[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1766223449819.jpg (317 KB, 1280x720)
317 KB JPG
>Turning off the "Hair" practically doubles the FPS and in some cases looks outright better (when it gets wet in the rain)

This is just a cutscene example. It gets worse when you're actually in the thick of action.

Are there any other examples of poorly programmed/fucked up graphical settings?

Sadly, there's no fix for the FPS tanking from using a sniper scope as it double renders a scene. Absolute Capcom retardation.
>>
The hair in Requiem was so good it was really jarring to jump into Death Stranding 2 after and seeing insanely good character models with terrible hair
>>
>>740341041
I dont take advice from people who think 78 is double 56
>>
>>740341041
they took time for baking the stuff in with artist time
asset quality is more important than anyone would assume
>>
>>740341041
no shit. this is why they still don't have good foliage in any game. it's still way too demanding on even the best hardware.
>>
My hair is very similar to Leon's.
>>
>>740341041
Whats the difference between 58 and 79 fps



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.