Yuri scenarios with at least one girl who is straight (or was until a few minutes ago).Lit recs also welcome.
Is that what they call it? I tag it "Rape the Straight"
>>4238604I don't think it's common enough to have a set tag name. I just named the thread after the classic pickup line. It doesn't necessarily have to be rape, could be after a bit of romance (or harassment) the other girl realizes she can swing that way.
Basically everything with Ingrid from FE:3H
DoroIngrid is more my style but I don't mind Mercedes mommy domming her either.
>>4239108Is it canon or just fanon?
>>4239161That Ingrid is straight and Dorothea fawns all over her? Yup.Unfortunately, Ingrid is very heterosexual and tells her to back off shortly before Dorothea jumps her bones.https://youtube.com/watch?v=U0PK97LtRwkDorothea is most often paired with Petra since they have a good paired ending.https://fe3h.noobsaigon.com/dorothea/petra
>>4239176Any good DoroIngrid fics/doujins?
>>4239180There are a few I've read where Dorothea and/or Mercedes have their way with her, but I don't have them bookmarked. Search the pairing on AO3.
Lady Knights are too powerful for even the most advanced lesbians.
>>4238604I prefer the OPs name term, it's funny and "rape the straight" prefers to just forceful conversion, instead of more romantic ones
>>4239176>Unfortunately, Ingrid is very heterosexual and tells her to back off shortly before Dorothea jumps her bones.That was just the opening move, nee-chan. Ingrid would succumb in the end if Dorothea actually tried.
>>4239530what's the original? seen like 30 variations of this image.
>>4239532it's a common lesbian meme, I'm not sure there's an original one
>>4239532>>4239540The original is from Kuzu no Honkai (fakesubs of course).
>>4239180Not the other anon. The only one I found that keeps with the thread's theme https://archiveofourown.org/works/39751470
Multiple Ao3 recommendations with this themehttps://archiveofourown.org/works/41164149https://archiveofourown.org/works/41305161https://archiveofourown.org/works/4759808/chapters/10883177https://archiveofourown.org/works/38784411/chapters/96979623#mainhttps://archiveofourown.org/works/45576115https://archiveofourown.org/works/46502968https://archiveofourown.org/series/2501524https://archiveofourown.org/works/43572331/chapters/109553941https://archiveofourown.org/works/46811485https://archiveofourown.org/works/46935874https://archiveofourown.org/works/44227477/chapters/117968869https://archiveofourown.org/works/45162367https://archiveofourown.org/works/46066507/chapters/115961191https://archiveofourown.org/works/50725054https://archiveofourown.org/works/50557813https://archiveofourown.org/works/51292420/chapters/129599134#workskinhttps://archiveofourown.org/works/54050404https://archiveofourown.org/works/47090779
>>4249194Literotica Recommendations https://www.literotica.com/series/se/36290https://www.literotica.com/series/se/6093033https://www.literotica.com/series/se/25152https://www.literotica.com/series/se/19111https://www.literotica.com/s/seducing-the-babysitter-redux-ch-01 https://www.literotica.com/s/seducing-the-babysitter-redux-ch-02https://www.literotica.com/s/seducing-the-babysitter-redux-ch-03https://www.literotica.com/s/seducing-the-babysitter-redux-ch-04https://www.literotica.com/s/seducing-the-babysitter-redux-ch-05https://www.literotica.com/s/seducing-the-babysitter-redux-ch-06All of this author's works: https://www.literotica.com/authors/christa_p/works/storiesHere is also a adult-fanfiction .org recommendation:https://naruto.adult-fanfiction.org/story.php?no=600106177
>>4249199>but are not purely yuri stories:why would you even post them then? And quickly looking at them, the first two ones seem to be divided between yuri and yaoi parts so they somehow get a pass but the last 3 links seem to be just a corruption story where an evil guy dicks all the girls straight. And even the third story from the group without warning has this:>The first half is a girl's love genre because there are a lot of lilies (lesbians), but ...The direction will change from the middle, so please be careful if you are not good at it.So fuck off or just spam more links for subpar English fiction.
Sakura found someone else to fixate on
>>4238607>I just named the thread after the classic pickup linenow I knowand knowing is half the battle
>>4263889Isn't her ring on the wrong hand?
>>4269373No? You can see here>>4263887 that it's always on her right hand.
>>4269411I was under the impression that wedding rings go on your left ring finger.
>>4263887>>4263888>>4263889These are excellent.
>>4263887>>4263888>>4263889Is there more?
>>4276496These are all fairly new, the artist will probably make more when he feels like it.
>>4276499There's a part 2 put I just checked his Pixiv. She gets banged by a door to door sales woman.
>>4263887>>4263888>>4263889https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/121071998#manga
>>4269422They go on your non-dominant hand, so the wife in those images is left-handed.
>>4302023I've seen this image become and can confirm that, yes, it's not a requirement and it is hot.
>>4302023How does she even end up tied up like that if she's not down for it? Needs yuri correction.
https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/35972850
>>4302023More like this, please.>>4337369Maybe she's a ditz?
>>4302023Is that Bayonetta?
>>4249194God bless you
https://nhentai.net/g/550221/
>>4341773There needs to be more yuri cucking the guy stuff like this.
Not sure if this is the place to ask, but I remember reading some facebook messenger screenshots of some dude livid that a lesbian stole his girl. Probably fake, but it was still hot.
>>4396636correction complete
>>4396636>I wish I were deadWhat a happy ending!
>>4396636Someone should make this into a doujin or /lit/ from the girl's perspective
>>4249177Yeah, there's tons of forcing her out of the closet but not enough making her realize gay is good without already being repressed. it still scratches the itch but it's not the same thing
>>4396636I don't believe this happened for one second, but yeah it is hot.
Is there a tag to search for this kind of dtuff
>>4397219It's the >don't forget, your girlfriend is a "fucking rugmuncher" now toofor me>>4397333It exists, since there is stuff posted in the thread, but there isn't a specific tag for it and there isn't a lot of it.
>>4397333I guess you can try scavenging the ao3 "orientation play" tag without the ability to filter or try your luck with the dubious consent ones but >>4397427seems to be correct. Even stories from Read Only Mind, a mind-control erotica site, that seem to be absolutely fitting have only generic tags. Here's one, for example.>https://readonlymind.com/@Kallie/MaritalAid/
>>4397427It's not that wild of an idea, seems like it'd be more common.
>>4397443Mind control is a different thing I feel like, the thing that's appealing is convincing them through good hot sex rather than hypnosis or whatever, that's cheating.
>>4397445Yeah, reading it now, the hypnosis was too specific for me. I get that it's hypnosis, but how did Isabella not notice the complete change in her outlook in life. Not only does she have 0 interest in men (despite marrying one) but also is a lesbian (despite having never thought that way before), and is insanely attracted to Cleo (despite having a purely professional relationship up until now). The stuff after is pretty hot, but the hypnosis should have just been making Isabella bi so Cleo could woo Isabella with her own charms while not contradicting all of her life before. Or just not use hypnosis and have Isabella be bi from the beginning with the exact same setup.
>>4396636DESU if not fake kinda deserved. I hate men like this who think their dick is god's gift to the world.
>>4238604They weren't straight in the first place, so that makes no sense. This is basically just a trope about closeted or undiscoverted bisluts.
>>4396636>asking for personal advice here>on /fit/ of all placesdude was literally asking for it
>>4405786It didnt seem like he did think his dick is gods gift to the world. It seemed like he was following the orders of people on 4chan, which was probably his first and biggest mistake. I mean aside from being naive.
>>4420255>>4425096>>4405786It's obviously fake. Hot, but fake
does anyone have the koikatsu yuri NTR manga?
>>4425765Why the fuck did you think something as vague as that is going to make anyone know what you are talking about?
The rest (to see the mom actually get fucked): x.com/soraoraora/status/1856471891416101358
>>4238595Does anyone know the origin of this meme? I know the original version was with the Kuzu no Honkai sluts, but that format still had to come from somewhere, right?
>>4456623It's an old joke so no one really knows where it came from, but it's been around since 2004 at least.
>>4449393>think this is pretty good>check out the rest of the artist's work>all bbc cuck shit
>>4341773Fucking artist hasn't made anything in months REEEEEE
https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/128514790#manga
>>4458361What did you honestly expect from an artist who draws a hyper realistic dick shaped mega-strap on like this? Have some common sense.
>>4480813>ai
>>4480814I need to know. Where did you spot that? I'm getting slowly blind to that.
>>4480815I don't blame you because it's definitely getting much much harder to spot. But if you zoom into where fine lines are, you can see how some of them meld together in ways that wouldn't happen with a real artist doing hatching. You could especially notice it around the desk and in the middle of the drawing with the apron and the right girl's shirt. Also the girl behind the maid is very high up for actually doing anything, at best she's just licking the dress, not the middle girl's asshole.
>>4480817>Also the girl behind the maid is very high up for actually doing anything, at best she's just licking the dress, not the middle girl's asshole.Wow, no kink shaming.
>>4480815I don't know what the link , I find it on a Discord server.
>>4480817Hm, good point. Maybe that's why the resolution is so low. You have to really zoom into that one to see it (or not in my eyes, I'm truly lost, sorry). But I guess the right girls supposedly left leg kneeling on the desk looks suspicious.Also what >>4480820 said.Lizards are real, sis.>>4480823Would it be weird if you ask the poster if that is real or ai?
>>4480829奉仕部 | YaeMiyabi #pixiv https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/135100980
>>4481021Nice, thank you very much. And no AI tag. Which means we can lay this matter to rest. Except the artist is untruthful. But who would lie on the internet, right?
a
>>4481143except it's pretty obviously ai. the "artist" only started posting very recently within the last few months and is posting consistently hyper-polished works that are all generated within the same model. please use your detective skills a little more
>>4480815there's something off about the maid's right hand.
>>4481235I don't know if this really applies to this thread's topic. This is just a random crackship.
>>4481143Pixiv has a huge issue right now where the uploader can lock tags so nobody can add anything they don't want. So basically if the """artist""" doesn't admit it's AI you have no way of actually calling them out, especially if they delete or block comments too.Frankly pixiv should forbid AI art altogether. Period.
>>4481239>>4481241>>4481290>started posting very recently within the last few months>maid's right hand.>Pixiv has a huge issue right nowDon't you dare you three to make me use my last two braincells for today. I'm trying to drown them in beer. Okai, it's fair to mention that the artist did only start posting very recently. First picture (in a set of three) is from July 4, 2025 10:57 AM named "自撮り" - Google translate says it's "Selfie" with the description "0704" which we might assume is most likely the date of the upload. I did not look at the day because I didn't really care for the rest that much desu.We have the following tags: Original - 女の子girl - 少女young girl - イラストillustrationgirl - 眼鏡 glasses - 自撮りselfie (which confirms the earlier translation). It has 229 likes 444 hearts and was seen 3,322 times (as of 22:55:10). We have one comment from モリゾー posted on Jul 13th, which makes this 6 days after posting the image. It shows the usual white elephant with heart eyes and blood shooting out of its trunk. I've asked 3 different AI image analzyers (screenapp, grasp, filebrain) They can't neither definitely confirm or deny it - can someone run that through with a better more definitive result?So if we just go for quantity: Why can't it be an image dump?The next picture set of three is called the same as the one before and was posted on the July 6, 2025 9:29 PM. Two days after posting the first. With an odd description: 0707. So it doesn't mean the day of the upload? Disregarding the tags, likes, hearts and views we accumulated one more in the comment section besides old faithful モリゾー on Jul 13th (this time with a different picture). tandemsky. This user posted on the Jul 7th. One day after the image got uploaded. All around positive vibe reactions. [1/2]
[2/2]If we are going down the immense flood of images we have the following result:Third set of three: July 7, 2025 6:47 PM (not even 24 hours) - No comments.Fourth set of four: July 8, 2025 8:59 PM (over 24 hours) - モリゾー is back on the Jul 13th.Fifth set of three: July 9, 2025 6:03 PM (under 24 hours) - three comments, one from our regular poster and two from a Chinese and a Japanese (all three of them positive, as Google translates tells me) on different dates.After skipping a day we follow the same procedure. Another set. The artist follows through we an uploading frenzy throughout July with the highest delay of 4 days between posts (pic related with the number 1 made me highly suspicious).August was seemingly a slow upload month with huge gaps and not even close to the amount as before. In those posted on September and October we also possibly see why the "artist" first used a girl with glasses but no eyes. Because now we can see the kinks appearing.In conclusion you all are right to be suspicious and it was indeed important that the uploader used so many in such a short of time. They messed up and forgot to clean some details which made capturing the odd ones easier. Thank you all. This was a major lesson for me.
>>4481526>>4481527None of us needed to go into such depth on the topic. We could just tell its generative image software by looking at it. I guess it's just something you need to develop a healthy sense for.And again, Pixiv allows this garbage, so there aren't even any consequences if you report it.
>>4481678>None of us needed to go into such depth on the topic.So you are admitting to making base assumptions? Without checking if what you are assuming is right or wrong? And you assume to speak for all? I understand you shouldn't take things at face value but I don't think you should just take what you think and feel first as facts. In my eyes it's preferable to be the dumbest person in the room instead of the smartest with the ability and the people to grow from ignorance.There are lazy artists and different artstyles. That's what prompted the first question. And with that in mind I can excuse some previously mentioned discrepancies posted from different anonettes earlier. Hatching? Never heard the term. Had to look that up. Interesting topic. Fines lines melding together? Hard to spot when the resolution is so low and you have to really zoom in to spot that. Either sis didn't need to do that or has a better monitor. However, at least for me, it's definitely hard to spot. There are some weird lines but as noted before my first assumption was "lazy artist" (no clean up of botched lines). This is the same for the maid's right hand. The positioning of the girl in the back I could also excuse with lazy proportions or she was just starting to kiss the tailbone of the maid with the nose underneath the skirt and working her way towards the goal. AI doesn't create art in the human way. It has an immense library to build from. From other artists and lifelike images. Like we do (external art by other artists and our eyes). So that specific artstyle must have come from somewhere.Admittedly it's lazy to not do a background check but I do think after this experience it's necessary instead of trusting at first that it's AI or it's not AI. The time might come when a real artist gets wrongfully accused of AI generating an image because they grew up with some "good" ones.Although what I am certain of is: I know that I know nothing.
>>4481707
it's almost 2026 anons, there's ai you notice and ai you don't notice, but it's going to be there most of the time either way; the bigger the work, the higher the amountyou're like the ones who still get mad at using 3d or even just digital tools, it's part of the industry whether you like it or not
>>4481526>>4481527Why do you care so much whether or not Ai was used? If Ai receives this much autistic attention its no wonder people use it.
>>4481151What's this from?
Speaking of AI, generating stories with this premise is pretty hot. It'd be nice if there was more nonslop smut for this topic, but it's almost all hypno.
>>4481727Why shouldn't I be?First of all I was just curious how someone could spot that in such a short time because I genuinely couldn't. If you want to learn, the easiest way is to ask for help or clarification. Second I don't like baseless assumptions. They lead to misunderstandings and unreasonable accusations. People seem to mistake my endless prodding and my open stupidity for autistic screeching I'd rather be labelled autistic or stupid than stop what I am doing. Not everyone has the ability to teach and it gets frustrating over time when someone doesn't want to understand the material. But I'm willing to learn and thankful for corrections. I'm sorry if this is annoying. I neither want to condemn or defend AI I just wanted to be able to spot the difference. That's all.
>>4481742Your break down of an illustration and pointing out Ai elements is moot, what you're really doing is soft shilling for the artist since nobody cared who they were until you came along and made all that noise. It's a valiant effort but nevertheless the end result is that the artist churned out content and people will continue to consume it regardless of Ai being used; I used to be a puritan myself believing in organic growth until I realized most success comes from faking it until you make it. Cheating will trump anybody who doesn't and the cold hard truth is nobody cares if you invested weeks drawing an illustration the bottom line is how quickly you're able to produce content that appeals to people with attention span of a couple seconds.Those who complain about Ai are disillusioned art chuds that cry foul when their piece didn't receive any acknowledgement.
>>4481729https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/135865528
>>4481756Is that thread relevant, just seems like general yuri?
>>4481752This is a fascinating viewpoint and absolutely unintentional. I saw it as collecting evidence it is indeed AI. To prove they are right in their earlier assumption. I wouldn't have started that "noise" if someone didn't point out it's Ai. But I can see that asking for it might be seen as soft shilling.However, I can only claim fault to the increase in number of views. Any other action after that is as far as I see out of my hand. For example I see a good and brave soul in one of those pictures pointing out it's Ai a day ago. Let's see how long this will last, yes? Not telling which because that would be soft shilling.At the end of day, it's fair game for me to use everything in your arsenal to bring something to live that is stuck in your mind and needs to find an outlet through your arm. Especially if you are in pain while doing it. But solely giving an Ai the brush or only doing the 3d models then changing the color to give the illusion of hand drawn feels wrong. I'd rather have an artist that can still do what they want and lessen the pain than a sole Ai artist or no no artist at all. You have to get creative to workaround that. But it has to be for me the human hand that worked on that in the end. Don't care if robotic arm or not. Or just change to a different arm.Ai is a tool. And it will stay a tool up to the point it chooses in a robotic body to paint for itself. Than I recognize Ai art. You wouldn't dare deny Roboko her art piece, would you?
>>4481804>>4481752>>4481742What the fuck are you talking about, are you just trying to derail the thread? Fuck off already, slop is slop and I don't give a shit about talking about it's merit or whatever the fuck. It's entirely off-topic
>>4481810My bad, I'm sorry. Relative piece offering?
>>4481810>I don't give a shit about talking about it's meritPoint in case.
