[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: file.png (1.85 MB, 1080x1350)
1.85 MB PNG
ya I dont think this game is dying anytime soon
>>
>>741654429
Is it worth playing? I am viscerally disgusted by woke shit
>>
the devs make the CPU's play each other to inflate this random metric lol
>>
File: civ7chart.png (110 KB, 1387x707)
110 KB PNG
>>741654429
>i don't think this game is dying anytime soon
The big patch injected some life, but it's quickly declining again. Reminds me a lot of Marathon's patch, actually. Similar numbers, too.
>>
File: file.png (1.11 MB, 1920x921)
1.11 MB PNG
>>
>>741654429
wow that's a big number! big good.
>>
how do you even enjoy civ, hoi or any other grand strategy game if you don't have the bad kind of autism?
>>
>>741654429
That honestly sounds pretty low.
I don't know what timeframe this is in, but that is only a few matches per player unless civ 7 plays extremely fast compared to other civs.
Weird metric to brag about.
>>
>>741655076
people dont really say right.
each game just layers more bullshit on top of already serviceable gameplay.
for that matter, nobody particularly shit on basegame vs dlc editions before 5. vanilla civ 3 and 4 were already fun.
also nobody plays civ games for the graphics in the first place.
>>
>>741655701
>nobody play civs games for graphics
I've heard at least more than a dozen people claim they went back to Civ 6 because the Wonder Animations in Civ 7 were a downgrade from this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ne8fCM5-K8M
and I mean honestly, you're not going to top that effort
>>
>>741656112
I posted the wrong one
but if you accidentally watched a few of them you can compare the laziness to civ 6's which literally lays it brick by brick
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPlKXWOQ430
>>
>>741656112
always thought these would be better suited on the map itself while you are actually constructing it, though showing a timelapse at the end is nice.
also think it shouldn't just can the whole thing just because it was built elsewhere.
it isn't a wonder but it could still be a tile improvement.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.