Ragnarok lads? Who asked for this?
Looks like shit, yet another low effort attempt from Gravity to keep Ragnarok relevantI'll probably pick it up on switch 2 anyways
>>740008134They somehow keep making ragnarok more soulless each time they try to milk it, the AI used on that one looks awful.
>>740008243>looks like shit>low effort>ill buy itretard ???
>>740009192Yeah I'm retardedI've spent 15 years playing the mmo on and off so I'm at least interested in seeing thing I can point at and say >I recognize that!!!!!
But then how will I meet young girls to chat?
>>740009349>how can I make this thread about pointless consolewar faggotry?
>>740009349pc won't either since pc gaming is done
They're making too much money to just sit still anyways.
ALL Ro games since 10 years ago have been absolute p2w slop (mobile, pc and official servers). This one will be filled with mtxs. I’d wait when the full version ‘Ro definitive edition from thor’ goes on sale.
Gravity will license the IP to a fucking ameba if it pays the fees, i can't think of another IP more whore'd out than ragnarok, not even sportsball have it this bad
>>740008134if it's the original MMO but single player ill play it
>>740008134>turn-basedinto the trash it goes
>>740008134>Ragnarok goes single playerAgain?
>>740013429Again? Again?
>>740008134And you say Ragnarok is targeting Sony systems.....AGAIN?!?
>>740012925it's anything but that sadlyhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpC1j2OpUIM
>>740013639So it's DS again?
>thought they were releasing a single player version of ragnarok where theres bots and a bunch of other stuff so you can play ragnarok offline>just some retard game using the title ragnaroki sleep
