Old thread >>4059618#
>>4489175
>>4489178
>>4487267It's a bandori fic where Lisa uses a device designed to shrink musical equipment for easier transport to shrink herself and climb Yukina's body.https://rentry.co/hag2rs9o
>>4489399Thanks anon, I'll read it soon.
>>4489183> _1.pngSo you have more then?
>>4490553
>>4489986Nope, this was the file name for some reason, wish there was tho. This scenario is so hot
>>4490636Really has the look of something with more context. Looks like it's not a first panel though, the shot are too tight. I might try digging for it
>>4491205It involves the ocs of someone else and the artist, they are featured in other comics of the artist some times together AFAIK.
>>4491643Well if you have it post it. If not thanks for the info.
Super Love From Ultra Deep Space
>>4489175No idea if this was already posted in the previous thread, but here.
>>4508566I'm still amazing we got this in Gushing. Can't wait for season 2.
>>4508567
>>4514661Thats hot
>>4514661Is there more of this?
>>4522095There's this one by the same artist.
I just want a giant Onee-sama
>>4541276
Bet you didn't expect Big Mom yuri.
>>4552916not enough girls taking care of their tiny older sisters
>>4553273I kinda wanna see her get sat on, ngl
>https://e-hentaiorg/g/3923725/05a6930a2b/
>>4556067That would be a crime.
>>4534544My personal canon title would be: "My personal guardian angel is a bit too much clingy"
>>4565936
I'm envious
>>4566912Imagine the smell
>>4586524sauce?
>>4587400https://x.com/TiredThunder/status/2085097663674904708
>>4489175https://x.com/i/status/2087149286534570138
>>4588894
We’re imagining four idealized “Alpha/Sigma” humanoids based only on naked-body visual sexual attractiveness:Women ideal male: ~190 cm / 6'3"Gay men ideal male: ~185–188 cm / 6'1"–6'2"Men ideal female: ~170 cm / 5'7"Lesbian women ideal female: ~172–175 cm / 5'8"–5'9"Then we asked: if every proportion stays exactly the same and we only scale the entire body up or down, how far could they go while remaining viable humans?Best scientific estimateMinimum: ~70–80 cm (2'4"–2'7")Maximum: ~2.5–2.7 m (8'2"–8'10")These are theoretical estimates, not proven hard limits.Below ~60–70 cm, proportionally shrinking the brain, organs, metabolism and cardiovascular system becomes increasingly problematic. Humans have survived at ~55 cm, but those cases involved severe growth disorders and altered anatomy.Above ~2.5 m, mass rises extremely quickly because it scales roughly with height3. A 190-cm, 100-kg man scaled to 2.7 m would weigh ~286 kg, creating severe stresses on bones, joints, muscles and circulation. Large mammals solve this with anatomical changes, which our thought experiment forbids.Robert Wadlow reached 2.72 m, proving humans can reach that height, but he had pathological gigantism and major mobility problems.Bottom lineFor our perfectly proportionally scaled, otherwise normal humanoids, the best defensible range is approximately:~0.7 m ~2.7 mFor a more conservative healthy, athletic, fully functional range:~0.8 m ~2.5 m
>>4589058Using the extreme proportional-scaling estimates we established:Largest woman: ~2.5–2.7 m (8'2"–8'10")Smallest woman: ~0.7–0.8 m (2'4"–2'7")If both are standing upright on the same floor, facing each other, the top of the smaller woman's head would reach roughly the larger woman's lower-to-mid thigh.For example, with a 2.6 m large woman and a 0.75 m small woman:Small woman's height = 75 cmThat's about 29% of the large woman's heightThe large woman's knee would be roughly around 25–27% of her heightSo the little woman's head would come up to approximately the large woman's knee or slightly above it, around the lower thigh.With the most extreme combination (~0.7 m vs ~2.7 m), she'd be slightly below the large woman's knee.With ~0.8 m vs ~2.5 m, she'd be somewhat above the knee, toward the lower/mid-thigh.So visually:2.6 m woman:HEAD ~75 cmTHIGHKNEE approximately hereSHINFEETIn short: the smallest woman's head would be around the largest woman's knee/lower thigh—not her waist or hips.
If two planets in the same solar system naturally evolved technologically advanced humanoids at our estimated extremes—~2.5–2.7 m giants and ~0.7–0.8 m tiny humans—we could make some educated guesses, but their body sizes alone wouldn’t uniquely determine the planets. Giant-humanoid planetLikely:Lower gravity, perhaps ~0.6–0.8 g, making enormous bodies easier to support.A large rocky planet, potentially ~1.2–1.5 Earth radii.A substantial atmosphere, perhaps ~1–1.5 atm, with roughly Earth-like or somewhat higher oxygen.Abundant liquid water and extensive land.A relatively stable, productive climate supporting a large terrestrial ecosystem. Tiny-humanoid planetPossibly:Higher gravity, perhaps ~1.1–1.5 g, favoring compact bodies.A smaller/denser rocky planet, perhaps ~0.8–1.1 Earth masses.A substantial atmosphere and abundant liquid water.Environmental pressures favoring small, efficient terrestrial organisms.However, gravity isn't the only explanation. Evolutionary history, climate, available food, predators, sexual selection and ecological competition could all influence body size. We therefore couldn't look at the humanoids and determine their planets' gravity with certainty. Their starA particularly plausible setup would be a K-type orange dwarf, perhaps ~0.7–0.9 solar masses. K dwarfs are attractive for long-term habitability because they live considerably longer than Sun-like stars while generally being less problematic than very active red dwarfs.The two planets could therefore occupy different parts of the star's habitable zone: the giant world somewhat farther out and the tiny world somewhat closer in.Most likely overall picture: two old, rocky, water-rich, biologically productive planets orbiting a long-lived orange star, with their radically different humanoid sizes resulting from a combination of planetary conditions and independent evolutionary histories.
>>4589058>>4589063>>4589064Why are you posting this AI garbage here?
>>4593474
