed exploration and discovery with action and adventure. Link and Zelda’s eternal battle against Ganondorf forms the centerpiece of these epic tales from the world of Hyrule.
Wow, did Jakks piss Nintendo off or something?
>>11848015No. Jakks just sucks and Nintendo is trying to expand their market.
>>11848018Fine with me. Jakks’ stuff is fine for the price, but damn are they lazy with Nintendo’s stuff outside Mario. Even their Sega line has more variety, and that’s still 80% Sonic.
>three figuresLink Zelda and Ganondorf, I’m sure.
>>11847899Has to, give me a Zelda/Transformers crossover and I'll be happy.
Jada’s SF line is incredible but they don’t have the production power Hasblow has. It makes sense. The Zelda movie is going to suck shit. I still can’t believe they didn’t just opt for another Illumination “make lousy cg movie, collect $1 billion” thing.
>>11848032Mach Kick-styled Epona would be awesome
>>11848032Dodongo Transformer please.
>>11848022I doubt that's Jakks' fault. Nintendo likely has the final say on what they produce.>>11848032If this happened, I wonder how they'd approach it. The more lucrative choice would be to make organic beastformers out of the animals/monsters/bosses of the series, but I feel like Hasbro doesn't think organic beastformers fit the brand's image, at least not for a crossover.Sadly, there aren't many machines or vehicles in the Zelda series. The coolest thing they could do, I think, is make a Spirit Tracks transformer with a train alt mode that transforms into something that looks like the spirit armor that Zelda posesses, and comes with a little Link mini-figure in scale, but they never get that creative with the crossover shit. It's always basic bitch trash for maximum marketability. The best we could hope for would be a Hylian shield that transforms into a really shitty Link, or something.
>>11848049Then let’s hope Hasbro is given more free rein with Zelda. Like, nothing off limits. Except maybe the CDi games, heh.Oh, and an accurately sized Ocarina of Time. Role play toy that plays music, is a Transformer, whatever.
>>11848051>Oh, and an accurately sized Ocarina of Time. Role play toy that plays music, is a Transformer, whatever.That sounds fucking awful. But it's exactly what would happen because crossover shit usually sucks. Just a mess of plastic that's obviously two licenses at once to stick on a shelf and forget about. Yawn.I'm a long-time Transformer fan, and it's an issue plaguing the franchise for a while; nobody actually wants a good Transformer. They want a recognizable character that arbitrarily has another form that may or may not be total shit. There's no balance or appeal anymore. The entire "transformation" aspect feels like it's become a formality.
Hopefully they're putting some effort into these figures. I need some OOT 6 scale figs.
>>11848077Fuck off AI slopper
>>11847993Wrong. They're better. Jada is trash and always has been.
>>11847899So the Voltron, Zelda, and Street Fighter lines are all going to suck arent they?
>>11848005>>11848006>>11848013It’s for sure more than the movie. Keep in mind, there’s a remake of Ocarina of Time coming out.>>11848015Hasbro probably made a better offer and is a bigger company.
>>11847899They better not be shitty movie figures. Classic or no buy.
>>11848013I wouldnt put it past them to double dip if the movie sells enough toys.
>>11848056Okay, just the role play one then. They did great with the Matrix.
>>11847994Atleast they still have Sonic. Mario may be in doubt unfortunatelt.
>>11848097I hope they still have Sega in general. But WalMart fucked them over so bad...
>>11848088Nope
>>11848098Sonic sales are atleast strong. Maybe they'll get a second wind once the non-sonic sega films see release?
>>11848108I'll take that as a yes
>>11848112That'd be nice. I still want a NiGHTS toy. Or Vectorman, if possible.
Blokees Zelda when. After everything hasbro ends up with Blokees too
>>11848122Hasbro is doing their own Blokees equivalent soon.
>>11848123And Blokees is doing a transformers One animated series with the toys. Im sure hasbro basically loves them at this point
>>11848122Blokees are trash though
>>11848126They do, but apparently they fear the money Blokees is making enough to crate their own equivalent called "Makits".https://news.tfw2005.com/2026/05/27/hasbro-files-trademark-for-new-in-house-model-kit-line-564849
>>11847899pretty good choice, they have a handful of characters and that fits Hasbro's strategy of rehashing a line every couple years
>>11848013that's why Jakks pivoted to donkey kong i guess
>>11847972the Sonic movie figures were great, they sold a lot of those, they missed out on the first movie though
This is cool and all but it isn't going to mean squat if we don't get SOME FUCKING ENEMIES. I am tired of having a collection that is just various Links and Zeldas with a couple of Ganons. Give me some God damn Bokoblins, Dark Nuts, Octoroks, Lizalfos, etc. I want to actually build out the world.
>>11848166Sexy Rito or bust
>Hasbro
>>11848171Kill yourself, furfag newcancer.
>>11847899What would their Zelda Haslab be? OOT Ganon?
>>11847899Im guessing itll be of the gay movie coming up
>>11848235Great Deku Tree? Jabu Jabu? The Wind Fish?
>>11848244>The Wind Fish?Nothing this cool will ever happen.
>>11847899Wow.
>>11848032>>11848035>>11848036>>11848049Have you seen the Autobot emblem that turns into Optimus? Imagine that but with a Triforce that separates into robotic versions of Zelda, Link and Ganondorf. Three triangles that look exactly the same but with completely different transformations. As a novelty it would be cool, at least to me.
>>11848244I can see Jabu-Jabu being the next big Lego set.
With the remake of OOT coming I'm slightly optimistic that they'll finally make figures of those designs, but I'm expecting it to be nothing but nu-Zelda slop and the shitty movie coming whenever
>>11848222Your tears are delicious
>>11847899Since I doubt we'll get anything better, hopefully they make an OoT Ganondorf figure. I would have much rather it been Jada, Storm Arena, or anyone that makes halfway decent figures. Unless this will be GI Joe tier team and not Marvel/Transformers.
One would think that with how big Zelda is, and how strict Nintendo can be, they'll put their best men on this.
>>11848235expensive roleplay items like a Ganon staff, master sword/shield, robosen sentient ornery chicken drone
>6"Gaaaaaaaaay. They better think about doing a 4" line too that could actually be supported with things like playsets, large figures of bosses, and army builder sets of enemies.
If it's just nuOOT cross promotion, I'm gonna be bummed.
Why does Hasbro keep making figures for soulless remake slop when it's guaranteed to lose money and go straight into the ross/ollies bins? That has been the fate of Star Wars and Marvel Disney+ shit, Indiana Jones, Dungeons and Dragons, etc. and will be the fate of Street Fighter and Zelda live action. At least they didn't bother with Tron Ares but they could be getting actually good IP instead of wasting time and money on this stuff.
Didn't scott neitlich toy guru say legend of zelda toys dont sell and only mario and sonic is what children want?
>>11848320How would he know? All we've ever had is a Link figure and a Zelda, both from Jakks.
>>11848321video games are escapist fantasy and enjoyers of those franchise usually prefer prop replicas or cosplay, why would they want dolls when they have a switch and can escape into a digital screen and watch an adventure unfold with their control
>>11848324You can say all that about Sonic and Mario, too.
>>11847899So, what's going to happen with Jakks?
>>11848328They keep milking Mario and whatever other Nintendo IPs they have. Unless the Mario Galaxy Movie toys bombed.
>>11847899Zelda toys? so just Zelda? what is the agreement?
>>11848328they're jakking off
>>11847909literally all collectors disagree
>>11848472Literally you're wrong
>>11848333He's the main character so it would make sense to just make figures of him
>>11847969When you grow up, you will acquire the gift of patience and you'll be rewarded bit a good collection of figures, trust me. Unless you have a terminal disease, if so, sorry to hear that.
>>11847978THIS
>>11848134>"Mah kits!"Sound like shit
>>11848472Literally true
>>11848560I think its supposed to sound like "Make it".
>retards think it's for anything other than the movie
>>11848564Literally wrong
>>11848598They already said it is
>>11847899I'm pretty happy with the figmas of the newer games, but if they do figures of the classic games like OOT or the NES original they have my unconditional support.
>>11848505They're slow, they lose money because I lose interest and I gain money by not buying from a slow company I don't care about anymore. Cool business stragedgy.
>>11847899>Its should have been Jada.it still could, because licenses usually exist in a couple of forms: childrens toys, collector toys, and then further subdivided by 1:12 scale, 1:18 scale, 3.75" scale, 1:24 scale, and so on.IT's how Fortnite exists in 1:12, 1:10, and 1:18 scale by two different companies.Overwatch had similar releases too. figma and Hasbro both released Overwatch figures in North America and they were both in 1:12 scale.
>>11848707Nobody is going to buy Jada crap. They aren't getting it, at all, ever.
>>11848628Artbros, what is this type of heavy shading called?
>>11848731Heavy shading
>>11848714funny how there is always some bitter faggot that looks at brands making quality + worth and then decides to try shit on them for no reason other than pure bitterness
>>11848751>brands making quality + worthWe know you aren't talking about Jada
>>11848754All the Jada figures I've bought have been worth the price. No they're not some high end import, but they're totally fine for what they are. What makes them so awful to you, honestly?
>>11848707If hasbro focuses on 6 inch Zelda what would even be left for Jada? Assuming these arent tied to the Sony film I mean.
>>118487776" still, because collector market toys are seperate from kid toys.This is how DCD was able the Icons line while Mattel was making their DC stuff.SAme with Figma Overwatch at same time as HAsbro's OVerwatch line.Most of the time 1:10 scale is done for collector lines, because of the cost factor. Collector lines sell fewer toys than kids toys, so the cost will increase. So a toy company like NECA or Diamond Select increased the scale to 1:10 to make it feel like you're getting more bang for your buck, but that 1inch difference is almost neglibible in actual costs.OF course, McFarlane started doing 1:10 for the DC children's line too, because he wanted to stand out from Mattel's old trash. Cost him next to nothing to increase that scale.Basically, the license can be pretty general and can be as specific as they want, in order to milk it for all its worth. so unless Hasbro is paying for both the collector and children's toy license across multiple scales, other toy companies can cash in too.
>>11848731Cal arts shading
>>11848751>>11848772Ignore Neca/hasbrofag he's crying with impotent rage because deep inside he already knows these companies are utter trash and Jada mogs them hard, so the only think he can do is spam shit to pretend there are multiple losers hating on Jada, sad isn't it?
Give me what I want, Hasbro
>>11848077You will get THIS link (adult or child) or NOTHING.
>>11848888Fucking site, keep the pic.
>>11848888CHECKED and BASEDToonFAGGOTS get ye gone, your reign of soulless cancer is OVER
honestly Hasbro should have all the tendie and capcom licenses. at least they would put out stuff on time and complete a team or two. hope it's video game stuff and not just movie shit.also Storm does better looking figures than jada. get fucked.
>>11848912>Hasbro should have all the tendie and capcom licenses>Storm does better looking figuresSorry, Hunter Schafer wasn't cast as Princess Zelda, so neither of those companies are the best choice.
>>11848869Jadafags like you are the worst thing to happen to this board, holy shit.
>>11848959honestly bubby, it's frankly embarrassing we gotta put up with you hasfag loyalists putting up with the sloppy shits hasblow craps out that you continually gobble up like a good little piggie
>>11848098Fuck those sega toys were so damn nice, even the dwarf guy was great. My first were beast broke but I think it's shoulder was messed up from the beginning since I don't break toys.
>>11848870>>well excuuuuuuuuuuuuuuse me princessthat's my Link.
I bet there will be something dumb online that causes everyone to pay attention to these getting made and calling the fans that buy them creepy men
>>11848656Gonna have a hill to climb to be better than most of the figma Link releases, but we'll see. Hopefully they release some mobs.
>>11848961Jadafag crying: the Post
Juhn would refuse to make Zelda because he's a short Asian queer
>>11848777I wouldn't be surprised if Nintendo gave the license to multiple companies; it seems quite rare for a license to be exclusive to one company these days.I'd like to see Jada Zelda stuff, I have their Cammy and Chun-Li and they're great, but Hasbro can make decent figures. As long as the line is closer in quality to Classified than Marvel Legends or Black Series we should be in for a treat. I'd absolutely buy an OoT/MM Young Link.
>>11849047>like to see Jada Zelda stuff, I have their Cammy and Chun-Li and they're great, but Hasbro can make decent figures. As long as the line is closer in quality to Classified than Marvel Legends or Black Series we should be in for a treat. I'd absolutely buy an OoT/MM Younglive action slop is lame and Hasbro have no competent sculptors. You do realize the toys will be based on the movie designs and be based on actual children?
>>11849050We'll see; Even assuming it is for the movie if the line does well there's a high chance they may do the games later.
>>11847909If the Zelda figures turn out like the Dungeons and Dragons figures did a couple of years y, don't expect good things now.
>>11848932Kojima wept
>>11849050So many stupid, wrong things in one post
>>11849061>honestly hasbro has it in the bag with how kino those classifieds and marvel legends have been holy fucking shit
>>11849050>Hasbro have no competent sculptorsThis proves you don't know anything about toys and aren't worth taking seriously.
>>11848551I mean, I have patience, but there's a limit to it. Like I said, I'm willing to wait for Mafex releases, but I don't view Jada as import quality. I don't see the point in an endless wait for what is essentially a good Hasbro figure.
>>11849074Post your toys
>>11847986>The hate boner for hasbro is so forcedIt's because you have a handful of incredibly vocal retards that parrot the same non-arguments over and over again and act like their personal opinion should be the be all, end all doctrine on how toys are made. It's really annoying and it isn't convincing anyone to not buy Hasbro figures.
>>11849083Try liking Playmates.
>>11849054Zelda has way more appeal (read: more buyers) than DnD.
>>11849084I just... Can't though, even if I want to. I was looking at their new Power Rangers collectors line, I initially was going to grab Gold Ranger since he's my favorite Ranger design, and maybe the rest of the team if I liked the figure but upon closer inspection I changed my mind. Minimal paint, pinned joints, and non photoreal heads. In the year of our lord two thousand and twenty six? I get they're only $20 and that's kind of steal in today's market, but the problem is, they look $7 cheaper than the average domestic figure.
>>11849089They would be less than 20 if it wasn’t for…reasons. Playmates is usually fine for what they cost.
>>11849084Playmates is pretty shit though, and you are a giant faggot, Boco.
>>11847957>Cuz it's one of the most popular toy lines to ever exist.That's because they're the only company that produces tons of marvel figures. If you want some niche characters like dazzler, your only option is marvel legends. There's no competition.
>>11849128Well, you're half right.
>>11849130Also they're genuinely good figures
>>11849138Uhmmm it depends
>>11849130If that were true, then something like DC should be just as succsesful based on the name brand alone, oh wait, how many times has the DC license shifted in the past 10 years? Exactly. Like it or not lil bro, Hasbro makes fine products.>>11849149Blokees sucks and the more you shill it the less likely I'll be to actually go buy one.
>>11848959>>11849028I'm not the anon you're replying to, I'm >>11848772I genuinely want to know what's bad about them since the few I've bought have been great for not being an import line. Are there issues I don't know about? If so I'd like to know them.
>>11849177I mean that's annoying sure but I don't mind waiting, and usually don't care about repaints. Even if those did bother me I don't think I'd consider them terrible. What about the actual figures do you dislike?
>>11849183>but I don't mind waitingAutism
>>11848258>a Triforce that separates into robotic versions of Zelda, Link and Ganondorf.Exactly the kind of performative bullshit I have zero interest in. Sounds awful. 1/10, would not buy.>As a novelty it would be cool, at least to me.So, a box set of three figures, you'd be looking at a price tag of $90, at least. Probably easily over 100, though, taking the license tax into account. Over 100 bucks for a trio of "novelty" figures that transform into fucking triangles?This is exactly what's wrong with toys. Too many of you faggots are just collectors. You don't care about a cool/fun toy that's well engineered or designed. You have no sense of style or creativity. You just want a thing you recognize to stick on a shelf to make up for your horrid lack of personality. Fucking hell, no wonder this board sucks.
>>11849177>already locked exclusive repaints to SDCCI'd hate if Hasbro locked figures I wanted to SDCC.Oh wait. They do that nearly every fucking year. Waited years for them to reissue BaF Sauron as a deluxe like they had done with so many BaFs recently, and they lock it to a 3 pack AND make it a SDCC exclusive.
>>11849173blah blah blah, hasblow this, hasblow that. Get some new material, it's getting stale at this point.
>>11849216When toys hit Ross it's not due to them being good or bad figures, it's whether or not people cared enough about the character to buy them. /toy/ is in the minority that they buy figures based on whichever is the objectively best bang for your buck, whereas everyone else just wants little plastic effigys of their favorite characters. Zelda is pretty popular, even moreso with the new OoT remake and movie along the way. DnD isn't nearly as relevant in the cultural zeitgeist as Zelda.
>>11849208>hasblow would sell Epona in pieces like the scam artists they areNah, Link with Epona will be a Pulse exclusive that you need to pay a subscription just to have a chance to buy it. And then they will cancel your order without telling you and claim you cancelled it. You still want Epona? All good, we increased the price after we cancelled your order. Pay up, paypig.
>>11849171It's like your argument is entirely off topic. Try to re-read the post, rajesh.
Why do hasfags constantly dickride the company despite it raising prices multiple times a year while giving them less and worse products?
>>11849293they're the toy equivalent of blizzfags or disney adults at this point, wholly unsurprising
>>11849293>Figure in 2019 costs $20>Reissues same figure in 2026 for $28>Put falcon's wings as a BAF>A two pack costs more than buying two separate figures for no reason>Jew rubbing hands.jpg
>>11849293Spoken like someone who knows absolutely nothing
>>11849293Same reason a certain shitposter will lose his mind over the existence of Elmo. Remember that thread where an anon asked when a brand doing Sesame Street figures would do Elmo and he had a melty?
>>11849349Ohhh, you mean a thing that doesn't actually happen but you keep pushing because...you're psychotic I guess? Weird. You're very weird.
>>11849208BaF is a thing of the past man
>>11849363Why does Elmo being the most popular Sesame Street muppet upset you so?
>>11849367Why do you lie so much?
>>11849371Answer the question, bitchboy. Why does the idea of Elmo being a popular character whose toys sell make you so angry?
>>11849376Wow, so aggressive. Is that what happens when your made up stories don't line up with reality?
>>11849257Depends if the movie turns out to be good. The first Mario movie was popular and people ate up merch from it.>>11849293You act like Hasbro is the only one doing it. You act like toys are the only ones doing it. Shut the fuck up already. Everyone is raising prices across the board, everyone is cutting corners, everyone is offering less for more money. Like the other dude said, the Hasbro hate is so forced it's getting embarassing.
>>11849376You need to calm down
>>11848013probably got the master license
>>11849379>>11849382>calling others angry>when xhe starts screaming with rage when someone asks why NECA is so incompetent they haven't made Elmo, the most popular Sesame Street muppet
>>11849392Are you have a delusional episode right now? Should you go to the hospital or something?
>>11849402No, but maybe you should? This anger over toys can't be good for your blood pressure. Don't let it go to your head!
Hasbro will do better than anyone else who had the zelda license before. which is to say nobody. this might as well be the first Zelda toyline ever.
>>11849039Stop confusing Zelda with Link, bitch
>>11847941>>11847899+We get the full cast-Gummy joints like what Overwatch had+Designs are great-But it's all movie shit
>>11849412>>11849392You need to get back on your meds
>>11849293they're battered wives
>>11849425figma was a million years ago. hasbro has good release schedules and will actually release on time.plus a solid character selection. I can only image Jada's take on Zelda wave 1Toon LinkBOTW ZeldaGoronall set to release august 2032
>>11849186I'm just talking as far as the quality of their figures go. Is there something in their design that makes them bad? Because the ones I have have all posed and looked fine. If people hate them for how long they take to release stuff and omitting characters, ok, but as far as the actual products go I find them to be perfectly fine. Which is what I personally care about.
>>11849434>MidnaZelda would get made, so can we please stop pretending that Midna is anything more than maybe wave 4 material? I don't care how much you might like her, she isn't important in the grand scheme and from a currently irrelevant game.
>>11849208That was reuse of a mold from 1992.
Hasbro Link gonna be like
>>11849755Kek, true
>>11847899Legit would love it if we got American Link from the Super Mario Brothers Super Show.
>>11849200What is cool is different for each person. When I was a kid there were robots that turned into letters, and I thought it was fun. I also think a transforming triforce would be cool. Don't speak for everyone.
>>11849777We probably will if they do a classics wave. OoT Link (Soul Calibur Loadout), TP Link (darker colors of OoT mold, with static Midna Imp) new OoTR Link (chase), Cartoon Link, Cartoon CD-I merchant fat guy, Cartoon Ganon BAF.If we get any females it'll be OoTR impa+Sheik in a two pack.Epona will come with a TOTK/BOTW Link in a special set.Sidon might be done but all Zora are gonna have terrible articulation and heavy heads.Any transforming figures are gonna be Ganondorf, Mineru or Gorons, but probably nothing beyond a "Crossover Transformer", crap shoot between it being an OC made to be a companion or a Link/Wolf.
>>11848472Lmao evenJada makes decent toys, they don’t make collectibles. They are better than ML and McF but it’s not a high standard at all. Jada is what ML should have been, but you will always be stuck with them barely making any improvements because """nobody else makes this character that appeared in the corner of the page of this limited run Burger King special""" and you still give them money. Hasbro Zelda will suck ass, screencap this
>>11849864Lil bro is mad that people are more invested in a character than whether or not a knee can Ben slightly farther. Sorry butt munch, but people buy figures for the characters. Most people don't care if some random character from a franchise they don't even like can crouch forward another two degrees than the figure of the character they like can. You lil guys always try to nitpick and bitch and moan about every possible tiny fault in something just because the brand on the package is one you don't like, when meanwhile you shill another product that is practically the same because it has a company logo you support on the package. The company wars thing is so gay. I buy from a , multitude of companies, Hasbro and Jada included. I feel like most people do this and only the hyper autistic are the ones who draw this line in the sand. Get over yourself. No one cares whether or not you're going to buy a product or not. No one here even cares what your name is let alone what toys you're going to buy. Just buy what you like and shut the fuck up already.
>>11849869Lil bro, I do exactly the same as you, I buy what I like from different brands, I have no loyalty to any of them and I couldn’t care less what others buy. But in my experience even the best ML (Mvc Cable, 2pack Sabretooth) were disappointing, Jada was disappointing, I don’t want a crappy figure of a character I like vs not having one at all, but you do you
>>11849877You sound like you don't have a lot of experience because while Cable is pretty good, Sabertooth is an incredibly mid figure. Take a look at Maximum Thor if you want their best output. Or something from GI Joe Classifieds. The problem ML has is it's been around forever and so they reuse old molds in order to get the higher character count. Which is the main seller, character selection. MLs engineered within the past few years are pretty stellar. The new Dark Hawkeye is using a newer articulation setup and it's actually quite nice, on par with any of the Jada figs I own. Honestly maybe try being more realistic with your expectations for $25ish mass market action figures. I mean, we aren't talking about like McFarlane or Playmates or something.
>>11849899>>11849899>reuse antique molds constantly, but character selection, man!>overpay for """maximum""" to get something remotely decent, bro!>pretty stellar, on par with Jada (which is mid)>try to be realistic for 25usd mass market figuresCoping this hard, jfc. It’s ok to like shit toys, but calling them stellar, I don’t know how you can sit with the amount of assfucking you get from hasbro
>>11849899I don’t have a lot of experience with ML, because the experience I had deferred me from buying more. Do you just keep buying stuff after being disappointed again and again? What are the stellar releases you’re talking about? I’m not interested in Thor or Hawkeye as characters though, and I doubt they fix the stuff I don’t like about ML. The materials, the way they feel, the finish, the paint apps, the sculpt, the articulation, the joints, the accessories etc. Plenty of people feel differently, it’s ok. Like I said, the argument that they are $25 figures simply confirms that they are cheap toys, not collectibles. I would rather spend 4x and have one good figure than 4 I don’t really like, but again, you do you
>>11849907Why even reply if you don't have an actual argument?>>11849915>Do you just keep buying stuff after being disappointed again and again?No? Honestly, there are very few times I get an ML where I am outright disappointed with it. Sure they all have their faults here and there, everything does, but I don't really get outright disappointed or frustrated with an ML. And I don't just love everything that crosses my desk. I don't buy McFarlane figures because 9/10 I am actually disappointed with what I got for various reasons, even though I like DC. >What are the stellar releases you’re talking about?I gave you two very recent examples with the new Dark Hawkeye and Max Thor. >I’m not interested in Thor or Hawkeye as characters thoughThat's fine, I was just listing them since they were recently releases and they were both very good releases.>and I doubt they fix the stuff I don’t like about MLAnd how exactly would you even know that if you don't try or at least look at them? I can tell you the articulation scheme is pretty different on those two figures compared to the ones you listed. >The materials, the way they feel, the finish, the paint apps, the sculpt, the articulation, the joints, the accessories etc.I mean, what exactly are you looking for in a domestic toy company because based on this critera, none of them meet your expectations. Hell, I'd argue even some imports don't meet your criteria. > I would rather spend 4x and have one good figure than 4 I don’t really like, but again, you do youAnd what are these amazing toys your supposedly buying exactly? Because from the sound of it, it's not a Mafex figure, not a SHF, nor even an Amazing Yamaguchi. So what exactly do you consider to be an acceptable quality toy? I'm really interested to know where these standards you have are coming from.
>>11849849Nintendo will never ever allow any CDi anything to happen. A third party MIGHT at some point do the Merchant but that's a fat fucking chance
>>11849949Americans are behind the 3p Chinese companies to begin with
>>11849877>>11849907>>11849915Don't bother arguing with them, dudes. It's like expecting a pajeet knowing how to use the toilet. It's useless.
>>11849918>>11849918That Hawkeye still has a waist swivel, man. Btw I really like the sculpt and paint of many ToyBiz legends, don’t own any, but there’s that. Not a full list of figures I own and like, but some examples: Mafex The Dark Knight Returns Batman, Terminator, Robocop, DD, comic Iron Man, MandoSHF LSS Goku and FP Frieza, random Kamen Riders, Movie realisation Stormtrooper Samurai, Deadpool2, Indiana JonesStorm Arena all SF figs, Storm Co SF2 ZangiefFigma Samus Metroid Prime and Other M, TotK and Skyward Sword Link, 2BNendo Kirby, Spongebob, PatrickNeca (!) Mirage Turtles and SF4 RyuSexyIce all dudesXcocann Chun-LiAcid Rain 6inch dudesInart Bale BatmanLpzz DeathstrokeRevo NG2, Harley (both Isekai and the older one), Juri, MazingerThreezero Mega ManNo figure will ever hit all of my criteria, but I am willing to look past some, like Neca Ryu is an old-ass figure, the joints are objectively ugly, but the sculpt and paint make up for it. I have some ML and BS and Jada and I just don’t see that
>>11849959>That Hawkeye still has a waist swivel, man.So? It also has a ball torso. Not having a ball waist doesn't make a figure bad anon. > Btw I really like the sculpt and paint of many ToyBiz legendsFor real? Those things looked dated back in 2005. You kinda have shit taste anon.>I have some ML and BS and Jada and I just don’t see thatSounds like you either need better eyes or should just stick with statues.
>>11849959You honestly think the left looks better than the right? You're crazy!
>>11849971I said many, not all, this one looks bad. I like ToyBiz Iron Man for example. Yes it has gorilla arms and all, but it has so much more soul than anything hasbro has produced so far. But whatever man, if I failed to impress a random guy on the internet with my taste in action figures, I will just cry myself to sleep like every other day
>>11849996>soulThis is just code for "your opinion". I think that nearly all of them, gorilla Iron Man included, looked bad when they were released, and look even worse today. I'm just saying, it's hard to follow your logic when you have the opinions you do. I mean you do you, but you don't need to whine about a toyline you barely even collect. It's annoying.
>>11848049Still jakks has been disappointing lately across the board like I don’t care for movie figures and that feels like that’s all they release now
>>11848098Is that why they barely release anything anymore like a few years ago jakks was on top of their game now it’s just a wave of Mario or sonic movie toys a year
>>11850009I blame Walmart. As usual.
>>11848077That actually looks really nice. The chainmail is the only thing that doesn't belong.
>>11850179It's AI slop
>>11847899>>11847901We're in good hands
>>11849947The meme fat guy might happen, especially if they do a classics wave.
>>11850377We're in good knees
I want an official Midna figure…
>>11847957>gets Hero of Time figure>face looks like this
>>11850621
>>118504995POA pack in with Wolf Link only, complete with heavy soft plastic hair "arm" and full fused shadow parts.Double standard figure price, plus retailer exclusivity surcharge.
>>11850621I will never understand someone who says they like these better than Modern Hasbro MLs. ToyBiz was sure a wild ride.
>>11850621lol wtf
Anyone that's actually followed Hasbro for a decent amount of time will know their budgets and quality steadily rose until it peaked in 2009, and after that they have been cutting costs and raising prices ever since. Every new year of transformers is worst than the last.
Nintendo isn't going to let a toy company reveal the designs of the new movie a year in advance that they've kept secret until this point. OOT remake comes out November so its more likely this will be the main trio (young link, young Zelda, ganondorf) as a mini line that will ship early next year. I think they would be more comfortable with spoiling the designs for a remake instead of a brand new project. This will serve as the classic representation for the toys, even if its still a departure design wise. Next year they will have a larger movie tie-in line that includes 6 inch and smaller budget figures. They will save adult link for the movie line because young link won't be in it.
>>11850824>that they've kept secret until this pointAnon Nintendo themselves released official photos at the start of filming. They will most likely be game related figures tho.
>>11850830We haven't received official film stills yet. These are all set photos.
>>11850621that fucking spidey makes me laugh every time
>>11850833NTA, but his point was, they're not exactly keeping the movie designs a tight secret, since they've released set photos showing the costumes.
>>11847899The movie lol
>>11850901It's still going to be game shit. It's too early for movie toys. Comic con is a collector event.
>>11850942That's probably true, but not the original point of contention. But whatever anon.
>>11850945The original point is that Nintendo isnt going to let a toy company reveal anything before they've even released a trailer for the movie.
>>11850964If you insist bud
>>11850966You don't need to insist on the truth.
>>11850830still crazy to me they used hot people that no one have ever seen before, very not current year.
>>11850996Probably because Nintendo is Japanese. Japs are (on average) less susceptible to western globo homo.
>>11850996Twitter was pushing for that one tranny to play Zelda for a while.
>>11850258>It's AI slopI know, but it still looks good.
>>11850830>link staring at Zelda’s assMah boy…
>>11850996>these are "hot people" in 2026We're cooked. You guys would have lost your shit if you saw how attractive the cast for even a garbage romantic comedy was in the 90s. And then the script would be written to force them to get naked and/or show off their ass.
>>11850964>before they've even released a trailer for the movie.My prediction is that Nintendo is going to schedule a "Zelda Direct" around SDCC and show off both the first teaser for the movie, as well as a gameplay trailer for OoT remake.
>>11851143Kojima>>11851188didn't happen though (cuz no Kojima)>>11851429subjective
>>11851429She looks a bit like young Mena Suvari before she hit the wall. Maybe with a hint of Katie Holmes? I don't know, but she is objectively pretty.I don't know about the actor playing Link's attractiveness because I'm not gay, but if you say he isn't hot, I'll take your word for it.
>>11851497>Mena Suvarigod you people have shit taste
>>11851504old nibba alert
>>11851497>Bo BragasonShe looks like Hailee Steinfeld to me, but yeah, she's really pretty. A million times better than that tranny that reddit kept wanting them to cast.
>>11851508I was just trying to think of actresses from the 90s that she looked similar to, but she does look a bit like Hailee as well.It could have been so much worse. We are lucky we didn't get the tranny or Melissa McCarthy.Actually, that last one would be perfect for pig Ganon.
>>11849869agreed. Marvel > Street Fighter.I've had that Ryu, Cammy and Chun-li in the same pose collecting dust while I wait for Zangief to completely ditch the line. I only really got them for their relation to MvC and because they're the only two female characters. meanwhile I pose and repose all my Legends because besides recreating a sprite in a game, superhero figures do spark the imagination.
>>11851537It's actually really really really funny that Kojima is making Hunter Schaefer the monster in his new game. They always hype up getting hired for this fancy high tier tole and then it's just "hideous deformed beast that will molest you"
>>11851602Street Fighter has never been good tbqh, it just gets press because of paid shills
>>11851653anon you're thinking of Mortal Kombat
>>11851692That series continues to live rent free in every capcuck's head I seeBut unlike certain franchises it doesn't need paid astroturfing from the FGC and desperate crosspromotion in Destiny and Magic the Gathering to survive...
>>11851702bruh they literally put a black gay furry front and center of their whole "professional" scene in an attempt to gain attention and traction on a new title some years back. Street Fighter's community occurs naturally and is much less annoying.That said the entire FGC is like 99% gay furry niggers now anyway so it's a moot point, if you can't just enjoy them in a silo by yourself you may as well not pay any attention to them. At least SF has unique character designs and isn't 20 recolors of the same dude wearing a ninja costume while they turn all their women into men with the strongest of jaw lines while paying out therapy insurance to their devs that have to research gruesome mutilations while everything else gets sanitized.
>>11851712>At least SF has unique character designs and isn't 20 recolors of the same dude wearing a ninja costume while they turn all their women into men with the strongest of jaw lines while paying out therapy insurance to their devs that have to research gruesome mutilations while everything else gets sanitized.Grim
>>11851712>That said the entire FGC is like 99% gay furry niggers now anyway so it's a moot pointWhat was the cause of this and what was the turning point?
>>11851692Mortal Kombat is a classic with tons of beloved color swaps
>>11852025Because you have to be at least a little bit autistic to be into fighting games, especially at a competitive level. And autism leads to being a furry, and furry leads to being gay.
>>11852188ok but also why is everyone brown
>>11851255That piece is what all true warriors strive FOR
OFFICIAL TEASE, REVEAL TOMORROW
>>11852779That'll be BOTW figures, that shield was used in that and Skyward Sword and I doubt it's the latter.Though it is Hasbro and they could just be being incompetent like usual.
>>11852025Capcom money and being essentially headlined for years by Mr. Wizard (gay pedophile capcom fanboy)
>>11852818I think it's just a matter of Nintendo standardizing what the Hylian Shield looks like at this point.
>>11852779Skyward Sword Each figure will be from a different game
>>11852834Lame but possible, that is the reason the BOTW one is the same as SS, but if they're doing collector focused figures, I would hope they'd make them accurate to the source material if Link is from any other Zelda game.
>>11852818I think they're also using it for the OoT remake as the new logo uses it.
>>11852779FUUUUCK YEEES!
>>11852779Ocarina of Time toys confirmed, woo!
>>11852844I doubt it'll be figures of that remake being revealed tomorrow when we don't even have a proper trailer of it.
>>11852856Wrong shield
>>11852860Nah, it's right
>>11852862You're blind then or as potentially idiotic as Hasbro may be.
>>11852864 gonna rub it in your face tomorrow you dumb bitch.
>>11852866How can you when I've already laid out how that could potentially be a outcome? also why would you be so prideful over getting inaccurate figures?
>>11852867You lost already.
>>11852779Movie doomers BTFO
>>11852868Choosing not to use your brain, sad.
>>11852779>>11852818>>11852836
>>11852779>>11852818>>11852836>>11852879
>>11852779I like the new one
>>11847899I don't care anymore. I have been priced out of buying toys. I wish I were buying toys for my children but I have been priced out of having a family too. Fuck everything. Burn the Earth.
>>11852896It’s cool dawg they’re about to kill a shit ton of us then reveal free energy as per an agreement with aliens/demons. Good luck.
>>11852779>>11852892Link this, Link that... Give me Sheik. It's been almost 30 years. I need a good articulated figure of him.
>>11852879>>11852880What do you think you're pointing out that hasn't already been stated?
>>11852860OOT remake changed the sword and shield
>>11852965The 3DS remake didn't.
>>11852968the switch 2 one did thats at the end of the year
>>11852970See >>11852859
>>11852971thought that as well but they could also just drop a trailer in the morning before hasbro shows them offto me it would be strange not to do the game that comes out this year and likely around the time the figures themselves come out
>>11852976Nintendo don't really care about figure cross promotion for upcoming stuff, consider how late after the games had been released that we got the Zelda Figmas. It still could be the remake but I just really doubt it, BOTW sadly makes more sense imo since it is the most recognizable to casuals at this point and a proven success.
So glad to finally be getting some good OOT figures
>>11852999Don't count your chickens.
>>11847899It's here...
>>11853015Which versions though? I'm guessing TOTK Link Zelda and Ganondorf? Or maybe they'll do three different Links?
>>11853037Ocarina Remake, Movie, and MAYBE original ocarina link vs ganondorf with phantom head.
>>11853037Not sure, based on the logo, it doesn't seem like the movie version. Could be just a generic link and zelda
>>11853037Ilm be disappointed if its TotK because we got Figma versions already but I hope they look good since it would mean the rest could lool good.
>>11853003>chickensGood thing Im onky counting my cuccoos then
>>11853037It’s skyward sword idk how people aren’t seeing it because it’s clear as day
>>11852779
>it’s just TOTK
First reveals
>>11853391
And they only look marginally better than the Jakks ones. That's hugely disappointing.
>>11853396Is one arm supposed to be longer than fhe other?
>>11853391It’s ok… not what I wanted, but Nintendo as the licensor may have demanded these as the first figures.
The butterfly joints are nice
>>11853392>Minimal accessoriesAs expected. Bravo hasbro!
>>11853404And it's gonna be $28-$32, and hasfags will eat them up like a good goy
>>11852866>>11852868Bitch? Where are you my bitch? Where are your OOT figures?
They look pretty good. But Tears. Bleh.I’ll wait for Ocarina.
>>11853397What did you expect? They have to be on model.
>>11853405Lino and Zelda are 28, Ganondorf is 42
>>11853128Is it?
>>11853391>>11853396A link that'll scale better with Figma Ganondorf is nice.Does Nintendo mandate that they can only make these three designs from TOTK? Zelda could of had her explorer clothes.
FUCKwhy couldn’t it have been BotW at least? We already have TotK figma.
>>11853411Yeah, so basically ML's price range
>>11853391>>11853394>>11853392>>11853396>>11853398>>11853401
>Treats of the KingdumbMeh. I bought the game, and it ran like absolute ass on my Switch so I only played it for like two hours and never touched it again. The figures do look pretty good though, but they're an easy pass for me since I don't care for the game. Call me when we get some OoT figures and I'll come back. I don't need Skyward Sword or Twilight Princess since I have the figmas and there's nothing Hasbro could do to outdo my DX TP Link. Wind Waker, I'd have to see how they translate the art style into figure form, it shouldn't be too hard.
>>11853391That looks fucking great!
>>11853420Oh man, I’d kill for Toon Link and the King of Red Lions.
>>11853400Fuck off, nobody cares what you think
>>11853420>and it ran like absolute ass on my SwitchWhy do you bother lying?
>>11853423What do you think then you stupid cunt, atleast the tripfag provided his opinion, you've gave nothing.
Wish NECA still had their gaming line, they would have done a sick Link.
>>11853427With explodable hips action kek
>>11853424Because he's a faggot, duh. He can no longer lie to himself about his fetish cult, so he has to lie about vidya to fill the void in his life.
>>11853424I'm a PC snob and anything that runs under 60fps is unplayable trash. To be honest I've gotten to the point where anything under 90 is kind of unacceptable to me. A bunch of older titles are locked at 60fps though so I tolerate it. But yeah, TotK ran at like absolute shit by my standards, making it virtually unplayable. Thank god emulation is a thing and it leaked online like a week before it released lmao.
>>11853429Fuck off you retarded cunt
>>11853424>>11853431Also, I'm not a fan of giving Nintendo money in the year of our lord two thousand and twenty six. If I want to play Nintendo games I stick to 7th gen or older.
>>11853432>I'm a PC snobThe peepee mustard rice meme died years ago and the ashes were absorbed into the earth when yatzee attached himself to that tranny to stay alfoat. Good luck lying to yourself about the price of the steambox being reasonable lmao
>>11853392Huh, these actually look great and makes me glad I cancelled/witheld my orders for the Figma. I like the designs enough that I still wanted figures of them, but not enough to pay premium for all three Figma either, so these are exactly what I would've wanted.
>>11853435You sound like a faggot
>>11852838it is accurate, cuz they're gonna update the OoT shield to look like that in the remake
>>11853405The alternative with more accessories are the figmas that cost triple/quadruple but also aren't very good. Do you own them? Or any toys for that matter? I'm guessing not if you are crying about $30 for a figure.
>>11853439Holy shit brother, that's alot of bullshit assumptions about me you made up in your own head just to get mad at. I don't think the Steambox is reasonably priced at all, and quite frankly, at the current price point, I don't know who it's even for, anyone who is willing to pay that much for a vidya machine already has a PC. I never planned on getting one, I did snag a Steam Controller though, that shit is pretty cash. >>11853441You smell like one Nancy boy.
>>11853446No you def sound like an up your own ass cuntrag. People like you are scum.
>>11853441Tranny, actually. Think about it, that loser's life revolves around telling people that he's a pc gaymer because he has nothing else going on in his existence the same way a tranny never shuts the hell up about its front hole. He's also embittered and salty because people don't give a shit about him playing on a pc the same way a tranny is mad when it doesn't get asspats for being stunning and brave enough to mutilate itself.
>>11853401Very ugly face, even the figma face isn't good enough which is stupid since the appearance it's 90% of what you need to do for a figure that barely poses
>>11853447If you say so
>>11853448Lmao, imagine getting this upset because I said I thought the Switch ran Treats of the Kingdumb like ass. Grow up babyface.
>>11853450Glad I'm not the only one that thinks her face is weird.
>>11853446>bullshit assumptions about meBitches about assumptions and doesn't deny a single one lmao, get your hrt ass back to redit and stop derailing the thread
>>11853398I'm never getting a passable OoT Ganondorf, am I?
>>11853396How long before the sword breaks?
>>11853458I literally did deny those assumptions by agreeing with you that the Steambox is overpriced and doesn't really have a target demographic. Thanks for not reading my post I guess. Fag.
>>11853452>Agreeing with the people calling you a faggotI know your kind caves in quick but God damn boy
>>11853464Are you really this lonely? I never disagreed with you about the Steambox at all, so I didn't exactly cave.
>>11853465/toy/ just likes to complain.
>>11853472This. They look better than the Jakks figures but not as good as the figma, which is exactly what I expected. Not sure why so many of the people here have to pretend to have a shit fit at every thing.
>>11853465>standardsSorry you're a miserable faggot
>>11853476Jakks never did TotK though
>>11853442Keep up, it's figures of TOTK.
>>11853479Sure, but I you can clearly compare how the average Jakks Zelda figure looks compared to these and see that these are a step up. Admittedly, not as big of a step up as I was hoping for, but definitely a step up nonetheless.
>>11853443Just say you love dickriding hasbro. It's ok dude.
>>11853465Good, for as much as a I don't care about these I do hope it is successful enough to lead to figures of other creatures or characters from the game and hopefully other games in the future.
>>11853486Just say you don't own or buy toys and go back.
>>11853495Literally isn't, but you keep on being a retarded dickhead I guess.
>>11853493I do buy toys, i just don't dickride hasbro like you. Hope this clears things up. Have a nice day, hasfag :)
>>11853502>saying you think something looks good is dickriding nowYou little queens need to stop getting so butt fucking offended when someone else likes something you don't.
>>11853502Post 3 toys you think are good
>>11853510You really like being wrong
>>11853502Spoken like a true lying faggot.
>>11853396Sculpt is disgustingly soft, like it was coated in acetone
>>11853519That just western figures for you
I will hold off judgement until Anthony posts his thoughts
>>11853510They have the exact same amount of accessories.
>>11853521Hasbro themselves have made better sculpts though.
>>11853392junk, but I hope it succeeds so we can get DIC versions of the 3
>>11853525Shhh, anon, he's retarded. Don't make him feel even worse than he already does.
>>11853527Thats as likely as getting CDi versions.
>>11853396Eh, marginally better than Jakks at over double the price. Guess I better hunt down the basic bitch figma one.
>>11853527I dunno how protective Nintendo is. They’ve always been very controlling with their IP in the past and seem to view figures as just another form of marketing a new game. I fear even with Ocarina of Time, it will only be remake related.
Really was not counting on this just being three characters in outfits we already have figures of.
>>11853561Really? They weren't going to be showing off the new looks from the remake, nor movie designgs, so it was ind of obvious. To be fair, with the sheild reveal I assumed BoTW, since I forgot about Treats of the Kingdumb most of the time.
>Hasfag got so ass mad he samefag thrice kekI won.
>>11853564Even the they could have changed things up, like have Zelda in her pre-time travel outfit or something.
>>11853566Who are you even talking about?
>>11853564>Treats of the KingdumbThat's the second time I've seen you use that and it doesn't sound any better the second time, improve it.
>>11853569Suggestions? I admit it needs some workshopping
>>11853392>>11853394>>11853396>>11853398For Hasbro? these look great
>>11853568The faggot that samefag by replying to me 3 separate times. I can only imagine how angry he was lmao
>>11853571Eh, I actually like their Joe figures a lot so I don't really have low expectations. And these just look kind of plain and compulsory, like Nintendo told them they just had to do the most recent game and they weren't very excited about it.
>>11853398>Literally the most emotive fucker in the game>Stuck with a single :[ faceMaybe they will make a two pack with a different head or something.
>>11853573I've heard good things about the Joe figures, I was still expecting Marvel Legends tier quality, its nice it's not, I would legit recommend that Zelda over the Figma for anyone that wants one to go with their Figma link, and honestly all 3 are good enough standins if you dont wanna drop the money or werent planning on using the extra stuff the figmas comes with.But a reminder, figma Zelda sucks, and this Hasbro figure can move better than her is just shameful.
>>11853577I'm really not feeling her bee sting face though
Figures look fine and have a decent price/value ratio for today's standard in 1/12. Seems like there is just a glorp like troll here samefagging and raging for no reason. Not sure how hasbro hurt him in the past or if he's so poor that $30 is too much for a 1/12 figure. He couldn't even answer >>11853504 if hasbro is so bad, what is better in the same price range? Before the Jada shill answers, these look about the same as what Jada would make.
>>11853569>>11853570Queersofthekikescum
>>11853524Can already predict his opinionAppearance- 6/10 sculpt too soft, ugly knees and elbows, face is offArticulation 6/10 awful ab joints, everything else is fine but poor rangeAccesories 3/10 just the bare minimumVeredict 7/10 not bad but below the average and somehow costier. Is the only 1/12 link so you might as well get it
everywhere else i see comments disappointed it's more BOTW figures.at least this will be a more accessible gateway to zelda figures in the right scale. I don't understand why anyone gets figmas when they're overpriced happy meal toys, now people who just want Zelda figures finally have options.
God I hate totk
>>11853600Will you be saying this if they cost the same amount as the figma? Because I can easily get Zelda's figms for $30 (the one already have I got for free, along with link and ganondorf for $40 each). No one is mad these are botw. Only thing that has anyone really disappointed is the choice of zelda's particular totk design
>>11853392>faggot ass nu-zelda slopwhat a waste
>>11853586Too edgy
>>11853606nobody cares about a cheap fuck like you. seeing Link on the shelves for everyone to have is what's important.
>>11853600>>11853606They aren’t even from BotW retards
>>11853612blue link = switchslop era = botw
>>11853612Okay. From botw $70 dlc. Happy?
My god, some of you people barely register as Human.
>>11853467>Are you really this lonely?The hell kind of limpdick retort is that? You're the one who waddled in here to derail the thread; God the fucking lack of self-awareness you autists have disgusts me
>>11853611>post complains about the figma being overpriced>yet Im the cheapfuckSure thing, timmy. Just say what you actually mean next time instead of being wrong
>>11853612I never said they were from botw, lowiqanon.
I just hope this means that nintendo is giving away the ip to other brands. Sh figuarts and Blokees making their own zelda figures would be great
>>11853576honestly they really should come with an extra head at this price point, other brands does it so it's just shitty
>>11853602Well you are an unloved faggot
>>11853557Shut the fuck up CC. We all know what you did
>>11853399One arm is bent...
>>11853657Awful game
Damn. Didn't realize this board has more incels than rk9 and v combined
>>11853695Get a new word or learn the definition of this one
>>11853695>YOU DON'T GLAZE THE LATEST NINTENDO SLOP LIKE A GOOD LITTLE NORMIE?! YOU MUST BE AN ICKY INCEL CHUD!
>>11853396>>11853398>>11853401Looks good enough for me. I have the Figma TotK Link but never picked up Zelda or Ganondorf, so these will definitely be a nice substitute without killing my wallet. Not sure if I will pick up Link or not yet. I think his face looks better than the Figma version since it matches the in game model more, but I dunno if I need another copy of the exact same look. I like that the cape is all softgoods though, as opposed to the hybrid that the Figma is, so you can actually put the hood on him and it's probably a better material than that weird model kit tier stuff the cape of the Figma. Maybe I'll hold off and see if they decide to do another release that comes with some alternate weapons/accessories. It would be nice to get a bow of some kind.
They look fine.It's just... I'm really past TOTK.Maybe if they start doing really niche Link armors.
>>11853569tits of the kinkdom
Kinda neat that Ganon has a hinge on his sleeve
>>11853740that's neat to have, gives him a bit more to work with.that being said though i really hope they make some of the enemies. preferable from more than just the switch duology.
>>11853745Yea, enemies are my most wanted thing from this line. I don't care what source they are from really, I just need something for all the Links I have to fight.
>>11853391>>11853392>>11853394>>11853396>>11853398>>11853401kek, I knew it. But desu if this is how they do each series that means Link Zelda and Ganondorf of each game for each wave?
>nothing but TotK and BotWslop until the end of timeI know it's fucking Hasbro, they always choose the laziest newest thing, but come the fuck on man.
Nope. I’ll wait for ocarina.
>>11853392fuck off with totk already, people who wanted figs of this already have the figmas
>>11853776Or Jakks
>it is 2035>three new Zelda games have since come and went>it's all just BotW over and over and over again
>>11853398Is his sword supposed to be that small?Other than that, he looks alright, depending on the price.
Nintendo surprisingly won't get rid of TP Link over BotW Link in stuff like promotional art. He's sort of the rep for the character. But give us some damn merch. Jakks never did anything TP related.
>>11853787They're priced like Marvel Legends. Link and Zelda are $27 and Ganon is $42>https://www.hasbropulse.com/collections/the-legend-of-zelda
>>118537200/10, trying way too hard just like you tried too hard to make friends in high school
>>11853392>>11853394>>11853396>>11853398>>11853401BOOOOOOOBOOOOOO
>>11853752It wont even be a line, it's just these 3 figures. I'd love to end up wrong but we should just be realistic with our expectations.
>>11853401>>11853396>>11853398As bad looking as McFarlane anime figures. I thank Hasbro for being so incompetent so I don't have to buy these figures
>>11853776I'm gonna keep wishing on my 20 monkey pays until I get the correct Zelda. I'm sorry, anon. Your only hope is acquiring more paws than me.
>>11853396>>11853398>>11853401Im not feeling it mr krabs. For the money Id rather save up and buy a figma if I want a premium version. Meanwhile the jakks are good enough for a budget/play figure. Unless they do something interesting instead of the main 3, I dont see the value.
>>11853740Is he doing yoga?
>>11853128
>>11853819Mr. Stevie already confirmed it's a multi-year thing. Nintendo wouldn't just let them do one wave and walk away.
>>11853391>>11853392>>11853394>>11853396>>11853398These Ocarina of Time figs are great! :^)
>>11853875Mr Stevie?
If they’re gonna do the new games can we at least get someone cool like Sidon?
>>11853879He's the senior design director at Hasbro
>>11853887Interesting, can't wait to see whats next.
>>11853401why does she look like a Bratz doll
These aren't the ICONIC LOOKS, Hasbro!
>>11853910Can you uncs get with the times already?
>>11853392>heroes of hyrule: ganondorf
>>11853600>zelda figures in the right scale.where? the Jakks ones?
>>11853936no zoomer is playing legend of zelda unless it's a collab in fortnite or some shit like that
>>11853949you really keep pulling shit out of your ass
>>11853875>Mr. Stevie already confirmed it's a multi-year thing. Nintendo wouldn't just let them do one wave and walk away.Just like their Fortnite line, right ;)
>>11853953it's a series that literally only millennials play, unc. real zoomGODS play roblox and gta v online uncsissy, know your place
>>11853954Nintendo is historically known to be strict with their licensing. Epic doesn't care. Fortnite was practically the town bicycle for multiple toy companies. Also it's clear that Hasbro is doing this because they likely secured the movie rights ahead of time so that Jakks couldn't do it.
I love how the hasbro link looks barely any better than the Jakks one but is $18 more for...a hand and a piece of cloth? Yet people are slurping this slop up. it'd arguably been less shit had they not start with something almost directly comparable
>>11854022Completely different scale and jakks never did TotK, if you’re gonna make comparisons make it to the figma
>>11853524He already did...
>>11854164Can’t tell if he’s serious or trolling t b h
>>11854164He can't be serious. They look okay for Hasbro but better than the Figmas?
>>11853955You could not be any more of a tryhard anon, or any gayer for that matter.
Decided to get them, I already have the Figmas but I want this line to go places that Figma will never bother to. If nothing else, Link and Zelda will probably scale better with Figma Ganondorf.
>>11854281Youre never getting Ruto or anything interesting
>>11854293ok
>>11854247>get bodied>i'm not mad i'm not madstay bodied freak
>>11854281I only got Ganon for now. Gonna wait to see what other stuff gets announced this weekend before I order the others to see if anything else is going to also ship in May. Hasbro has a bad habit of releasing too many things at once and it just rapes my budget when they ship them two or three months ahead of time.
>>11854164I dunno how his fans take him seriously.
>>11853875Can I please have a link to that Stevie statement?
>>11853399Yes, slightly. Rauru's arm isn't quite the same proportion as Link's own, it's like... Half a finger longer.
Wow. You all make me ashamed to be fond of Zelda games.ToTK Zelda will be more posable than figma because of the soft rubbery skirt, ganondorf will be easy to alter into wind waker style and then twilight princess, link only needs an arm and tunic swap for botw and then classic looks, Ganon having a sleeve hinge means link hats probably will be articulated too, so he won't be stuck in a certain pose.Id also expect a "darkened arm" and "awakened sages" Rauru arm look, with luck, the arms will be made to detach and swap for varied game looks. (Though I don't expect that)But all you assholes are doing is bitching about blue shirt era games being NOT MUH ZELDUH
>>11854376>https://www.instagram.com/p/Da3ajGtN-xD/?igsh=cjAyMHQ0eHRwbnBr
>>11854417Thank you!
>>11854413Okay…? I mean it’s only natural for people to want the looks from the games they like lol
>>11853406DAMMIT.
Makes me wonder if they will make the older designs. And will they keep each wave of figures only to three? Is it going to be the main trio every time? Are there any more SDCC reveals coming?
nintendo refuses to make figures for anything before 2016
>>11853392On one hand, they don't look bad. Maybe a smidgen above Jakks's figures.On the other hand, I'm frustrated it is the newest games. I get it, those are the biggest sellers and there hasn't been a mainline LoZ game for, what, 10+ years at this point with the traditional look? Maybe if the OoT remake appearances are good we'll get to toys from that.And yes, of course people are going to want the older designs because that is what traditionally Link and Zelda look like. The series itself is 40 years old, and BotW is only 10 of those years.
>>11854450>pending licensor approval>"Do you like what we did to Zelda?">"WHY SHII ROOK RIKE STING VICTIM? SHE FIGHT BOKOBURINS NOTTO GIANTO JAPANESE HORNETS!! BACK TO DRAWING BOARDO OR ELSE WE GO BACK TO THE PAST SAMURAI JAKKS"
>>11854459Kek
>>11854446The full line is launching in 2027 and it was stated these are only the first few items. So that could mean more figures are in this wave. But it could also mean there's another scale we don't know about, roleplay items, etc.
>>11854300The schizobabble and cope is going to help you beat the tide pod allegations, I promise.
>>11854477This unc is not beating the bodied allegations I fear
>>11854459thank god for nintendo's quality assurance
>Link and Ganon preorders sold out>you can still get ZeldaOminous
>>11854516
>>11854578female action figures do not sell as sell
did they give Zelda a fat ass
>>11854447>>11854449>>11854452These are all double barf. First we have figmas of these already, second these are the new designs instead of the 64 ones>>11854699We wont know or care, because she's wearing a dress
>>11854447>>11854450>>11854452These look way better than I was expecting from Hasbro, it would be funny if they of all people gave me good/decent Ocarina of Time figures.
>>11854616Being yet another traffic cone doesn't help.
>>11853482oh good i can skip them then
>>11854759>average hasbro fan scared by the female bodyStormbros... we found our brethren...
>>11854452I don't understand the hinged sleeve. It still juts out when his arm is raised, so why not put a swivel just above the elbow instead?
>>11854480Not denying that you're a retard with brain problems is how you win
>>11854449Savin me money
>>11854449Jakks pacific did a lot of older stuff, the Zelda lego sets seem to be half Totk/BotW half OoT So I dunno, seems like there's a realistic chance.
>>11854447>>11854450>>11854452It's funny. If these three designs had debuted as original toys with no fanfare, I'd probably think they were really cool reimaginings of the Triforce trio, and would love to see a game designed around them. But having known these designs for the past several years and being given enough time and exposure to get thoroughly sick of them and the games they're from, I have zero fucks to give.Either way, I don't think I'd buy them, though, because they look like cheap hasbro shit.>>11854226>He can't be serious.He means they look better than the Figmas given the price point he knows they will have. You underestimate the number of collectors who allow affordability to affect their opinions, simply because they are chronic consoomers who literally cannot stop themselves from buying (thing they recognize). Thus, a toy that looks half as good, but at 25% of the price is considered "better". For their wallet, that is.>>11854449>nintendo refuses to make figures for anything before 2016It sucks. 10-year-old me is still dying to get LttP/LA figures. The LBW Figma scratched the itch, but it just ain't good enough. I want something straight-up based on pic related. And make sure you give him a fucking sheath for his sword, this time.
>>11855016Still bodied I'm afraid
>>11855190Nintendo will NEVER allow manual/concept art figures
>>11855216"Manual art" is literally just official art, which is exactly what ALBW Figma Link was based on. He doesn't look like this in the game itself, at all. And none of this is "concept" art, lmao.
>>11854164>>11854168>>11854226>>11854369Yeah, apparently he was 100% serious…
>>11855226>He doesn't look like this in the game itself, at all.I was about to say nobody would want a Link's Awakening figure based on his in-game appearance, but I'd kinda be interested to see how someone would turn picrel into a figure. Obviously you might have to change the proportions, but a stylized Link figure with this color pallet would go pretty hard, as long as it didn't have that fake pixel shading shit that Neca tried with TMNT.
>>11855333>he handles terriblyIt's pretty clear where his opinion is coming from. He's a hamfister who would rather have cheap shit he can be clumsy with than something that actually looks good. Also, it's like others have said where he's subconsciously including the price tags in his assessment. The fact that these are gonna cost like $30 unironically makes them look "better", because the concept of simply not mindlessly buying everything is completely alien to him.
>>11855380>The fact that these are gonna cost like $30 unironically makes them look "better", because the concept of simply not mindlessly buying everything is completely alien to him.this is the unspoken issue about a lot of "poorfaggotry" in toy collecting. The problem isn't usually that a single toy is too expensive, because saving up an extra 50-100 bucks for an isolated purchase isn't much of a hardship at all. The problem is when people just habitually buy everything because they are mindless consoomers. At which point, a toy costing less than half of what the alternative costs becomes a MAJOR asset.These people are total NPCs who are just following programming to own as much plastic as possible. The opinions they have about that plastic are completely untethered from reality.
Why even give her butterfly joints if it's just gonna muck up the sculpt and silhouette for no real benefit? Not like she needs that much movement in this look
>>11855433Sword swinging poses or pre tooling for movie/botw archer Zelda.if you want a goddamn "game poses only" get a statue.
>>11855459>Sword swinging poses or pre tooling for movie/botw archer Zelda.Likely this. Those look like they might actually function well, so you can get some non-canonical stuff going on, I guess. Zelda's design really doesn't lend itself to being translated into a compelling action figure.
>>11855433I'm surprised both Max Factory and Hasbro made this version of her, instead of her main outfit with the pants. It would be much better for an articulated Zelda.
>>11855372I wanted a Nendoroid of this (would even settle for 3d remakes) forever
>>11855497Has to be some sort of mandate.
>>11855497Pants was the main outfit in BotW, not really for TotK, it would make for a better toy for sure I agree.
>>11855559>Has to be some sort of mandate.I figured that could be the case. It wouldn't surprise me.>>11855562>Pants was the main outfit in BotW, not really for TotK, it would make for a better toy for sure I agree.Also, it's a simple rerelease with long hair for the BOTW version.
haslabs for golden dragon Zelda and Ganon incoming
>thread dies the second Hasbro shows off TOTK figuresyeah
>>11855404>saving up an extra 50-100 bucks for an isolated purchase isn't much of a hardship at all.retard. that's money that could go to actual useful stuff like groceries or electricity/water bills. stop living with mommy and get a job.people who pick the hasbro version aren't cheap or poor, they just don't think the figma is worth it just to have a zelda toy.
>>11855433pits
They don't look bad but I only buy figs of stuff from muh childhood and these designs are all modern. I'll buy Zelda figures if they do any based off the OG games. Or even Ocarina of Time.
>>11856124that's their "break glass in case of emergency" move
>>11855196God your banter is softcocked and brainrotted, no wonder you're a salty bitch over being a poorfag
>>11856191Holy shit you're just bodying yourself now
>>11855459>get a statueI mean it might as well be one from the waist down as is
>>11855986No it dies because you all keep bitching and trolling
>>11855433Hi Anthony
>>11855372They should do the printer design for a classic LA Link.
>>11856277Because hasbro puts the effort to make a hard plastic cone with a rotation ring for lower thighs and knees instead of going with a cheap ML lower body with a rubber cone.Admit you're mad because the first Zelda you get isn't one you can make into a gooner bait figure without buying another body
They look decent, but I don't want a lot of LoZ figures. I'll gamble on them making some green Link and either a traditional Zelda or tight pants Zelda in the future.>>11855433Simply going through the book with articulation. Butterfly joints were in the budget and butterfly joints were made.
>>11855459Probably some pre tooling for OOT Remake Sheik figure while at it.
>>11856488>rotation ring for lower thighs and kneesWow very cool, you're still getting no movement at all out of the thighs, it's essentially a statue from the waist down. You cannot make any argument otherwise. It's retarded to say "IT'S FOR DA ARTICULATION AND POSES!" when that clearly wasn't a priority. >>11856601>Butterfly joints were in the budgetPretty shitty use of the budget then
>>11856046>they just don't think the figma is worth it just to have a zelda toy.You're literally agreeing with me, then. If you just want to have Zelda-shaped plastic, that's fine, but don't be delusional and say the cheaper one is "better" just because it's the one you can more-easily afford to fill the emptiness inside you.And honestly, if 50-100 bucks is so much money to you that you look at it and think "I need this for groceries/utilities", you should probably put a pause on collecting worthless plastic as a hobby, regardless of whether you live with mommy or not. Just some free financial advice for you from someone who doesn't live paycheck to paycheck.
>>11856458holy peak
>>11856458the potential for alternate faces alone would make this a goldmine. A Link figure with this face would heal me on a spiritual level.
>>11856458I want the real Classic LA Link. But what I want most would be figures of Zelda 1 or Hyrule Warriors Link.
I'm definitely get Zelda and Link just because the scale of the figma make me autistically mad. These apparently are the right size according to preorders, finally.I'm hoping we get my Gerudo womanlet Riju, Purah, and Queen Sonia at some point if they keep doing the TotK era characters.
>>11856721This will most likely be the base female body for future releases. With the OoT remake later this year, expect figures for that and they can use the base body here for Sheik.
>>11856721You can't read well and are determined to interpret my words terribly just to hate that your option isn't a coomerbait tight pants Zelda with static butt plate sculpt.I'm not expecting a design they've never made in ML before, I'm expecting the plastic to be a flexible skirt like star lord's long jacket, with a standard ML female articulation beneath, not "if you don't see the joint it ain't there" like YOU are demanding.
A possible under-dress articulation layout
They'd better have Zelda scaled right with Link.Jazwares swapped their scale, so link's nose is close to the top of her head.
>>11857677yap at hasbrohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jl5NSpgVhzM
>>11861262Ok, obviously she didn't really confirm anything, but they way she speaks makes it sound like figures from other Zelda games are coming.
>>11861711Who is "she" and why the fuck should I care what she says? Not watching that vid; looks gay and annoying.
>>11861711No shit they're coming, hasbro is at least guaranteed three waves, ToTK for pre Xmas/xmas rush, then either the movie or OoT Remake before and after each other, then maybe twilight princess, botw, or others.Id bet we get the ToTK sages as a set of four and a deluxe Mineru if this wave does very well, but if it doesn't, well just get the Triforce trio most of the time until occasionally important characters like remake ocarina impa or the horses.After most of that would be where is think there's a shot at monsters.
>>11861849>hasbro is at least guaranteed three waves, ToTK for pre Xmas/xmas rush, then either the movie or OoT Remake before and after each other, then maybe twilight princess, botw, or others.What makes you so sure that each wave is going to be based on a different game?
>>11861108huh... never realized she was taller.
>>11856767holy FUCK i want some Fish & Chips now
>>11861877It would be stupid to complete a game cast before moving on, especially with the movie and the remake coming.
>>11862072And has ro got the size right, that hasbro pulse video shows them all standing, and link IS slightly shorter than Zelda!
>>11862758So basically, you're full of shit? Cool, cool.
>>11862918Fine believe that they're only ever doing these three.
