[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


>former Bioware, Bethesda, Naughty Dog devs
I'd really like to believe that this could turn out good, maybe and MAYBE if it ends up being more RPG and less survival. Because who the fuck is buying another early access survival open world crafting game in current year.
>>
So it's grounded but you're a rat? Isn't this 4 years too late?
>>
>>740276063
The races are 'asymmetrical' (how no one knows yet) but the Owls can fly. I guess they're trying to get the 'my friend showed me ROOT but we didn't know how to play it' audience
>>
>>740275960
>survival crafting game, but with town building and named NPCs
Nice.
>real world-scale rat adventures
Very cool!
>medieval or illuminated manuscript UI elements
I like it.
>gameplay video immediately looks like assets dropped into an engine that could have been made by one guy
It's over. I feel less willing to give the benefit of the doubt to early access games than ever.
>>
>>740275960
>former blabla devs
never turns out well
>>
>>740275960
looks like a yet another generic survival/craft slop but with animals this time, and multiplayer to make players (instead of developers) create their own gameplay.
Indie devs could make whatever they want, but somehow that is always a 5% clone of a popular thing



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.