Halo remake hasn't been developed in house. What could possibly go wrong?
Would you be more or less concerned if 343 did it all in-house?
>>739636265Is no different to how 343i was a revolving door of contractors that only worked for 18 months with a handful of permanent staff
>>739636265who gives a fuck? you'd have to be a completely retarded piece of shit to play demakes.
>halo player pretends to have standards
>>739636265That's pretty much every modern game though
>>739636265Halo wasn't good when it was made in-house by Microsoft, so why are Halo trannies bitching now?
>>739637054they are now old enough to be nostalgic about garbage, oblivious to the fact they are the reason the industry took the direction it did.
>>739636265xbrahmin we will finally reclaim out izzatt from those bloddy frenchisher bastads
>>73963626590% of Microsoft's workforce are 18 month contractors, it's why everything they make is ass
>>739636265As opposed to what? What does 'in-house' even mean when it's a completely different set of people with different ideas that make shit games? Just because they have the legal name?
Halo was never good to begin with.
>>739637054They saw an ammo count on the needler model
>>739636680>halo pretending to have players
The only good Halo games where the Halo Wars games, which are both a completely different genre, but also developed by completely different devs.
>>739636265warcraft reforged
So it might actually be good?
>>739639039That does look awful, but it’s not Halo
Nobody would care if people just found that out while looking at the credits, but announcing it beforehand makes it sound like the game is shit and they're trying to dodge responsibility.
>>739636265The revolving door contractors they had in-house made it basically indistinguishable from out-sourced garbage anyway
