We need more riddle games to keep nu-gamers' minds sane.
9
>>740971583Think about the question closely.
0 because of some bullshit I bet. Maybe with a knife because slicing doesn't count as breaking.
>>7409714681
>>740971709well it's either 9 or 29depends on what they mean by the "you aren't allowed to stack" rule
I'm going to assume 29 or something like that.
29!
>>740971468I'll always find funny how /v/ for so mind broken by some of these puzzles that they think every single one has to be some bullshit answer instead of just using your head a bit
>>740971934I'd assume that stacking would be breaking it in half, then putting one half ontop of the other and then breaking them "once" for a double break
>>740971989if the answer to a "puzzle" is straightforward then it's not a fucking puzzle.
>>740971468ZERO, they're rectangles
0, you slam the chocolate bar on the ground and it naturally breaks.
>>740971468Nah you need more warcraft 3 from before it got pozzed by reforgedhttps://fileditchfiles.me/temp/ec3eaeb41572d96a2c39/Warcraft_3_1.31.zipWarcraft 3: N9UBI4-GRQS-TDV29O-QF8H-7SMKLMReign of Chaos: B6TEVN YD2V-X4MFXX-VNHX-PZ2R2RFrozen Throne: WGMNX2-EGT7-8KD9EV-H6ZR-ZPH7PZlink is good for a bit over 3 days.A friend shared this to me so I am sharing the love (after finding some keys that worked for it)
>>740971934What else could it possibly mean?
>>740971468Nowhere does it say that you have to break it in a straight line from one side to the other.
>>740972027Who said it was straightforward? You're the exact kind of person I'm talking about
the answer is ONE! you could've used a press to break everything all at once!
>>740971934>>740971952>>740971984Quite simple innit?
>>740972101Wrong thread?Also 1.31.1 is absolutely broken. Blizzard picks 1.29.2 because it's the least broken old pre-reforged WC3 that supports 24 players.
>>740971989>professor layton>ever having a straightforward answerPick one and only one.
I slam it hard onto a concrete floor.The question never stipulated they be intact.
>>740972167>you can only break the chocolate at the lines that run between squares
>>740971468>>740971583>>740971583It is 9 layton you fraudulent faggot. >no stackingYou said nothing about holding multiple columns of chocolate in hand at once in parallel, not stacked. Checkmate you slimy limey tosser.
>>740972134>>740972262The wording was>you aren't allowed to stack multiple segments on top of each otherI interpreted that literally, as it's a weird way to phrase the rule, so logically you could break multiple along each column/row as long as it traced along one line.I do not like the wording of this puzzle.
There's something really puzzling about chocolate, don't you think?
>>740972076>>740972285>throwing your chocolate on the floorAnd you intend to eat it afterwards?
>>740972293NTA, but I think he means that you could break intermediate segments without severing the bar.But I suspect that would count as stacking.
>>740972387Americans am I right?
>>740972331zero, what the fuck?
>>740972429Could I get that with more artifacts please?
>>740972262there's no riddle then...LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYTOOOOOOOOOON
>>7409723318 I think?
>>740972387Wrap it in foil first, dumdum.
>>74097242919
You guys think you're detectives, eh? Then this should be easy.
>>740972535The riddle was the friends you made along the way.
>>740972429Every asshole thinks they're so goddamn smart slightly changing the pictures in the last row.
>>74097242931, if there are 2 flowers in the bottom onecaterpillar =7, clock=6, flower=2
>>740972262genuinely a retarded "puzzle"
>>740972561Either way is 8, this or just repeating the vertical slices all the way down
>>740972641drippingslick
>>740972641That pussy is wet.
>>740972693It's wrong. Stacked=/=held in parallel. The answer is 9.
>>740972761I agree but the "correct" answer is 29 because fuck you
>>740972561That's exactly right.
>>740972641She was sucking off the fox that's why there's cum in her hair
>>740972641He saw that she's a woman.
>>740972687The caterpillar lost it's flower and the tome on the clock changed.
>>740972761>>740972794Do you have monstrous hands or what?
>>740971468This goddamn thread is gonna make me go and get a chocolate bar. Im such a sucker for ads. (I know this isn't an ad)
>>740972719>>740972739Very sharp. You've got it
>>74097242926
>>740972879it doesn't state the size of the chocolate
Could go for some chocolate right now.
>>740972839oh God oh noso it changed to 5+4x5 which is 25
>>74097242925
>>740971468>huge sheet of chocolatei would say thats a relatively normal sized portion for an adult man
>>740972905time on the watch is wrong
>>740972940>>740972970look at the caterpillar again
>>740972937>huge sheet of chocolate
>>740972939ermmmm keypads don't exist anymore Layton
>>740972939FUCKME
>>740972939text me
>>740972905the watch its not on new yorks time
>>740973034We are old.
>>740972641I don't care. Take it up in prison, you thieving whore.
>>740972905The time on the watch. At this point, Cassandra Cunt is a repeat offender and they should just keep the bitch locked up.
>>740972902Chocolate bar taste awful. I haven't ate one for ages.
>>740973005FUCK body segments changed so it's6+4x5 = 26
>>740973014a huge sheet at what scale though?it can be a large sheet of tiny chocolate
>>740972939the game
>>740972939Box wrapped in panties
>>740972994>>740973098>>740973124Well done. She's gonna be doing time for that one.
>>740972429Fuck these questions. Bunch of bullshit
>>740972939Did this bitch just ate the triangle parts of my god damn toblerone?
>>740973254blue paint
>>740973254Foxes are colorblind and he couldn't possibly tell that the painter is missing a color.
>>740972331Why the fuck would you drill a hole into chocolate?
>>740973312you get blue by mixing yellow and green, dummy
>>740973312there is no black or white either
>>740973364To add some nuts to it if you know what i'm sayin'
>>740973392The canvas is white
>>740973254She had been posing naked.
>>740972939So what's the fucking answer and how are you supposed to work it out?
>>740972325>>740972330even if you do it that way you need to break your columns/rows into individual squares, and once you've broken the columns off breaking them into rows all counts as separate breaks
>>740973141Maybe chocolate bar taste good now.
>>740972939>instead of just putting TEXT ME I'm just going to drill some holes in your chocolate to make a retarded puzzleWoman moment
>>740972939>INSTALL GENTOO
>>740973497it cannot be solved by azerty keyboard losers
>>740973465they put the stuff in the chest
>>740973465Obviously the one dude was in a chest, waited, got out and took a bunch of stuff, and went back into the chest with his loot
>>740972705If you do vertical slices all the way down you lose out on two pieces. The first and second pieces will both have a part of the hole in them.
>>740973465they took things from the house. the chest is utterly irrelevant
>>740973312Bingo.
has anyone ever had sex with cassandra cat asking for a friend
>>740973681The rings are made to fit the fat bitch's fucking sausage fingers, not Cunt's skinny things.
>>740973637So like there was 3 dudes, 2 carrying the chest another dude inside
>>740973681I woukd assume the jewelry is Hippo sized
>>740973502A break is a break, you can't say it's actually 6 separate breaks in one move.
>>740973721She stole a bunch of cum from me once or twice.
>>740973681Because Slylock knows she's a lying bitch
>>740973465Accomplice inside the chest? The other son, if fact, the delivery film is called "Swine and SonS" after all.
>>740973785t. not skilled enough to half-a press
>>740973497Bitch fatfingered almost every key on her chocolate letter press obviously, the top of the notch new technology on layton's universe (2007)
>>740973862""""henry"""" was right
>>740973858actually the other son died from brain cancer, but the dad keeps the s for sentimental reasons
>>740972641>The cunning cat is lying I'll admit I completely misread that
>>740973764>>740973784That rings true.
Unrelated but I despise yuriniggers and want to see all of them get beheaded by some third world gentlemenNot just the annoying twitter dykes but also the faggy "men" who shill that jewish garbage
>>740973771More like a small boy/piggy.
>>740973681>another Cassandra Cat puzzleIs this furnigger down bad?
>>740973983>Chief Mutt
>>740973983>20mph>15 minutes5 miles>Forest Miles 10 milesfuck the police
>>740974009Damn I don't even understand the question, I guess I'm a brainlet
>>740974198How many different colors you need for the window so that no adjacent areas are same color, assuming the sword is yellow.
>>740974009i guess 5
>>740974198Paint each segment with 1 color and have no segment touching the same color. Sword is already painted yellow.What's the least amount of colors you need?
>>740971468I heff tvelve metchsteek...
>>7409740094
>>740974167>>740974085You've figured it out. Last one for now. This one's a hard one.
>>7409740093.
>>740974009Its so over for meI can't even be bothered to even attempt this one
>>740974297>>740974314Oh ok. Well probably 4 because of the 4 color theory
>>740974389This cunt is a straight up ho
>>740974396I don't think that's enough because you need to count yellow and there's an odd number of panels if you go around the sword alternating between two colors.
>>740974389>bottomless and a dildovery nice editalso the door's locked despite the thief apparently escaping through it
>>740974009I think three. You can alternate two colors for all but one panel at the end where you'd have two of color 1 again, so that panel will need a third color.
>>740973910>>740972939This is highly unrealistic. What a bullshit puzzleWe don't have girlfriends
>>740974389uhh it's uhhhh idk
>>740974452Oh wait it's like a checkerboard, you just need 1 additional color
>>740971468It's a trick question. There are no lines between the squares because they're not square. They're just rectangular.
>>740974389Why is she bottomless
>>740974389The door opens in and there are loose articles in front of it, meaning if the thief left through the door he'd have moved them out of the way.
>>740974389the most valuable thing in the room was her
>>740974578she's not, she's wearing a shoe
>>740974389Why does she wear a bra but no panties?
>>740971468>>740972262
>>740974389is it the deadbolt on the door still being locked?
>>740974469Reuse yellow.
>>740972429197+2×6
>>740974662No stacking
>>7409723310 because you can see the edge is thicker and a different shape than the rest, and the other end bit is ruled out
got a question for ya
>>740972641>>740972905>>740973254>>740973681>>740973983>>740974389
>>740972101Isn't 1.31 pozzed? The demake devs released a few updates to the original before they turned it into reforged. They messed with the campaigns too I think. >>740972270I'm still not sure which version is best. The last versions before reforged all had some minor bugs or they were incompatible in some ways with modern systems, like stretching on 16:9 monitors.
>>740974662Moving them like that doesn't make each segment broken magically be a single break
I've never played the professor layton series, are they all worth playing? I like puzzles.
>>740973465>How did they do itSays it right there. Ms. Pooch was their accomplice and is now hoping to reduce her sentence by ratting them out after being caught.
>>740975145They most certainly are
>>740974963How many pumps into Cassandra before you bust?
>>740975145Katrielle Layton is the only one I wouldn't suggest. Everything else is good.
>>740975295>>740975403Thanks, I'll give them all a try now. I'm Eastern Europoor and consoles weren't popular here. I've missed out on lots of kinos so I'm starting with the classics.
>>740975145nds games was very good, fuck looks like im old.diabolic box, last specer, unwound future - all kino games.
>>740974816they're not stacked they're lined next to each other
>>740975519Good idea, I'll start with an nds emulator. I noticed some of them had Android/iOS releases too but they're probably stripped down versions, like the Castlevania games.
>>74097398360 mi/h is 1mi/min, being 20 the limit the speed is a third of that, so she should take 3 times as long to do one mile, thus 10 miles should be taking 30 minutes.
>>740975606you can kinda buy nds, r4 cartridge, and do stuff naturally but whatever.
You should be able to solve this
>>74097242914
>>740975452The first 3 games have a mobile version too
>>740975835Brown cock?
>>74097242917too many assumption but seems the most logical
>>740975835What fucking middle you dumb slut.
I HAFF TVELVE METCHSTEEK
>>740975835>BrowcoodocaWHAT THE FUCK IS A BROWCOODOCA?
>>740976340FUCK YOU
>>740974396Indeed!
>>740974702You're missing a color next to the yellow one that invalidates your answer so it's 4.
>>740976820six minutes
>>740976923Very good!
>>740972027these games are meant for 4 year olds
>>740974662you can't cut non-contiguous pieces of chocolate rrrrrreeeeeeeeeee
>>740977274Has to be B. D is three blocks tall so can't go above B, and B is three blocks wide in X and Y so can't be beside D, therefore it must go above D, therefore it must be on top.
>>740977163Damn that's clever
>>740973910AZERTY keyboard users in shambles
>>740977461Perfect logic my good man, well done.
>>740973785what if I have really large hands and can grip all pieces at the same time and break them in one motion
>>740977631good, fuck them froggies
>>740977807The motion would be one but the amount of breaks wouldn't.
>>740974009This is just the 4 color theorem but phrased in a different way
>>740974389I love this edit
>>740977163>>740976820My brain must be deadHow is that 6 minutes
>>740972429? = 55Caterpillar is always 7 (always 7 limbs shown)Flower is 2 but is 2^2 at bottom equation because flower is borrowed from caterpillar this time.Clock now shows 5'oclock at bottom instead of 6'oclock.7 + 2^2 (4) x 5 = 55If you do pemdas = 87
>>740977620no, it's fucking retarded. the wording implies she turns over only the clock whose sand has finished falling. what they actually meant was>she turns both timers over when the sand in either of them has finished falling
>>740976820>>740978140you flip both over at the same time3 minutes runs up, and has 0 minutes remaining and 3 minutes spent5 minute timer has 2 minutes remaining but conveniently has 3 minutes spentSo now you flip both the 3 minute timer and the 5 minute timer so they both have 3 minutes on top and can run out at the same time. in only 6 minutes total
>>740978140Turn them both over and wait three minutes.At this point, the three minute timer has zero minutes of sand at the top and three minutes of sand at the bottom. The five minute timer has two minutes of sand at the top and three minutes of sand at the bottom.Flip them over and they now both have three minutes of sand at the top.
>>740978240FUCK I MEAN 27*
>>740971468>no release date during the nintendo direct for the new layton game even tho its supposed to come out this yearIts gonna get delayed even more isnt it...
>>740978251Are you retarded? Honest question.
>>740978251Can you read, perchance?
>>74097793918:49 x 3 = 56:27
>>7409724293(b) = 21 -> b = 72(c) + 7 = 19 -> c = 6f + 6 + 7 = 15 -> f = 27 + (2(2)*6) = 31
>>740978583
>>740972939"FLEE WHILE YOU CAN"Women make things complicated as is without some bullshit chocolate puzzle.
>>740978962You forgot to account for the fact that the final caterpillar has the flower removed from her head and an additional segment added, and the final clock shows 5:00 instead of 6:00
Layton, fuck your bullshit
>>740978868Perfect
>>740978991Would.
>>7409724296segmented worm^flower = 706:00:48 = 6 (1 second = 1/3608)flower = 27segmented worm + flowerflower + 05:00:487segmented worm = (√7)*7/6 = 3.086709862908689022flowerflower = 2205:00:48 = 5+1/451>? = 30.089
>>740979509Oh fuck, I thought the last line was a+b+c, not a+b*c. With that>?=113.1354903507135670
>>740979604I think he's going west because it looks like the sun is setting and the moon is rising
>>740972262What's the puzzle?
>>740979809Take a look at the tree.
>>740979978Yeah I saw the tree. The order of the photos must be A, D, C, B. The horse is still relatively heading towards the sunset is it not? I mean it's don't directly towards the sunset but still pretty close
>>740976758I knew they'd mess up what "adjacent" means. Tip: Two shapes are still adjacent if only their vertices touch.
>>740980245The trick is noticing that west is not to the right, but forwards. so the picture is standing east relative to the cart, and since the sun sets on the west, the cart is going south.
I don't know where else to talk about this so I'll do it here, I wanna talk about how bullshit psychology is.There's a cognitive test called the Wason Selection Test, you can either read it up on wikipedia or watch a Vsauce video on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOiCFa5niuM The vid's way too fucking long so I'll try and make a quick report here (I gotta split it into two posts anyways, lmao)You're given Problem 1 (see image) and told a set of rules. Every card has two sides, one side has a letter, and the other side has a number. The rule is that every A card needs to have a 7 on the back. Which cards do you have to flip to make sure the A-7 rule is being held true?90% of people would immediately say "oh, you have to flip the A card, and the 7 card" but they'd be wrong. The reality is that you have to flip the A card and the 8 card. The A card obviously needs to be flipped because we need to check if there's a 7, but with the 7 card we don't actually care if it has an A or any other letter, if it's any other letter then we don't care because only A needs to have 7s, whereas 7 can have anything and so if it has anything else then we're fine but if it has an A on the back then we're also fine because the A-7 rule is kept intact so we don't actually need to care about what's behind the 7, but we still need to flip the 8 card to make sure there's no A on the back of it otherwise the rule would break.Then you're given problem 2 (see image again) and told the rule. Every card has an image of a person, either an adult or a child, and the back has what they're drinking, either soda or beer. The rule is that there is no underage drinking allowed. Which cards do you have to flip over to make sure the rule is being upheld?90% people would say "oh, flip the kid, and flip the beer" which is in fact the correct answer.You might have noticed that these two problems are actually the same problem, just reworded and recontextualized(continued in part 2)
>>740980476(part 2)The problem introduced here is of course "People are given the same test slightly reworded, but in Problem 1 almost all respondents get it wrong initially, whereas with Problem 2 almost all respondents get it right. Why is that?So big smart psychologist dudes came up with the reasoning that "oh, AG78 is an abstract concept, whereas 'underage drinking' is a well known concept of real life rule system, clearly people have an easier time understanding real life rule systems than they do abstract concepts like numbers and letters, that's why they get the first problem wrong and second problem right, because the brain understands social concepts better than abstract concepts"This is where I think this test is complete BULLSHIT. Because as soon as I heard Problem 2, I immediately understood "oh, this isn't a logic test, this is a linguistic test" because Problem 1 talks about A and 7. Your mind is immediately drawn towards the A and the 7, that's why 90% of people immediately guess to flip the A card and the 7 card. And then Problem 2 talks about underage drinking. Your mind is immediately drawn towards the underages, and the drinking, so 90% of people immediately guess to flip the underage card and the drinking card. This sounds intuitive right? THEN WHY THE FUCK DOES NO ONE TALK ABOUT THIS LINGUISTIC TRAP? The entire vsauce video is them going on an about "social rules" and "abstract concepts" when the reality is just that you're pre-primed by the question's phraseology. If Problem 1 instead said "A can't be 8" then you'd be right by choosing A and 8, and if Problem 2 said "Kids must drink soda" then you'd be wrong because you'd choose the kid and the soda card. WHY IS NO ONE BRINGING UP THE LINGUISTIC ISSUE???? There's like 2 comments out of 7k comments on the vsauce video going "hey wait a minute, this is a linguistics problem!" with ZERO REPLIES, literally everyone else is talking about the "social rules" bullshit. God I hate psychology
>>740980449No yeah I got that. I knew we were facing West, but the cart is getting smaller as it going into the horizon. Surely that means it's going further away from us. Like it's going into the horizon that's why I said west.
>>740980602Oh that's a good point, I guess it's heading south-west lol.
>>740971984>29!Pretty sure the answer isn't 8.842x10^30. that sounds a bit excessive.
>>740974636She got raped anon...
>>740974662this is how I saw the puzzle, I imagined breaking the chocolate with a knife that extends so lining them up would save cuts. The puzzle should say you use your hands to break the chocolate.
>>740980898Left 3 top row
>>740981017With a pink dildo.
>>740981180That's right!Ok I'm done posting for now. Thanks for participating.
>>740972330>so logically you could break multiple along each column/row as long as it traced along one line.no because horizontal and vertical stacking are the same
>>740980476>>740980527You are absolutely right, I never thought of it that way
>>740975835wha?
>>740981321I hate psychology so goddamn much, it's just jackasses making up fake solutions. Somehow psychology has made people stop using their brains and just believe whatever the psychologist says. It's infuriating
>>740972429It can't be solved because the symbols in the last equation were never given values.
>>740981552Fun fact, most shocking social experiments from the 70s, like Stanford prison, Rhythm 0, Alcali etc. were bullshit lol The results were always either instigated by the researcher or just completely fabricated
>>74097242928
>>740981970I know this all too well, even argued with my high school teacher about them when we were learning about it, but she just kept going "ah, who knows, who knows"
>>740981970what about the one where people zapped each other because the trustworthy science man told them to?
>>740975835BrowCooDoCareading from the middle gets:bRowcOoodOcAROOA... but what does it mean
>>740981970Rhythm 0 was the one where some lady said people could do whatever they wanted to her right? I remember the House episode based on that one
>>740982170Milgram experiment, that's actually one of the few that was reproduced later on. Most of those experiments were created due to the hippie zeitgeist of "duuude what if humans are actually all beasts". Then one dude created the "pit of despair" to keep monkeys in solitary confinement until they got depressed and everyone stopped afterwards.>>740982210Yes, in reality most of the audience didn't actually do anything so there were several instigators among them.
>>740982210The same lady also did a ton of other wack ass modern art displays, like playing the knife game in public until she passed out due to blood loss
>>740980476That was my immediate thought watching the video. "Man, when I state this question confusingly people don't get it right, then I ask it with clarity and suddenly people always get it right. What a conundrum!"
>>740975835Brown dookie
>>740971468One. Put a wire grid ontop of the chocolate placed on the divisions between the squares, then hit it with a hammer to cleanly break the whole thing.
>>740973785If I have 6 sticks and break them in half, it makes 12. It was one motion to break them, but it resulted in 6 breaks.
>>740980527That's actually a really good point, though I'm going to play devils advocate and say that it's worth checking what the primary literature says because a lot of popsci videos/articles love clickbaiting, misleading and blowing things out of proportion. That said there is also a lot of bullshit psychology out there so I'd also believe this being part of it.
>>740980381That's not necessarily true, there's no universal definition. It's a poorly described problem in the puzzle to be sure, but it really depends. In a lot of conversations talking about shapes it's really only edges, and I think specifically in the proof about that adjacent colour thing as well.
>>740980527well, time to write and peer review a test where you give them the second test, with the rule "every child card must have a soda on the back"instead.or run a split where every A must have an adult on the back, and you need to make sure none of the 7s are underaged drinking.
>>740979829There is no puzzle, it's just an paranoia detector.You have to break the chocolate 29 times. The rules forbid you from stacking, so that's just how it has to work: Normal, no bullshit.Everyone trying to weasel around it is being an insecure smartass, scared by the right answer because they think it's too easy and they don't want to be embarrassed.
>>740976758this is such a perfect example of layton bullshit.>she wants to build a stained glass windows and use colored glass, how many colors does she need>lol she needs 3 and one of the colors will be INVISIBLE because it will be unstained glass haha i really GOT YOU didnt i you retard
>>740983031I can't access 90% of the results on Google Scholar because lmao you need to pay to access this shit.But I managed to find this https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=67706 it talks about a wide variety of other papers also doing the experimentThey actually talk about the linguistic aspect of the problem, but they bring up irrelevant stuff like "the word 'must' or 'should' was used in this example and that caused a shift in attitudes", or "this question was phrased in a 'not-Q then P' way but this one was phrased 'not-P then Q' way and that slightly shifted responses." or "this is phrased in a Deontic way, but this is phrased in an Indicative way" or "the narrative that is constructed by the question depending on if the reader is involved or not involved in the situation"They finally do go over the linguistic aspect of the problem in section 6.4 but they fuck it up by saying shit like "oh the amount of time the person spends looking at the card, or their eye movements impact selection" like no it fucking doesn'tThey never actually say anything close to "this question has A and 7 in it, therefore people look at A and 7">>740983754Maybe I will, maybe I'll go get a degree in psychology if it's so easy to just write bunk papers and pretend like it has meaning
>>740976758I would throw my ds out the window
>>740976820Eight minutes.>>740978487When you start the amount of sand falling is (5,3). You'll flip the timers at 3 minutes because of the 3-glass (2, 3), then 2 minutes because of the 5-glass (3, 3), then go to sleep at 8 minutes.
>>740984752No no. When the 3 first runs out, you flip BOTH the 5 and the 3 so that they both have 3 minutes remainingIf you didn't flip the 5 at the same time, then it'd be left with 2 minutes
>>74097793967
>>740984818oh fuck
>>7409768205 minutes. You flip the five minute timer and two minutes in you flip the three minute oneThree minutes from then they’ll both end
>>740983160Yes, and that is why it's important to specify whether sharing a common boundary is part of that definition.
>>740985452how do you know when there's 2 minutes left
>>740984554Yeah the paywalls are bullshit, even my uni login can't get through most of them. As far as I've been able to tell the linguistic effect is something that gets mentioned a lot, usually referred to as "matching bias" (e.g. the abstract of https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00335557243000067 which seems to be cited a lot). Unfortunately it's hard to tell if it's something that actually gets tested for properly or is just handwaved away most of the time because again lmao paywalls.
>>740985796perfect internal rhythm
>>740972262but what about the segments I eat right off the whole thing before breaking them?
>>740985817>construct instances which matched, rather than alteredsounds like what I'm talking about pretty well, yeah. It appears to be cited by over 100 other articles too. Too bad I can't fucking read ANY of them>>740985853you can just flip both, and then immediately flip them overtheoretically instant sleep method SCIENTISTS DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW THIS ONE SIMPLE TRICK
>>740984293Quiet route, going against the majority is usually a bad idea
>>740984293>I know that everyone is taking the quiet route and try to get ahead by taking the busy route>but I also know that everyone is thinking the same thing and instead get ahead by taking the quiet route>but I also also know that everyone is thinking exactly that and so the busy route is the real thinkers choice>but I also also also know>HOWEVEROnce things get to a certain level of mindgames it starts to feel like you'd be better off just flipping a coin.
>>740984293>old signposts that are literally labeled Busy Road and Quiet RoadShove that signpost up your arse, Layton.
>>740984293well if everyone chooses the quiet route then eventually the quiet route will become busy, and the previously busy route will become the quiet route. Then people will start taking the quiet route which will become the busy route, and the previously busy route will become quiet. Therefore we can assume that that the routes are both equally busy/quiet +-1 car,
>>740984293The Busy Road doesn't have fences so just swooce right in
>>740986783smart>>740986380>>740986657>>740986668>>740986743dumb and slow and stuck in traffic
>>740986897FFFFFFFFFUCK YOU LAYTONTHAT'S NOT HOW WORDS WORK YOU FUCKING PYGMY MARMOSET BITCH
>>740986897>implying you wouldn't hear engines running or honkingLayton, you need help.
>>740986897So, the point of this puzzle is to emphasize that the sign does not provide any real-time world information?
>>740987887this was the game made after the puzzle guy died and it really showed.
>>740974481That's lipstick you moron
>>740989021look a little closer anon
>>740974704reverse Resident Evil 6
Can we burn Layton in the stake yet?
>>740976884Nah. I got sloppy but you can break the pattern with yellow and invert red-blue on one side.
>>740974481>>740974682That wouldn't work as proof, she could just say that after he ran out, she panicked and locked the door behind him. The real answer is that there is a water bottle still lying in front of the door. If he had opened it, the water should be pushed out of the way, and it's just generally a known fact that hotel/motel room doors open inwards as a standard.
>>740989928dumb bitch got thirsty after locking the door and spilled her water like a dumb bitch
>>740975835Okay, if I read from the middle of the page, that means I'm reading from the center, then moving outwards. Therefore:BrowCooDoCaTurns into:worBooCoDaCWorboocodacWar Beau Codac.I've solved it!
>>740971468>says chocolate squares>pictured: rectangles
>>7409714680Just CONSUME
>>740984293>>740986897i would've argued>traffic congestion probably happens on the right side for some other reason (e.g. a chokepoint further down the road), whereas the left side doesn't have that issue, hence why it's generally less busyover the mindgamey "oh but ackshually it's X because everyone is maybe thinking Y or something" bullshitthe "real" answer sucks
>>740980476>>740980527Nobody brings up the linguistic issue because the entire issue is the fact that humans innately understand the linguistics map when you present it in contexts in which our brains have been programmed to absorb faster, numb nuts. That's the entire point of it.>BUT THERE'S A TRAP!!Version 2 of the question has the same trap built into it, but our linguistic map of what "underaged drinking" means is more clear to us on how to avoid that trap. It's a literal 1-1 translation of the puzzle into a social dynamic, and we understand that social dynamic more than we do abstract concepts like numbers and letters.
>>740990132rectangle and square in Japanese are the same word
>>740990649>the robustness of the thematic-materials effect has been seriously questioned.>Maktelow and Evans (1979) did not observe the effect when the materials were cards describing foods and drinks and the rules involved the relationship of their consumption; for example, "If I eat beef, then I drink gin.">[Other researchers] have replicated Maktelow and Evans's failure to find facilitation for food-and-drink rules.It literally doesn't matter if it's abstract concepts or real life social dynamics as evidenced by this very study that failed to find a link between real concepts and solving the problem correctly. What matters most is how the question is phrased and which words are used to draw your attention to which cards.
>>740990649Not really. The wording of the two is different.Problem one has the wording of "X has to have Y to it" where as Problem two has the wording of "X should not have Y to to it". It does indeed change the mental mapping of the question.
>>740990967if he was black then he could just jump acrossor just get a 20 foot long plank next time
>>740991125
>>740990849>"If I eat beef, then I drink gin."Found the problem again. This doesn't linguistically map out the same as before. The underaged drinking version + the A to 4 version both are implicating the idea that there is a rule there. That's not the same for food and drink like this, even though it maps out the same.>>740990956The wording of that is logically the equivalent though. "Underage must not be drinking" = "If there is beer, then the drinker must be over age" and in some cases that wording is used instead. "If P, then q." "If not Q, then not P." The "clarity" in the wording doesn't exist except for the fact that we understand the concept of Under aged and drinking so we just "get it." It's like people who can't understand math except when you put it in terms of money (jews). Of course using language we created words for is going to "clarify" something over math formulas.
>>740991285They are logical equivalents, but to the psychology of the average person with split second decisions instead of thinking it out, they are already predisposed to think in terms of X and Y. What those X and Y are (plus the stated rules of their relationship) does influence a certain part of that initial mental mapping. The only way that we could test that is if question 1 was reworded to have "A should not have 8 on the other side" and question 2 to become "Underage should have a soda". It'll be pointless it talk about this without seeing if that does indeed influence the change. The baseline concept is solid where we mentally map things that we use in every day life better than more abstract concepts, and I would take it on the chin if the results did end up being the same, but there is a stone to turn in this experiment.
>>740991285alright bruv, I'll ask my family next time I see them what they think of the test. I'll give some of them the original test, and then I'll reverse the wording on some other people's test and see what they think. Give me like 3 years to solve this and, I'm thinking maybe, like, $400,000 and I'll get you your answer
>>740991273Ben does Kegels and Bill has performance anxiety
>>740991273Ben didn't run the same line as Bill. They can both start and end at the same place, but as far as we know Ben ran in circles for an hour. I don't know if they're angling for something more clever but the constraints are pretty loose.
How are you niggers so smart, I get some of these but the fucking cassanda cat ones really have me feeling like a dumb nigger, how tf do you guys know the time on New York time, why would it have been and she couldnt have changed it?
>>740991814It's on a clock in the background.
>>740991814Well first of all, these pics have posted several times in Layton threads so at least half of us already know the answers
>>740991492>but there is a stone to turn in this experiment.I'm fine and open to that as a concept, but without having really read through any of these studies at all, I'm just making a base assumption that this in general would have already been tested for in a control group specifically to avoid the problem of any priming.What I'm ultimately saying to you is that you're sort of correct about it being about "linguistics", but the issue is that the linguistics itself is the result of us understanding the concepts more clearly. If I saw something like "If I eat food, then I drink water," the language and social context of that sentence doesn't really imply the same connection between the two events like the other versions of the puzzle does. I could drink water, then eat food in that order, or I may choose not to drink water, because in this scenario, without the implications of a "rule" in place being communicated in any implicit way, the listener doesn't necessarily make the connection that I'm asking them to comprehend "There is a rule here that on the event that I eat food, then immediately after I MUST drink water," and then the later request for me to ask them to find when this "rule" that isn't clearly established is broken, they don't quite get it.With the letters/number version, there is an implicit rule defined by the fact that it looks and sounds like I'm speaking in commonly understood math terms.With the underaged drinking scenario, I'm already speaking in concepts that you understand much more quickly. I'm conveying way more information in less words (e.g. the term "underage drinking" requires you to already understand that I'm communicating to you the concept of what is an underaged person, that drinking contextually means alcohol, and the fact that the former isn't meant to be doing the latter, and that in the scenario you are meant to be looking for these concepts and prevent it).
>>740991273marathon/decathlon
>>740991753That's good enough, I'll give it to ya
>>740991937Yeah that's fair enough. Not even the anon originally posting it, was just driving by in the thread to give my thoughts on it. I wouldn't know the actual studies and if they controlled it as well.
>>740991814>he's having problems with puzzles meant for kidsLook at this man and laugh.
>>740991978>by the way they're actually lab rats in a mazewhat the FUCK Layton
>>740971468>Riddle games in the age of AI
>>740991978What fucking horse shit is this? Is the laboratory rat thing even necessary to the question?
>>740972795THOSE AREN'T THE SAME SHAPELAYTON YOU NIGGER
>>740992021Hey, cut the boy some slack, you were 12 years old once too.>>740992032Is the pool on the Titanic still full of water?
>>740991978THEN HOW DO YOU KNOW HOW THEY ALWAYS RUN THE SAME TRACK IF IT WAS THE FIRST TIME FOR ONE OF THEM
>>740992083just think outside the box brah
The answer to the question is -1. There is always more chocolate no matter how much you cut it.
>>740971468I'm gonna say 9, because while you're not allowed to stack them on top of each other you can just stack them side by side.
>>740991978TRACKS ARE NOT MAZES. WORDS MEAN SOMETHING
>>740992058>you were 12 years old once too.ah, but you see, i never was.and i wont be for another 10 yearsyet i was alive for 9/11how is this possible?
>>740992192Fuck you Layton, I'm not participating in any more of your riddles
>>740992083When there's only one run, the sum of all your runs is one and that one run is also "all of your runs".
>>740971709post her lewd art
>>740992192Not this again. the horses are teeth and the hill is the gums.
>>740991814>How are you niggers so smartThere's a couple of types of puzzles out there for different types of intelligence. For example, this picture from a mensa day calendar I have tests logic/IQ, or your ability to convert things into mathematical numbers and run through your ability to calculate them to derive at the correct responds.Puzzles like Shylock Fox or "One-page mysteries" test your imagination and ability to model the rules of the world. You're supposed to build up enough life experience to figure out the "trick" involved or catch the lie by imagining the different possibilities and excluding them based up on the simulation you concoct in your head of the scenarios.Layton is kind of an odd ball in my opinion cause it sort of flip flops between both but it doesn't do it very well because it feels like half of the answers they ask you have legitimate and valid alternate solutions that are easier to find, but the game wants you to autistically only do it one way.Ultimately though, the real answer: Experience.For the New York puzzle, I saw a clock on the wall, a watch on her wrist, and just from knowing similar other puzzles I just knee jerked "The time is different" because that's a fairly common solution when time is visible. I didn't even need to remember the concept of timezones, nor did I have to check the ticket in her hand to see she was going from new york to paris, or the fact that the only other visible exit is from LA where the time difference would have been backwards, not forwards. It's not fully legal-proof, but it's more than enough for these.
So you hear about joker shooting the bell?
>>740992184Words mean whatever the people who write this stuff want it to mean. So go fuck yourself and buy their books and classes so you can trick people by appearing smart too.
>>740971468I hate bullshit questions like this, just fucking ask what 30/5 is, ain't reading that shit.
>>740992286No but I've heard church bells malfunctioning lately.
>>740991273>>740991978Layton would bitch slap the asshat who thought of this "puzzle".
Bananabros... are we ingesting literal poison?!
>>740992448he was shot and in the hospital
>>740971468No logic here, just recognizing math patterns. The text isn't important. What's the answer?if you've played Stellar Blade and know the answer already, don't spoil it
>>740992448If I had to guess, everybody would be too busy in sunday mass to actually ring the bells.
>>740992448Was it something to do with the proximity of the sound? The village church bell would sound different to a church bell coming inside the house.
>>740992516>Was it something to do with the proximity of the sound?No
>>740992448Fuck, I think I saw this in a prior thread. Was it that the bell was broken?>>740992458I am having so much trouble trying to reverse engineer what the fuck the question could have possibly been to that.
>>740992548looks like just trying to solve a maze but you ice physics to the end of the wall if you touch a banana peel
>>740992448there were no bells that day because it's his funeral
>>740992548>Was it that the bell was brokenFuck you for probably being right.
>>740992502No.>>740992505Interesting though, elaborate further.
>>740991978
>>740992548>Was it that the bell was broken?But how would he know?
>>740992448the lazy bum passed out drunk and left the TV on
>>740992448because some dipshit converted the bell sound file to bitcrushed MP3 instead of leaving it OPUS format, fucking asshole. You know we can all tell when you use lossy formats right?
>>740992705The sound did come out from the church.
>>740992448He looked at the time after hearing the bells and realized the amount of rings didn't match the current hour
>>740992649>Elaborate furtherNot much to elaborate. Anybody that would be able to ring the bell would be too busy in church so a recording plays to make up for it.
>>740992756well maybe some joker shot the bell to make it ring again, who knows?
>>740992448he was the hunchback
>>740992759He realized about the recording just from hearing alone and not any extra information.
>>740992639Look at this little genius nigga. I can't believe I didn't see that myself cause I love ice-slide puzzles.>>740992701He could see the bell from his window and it wasn't moving/there.
>>740992798>He could see the bell from his window and it wasn't moving/thereHe could only hear the bells.
>>740992791he was wearing headphones
>>740992448the bells had swamp gas
>>740992448Nuclear war broke out at that excact moment, and he realized it was a recording because the speakers ceased to fuction immediately due to the EMP. If they were real bells the ringing would still last for a few moments.
>>740992448
>>740992882Exactly right. Good job and good night.
>>740992448it didn't trigger his ASMR
>>740992818left one if you have color blindness
>>740992916good night
>>740992818I got it. The left shape is perfectly centered, but the other two shapes are shifted to the left and not perfectly centered
I'll leave this one here but I can't answer any questions, you can figure it out on your own, however, should be fairly trivial :^)
I got one from a children's book of riddles that has stuck with me, not because of it being hard, but because it follows the rules of a good logic puzzle:The detective was sitting in a bar in Vegas, enjoying the night life around him, when a tanned man from head to toe with a large smooth chin and ocean blue eyes walked up to him and offered a drink. The detective accepted as the man sat next to him. "Y'know detective, I was actually out in the desert lost for months!" said the man. The detective nodded and asked him what it was like. "Horrible! I had barely any water, a beard that covered my entire face and I got shivers during the nights!". The detective kept listening. "But I am glad that I came across here last night, someone let me in, got a nice meal, a good shave and a nice glass of water". The detective finished his drink and turned to the man, accused him of lying saying his story didn't make sense. What tipped the detective off?
>>740992834Yeah I just reread that. "It was only the sound of the sound of the bells that indicated it was a recording." Hrmm....He's a detective. Maybe he arrested the bell-ringer during the week and remembered he was still in jai-->>740992916>Did he hear some additional sound which should not have been there?>NoFUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU GO DIE>Hurr, it's not that there WAS a sound, it's that there WASN'T a so-SILENCE IS A SOUND FUCK YOU FUCK YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOU
when the fuck is that professor layton game coming out anyway is it jsut vapourware now
>>740992995ok somebody hit the bell a 13th time both times
>>740992995Everyone knows this one and I fucking hate it.
>>740992171Interesting. Read the rules again
>>740993040how?
>>740992995Only thing I could think of with this sets bullshit logic is that the vicar is old and either can't count correctly or his ears are messed up and echoed the 12th bell ring
>>740993014Ok explain how the fuck silence is a sound
>>740992995
>>740993110Hint: A few anons in this thread have made mention of the solution when it comes to bells.
>>740993092
>>740992995I remember this one. Fucking bullshit
>>740993012why would he go to a bar if he needs water?
>>740992916>>>>>it was only the sound of the bells>teehee it was actually the sound of the bells being cut :^)THE ANSWER IS CONTRADICTING ONE OF YOUR STIPULATIONS YOU DUMB RETARD
>>740993012>tanned head to toeIs it because he wouldn't be tanned on the parts of the face the beard used to cover if it was true?
>>740993135https://youtu.be/4fWyzwo1xg0?si=C-da3yPEapLR_aPM
>>740993206That's the one. It blew my mind as a kid when I read the answer.
Here's a riddle, it should be no sweat Yes or No, is water wet?
>>740993135While I wouldn't call silence itself a sound the wording was that "the sound of the bells" indicated it, which I'd definitely consider to include the sound stopping.
>>740992995the bell was brokensomeone was shooting itthe bell ringer on the night shift couldn't counta wizard did itits was a funeral bell
>>740972262Nah, you could do every segment with one breakPlace the chocolate between two same sized semisphere bowls, push the bowls together and all the seams will snap in one go
>>740993206>>740993242I thought he was naked
>>740993012>What tipped the detective off?You shouldn't eat just like normal after such a long time of starvation.
What goes up a chimney down, but not down a chimney up?
>>740993259No, because being wet means being covered in waterwater can't be covered in itself
>>740993259No. Water is water, it isn't wet.
>>740993201hey anon.the reverb is MEANT to be there.reread the 3rd clarification carefully.did e hear some ADDITIONAL sound, which should not have been there?nohe DIDN'T hear an additional sound which SHOULD have been there
>>740993242The wording of "tanned head to toe" feld a bit odd which tipped me off from the start, still a pretty neat one for a childrens book.Speaking of childrens books I should dig out my old copies of Deltora's quest I remember there being some fun puzzles that would fit these threads.
>>740993314An umbrella?
>>740973785it doesn't say hand motions you spastic
>>740992284EMU MSUEastern Michigan UniversityMichigan State Universityplease ignore the kaijiyou set up a series of equations and then solve using the center row because it's the only row/column that has two values given. Then you plug in the series of equations for each other and find the values of E first. Once you have 1 other value, you can solve for all other values.
>>740993259no sweat
>>740993349Brother, thank you for getting that so fast. You genuinely would not believe how many normies this question breaks their brains on.
>>740993357You got the math part right. The word is wrong though. Good job though.
>>740993437what
>>740993395It was the only thing that made sense to me. I just had to think of something that could be in both an up and down state, and I was pretty sure it wasn't a quark
>>740993437>>740993460Oh, museum, fuck me
>>740971468How is this shit not 10 picarats bro?
>>740993347THE REVERBERATIONS ARE PART OF THE BELLS' SOUND. THAT'S WHAT RINGING IS, THAT'S THE WHOLE PPINT OF THE BELL'S SHAPE AIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>740978619It's Level 5, you should expect every release window to get pushed back.
>>740993506Don't feel bad. This calendar is full of word riddles and crosswords and word jumbles, and word puzzles are my weakest category by far. I fucking hate them so much.
>>740993314a kid with Trisomy 21
>>740993528Yeah and it wasn't there. Something that should be there isn't. I'm missing what's got you confused here
>>740993528yes, and the reverberations are not an ADDIITONAL sound that wasn't meant to be there.read the 3d clarification again anon.
>>740992995There it is
>>740972641Where's the r34 of Cassandra?
>>740977879>>740982839What's the difference between holding multiple lines of them over each other and just breaking one line at a time? If you count the former as multiple breaks, then the latter would have to count as billions of breaks because you're breaking the bonds between billions of atoms in one move. Checkmate retard.
>>740993618OF COURSE. A RANDOM JOKER WITH HIS RIFLE AND MAGIC SILENCER.
>>740993618There is absolutely no reason the joker couldn't have been throwing hammers at the bell, I think I get credit.
>>740992192no-one?i thought it would be TOO easy.
>>740992192>>740993794leap year bullshit who cares
>>740993794I'm not allowed to reply to minors.
I heff twelve metchstick
>>740993618SOMEBODY STOP ME
>>740980527Except they're not the exact same problem because Problem 1 is X should have Y and Problem 2 is X should NOT have Y.
>>740993840FUCK YOOOOOOOU
>>740993584>>740993604It's the first Q I'm having an issue with because it made it sound like there's nothing unnatural happening to the bells, that the solution is the detective doing something. Then it turns out something unnatural did happen to the bells.
>>740992192there's a 9/11 every year you 2 year old fuckgo to bed
>>740993728You could actually just break the chocolate into 4 separate pieces with one lucky press at the center, but I think the question ONLY wants you to break it one line, or one square at a time
>>740992284
>>740992192>>740993794I got banned for making a joke like this once
>>740972429Caterpillar with flower is 7Clock pointing at 6 is 6Flower is 2Caterpillar without flower is 7 - 2 = 52 flowers is 4Clock pointing at 5 is presumably 5So 5 + 4 × 5 is 25.
>>740993913It means it was just the sound of the bells in isolation that gave it away. It wasn't anything visual like he could see the recording being physically played or have prior knowledge about the set up. It's strictly just about the audio itself. He didn't hear any scratches or white noise or whatever but still managed to come to the conclusion just from listening
>>740994038Hey I got that calendar for my Dad. Neat
>>740973364See >>740973560
>>740994084The caterpillar in the bottom is different from the other ones. Try again.
>>740994038You're only half done.
>>740986897Nobody ever eats at that new restaurant. It's always too busy
>tfw it's to late in the thread to drop one of these fuckhuge puzzles by puzzlefuckershttps://www.janestreet.com/connected-cities/Stuff like this and Cryptics are the real bullshit of the puzzle/riddle world. Especially when they demand trivia knowledge that you might not even have.
>>740973681She's normally a bitch but she's clearly innocent here. There is NO WAY hippo sized rings would fit in that little pouch, so they're obviously hers.
>>740994442I'll have to check this one out. Saved
>>740994442jesus fucking christ
>>740994442I ain't doing all that shit, nigga.
Has anyone here besides me watched Idiotest? It's got some pretty good lateral thinking puzzles
>>740994442Hey I ordered an antique from you from Cairo, but all I got was an ant. What the fuck I spent like 750 on this
>>740974389The bed is untouched even though a thief would obviously also rape her if presented the opportunity. This proves there never was a thief.
>>740994858maybe he was a homosexualy'know, be gay, do crime
>>740992504I have played stellar blade. Was a little sad there were only two of these puzzles in the game. They were nice.
>>7409925045005?
>>740977879>>740982839The wording in the question leans more toward the number of break motion, rather than number of breaks. So the correct answer leans more toward 9. Specifically, "The fewest number of times I'll need to break the chocolate, is 9." Checkmate, atheists.
>>740990708thats shapist
>>740971583If you're allowed to hold pieces side by side you can do it in 6.
>>740997120This dude got ogre hands
>>740972429flower on caterpillar adds +2 on top of its segments, bottom caterpillar has 6 segments and no flowerflower has a value of 2 so bottom is 4clocks value is the minute hand minus the hour hand, bottom clock has a value of 76+4*7=34
>>740993350and yet the correct answer shows a row break as equivalent to 1 break >>740972262
>>740984114The answer shows them breaking multiple squares in a row too, faggot
>>740974318>I heff tvelve metchsteekThis comic will always be my reaction to those games.
>>740979604South. A leaf that is present on A and D is gone on B and C, and the sun is lower in B and C compared to A and D, indicating it is setting. As the sun sets in the west, and the carriage is moving left of it, it is travelling South. Unless there's some Laytonian bullshit about the carriage actually moving backwards.Picture order is A D C B
>>740971468Stupid question but can you use something like a metal grid to cut every piece of chocolate at once? Like if you had some tool that would cover every line between each chocolate square.Does the "number of times" you need to break the chocolate go up in increments when you perform the act itself of cutting the chocolate, no matter how many squares you separate at the time you cut? Or does cutting one square count individually? I'd be tempted to answer with "only one time" if the former is true. You could use a 3D printer to create a chocolate grid cutter and only press on the chocolate piece with it once, in order to separate every square neatly in one go.
>>740998878You are overthinking a retarded layton "puzzle"
>>740998878It's implicitly implying that you can only break one line at a time, so no you can't do that
>>740999623>implicitly implying
>>740999623It only say you can break the chocolate between the lines. So if you do it in one go it still counts
>>740972101fuck off to your own thread, blizztroon
>>740972325I was thinking the same, but if you can put them in parallel (which is literally what the stacking rule is trying to prevent), it still wouldn't be 9, because you could also put your first split in parallel. IE, once split between Row 2 and Row 3, put top segment parallel with bottom segment, and split between Row 1 and Row 2 in at the same time as between Row 3 and Row 4, which saves you a split and becomes 8 with no further parallelisms. Due to odd numbers, I think you can save 3 splits this way for a total of 6. Maybe less with some rotations I'm not bothering to think about.
>>740974389>bottomless lipstick one bra strap hanging off dildo in plain sight just one high heel onUHGGHHHHHHHHH UGHGUHGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
>>741001560You forgot the picture of an big white cock on the wall.
>>740974452How did you know about the 4 color theory and not understand what the puzzle was about?
>>741001019Same approach as >>740997120. Minimum number of breaks is ceil(log2(width)) + ceil(log2(height)).
In your preparation for a Layton puzzle, you drilled a hole in a perfectly square chocolate bar. Unfortunately you had terrible aim — you wanted it to be in the dead centre, but instead you were way off.Fortunately you have your ultra-precise chocolate knife and chocolate glue with you. Is there a way you could cut it into two pieces and reassemble them, to get the hole where it belongs? And if so, what's the shortest cut?(the grid lines of the chocolate are irrelevant to this puzzle)
I heff twelve metchsteek
>>741003568FUCK YOU
>>740974389The laptop is facing the wrong way
>>741005548Also the lamp would be on the laptop on that little ass desk which don't seem right
>>740971468is this katrielle game good? should I get it?
>>740973983>police chief is giving out speeding ticketsEither low crime area or low tax low budget area.
>>741000584You're still making several breaks.
>>7410034602
>>740994578You should be ables to solve this.
>>741003460Cut off an L shape consisting of the bottom right square, the 3 squares above it and the 3 to the left. Then flip it around to the other side of the square. The cut will be 6 grid units long
>>741008139I told you the grid didn't matter. But yes, that's a correct answer! You can do some sort of L-shape no matter where the hole is on the square.It's not the shortest cut.
>>741008263I guess you could just cut out a hole where it's supposed to be then fill in the other hole with the punched out piece. Then the cut length would only be the circumference of the hole
>>741008376There you go.Despite being the most 'obvious' answer, people seldom get it first.
>>740971468I can do it in 6, i dont care what the answer is, for me its 6.
Are you guys excited for the new Layton game? I'm happy it's coming to steam since I doubt it'll run smoothly on my Switch and I don't have a Switch 2.
>>740972027And I hate those beucase they're not puzzles. They're more like riddles.
>>740997628Wow. You're one stupid fuck, aren't you.
>>740979829to filter brainlets who'd think>30 breaks make 30 pieces!
