What did Atlus mean by this?
Putting women in bikinis to sell products works and makes the consumer more likely to buy products.
>>739729412I was told that wanting to see cute girls in revealing outfits makes you a bad person.
that all atlus fans are die-alone incels
>>739729248Yukiko > all
>>739729531well you live in america or uk
>>739729531It makes you a woman-fetishizing chud creep incel, yes.
>>739730269Unfortunately, yes.
>>739729248Men in general are hebephiles.
>>739730310There's your problem. Your country is either brown or black.
>>739729248Girls wear bikini when they go to the beach, that's normal
>>739730309>woman-fetishizingI know you're memeing, but I'm willing to bet that some people think men being attracted to women is actually some weird fetish.
It is a light-hearted intro to a video game made for teenagers. I don't think there's a deeper meaning to it.
Today this scene would be 152 rolls post-pitty.
>>739729248>girl in bikini bad>boy in thong good
>>739730463Skimpier ones than that, even.
>>739730415It's literally encoded into us at a genetic level. Am I allowed to point out that women are gold diggers (and that's okay)?
>>739729248Women simply need to embrace their true selves.
>>739730698She'd have 152 rolls as well and own a furbaby pitty
>>739730954Men talking about women in any negative way is inceldom, so no.
>>739731018My apologies. All women are queens that deserve 10/10 husbands just for existing.
>>739730954No I get you. Women naturally feel attracted to Men who are better providers. If anything, romantic love is a weird invention we came up with to reduce make the most people happy I guess. Monogamy is not natural and favors unfit men the most. Which makes sense considering men have been in charge for most of human history. If we lived in a society ruled by women then we would have reached chadgamy ages ago.
>>739731134That is literally what they and their simps believe.
>dude the girl that wants to be a boy and has the smallest chest actually has massive titskek who wrote this?
>>739731267Busty women who downplay their big tits is incredibly hot though
>>739731134They unironically do but 10/10 husbands are not in high supply. >But men should also deserve a 10/10 wife!That would be operating under gender equality logic which is woke shit.Men and women are just not the same.
>>739731297This guy gets it.
>>739731267Genius japanese master at work.
>>739731328The problem is that the 10/10 men that women want do not want or need monogamy
>>739731267>cute tomboy is also secretly a titty monsterHNGGGGGGGG
>>739731220Partially correct. Monogamy exists to make as many people as possible as happy as possible. If nature had ran its course it would either be the male extreme or the female extreme. The female extreme is an actual 90/10 world where most men would either have to pay for or go without the touch of a woman while the "lucky" 10% would be literal breeding bulls and nothing else. The male extreme is that women are literal slaves that exist only in breeding camps while what child is kept is extremely selective.Neither of which are good options so monogamy is the happy middle-ground.
>>739731625>Neither of which are good optionsThat's just your opinion.
>>739731267Revealing massive tits underneath wraps is like the female equivalent of men taking training weights off in shounen manga
>>739731674Nah, damming 50% of humanity is not preferable to you having to talk to a woman to reproduce.
>>739731792Back to your lobsters.
>>739729412Pretty much this.It's weird just how many persona 4 haters can't comprehend this simple thing
>>739731942>having to talk to a woman to reproduce.That's what we have today and it's making every advanced society go extinct because people are terrible at making choicesIn societies that actually historically reproduced, your parents or your master just told who you would marry and have kids with once you were old enough, and it was a matter of duty and you could fuck off with all that "love" and "consent" bullshit and if you refused you would be a social outcast.
>>739733393It has a lot to do with the fact that anything geared towards heterosexual men is off-putting to them, despite it being the norm for decades.
>>739733281Ummm ...... That's a literal CHILD!
>>739733450No it's not. In the 50s we were leaning towards the male extreme, women were delegated to chores, housework and breeding while in the 2020s were leaning towards the female extreme where 1 chad fucks 10 women while (You) die unloved.The pendulum swings between the two extremes as it always has.
>>739731625It's not about happiness, it's about stability.Being a chad doesn't mean you're invincible, even a small group of betas can simply team up and kill you. Only a society where the providing gender (men) has reasonable access to the breeding gender (women) can be stable medium to long-term. Note that even in that society, the highest value men have access to the highest value women, but if they monopolize access, that's a very quick way to get stabbed in the back.
>>739733801You might be surprised to hear that for the last thousand years killing people is generally frowned upon.
>>739729248
>>739733874Killing people of your in-group has been "frowned upon", as you put it, for longer than homo sapiens as a species exists, for basically any social species. Similarly, trying to monopolize productive access is also "frowned upon" and can very quickly lead to exclusion. You will find that for species that do monopolize access (gorillas, lions), they rarely have other males within their group, usually only as offspring, and only for a limited time before they are "thrown out" to start their own harem.
>>739734129Yes and that would be a great example if humans had brains the size of golfballs like lions and gorillas.
>>739729412>womenthat's a drawing bro. there's no woman there
>>739729248It was a deep and insightful commentary on how the media sexualizes underage girls for profit
>>739734806that would give me such a huge erection. there's no way that laura bailey wouldn't be able to see it. i think she's the kind of woman who would enjoy that she gave me a boner but would have to pretend to be disgusted and call security (even though she's the one who gave me a boner by saying that she has to take a fat, smelly, greasy shit in rise's voice) due to professional reasons and foid hivemind reasons
>>739734806So quite based?
>>739730415>>739730954I struggle with this. Like I look at a 16 year old and I see that she's in the prime of her youth, physically mature. And I'm supposed to see them as a kid? How do people manage that?
>>739733982She's so fucking cute right here.
>>739731625>>739733801>>739733874>>739734129Monogamy works to keep civilization largely stable because women are accessible, so men strive to work for the right to have them. If that social contract breaks and women start forming harems around the chads then those non-chad men stop working. And society needs those men to run.
>>739734806>Laura BaileyI detest matt fucking Mercer and his gaggle of faggots so god damned much. Theyre in everything and they always sound the exact same
And here I thought the other bait Persona threads were bad
>>739733771>In the 50s we were leaning towards the male extreme, women were delegated to chores, housework and breedingYou don't know shit about history, dude. Women were not chattel slaves in the fucking 1800's, let alone 50's.
>>739731267It will be remembered for millenia
>>739729412I can't remember the last time I saw an ad which tried to sell the thing in question with hot ladies, much less ones in bikinis.
