What's stopping you from upgrading to 4k?
I like playing games at 60 fps
>>740979883
>>740979883what's your offscreen slop supposed to show us>autism stats up in the top right PCTroons can't even enjoy games without having that shit displayed at all times >frames dip below 60 for a split second>REEEEEEE TIME TO TROUBLESHOOT FOR HOURSmental illness
>>740979883What's stopping 4k from not being a meme?
>>740980952You lost tranny
>Have 4k monitor for like 10 years nowI won't elaborate, I think you're smart enough to figure out what I'm saying here.
>>740979883PC has no games
4K OLED and a 5070ti has been game changing for me coming from a 1060 and a 1080P LCD.
i have no need for it
>>740979883>Lots of games that won't run at 4k/60 without upscaling, even on a 5090>THIS is supposed to be the current standard1080p/60FPS worked as a standard because PC hardware at the time could easily fucking achieve that. We haven't had a real, functional standard since then and everything has slid to shit as a consequence4k fuckery is literally vidya getting dragged along by the TV and movie industry just like the original jump to HD
>>740979883Money
>>740979883I did and I went back to 1440p. I use my 4k monitor as a side monitor now and I can't see a single difference in quality looking at them side by side
>>7409798831440p just werks
>>740979883They don't make 16:10 monitors that high anymore
>>740979883The human eye can't see over 1080p
>>740981484You now remember that they briefly tried to push "8k gaming" even on ps5 until they realized how fucking retarded that was and that even if they wanted to, incompetent developers and Unreal Engine absolutely will not allow them because of misappropriation of upscaling tech.
>>740979883I already upgraded back in 2015.
>>740979883i don't even notice the difference aside from the UI in most gamesdon't need anything more than 1080p, only time i've played a game in 4k was stillbirth because of how fucked performance mode looked
1440p upscaled to 4k is perfectly fine
>>740979883because while it's undeniable that 4K is better, personalluy, for me, individually, i dont need more than 1080p i tried 1440p monitors, and i felt like the improvement wasn't worth the cost, so i tried 4K, but that felt even more of a waste, so i went back to 1080p but upgraded to 180hzi can run most games at 120fps or higher, and all recent releases at AT LEAST locked 60fps when they're more demandingand if i want and can(read, in the games that perform well enough to leave room for it), i can "replace" the awful antialiasing solutions by downsampling higher res down to 1080p and obtain a better image quality while not sacrificing much performance
>>740979883Because all the games I play were not made with 4k as a target resolution. Hell, most weren't even made with 1440p.Matter of fact, most of the shit I play was design around a 16:9 ration at 720p.>what does that ha-Shut up retard, let me finish. When you get a hugeass 4k screen, you will see farther in more detail, and then you'll see how fucking shitty the LODs are, how close the draw distance, you'll see models popping into existence and the illusion will shatter. It happened when I switched to a 27" 1080p and I had to adjust, it happened when I switched to a 32" 1440p and I had to adjust. I will not pay more just to suffer.
>>740982512this is the reason I never watch HD porn.
>>740979883The games
>>740979883I have no desire to buy a 5090
>>740979883I only play good games and they don't require 4K
>>740981928maybe if youre a discernmentless nigger
i have an ultrawide
>>740979883the 1080x1920 screen i bought 12 years ago is still working fine.and the other 1080x1920 screen i was given by work also still works fine.i do not need to consume for the sake of consumption.when one my these screens dies i'll either buy a replacement of whatever specs is current, or ill bother work to get whatever they currently have 800 of installed at the empty office.call me pov if you wish, but the ONLY games i've had video issues on are the ones using ai upscaling, or DLSS, or whatever to reach larger screen sizes without killing performance.besides, you don't sit close enough to your screen to SEE the pixels at 1080p now do you anon, you don't treat your screen like a phone and sit 2 inches from it right?
>>740979883My high IQ, which knows that anything over 1080p is wasted computation (high fps is better)
>>740979883Doesn't really add anything to the experience.
>>7409798831440p at 240hzSilky smooth framerates for both vidya and web browsing are far better
>>740979883Money and performance. 1080p was a massive milestone and a step up from 720p and 480p because it needed like 4x the performance.2K needs 4x the performance of 1080p normally.4K needs 4x the performance of 2K. So 16x the performance of 1080p and 64x the performance of 720p. Most PCs still barely play 720p at 60fps to this day because PCs have sorta stagnated on the exponential scale with performance.Of course, 4x the performance isn't that accurate of an estimate and in reality it's much much less to run 4K with workarounds for resolution, but it's still a dramatic increase in performance that is required for 4K to run well. 2K at 30FPS is a struggle for GOOD machines nowadays, 4K is near impossible.
>>740979883People don't make wallpapers in 4k. 1440p is good enough for me.
>>740979883Nothing
>>740979883this shit makes MGSV horrible to play at 4kwhere the fuck is the LOD patch modtrannies
>>740981484>1080p/60FPS worked as a standard because PC hardware at the time could easily fucking achieve that.No they could not.PS3 and Xbox 360 was meant to be this and they could barely run 30FPS with 720p for many games. They had weird architectures too in order to boost performance and it just wasn't enough and in the PS3's case kinda killed the console because it was too complex for coding. Nowadays, the PS3 would be IMPOSSIBLE with it's design for devs to make games for it if it came out today. Devs are just not capable of that level of programming nowadays it seems. That gen of programmers has either left the industry largely or moved to independent studios. Arguably the last generation of games industry where most AAA studios had their own inhouse engine and didn't just use Unreal or Unity. Though it also was the first the gen to have heavier use of Unreal engine from memory.
>>7409840905090 still barely does it at 30FPS from memory. In fact that was a criticism of it because it relied on AI bullshit that didn't really solve performance issues well at all.
>>740979883my brain :(
>>740985532Again, 5090 and most high end processors still kinda suck at it. Nowadays it cheats with AI usage and it makes it look noticeably shitter.
>>7409798834k is good and if they design games to run at 4k it means theyll run more better 1080p (your peasant resolution) and 1440p (the patrician resolution)
>>740979883I am happy with 1440p OLED
>>740979883i see no point in spending a thousand, to potentially thousands of dollars for a meme resolution that's unobtainable by every single gpu, including my 5080, at a good frame rate.
>>740979883I already took the 4k pill
>>740985775>if they design games to run at 4k it means theyll run more better 1080pNot necessarily. Sometimes that causes major problems with DOWNSCALING.Especially if things like subpixels get involved (not really an issue though with 1080p/4k games, more with 240p 2D games kek)
I don't play anything that would benefit from it.
What's the use of all that resolution if the game draw distance is trash?
4k is a meme for gamesMovies look great though.
>>740986183It's kinda dumb that games don't even remove objects sometimes anymore nowadays.BotW and Elden Ring kinda baffles me because they pull every trick in the book for performance, to the point where modders of Elden Ring trying to port Morrowind into it's engine are having extreme difficulty because ER, not Morrowind (a game from a time where optimization was crucial might I add), is so highly optimized they struggle to port the code of Morrowind into it.Seriously, look it up. That person is insane trying to code with that sort of code with none of the tools From had (because proprietary Havok bullshit or something).https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ed6kKLd3FsoIt might not be optimization, I kinda stopped paying attention mid vid kek. May have misinterpreted that vid.
>>740979883My monitor sits less than 3 feet away from my head and because of my speakers, I can only fit a 23inch monitor in the space between them. 1080p is enough.
>>740979883Don't need it, I'm going smol. Buying random shit I find that is custom make. 4k is meme, smol is the world
>>740979883I did this week, I should've done it sooner, 1440p is the bare minimum.
>>7409798831440p 60fps have been more than enough for me.
>>7409798834K on a screen that isn't 50" or above seems kinda pointless to me. I don't have space for a fuckhuge monitor.
>>740979883If you ever get a chance to compare 1440p and 4K directly by having 2 monitors, I highly suggest you go ahead and install Destiny 2 to compare them. It's free to play.You'll understand immediately that 4K is actually not a meme. Destiny 2 has horrific anti-aliasing options, no matter what you choose, but the extra pixels for 4K help so much, the jagged edges become significantly more tolerable. And it's not just that, it's everything just looks even sharper. I am still not using 4K, because the performance hit is just not justifiable as I am a framerate whore.
>>7409798834k won't turn a shit game into a good oneI even regret upgrading from 1080p to 1440p
>>740988282Even looking at regular programs the difference is huge, I have a 4k and 1440p monitor side by side but after my other 4k monitor shit the bed I'm waiting for better models to come out, maybe a 5k or 6k monitors or one of those pulsar monitors or miniled, I can't decide.
>>740980703I taught myself to post it wrongas a joke
>>740985846this4k is for taking screenshots and pretending you don't immediately turn on DLSS performance + framegen the second a new UE5 slop game drops1440p high refresh is the actual sane person setup unless you exclusively play 10 year old games or console ports on a TV
I'm an eternal waitfag.
>>740979883There are no games worth playing in 4kRetards who bought 4k monitors didn't buy it to play video games. They bought it to watch playstation tier "games"
>>740979883>cars pop out of existence even as you look directly at themthe whole simulation illusion in gta hangs on the thinnest thread
>>740979883I have a 4k tv and I have a 2k monitor
4K is just an excuse for game devs to make the in-game fonts smaller and harder to read.
>>740979883Seems like I'll be chasing after numbers that can't stay consistent no matter how much money I spend due poor optimization. 1080p with a 4070 ti super is all I'll ever need and damn do these pixels look sharp
>>740979883fuck...looking at this game feels like looking at an old workplace I was employed in.
AI datacenter jeet faggots are keeping me from upgrading at all actually
I'm starting to understand why this place despise almost ANY videogame... 3080 Ti user at 4k, watch and compare all the specs if you're so incredulous.
>>740979883i used to play on the pc on a 4k 16:9 42 inch OLED TVbut i found the vertical space to be too big to play comfortably at desktop distanceand i hate the multi monitor setup because black lines on the edge of every monitor is fucking stupidso i moved to a big 3440x1440 monitor + a small side monitor and that's perfect for me, on top of getting better frames
>>740979883>What's stopping you from upgrading to 4k?Mainly:- inflation- eyesight getting worse with age- can't stand bad fps and any game worth 4K will be unoptimized shit
>>740988282This so much
>>740979883What's the point on 27" monitor? 1440p looks sharp and has more FPS. But if you play on a bigger screen 4k is legit.
>>740988282You can run destiny in higher rez than native, not even 4k, and it will look fine. I know what you are talking about, but it can be fixed on a 1440p monitor if you run it at higher rez than native, thats how I played it.
>>740979883Your display isn't big enough to benefit from 4k.
>>740979883Lack of 220 ppi 4K displays
>>740999742>>740999979>4K on 32"138 ppi is not sharp by any measure imaginable. You need 5K on 27" and 6K on 32" for it to achieve 218 ppi, which is where it starts to become sharp.
>>740979883I honestly don't even like HD. Games had more soul before HD.
>>740979883I've had my 4k screen or a few years.>>740980090As do I, at 4k.
i am perfectly comfortable with my 1080p60
>>741001698yeah just like how youre comfortable with your girlfriend seeing other men
I don't have any need. 1080p is good enough.
>>741001786utterly mindbroken
>>740979883Mostly money. My PC is older than some posters here.
>>740979883You being mad as fuck stays my hand.
I just moved to 1440p this year
>>740995363You're a nigger.t. 6900XT, 32GB RAM, 12700K, and >>741001795
>>7409798831440p is still the sweet spot fidelity wise to my eyes, 4K seems like diminishing returns
I can't see any pixels with 1440p so I don't see how 4k would be better
>>740979883>640x360>4k
You need a 4090 minimum unless you want to play with blurry dlss fake frame ai slop.
>>740979883Why would I? It doesn't change gameplay.
Resolution is worthless past 1440p. Pretty much every single modern game isn't playing 4k native anyway.What I want to see is NPCs and Players doing stuff super far off in the distance. World of Warcraft has a massive world with massive view distances, but the world feels completely dead and empty because you can only see mobs and players 100 meters around you.
im broke as fuck
>>741002982My blurry dlss fake frame ai slop at 4k looks better than anything you could possibly have at 1440p and 1080p.
>>740979883Because it's a joke? There's a reason that every advert for consoleshit like the PS5 has 'muh 4K' plastered all over it.
>>741003235wtf is this rain
>>741003235>"Oh yeah thank you for the slop Nvidia!"
>>740981484This, I have a 4090 and I'm struggling to get 60 at 1440p in some games.
>>741003426I accept your concession.
>>740981262Name literally a single game you can run on max settings at 4k native resolution at 60fps, on your 5070
>>740981484Gaming was HD long before the TV and film industry.
I upgraded to 4k last November.
>>741003541Someone with a 5070 Ti can run any new game at upscaled 4k 60fps very easily.>but that's not true 4k!Doesn't matter, it's much closer to true 4k than it is to lower resolutions.
What causes this cope among gamers acting like the best stuff is a big meme? Like home theater fags would own actual theaters if it were feasible, you don't hear them saying movies look like shit anyway and no one can even hear surround sound
>>741003590>Doesn't matterHoly cope
I actually went from 4K 60 fps to 1440p 120 fps.I wish FSR and DLSS had ultra quality mode that would be like 75% resolution scale for 1440p.
>>740980952>60fpsLmao console niggers still living in 2010.What the fuck are you doing if you're using a monitor below 144hz?
>>741003617If you scoff at upscaled 4k for not being true 4k, you should scoff at 1080p and 1440p even more because they look way worse.
>>741003590lmao you're brown
>>740979883the coronavirus crash and the trump crash
>>741003735I am caucasian with green eyes.
>>741003235>posts a grainy jpgAre you retarded or does your game actually look this shit lol?
>>741003807If you owned 4k you'd know 4k .pngs are fucking huge and way over the 4mb 4chan file limit. Cretin.
what are examples of images that would look blurry or jaggy on 1440pI physically can't see it
>>741004107a person with poor vision usually cannot tell they have poor vision, how would they see it? you'll only be able to tell once you have glasses
>>740979883nothing, been on 4k since like 2018 my man, recently upgraded to one of those 4k 240hz oled monitors and its great
>>740979883All the gigs of 480p porn I downloaded from the 2000s and 2010s will look like it's for ants. It's already really bad in 1440 res.
I was happy even with 240p 25fps. You had to be there to get it.
>>740979883>4k would be nice>But now I have to upgrade to 5090 to get decent performance even with DLSSBasically this.
>>7410051803DS?That was 10 years ago.
>>741005768Never had anything from Nintendo.
I really think anti-4k faggots should try plugging their PC into 4K TV.It looks awesome.
>>741005042ai upscale it. ez.
>>741006224It doesnt look any different between them. I know this because Im looking at a 55 inch LG C3 that I did just that on. And theres generally no fucking difference dude. You get the same kind of eye coverage unless you're a sperg sitting 30cm away from a 4k TV.
There's never enough vram fuck jensen
>>740979883I dont want to give jewvidia ceo more yacht.
I have 27" 1440pI think I would only get 4k if it were xbox huge and further away so I don't have to focus as closereally big
>>740980952having a bad day?
>>741006380Laughs at you with my 24GB AMD card.
>>741006335>no fucking difference dudeYou simply sit too far.To get similar experience with TV as with monitor you would need to sit at ~1m for 65" TV. This is true for me if I compare it to 27" monitor at my normal viewing distance of 50cm.You want the same field of view to get covered after all.
>>741006801Enjoy fucking up your eyes lmaoFor the 40 degree or "Recommended cinema distance" You need to be 2m away for a 65 inch.
>>741006919>cinema experienceYou are playing games not watching movies.60° is I think good for playing games.What kind of monitor are you using right now and how far are you sitting away from it?By your "recommendation" I would need to sit twice as far from my monitor, which is retarded.
as stupid as 4K phones
>>740979883RTX 4060
>>741001013macOS can't into games
>>741003541He could almost every single game made before 2020And those games are better than almost all games made today
>>740979883Exactly all that pop in. I also kept my texture filtering to 4x because you go so fast in online (and online has worse graphics than single player) that there no point on using higher texture filtering.1080p 60fps is fine, because the game launched at like 720p 20 fps.
>>7409814841080p 60fps is the standard. Anything above that is overkill and for retards. You know why games run like shit on 4k? Because 4k was made for fucking MOVIES. To get more detail out of rescanning 35mm/70mm printed films.
>>740985872>4k pill>Posting a compressed image on 4chins>I'm seeing this as a converted mobile 2" thumbnail on 4chinsLmao.
Reminder that they'll tell you 1080p and 1440p is all you need while also telling you games are blurry and that upscaling is baad
>>7409877631600x900 is the bare minimum. Nothing above 1080p is worth it. What you're getting excited about is replacing your old burnt out monitor. You'll understand soon when you start playing older games and it looks fucked up because it doesn't scale to 1440p.
>>740988282>You NEED to upgrade 4k because of aliasing!!!Lmao. I play all my games with AA off because it looks like shit.>But the jaggies!!I'm not a child.
>>740993637You knows worse?>In a plane or heli high altitude>Can see the headlights and rear lights of all the little cars, thousands of them>Fly lower>All the cars load the first 3D LOD>What looks like a thousand cars is now 20 cars:/
>>741007926>AA looks like shit, so I play with something that looks even more shit.you're worse than a child
>>741003235>That rainGod you people are such retards. I had my first taste of fake AI upscaling with Xenoblade X and you guys are genuinely retards for supporting that shit.
>>741003590What a fucking cope. Just because I play a 480p video on VLC and it upscales it my native resolution it doesn't mean more detail suddenly exists.
>>741003603>you don't hear them saying movies look like shit anyway and no one can even hear surround soundHere's the thing anon, for many years we were getting shitty 4k discs of movies that were mastered in 2k (that means 1080p you fucking retards. 2.5k is 1440p) and just cheaply upscaled to 4k. Also we are getting bigger and bigger soundtracks like Dolby Atmos, where you need to install speakers in the ceiling, which sounds WORSE than original soundtracks. Why? Because there fucking movie was originally in mono or stereo and they artificially have to separate the sounds to create "Remastered 5.1" audio. It's terriblez especially when you have a sound bar because 2.1/3.1 is genuinely all you need for watching movies. I genuinely hate this stupid bullshit that they've pushed home cinema into requiring stupid shit like that, especially HDR which does not look good on most displays and does not work on most displays because your TV either does HDR10+ or Dolby Vision but not both. You cannot tell me Citizen Kane will benefit from a fucking Dolby Atmos soundtrack and Dolby Vision in fucking black and white.>t. 4k 240hz laser projector owner who sticks to 1080p/60
>>741008156The rain looks exactly the same at native resolution. Now go on, post the rain from your favorite game.>>741008215Correct, because VLC does not have advanced temporal upscaling. Lol dumbo.
>>741003686>If you laugh at fake upscaling you should laugh at native resolution Lol. LMAO. R O F L
>>741004085Then try posting them as jpegs and not pngs, dummy.
my main monitor is 1080p and my side monitor is 4k, i like to game in 1080p for the performance boost
>>741008543Fake upscaled 4k looks better than native 1440p and waaay better than native 1080p. Not that you'd know, since you've never seen a comparison on a high res monitor.
>>741007125>>741006919I have a 110" projector screen and my chair is like 9 feet away 4k (movies) look great. I can also lay in my couch where the screen is like 4 feet away and it looks great. Benefit of not having a TV is that you can sit closer and youre not melting your eyes because of the screen acting as a flashlight straight into your eyes. Seriously, zero eye strain at night.
>>741007842>Games are blurryTurn off AA.>>741008039Dunno what shitty game is that but yikes. The only thing you should ever use AA is with soft shadows, which whatever trash game that is is not doing.
>>741008582Can't you just set the resolution to 1080p when gaming on a 4K monitor.
>>741001698Coping poorfaggot.
>>741008805>Turn off AAI'd rather my game be blurry than have jaggies and textures swimming
>>741008867>Nooooooo you NEEED to upgrade for all those great native 4k 240hz games like.... And..... Uhh..
>>741008805>The only thing you should ever use AA is with soft shadows, which whatever trash game that is is not doing.Absolutely deranged opinion. Modern games look like ants are crawling all over the screen when you turn off AA. Maybe if you're playing games from the 2000s at 4k I can understand thinking this, but for modern games fuck no.
>>741007879>1600x900 is the bare minimumLmaoooo what is this 2001?>What you're getting excited about is replacing your old burnt out monitor.Nope, my previous monitor which I just replaced was a 1440p OLED one, it never burned in. Coping poor piece of shit, try getting a job, it helps you buy nice things lmao.
>>741009009Stop being poor, god why is /v/ full of coping poor third worlders all of a sudden?
Why do people with lower end hardware always behave so bitterly and aggressively?
I like playing games at 540 fps.
>>741008725I don't get why too high brightness would be an issue, just lower it to comfortable level.
moneyalso, is there a 27"/4k monitor? can't use bigger than that
>>741009410>27' 4kMillionsEvery brand makes them
>>741009467>27' 4kThat's a big boi.
>>7409798834K.
>>741009410i think you can get a niggabyte 160hz IPS 27 inch 4k for about 300 bucks nowadaysif you got the money you can get an OLED but that's gonna cost thrice as much
>>740979883>What's stopping you from upgrading to 4k?i only have 3 k's, waiting for a kind stranger to gift me a fourth
>>741009252Dunno what you're on about. Reading through this thread, it's mostly the high-end guys coming off as dismissive or aggressively boastful.
I got a 4k display and honestly there's not actually that many games that have models & textures that truly pop in 4k. I played Jedi Survivor last month and even though it stutters like crazy I have to admit it has really high detail character models and weapons that look insane in 4k. Whereas there's something like 007 First Light that just looks so soft and there's barely any difference between 1440p and 4k.
I upgraded to 4k in 2019 and have never looked back. I suspect for a monitor my end goal is a 5k2k screen that can do 200hz+, but 21:9 still has me wary due to my love of many old games that only got fan patches to work with 16:9.
im using my 4070 super for 1080p and there nothing you can do about it
>>740984567>he calls that wideSTEP ASIDE
>>740979883Fractional scaling sucks. 2880p is the absolute minimum for 200% scaling that's actually usable on the desktop. But nobody makes a 120Hz 2880p display, so 1440p it is.
>>740985423> Most PCs still barely play 720p at 60fps to this dayFukken igpus will do that.
>>740979883The jews
>>740979883Huh
>>741010291You can pre-order Odyssey G80HF if you really want. It will start shipping next week.27" 180Hz 5k, sadly it's IPS with no HDR, price is also retarded.
>>741003603>What causes this cope among gamers acting like the best stuff is a big meme?The decline of toasty and the rise of the poorfag. Both have no money, both react very differently to something better than they have. To wit Toasty sees that 4k screen, the latest and greatest games and the mighty 5090 turbo ultra giga edition, sighs wistfully while thinking one day, one day that will be him and then immediately goes back to playing heroes of might and magic III as that is all his system can run. He knows there is better out there but does not lament not being able to partake.The poorfag however once again sees that fancy setup, realises he only has 20 rupees to his name and starts seething over this fact. He then proceeds to relentlessly shitpost and seethe saying these are all unneeded, memes, are for retards etc to convince himself what he has is the ultimate setup and nothing better can exist or will ever exist. Until he eventually upgrades and moves the goalposts again.This distinction is extremely important - you can discuss vidya with the former but not the latter.
Would switching from 1440p ultrawide (with 4K DLDSR in most games) to native 4K 16:9 be a meaningful upgrade?
>>741010625That price is actually reasonable. I was actively considering the apple studio display. THAT's a retarded price.
>>741011185Crapple tax is real.>$400 extra for an adjustable standkek
>>741011150Hard to say. "Native" 4K these days isn't very native. The GPU renders 3840x2160 pixels, sure, but on top of that is the smeary blur caused by blending several frames of TAA so the end result doesn't look very good. It's got to the point that 1600p upscaled via DLSS to 4K can look less shitty than "native" 4K.
For me it is the depth the higher resolution adds to a scene. Distant objects stay more distinct from the world around them.
>>741011530use DLSS/FSR native AA.>>741011150Yes.But the GPU requirements are higher, I moved from an RX6800 to 9070XT when moving from 1440p144 to 2160p144 since the 6800 was struggling at 4k on newer games.
>>740979883>Has 4k setup>Films shit with his phoneAbsolute state of PC gaming
>>741011530TAA isn't blurry at 4k
>>740979883I have a RTX 2080 and I like playing games at 60fps minimum, preferably 100fps or more. My current GPU can't run 4k well and I don't like the state of hardware prices to upgrade any time soon.>inb4 upscalingFuck off.
>>740979883i have used 1080p for so long that my eyes have permanently shut off every receptor that is not necessary for gaming with a 1080p monitor
>>741012764>TAA is less blurry at 4kFTFY
>>740979883Money.
>>741003235Ok, enjoy your expensive frame drops then...
>>741012803Cope harder reslet
>>741003503Jesus man, you need to learn how to optimize your system, buy a course or something
4k is a meme
>>741013138
>>741013030I'm in line with the benchmarks.
>>741011530TAA is native. Just because it's softer than not having antialiasing does not stop it from being native.
>>740979883I'm spoiled by 120+fps at this point
>>740979883Getting a computer that can run 4K at an acceptable framerate is just way too expensive. I've gone for 1440 instead.
>>741014690All the good games are easy to run at 4k. Unless you are a sloppa.
>>741001937Lmfao, ok...>6900XTThat's even worse.>>741001795Not at all.
I will upgrade to 4K once nvidia 60xx generation and AMD ryzen 10000 series comes outyes I am willing to pay $3000 or more for a new pc
>>741018080Same, but I don't think $3000 will be enough for a whole PC not even close.$1k for a nice monitor$2k for a GPU like 6080What about the rest of the setup?
>>740979883>What's stopping you from upgrading to 4k?Nothing, I did it in 2025.
>>741018080gibs me dat 10800x3d and a 10900XTX pl0x
