They make it possible for you to see the vision the devs couldn't create with the primitive technology they had during their time.
right looks better
>>739423326>>739423352t.
right is better
>>739423352Off course aquajeet like the AI generated slop better
Left is better
>>739423352>>739423326fpbp
>>739423238left looks like a cartoonright looks like a video game
>>739423238>>739423326>>739423352>NOOO YOU CAN'T STYLISE YOUR WORK YOU REALISM RACIST PERMA VIRGIN
>>739423238The sky, church lighting and moon glow on the right are all unrealistic so a remake wouldn't have any of that and would instead have Technically Accurate Path Tracing which would look even worse
impressionism is my favorite art movement tbqh. have seen van gogh's and monet's paintings in museumsi'm kinda surprised i haven't seen more games attempt an (post-)impressionist art style outside of a handful. there was a game in /v/ dev threads that pulled it off well but i haven't seen it in a while, there was that one-off nsmbu level that was probably the most interesting modern mario has ever looked and skyward sword also tries for the style but doesn't pull it off very well when the world is so small and dense imo
>>739423238lol left looks like some shit I doodled with crayons at applebees on the playmat
>>739423238A better argument would be a graphics mod for Minecraft as Minecraft was deliberately made in that pixelated style even when the tech was available to make a higher fidelity game. Painters were never limited by the technology available to them like old video games were.
>>739423238The thing on the left is a tree? I always assumed it was a cool wizard's tower.
/v/ hates all remakes/remasters out of principle so even if it was the exact same game and looked exactly the same but just ran at a higher framerate made to work in widescreen some faggot here would go>"SOULLESS">THIS ISN'T THE ORIGINAL ARTISTIC VISION OF WHAT THE DEVELOPERS OF SUPERMAN 64 INTENDED
>>739423238Ai is based
>>739423326>>739423352Good morning!
>>739426584thisall remakes and remasters are exactly the same as their original
>>739423238Right is better. Art died after the 1800`s because of that surrealist crap.
>>739423238Right looks better
>>739426584Fixed
>>739423326>>739423352More proof that weebs have no taste. Which explains why they can tolerate anime made after the 90's.
yoooo ai slop already existed back then? das crazy
>>739426584I think remakes made by the original developers are fine
>>739426584>IT'S EXACTLY THE SAMESo there's not point in buying it!You played yourself, kike.
>>739426835Silent Hill remaster is cheating. They literally started putting comic sans into the game and everyone agrees it's a shit game. Plus the fog was just due to hardware limitations and it was a happy coincidence it also happened to make the game more spooky. One of the things the game is most known for is the fog, so now can't have fog show up in real life without some faggot going "WOW THIS IS JUST LIKE SILENT HILL". No, fog existed before Silent Hill you retard.But I heard the actual remake is good even though I didn't play it. But I did play the original Silent Hill 2 and it was an annoying and felt like "yeah you would only like this if you played it as a kid in the 90s". It's kind of like an adventure game where none of the logic makes sense to anyone but the devs.
>>739427272Is Medievil PS4 cheating? Is RE3make cheating? Is Metal Gear Solid: The Twin Snakes cheating? Is Conker Live and Reloaded cheating? Is Pokemon Brilliant Diamond and Shining Pearl cheating?
>>739427429>Is RE3make cheating?I don't know about the new Resident Evil remakes but the original Resident Evil remake made for the Gamecube is largely considered superior to the original.
>>739427559Yeah that game's cool but I'm pretty sure I said 3.
>>739423238>Impressionism vs Realism. That's 2 different genresThat's like saying the Demon's Souls Remake is not a Souls game anymore
>>739426584Some games are unironically better in 4:3 thougheverbeit.
>>739423238>AI can't even make it a crescent moonSoulless
>>739423824For reals tho, pictures don't do Van Gogh paintings justice. He slathered that shit on and a picture of it can't capture the 3D quality of how fucking thick and textured the strokes are.
>>739427272> Plus the fog was just due to hardware limitations and it was a happy coincidence it also happened to make the game more spooky.DUDE! It's just a coincidence! I can't imagine artists intentionally making use of the limitations of what they are working with.
>>739423238Is there another painter that people today jack off anywhere near as much as they jack off van Gogh? I see some people online jack off Dali and Beksinski, but I'd argue it's nowhere near as much.
It looks better, what's the problem, chud? The original painting still exists and you can appreciate it, but I'm gonna appreciate the remake because it looks better. You lost, AI won. Deal with it chud
>>739423238that was supposed to be a tree?I always thought it was some kind of nightmarish tower
i like both
>>739423326>>739423352BASED
>>739427868The main reason Van Gogh is even famous is just because he cut off his ear. That's the story of most art. It's less about the actual art itself and more about the story behind the artist. Right now there is probably some artist who is ridiculously skilled but he just spends all his time drawing like Sonic the Hedeghog wrinkly feet or something weird so no one will take him seriously.Actually that's what a lot of artists do nowadays they just take commissions from people which means they might end up drawing like SpongeBob and Optimus Prime romantic fan fiction even if they're not into that sort of stuff because got to make money some way.
>>739428256That's certainly part of it, but he was also quite innovative.
>>739428256Norman Rockwell is a pretty good at painting but it sucks this piece of shit of a site has just reduced one of his most famous paintings to something you see when someone is going to give you a bad opinion.>WELL I THINK BIRDO IS THE MOST ATTRACTIVE SUPER MARIO WOMAN
>>739423326>>739423352Okay sanjay.
>>739428563I fucking hate 4chan so much. It gets worse every year.
>>739428563Rockwell was a commercial artist though, who did ads, patriotic propaganda and kind of kitschy Americana. He's still a great artist, but not really in the same category.
>>739423238The fact almost nobody knows what OP means by the pic he posted tells me I need to get off this board permanently, it seems all of the white / asian people left, this is clear from the amount of broken English here, the indians or whatever they are can't even tell the difference between an artstyle and graphical realism. My last post here, fuck this.
>>739423326>>739423352>>739423401You have no soul
>>739423326>>739423352This but post-ironically.
>>739428256>Right now there is probably some artist who is ridiculously skilled but he just spends all his time drawing like Sonic the Hedeghog wrinkly feetArt is about more than just your technical skill at handling a paintbrush. What you choose to depict and how you choose to depict it matters, and it matters even more now that we have photography and AIslop. Lack of art direction is why most technically impressive modern GPU tech raytraced 4k videogame scenes actually just look shit
>>739432585Damn, Hanebado still looks amazing.
>>739423238videogames arent art faglord.
Remake this.
>>739432585This is super jarring to watch, some parts are great then goes back to shit, then back to great, then back to shit, the quality goes up and down.
Why do artfags hate Starry Night so much?
>>739423326>>739423352I'll give you that it's interesting to see what Van Gogh likely would have literally visually seen to inspire Starry Night, but the painting itself still has more artistic weight to it.>>739431456heh
