So how are they going to butcher it?
>>740259178Shitty ass character models lower quality than OG Resident Evil 4. Just like every other ecchi game.
>>740259351So never ever realismslop. Already better.
by not making it
>>740259351I was asking about GG3 specifically, not the entire series.
>>740259178My guess is no clothing damage.ORThere is lewd but it's relegated to one cutscene way in the middle so no reviewers or censors will ever see it.
was it confirmed or something?
>>740260141No, that's just an illustration Inti Creates made for Famitsu's 40th anniversary. There are 2 new characters there and they're announcing a new game at TGS so there's that.
2's vacuum gimmick sucked. I hope they don't do something like that again.
Hope it's a FPS
>>740259178It'll be Gal Guardians 3, they wouldn't create Gal Gun 3 with two twintail main heroines
>>740259558until they make it 2.5D unity mush with bloom smeared over everything and "modernized" UI that looks like a mobile gacha still better than western face scanned goblins though
>>740259178oooh, luminous avenger collection?
>>740259178If not Guardians 3, then probably just some tech demo kind of thing like Gal Gun VR. I really can't see them committing to a full sequel for something that's going to be banned or censored everywhere.
>>740263984Yes, they made a collection and made it obsolete before it was even released, the absolute madmen.
>implying it even gets made
>>740259178No Doki Doki Mode, or it's changed to something "wholesome and consensualerino"No clothing damage/vacuumPantyshot angles blocked like the original Xbox 360 versionNo lolis/flattiesWill be set in college instead of highschool (and the above points will still apply because the "they're heckin underaged" argument was always just the motte feminists retreated to after the "rape culture/muh soggy knees" thing started losing currency).Will still be banned from SteamWill still be censored on Shittendo ShitchIt will be firmly in "why did they even bother?" territory
>>740259178LOVE ME! MITSUMETE LOVE ME!
If it were to get made, they should just go down the Steam + patch route to start with then let Nintendo JP have whatever they are willing to take for a JP/Asia console release. China will buy more on Steam then the West would buy on console anyways, especially if it is cut down to what the Western consoles would allow.
>>740267659This would be ideal, but few non-eroge Japanese publishers are willing to do this for some reason. Inti cited wanting all versions of the game to be consistent as their reason for canceling the Xbox One version of Gal*Gun Returns and I suspect the same mentality is at least part of the reason why JP ecchi developers tend to just self-censor rather than play as close to each platform's rules as possible.
>>740259178The wiki admin thinks this is a tease for Gal Guardians rather than Gal*Gun 3.If it is, I think we can conclusively that Gal Guardians is no longer a spinoff. When are Inti going to come out and admit Gal Guardians was conceived as a replacement for Gal*Gun? Why are Inti so desperate to hang onto this series even at the expense of everything it once stood for rather than just let it lie like Senran Kagura?I'm already sick of all these pussywhipped Japanese developers talking about reviving their ecchi game series only to not fully commit out of fear of being canceled. You have to know what it means to make such games in current year. If you're not willing to commit, don't fucking bother.
>>740268949Schizo behavior of yours. Also>wiki adminTalk about a nothingburger.
>>740268949>wiki adminlmao
>>740268949>wiki adminBe honest, is that you?
>>740269620No.
