Was it too white-coded for the soulsbrown audience?
Other way around
>>740316850You know the story in this game is that a simp king ruined his kingdom because of a foid
If it wasn't called dark souls 2 I would have enjoyed it more. The original director should have just been allowed to do his own thing and make his own (blank) souls game. It's like calling dark souls 1 demon souls 2.
>>740316850Yes
Explain how it's "white coded". It seems like ass.
>>740316850Based on how DaS 3 went out and YT audience reaction, I simply assume that so called "true Dark Souls fans" simply expects and wants same game all the time. I honestly don't understand all the hate 2 got and why they prised 3. Nothing 3 did makes sense in comparison - return of retarded SL based (plus upgrade based) matchmaking for both PvP and coop (so you again have to follow some very strict builds, even more so given very precise stat requirements for weapons and their general availability if you want to engage in coop - PvP at the other hand, will always works in a way of getting invaders messing up your game), stupidly linear world design (basically one path to follow with very little variation), absurd weapon requirements (with developers openly stating they are designed with online play in mind), BB level of combat speed and delayed attacks (yes, they were present before but this was the point where they started to get ridiculous) and many more.Dark Souls 2 deserved to be whole separate game, away from unworthy crowd.
>>740317167How was he supposed to know she was demonic entity?
>>740317696The game could have this insane vibehttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=U6uyuIQYlfYNot the released slop we got
if anything it was too ambitiously white for the japs to handle
>>740316850I have nightmares about the Darklurker still
>>740317167that’s classic literature though, literally the homer epics are started because of shit like yhis
>>740316850>Was it too white-codedWhat does this even mean?
>>740318491found one