Which one are you getting?
>>11910465The eventual SHFiguarts.
>smirking sculpt >more guns>bigger scaleMcFarlane is cooking.
>>11910465The one with double uzis obviously.
>>11910465i got the classified one but the todd's offering actually seems better for once, the classified version comes with a lot of shitty nu-raider accessories where todd's has classic onesthat said both of them are pretty shit figures for the price, maybe the chinese will make a good lara one day
Can't wait to pose her with Duke Nukem.
>>11910478Don’t forget the pins
>>11910501new duke figure when?
>>11910465Well they are different scales. Who cares
>>11910472the only real answer.
>>11910556I feel Amazing Yamaguchi would be more fitting, due to her acrobatic nature. Also maybe we could get some actual cleavage.
>>11910551Wasn't there some Chink company that promised make one a while ago? What ever happened to that?
mcfarlane tards can't tell what a render is and are talking about the faces without realizing they're comparing apples to oranges. would expect no less from pin defenders
>>11910634Might happen in ten years. Might not.
>>11910465left
>>11910465I'm sticking with Classified provided Amazon actually ships mine. I have only been happy with a modern Mcfarlane figure exactly once and it was MK11 Spawn. Every other fig I've gotten from Todd has been some degree of disappointing. Plus 1/10 is a dead scale.
>>11910465Hard to compare against a render but then again we only have promotional picks for the classifieds.We will see once the figures are out. For what it's worth McFarlane one seems to have bigger tits and doesn't look like reboot Lara. Classifieds almost seems like nu Lara Cosplaying Lara Croft
>>11910465Hasbro. McFarlane sucks, and the figure won't look good -at all- once it comes out.
>>11910786>but then again we only have promotional picks for the classifieds.No, we have pics of the actual figure. Lots.
>>11910815They actually gave her really nice boobs I'm shocked.
>>11910848The trade off is no ass, which is dumb since their female figs have or had asses last I saw.
>>11910465>full sized toyvs>half-sized non-durable goods for double the priceNot a tough choice tbqh. Retards will squeal about pins because they want a statue, not a toy.
>>11910946What are you even trying to say, here?
>>11910465I'll wait to see how she looks in hand, but the McFarlane wins for me since she'll scale better with the rest of my non-Japanese video game figures. Most importantly Nathan Drake, who I was planning to display the Hasbro Lara with.
why does it take a couple of years for Japan to release action figures of character yet it's taken 30 years for Americans to release an action figure of this boomer gooner slop?
>>11910956Toybiz released a figure of her well over 20 years ago you obese Singaporean furry.
>>11910965and it looks like shit >kennerdoubly shit given how shit everything kenner has ever made, only boomer magatards like the 3poa podcast ever goon about
>>11910465Whichever one goes to the clearance bin first. Fuck Square Enix and their scalper-tier pricing.
>>11910951He's trolling, he isn't saying anything
>>11910971>Square EnixAnon, I...
>>11910465SOVL / SOVLLESS
>>11911003Fuck off
>>11910465Most likely neither.McFarlane has more guns but is short on other accessories. Like I don't miss the bow but the grappling hook and rope would've been nice. I don't know what that little black thing next to the single red hook thing is. Also, it's in McF's weird scale that isn't going to fit with anything once his DC line is finally done.On the other hand, the Hasbro is a bit marked up due in part to accessories I'm never going to use and is sold out anyway.As an aside, this reminds me a bit of when the first ML Rogue (from Hasbro) suddenly went nuts on the aftermarket and people were buying the Marvel Select version to cope. Again, it was an OK figure on its own, but it didn't fit with much else.
>>11911024there are plenty of other 1/10 toylines like mythic legions, neca, storm collectibles, it isn’t some unheard of scale where she won’t scale with anything else but it is a bit more limiting
>>11910465Both. Already pre ordered the Hasbro and it looks good so I'm glad. The McFarlane also looks good, I'll wait till we see the actual figure to decide which is better but I'm going to get it for the accessories, since the Hasbro doesn't come with the Shotgun, Uzis and Flare. Would be cool if we get a battle damage Lara at some point.>>11910815That looks great! The artwork looks awesome too, can't wait for mine to arrive.
>>11910465The Hasbro one sold out so fast it crashed BBTS. The McFart is literally still available almost 24 hours later. That's all you need to know about which one is better. The game was won before it even started.
>>11910465The McFarlaine version looks better even though articulation points on bare skin always look like shit.
>>11910971They don't own it. CD does. CD produced a massive debt for Square-Enix with their shitty nu-Lara trilogy, then raised the money to buy it from Square-Enix sot hey own it now. Yeah it reeks of deliberately sinking the property so they could take it.
>>11911135That's because it's a render. McFarts almost never end up looking as good as the render.
>>11911142Still, I'm not buying the Hasbro one simply on general principle of paying that price for a $27 retro-card.
>>11911139this is not really accurate, square sold it off because they wanted a bunch of money to spend on blockchain and NFTs (yeah it worked out as well as you would expect) and tomb raider was among their least valuable IPs because they had unrealistic expectations for their western studios, but it didn’t actually put them in the hole
>>11911147So you'll pay $50 for what is essentially just a regular DC Multiverse release with a few extra accessories? Bruh
The McPharland looks more fun.
>>11911500Not at all
>>11911504And there's the mask drop
>>11911504Trying to bash on Hasbro but in the same breath praising McFarlane shows you're not genuine with your complaints and you're just looking to shit on whichever company your most biased against. If you hate Hasbro, you hate McFarlane.
>>11911511>If you hate Hasbro, you hate McFarlane.
>>11911515>>11911517Just saying. Not sure what one company has over the other, they both suck in similar ways.
Are toy collectors not allowed to have differing opinions?
>>11911523Explain to me what McFarlane does better than Hasbro or vice versa.
>>11911517In other terms, you don't buy toys.
>>11911530Then why are you even in this thread?
>>11911532Are you a bot?
>>11911525McFarlane's has a more attractive body shape. It's a turbo sexo character so Hasbro's is the inferior of the two.
>>11911534>McFarlane's has a more attractive body shape
>>11911534If Todd's actually even turns out that way. You won't know until it comes out, you're looking at a render.
>>11911547Yeah, this reads like a shitty AI chatbot wrote it.
>>11911549why are you expecting anything more out of a Singaporean rat
>>11911553>>11911556It's actually kind of impressive how you've been doing this for like half a decade at this point. You need a better hobby Athena.
>>11911557impressively sad maybe
