the cracks are starting to show
>>741770508Games have had skins behind extra editions for over 10 years
>unisex
>>741770508How much money does a company need?
>>741770652a public company, that is owned by 750,00 faceless shareholders who all have different goals and needs, but only one thing in common?all the money in the world
Is it just a skin or the entire customization feature with that store?
Feels good not to be poor.
>>741770610most salons are unisex, dipshit
>>741770508I'm gonna pirate that game in about 5-7 years when all the stuff is released. I ain't buying that shit
>>741770758Specific stores entirely, the whole shop is closed. So you will have clothing shops, and mod shops in the base game but some other shops are fully closed.
>>741770508pirate Chads will get everything. let that sink in.
>>741770610You're not familiar with the concept of hair salons for men and for women? They probably made it a "unisex" instead of having two different locations.
>>741770652
Is that all singleplayer content? AHAHAHAHHAHA
>>741770508I'm not gonna get the game until the Super Duper Complete Edition for PC in 2028 or thereabouts, why should I care.
I'll own everything.
>>741770758Looks like those specific stores.
>Game is $80 and Ultimate is $100.>Except they hide a bunch of content they cut out of the "standard" edition behind the UltimateSo the game is $100 and $80 (still to expensive btw) is the poor people version. God I wish nothing more then for the jeet coded game to fail but it's going to dwarf all previous sales records.
>elevated streetwearFaggot brown nigger worshipping phrase
>>741770797>bragging about spending more money than notMost intelligent /v/igger
>>741771045>>741771364Is $100 that expensive in the third world where you live?
>>741771778(You)
>that will be another $30 for GTAO 2IT JUST KEEP GETTING WORSE
>>741771778yes you're right>>741772110he's right
>>741771778Irrelevant shill argument thoughbeit.
>>741770508Why the fuck is Lucia so fucking flat?Couldn't she just wear a pushup bra here to accentuate her cleavage or something?She looks fucking horrible in that top.Literally like a fat goblina.
>>741772110Stop living paycheck to paycheck you dumb moron.>>741772167Who fucking cares about GTA Online?
$100 is the new $20.
>>741772167>free month of GTA+lol wut
>>741770797>heh I can afford basic functionality in a single player game, can YOU??grim
>>741772298>Who fucking cares about GTA Online?It made like 100x more than GTAV itself
>>741772262It's not an argument at all. It's a question.It's almost 5 months left until it's released. If you want to plat GTA VI and you can't save up $100 in that time, you have no business even playing video games because getting clean water and food to survive the day should be your focus.
>>741772529Believe it or not people's lives don't revolve around GTA6, they have other shit to spend money on
>>741772462So the stakeholders care about GTA Online?
>>741772298>>741772529What do you even get out of this le ebin trolling? Is it really just for the (You)s?
Glad I'm not poor and can spend 100 bucks without having to take a loan from the local favela mafia
>>741772605>>741772654Again, if you really want to play it, save $20 every month from now. If you can't save $20, you have much bigger problems in life than not being able to afford a fucking video game.
>>741770508>have to pay extra to do basic customization of your characterEh, I will skip it again. Good luck Rockstar.
>>741772609Presumably people spending money on GTAO care about GTAO
>>741772825No I don't think I will, I'll just pirate it. They're not my friends, I don't owe them anything. Should've cultivated a better relationship with the fanbase, then I'd feel bad pirating
>>741772167>another $30Get real. GTAO 2 is going to be it's own full price game. They know they can get away with it.
>>741772609stakeholders and dude weed lmao gamers love gta online
>>741772940>No I don't think I will, I'll just pirate itCool.>Should've cultivated a better relationship with the fanbase, then I'd feel bad piratingI've never felt bad pirating. I'm not going to pirate this though because I don't want to wait years to play it.
>>741772298>Who fucking cares about GTA Online?you're the only troglodyte who doesn't care
>>741770508Where are her tits?
>>741770798>>741770880The coping has already started lmao
>>741770921Except online mode, the actual game.
>>741770508fucking TODD HOWARD
>>741770610lots of people have sex at uniwhat they mean is monosex
>>741770508>unisex salon used as a distraction as to why the salon is open for anyone other than Whites
>>741773679I guess I'm alone in wanting to play single player games and not having to deal with 13-year olds running around online.
>>741773726This is the one thing that's really bugging me. I was hoping for one screenshot where she has fake tits to confirm it'll be in the game.Ultimately it doesn't matter, this is just the beta. Mods will fix it once it launches properly on PC in two years.
I think the chances are high that Take-Two will force GTA Online to be sold as a separate product, with FiveM's RP module locked behind a monthly subscription
>>741772409Yeah it's fucking over. Modern gaming is dead
>>741770758>>741770832>>741770957Actual non retards.Leaks already mentioned GTA6 is gonna have 700 stores so while not all of them might be yiu being able to pruchase items (I expect they are) you would exoect a lot of them are, and they are there for stealing from too, as well as holding up. So instead of GTAV having 20 gas stations you can buy groceries from and hold up then like 4 unique clothing stores then cut and paste stores plastered over the map, it looks GTA6 is gonna have shit loads of stores where you go and they sell unique stuff only from that store. Car modding places too, which of course in GTAV every pay and spray had the same tiered upgrade shit and then they added a unique custom place in GTAO.Looks like the UE is gonna lock you out of a handful of stores with unique shit but the base game will of course still have shit loads of stores to choose from.ngl this kind of got me a but hyped for the game because while I will be playing GTAO at some point i would like to at least do 2 back to back runs of GTA6 single player as well as be able to play the single player again in the future without being bored post game like GTAV. So if they are putting effort into RDR2 style immersive gameplay I expect this might be a GTA game that really goes deep into crime and customization rather than crime just being missions you breeze through and customization being shallow or tiered stuff for cars.On a related note I hope devs like CDPR take what GTA6 does and tries to do it in the next cyberpunk game because that is what that game really needed and lacked.
>>741770508give me a source link to that image because i've seen enough fake shit in this place to stop believing a single thing is real
>>741773735>gets told about a fact that's been true for decades>"hur hur coping!"Unironically kill yourself, you pea-brained /pol/faggot.
>>741774045biggest normalfag nigger kike on this board right now
>>741770610I miss Super Dave...
>>741770610
>>741770508no silicone tits no buy
>>741771778Very circumcised opinion
>>741774045You need to take into account that Rockstar has a huge fanbase of drooling retards, so every time there's a leak claiming you'll be able to enter every location, fly out to Liberty City, or take a shit and fuel your car, it has little to do with reality, at most you'll get 30-40 enterable locations across the map
>>741774045seriously consider suicide
>>741774304Shouldn't you be preparing for the 20km walk to the nearest clean water source instead of shitposting on the internet?
>>741774487Why would you think they have not put so much fucking effort into adding shit people can spend their money on in game in GTAO...So much customization options and shit that makes you want more of so but shark cards.The game is already shown that holding up, purchasing items, stealing cars, limited weapon storage and manually holing loot is integral to the gameplay of the game.They are clearly going for the RDR2 immersion gameplay in this game.>>741774164>>741774572Lol, imagine actually being a PC only salty faggot and not even being an idort.Faggots salty they don't get to play GTA6HAHAHAHAHAHA
>>741770797I have enough money to buy thousands of copies for given price, still not buying.
>>741772529>if you don't wanna waste money you must have le problem to worry aboutI can afford all the time I want to post here.I can even afford to do it for free, unlike jeets like you.
>>741770508i dont care if its just cosmetic options locked behind the ultimate edition. i couldnt care less about what my character looks like. but if its whole story content and locations locked, thats bullshit
>>741770758The ultimate edition unlocks special stores that make ugly, overdone "premium" customization options available.The only thing that's weird about it is that they're locking those special options down to special locations. So those items are either going mostly unused because they're in inconvenient locations and no one will care enough about that ugly shit to seek it out, or they're going to be gating a conveniently placed pay'n'spray behind a paywall.I have never seen a premium edition of a game bundle cosmetics that actually looked good with it. It's always the gaudiest shit that doesn't even look like it fits in the game because blending in nicely with the rest of the game defeats the purpose of a special dickwaving richboy bonus you're supposed to show off to your friends.It's going to be crazy haircuts and makeup that no one will use, clothes that look out of place, and 50 tattoos that look like the advertisement decals they used to put in Tony Hawk games.
>>741773905There's no need to segregate the salonMexicans' mamis cut their hair for themBlacks go to their own barber shop because it's a front for drug dealing and they need to make it look busy
>>741770508>sara's unisex salonnow we know for a FACT this game is jeet coded
>>741773763multiplayer was shit in gta 5 and it'll be shit in gta 6. Have fun getting blown up by some pay2win helicopter that fires nukes or something.
>>741773763>an actual game>a tedious grind just to do fun one-off things>drop support when people leave en-mass after realising you have to do a gtao level grind again even after paying 80$ for online separately>unless you pay 1000 real sheckle))))ngmi
Swinging your credit card is peak gaming
>>741775854do you not know the difference between saloons and salons?
>>741770508No facial hair for women? But what if I want to play as a character that represents me?
>>741770797>Hello my name is Freddy Francesco and I am rich enough to buy GTAVI Ultimate Edition >... Are you?
>>741776406>1 PS5 with 1 copy of GTA VI Ultimate Edition and 1 month of Playstation Plus Premium
>>741774845>actually excited to play GTAI second that other anon, please fellate a knife
>>741776136>heh, I came away from the Steam Summer Sale with 37 different indie slops and I only paid $10 for each on average, heh
>>741774104it's on official website retard man
>>741770508"You will own nothing and be happy" kicking in full force this year. tkd
>>741777013>PC only dickless americanHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>741770610https://youtu.be/3o5m_mXadoU
>>741773735you don't even go outside you retarded faggot
Indian shill thread.
>$100 for a cutscene and driving sim
>>741773726woke devs hate giving women big boobs. See Expedition 33. not one woman has boobs that go above b cup.
>>741772167Either VI online isn't coming out until PC because of their modding engine or they're staggering release and maybe trying to pull a trick where they charge for it separately or force you to get GTA+ as a subscription.hard to tell with this company
>>741774107>>741778595How did you get baited
>>741776406Yes, but why would I want to? Looks like wokeslop to me.
>>741772167>>741779223there is a 3rd edition on the newzeland PS store thats $115 that has GTA+ 1 month
>>741774045That's why I was excited too but at this point I need to start seeing evidence of the gameroll leaks because we didn't have the newer delay when they were leaked, a lot of it could have easily been cut.
>>741779419guess we will have to wait, this company has always been awful at delivering news it made playing GTAO a miserable experience because you never knew when to expect patches or new content, got even worse when they started time gating patches so even though a new patch would release and the files were on your computer you had to still wait 3 months for everything to fully unlock.
>>741779223Yeahhh that could be the only reasons.God you dickcless americans get retarded and more retarded by the day.
what in the fuck is GTA+? smells semitic
>>741779589>speak the truth>mentally ill thirdworld troon who can't read has a mental breakdownmany such cases
>>741779657it's a monthly subscription for the privilege to BUY exclusive content in the GTA online version, literal pure greed.
>>741779750>truthJust because you don't have a penis and are retarded (american) so cannot fathom concepts because of that retardation we just ascertained, doesn't mean other possibilities are unable to be comprehended by us non retard.They could be you know, calling a different game a different name to differentiate between the 2..you fucking mindless cockless (american) retard.
>>741779823>privilege to BUY exclusive content?qrdI thought it just gives you a monthly stipend and a free car in GTAO.I checked the free car this month and it is some submarine type of car.I might actually wait until I see a car worth having before buying GTA6 just so I can get the free car. not that i am looking on playing GTAO again but i bet they will have some unique shit in game to unlock stuff in GTA6 so I will have to play it at some point to get the free shit in game.they really fucked that game. Was fun for a whole but it is just a fucked game now.Though i heard you can play in private lobbies now so just ignore randoms.
>>741779823>>741780232nvm I just checked it. Seems like its a sham but I guess if you were hardcore into GTAO it might be a bit of a good deal, like an MMO sub.ESO (and FO76) jew you out with what is essentially a mandatory sub if you want to take the game seriously. At least this is not mandatory.
>>741780232playing in private lobbies was always possible I think
>>741770508LoL, the real theft is the ultimate edition
>>741770508seems like just exclusive skins but you have to buy them in game which is better than how they usually do it by showering them on you all at once when you start the game.
>>741780730You could not get most shit done and none of the public event stuff happened.Its changed over the years so I cant remember what did or did not happen in private lobbies but the most important thing was the business stuff you had to do in public lobbies. Now you can do that in private lobbies.
>>741774304>Very circumcised opinionlol
>>741780019learn to read little labubu lad loony troon
>>741780232>>741780723There's sometimes exclusive store content only GTA+ members have access to which still costs you in-game dollars.I'm willing to bet GTA VI online will pull this off since it's already in single player, stores only GTA+ members can access and the inventory changes every month.
why do they look so plastic? they look like sims characters
>>741785873Arthur genuinely looks better visually
>>741770508its the shallow dressup like in insoi while the actual gameplay gonna be the same repetitive loop stretched to 50 hours, but someone may say nigga throughout the game so its good actually.we live in the dark ages of AAA where just making an interactive movie is enough for normalfags to buy it, no need to sweat about gameplay, innovation and so on.
>>741770508>donk style
>>741785873i mean, to be fair, modern women also look plastic
>>741770508the cracks is that they never showed any gameplayso far their marketing is:>brand name>americans are degeneratesokay? and why would i be interested?
>>741770508Man, you'll have to buy the game again for the PS6, just wait.
>>741770798nta but as a heterosexual male (male) who has gone to salons, no salon actually advertises being unisex because it's a givendoing so is blatant, unironic pandering and virtue signaling
>>741770797unironically reddit behavior; spending money is not a competition to people with critical thinking skills
>>741770508>no facial hair for luciaYikes, not okay.
>>741770508Grim
>>741772167It’s gonna be a sub on top of your sub
>>741787213ofc. Rockstar will make 0 new games in the next decade and just re-release GTA6 on every new console and PC.
>>741774045>700 storesUnless they are copa pasted this has to be fake, like starfield promised 100000 unique planets
>>741778595And you don't have hair to cut, malding bitch
>>741771778no game is worth $100 no matter how much money you have
find it intriguing how little value money holds to people anymoreI pirate everything I can because I like not spending money
>>741770508They're gonna get a lot of money from kids and knuckle draggers that will forget to cancel this.>>741788446normalfags and especially redditors don't actually know the value of money
>>741788446By this logic I could charge you $500 for a taxi ride down the street because...Cars and taxis have existed for decades now?
ultimate edition is very transparently them still trying to price the game at $100, knowing full well nobody's going to buy that stupid fucking bullshit at $100on the other hand their investors are dumb and believe $80 is the "real" price, so their stock price just tanked, lol
>>741788446All of them said it was gonna be physical. What do they think the next step is gonna be? Hey want online? Better pony up for the sub lol
>>741770797Feels better not being a cretin.Enjoy your Goyslop.
>>741770580yes but when dragon age sold MTX/DLC by telling the player in-game "you can't go here unless you pay up" it was bad, and it's still bad now.
>>741788446and then you get absolute brainlets tell you to "vote with your wallet"
Yes Rockstar can get away with it. BUT. What makes no sense is other companies thinking they can get away with pricing their games like GTA and expecting success. Its like pricing a Toyota corolla at the same price as a Mercedes.
>>741788935i don't think rockstar can get away with it. source: that $100 price tag they were so horny for to try and force the game into turning a profit is now being sold as "ultimate edition", leaving a stripped down version as the "normal edition"
>>741788836There's no way they'll lock GTAO behind a sub, but they will definitely make playing it a lot more convenient with a sub and they'll make it just almost unbearable to get money without buying shark cards.
>>741773763shits for brown people no thanks
The game is going to come out and you'll realize the extra shops are not $20 worth of extra content
>>741789250naw i have full confidence the game is going to be sold neutered as their "standard edition". that is already quite the list of shit not available to normie buyers. for EIGHTY FUCKING DOLLARS already
>>741773763oh you mean the part of the game that isn't even available at launch?
GTA online is going to be a monthly paid subscription like an MMORPG
>>741789050I don't think anything is beyond them at this point. I honestly didn't think they'd try to kill physical but they're doing it. They knew it would have huge backlash and they most likely wanted to do $100-120 because they leaked it so much but saw not enough people would bite. People should boycott them and hurt them for this shit
>>741770921fuck you
>>741789532Yes it is. They're deliberately using words like "GTAVI is a single player experience" on the site because GTAO is not part of GTAVI at all this time, it's a separate product you subscribe to play.
>>741770797ahh no way man this guy can probably afford to klarna a new iphone every year too
gta players are the type of dudes who go to a "unisex hair salon" so they can look nice and gay for pride month.
>>741772529Video games are worth $30 max and that's being generous. Also stop projecting
>>741772167>>741772345>>free month of GTA+holy fuck, what if GTAO is subscription-based (you need GTA+ to play)
>>741770508Goddamn, Rockstar is not even subtle about trying to troon out kids aren't they?You faggots are actually looking forward to this propaganda full, empty materialist, cultural rot product?
>>741774045did BossManFuckTheWorld tell you that?
>>741770610>Did you write that!?
>$80 for base game using mobile game tactics where most of it is locked>$100 for the actual real game>physical edition has no disc>no GTA online, possibly a separate purchase entirely>massive graphical downgrade>Lucia got hit with the ugly stick because she was too sexy in the earlier trailersYeah, nah. Fuck this game. And fuck every nigger cattle normie that pays these prices because every other company is going to do the same now.
>>741770797>Bragging how much dick he can suck.Weird flex but ok.
>>741787401>>741773735You must be an unironic special breed of retard because there have been unisex clothes, for example, since the industrial revolution
>>741770828true same experience, we all should know what to expect, spoilers are going to happen, but the story is the weakness part anyways
>>741770508They have over 7000 diverse voices working on it chud, the base price isn't enough to pay them all.
remember that iconic beach shot from trailer 1 with 100s of NPCs at the beach?not a single soul in the background lol
damn, is it ACTUALLY gonna flop?
>>741789939>Consolegoys playing 2 subscriptions on top of shark cards and god knows what else this is like a jewish baclava
>>741792560no, but sales have decreased by 10%you underestimate the cuckmind
>>741792454Saar please be understanding of hard optimization work
>>741770508This looks like a WEG
>>741792454notice the lack of tyre tracks?screenshots are not reflective of gameplay when made by people with all the editing tools to stage a scene how they like
>>741789947>You faggots are actually looking forward to this propaganda full, empty materialist, cultural rot product?mostly browns.
If it's too hard for you, it's acceptable to wait until the game is at least 50% off. You will be forgiven.Let it burn. This is The Great Immolation of our time.
>>741792560GTA6 has to make $2.5 billion just to break even, that is probably why they are going to also charge for GTAO2. It has to break records to be profitable which isn't impossible but way the economy is going how there is a high chance it won't make enough.
>>741793664Putting that in perspective, its the same amount the US spent to fund the Manhattan project
>>741773763>mod menu 200 billion and buy everything >get ddosed by some brown you offended by existingGG no re
"people" on this forum can't save $100 since 2013? What gives?
>>741770797Feels better to have good taste.
>>741794102>mod menu 200 billion and buy everything>get banned>have to buy another copy of gta6 because there's probably a DRM code then another copy of GTAO
>>741770797Same, that's why I own a PC and don't play games for niggerd
>>741794126only retards spend money on shit that ain't worth it
>>741771778Its usually $100+import taxes so like $150 in some countries
>>741770508$100 for the game isn't enough for them?
>>741794126Good job outing yourself as poor. People that have wealth out of life choices do no like wasting it, they either frugal or invest or both.Spending lots of money is something poor people do to show that they are not poor, it comes from the insecurity of growing up poor.That's also how people that hit it big with the lottery or instant fame end up poor despite having so much money, they did not escape that poverty mindset.
>>741796747the term is called nouveau riche.
>>741779223GTAV and RDR2 didn't launch with online either. They just want people to play the singleplayer first
>>741770508nobody cares because people are going to buy it anyway. GTA6 is literally a glass of water in the fucking desert for normies like me.
>>741770797This was always the strangest argument to me. It's like bragging that you pay 10 dollars to buy a single grape.
>>741796842That's referring to old money vs new money, refined tastes and social acceptance of the old money. I'm talking about how you see money, one sees money as a way of attaining pricey things that depreciate instantly and the other sees money as an asset that can better be used for attaining more wealth or a thing to retain.One lives flashy but has nothing out of insecurity and the other has money and doesn't need to show off because the money they have is the security they look for.Both of these people can start in the same place but the different mindsets of how to handle money lead to very different outcomes.
>>741792560It will sell, but the novelty of multiplayer has worn off years ago.
>>741788842You’re on /v/ you dumb nigger, you are most certainly a degenerate cretin, even more so than normal since you think otherwise
>>741797624>i want to buy gta 6 because i like gta>HUURRRRRR YOURE POOR AND STUPIDproject much, faggotron?
>>741774045Epstein's strongest soldier.
>>741770797But only a retard would overpay just to get the 'reward' of the full game, and retards aren't rich. This logic dictates that no one will buy GTAVI and will be the flop of all time
I didn't read the thread but is GTA is a Second Life clone now?
>>741773763yeah fuck the curated singleplayer experience i want to eat a homing missle in the back of my head from some kid who spend $100 from mommys credit card for a armored hover car
>>741770508>Donk stylingsThis shit is so gay
>>741798504>food analogy
>>741771778>paying $100 for pixels to a corporation that will sell millions of copies and make billions on sales alone>bragging about it and defending itkek
>>741798504A more correct analogy would be cutting off a big piece of the cake but still sell the now cut cake at the same piece while charging extra for the cut-off piece.
>>741798747>The company will put exactly 0 cents into his account for dick sucking the game on a basket weaving forum>he does it for free>even jeets are smart enough to get some payment for itjej
>>741798504Imagine fucking up a food analogy.
>>741770798>salons>unisexbruh
>the gta shill defense force already putting in overtime L M A O
>>741770508looks kino, im buying the special edition
>>741770508gta6 is about to normalize paying extra money to enter physical spaces in video games.5 years from now, you'll be prompted with a "pay for the deluxe edition to enter this business with 5 exclusive quests"
>>741792560Online will be a subscription. They’ll milk normies and RPfags to death. They’ll walk back this “ultimate edition” shit with “but all that’s free if you subscribe to GTA online for $20 a month!”.
>>741799975>Online will be a subscription>rpfagsthere'll probably be no modding for rpfags if its a sub
>>741799915from horse armor to this. What a ride
>>741799534how is it fucked up?
>>741799975>>741800038They'll probably include a lobby system rental fee similar to the old days of MP games like EA and battlefield that lets the admins add things in (also paid) from a store R*/TT owns. Pretty sure Bethesda tried this too with paid mods but they don't have the retarded brown audience GTA has.
>>741798504>lowest of IQ takesShould've been "Hey I made the cake and yes it already costs more than the others, but I have to remove the strawberries on top if you don't pay an additional $20, even though they're already on it and will be thrown out either way."
>>741799915and youll still be a bald loser crying about it to nobody in particular online
the worst thing is other companies will follow that trend now80 bucks will be the norm100+ for locking content in the game
>>741800358but that's the point, it wasn't removed from the original cake
>>741770508If I can't make Jason and Lucia look like crackheads they failed on the character customization front.
>bought the console version of GTA V and haven't touched it since the PC release>bought the console version of RDR2 and haven't touched it since the PC releaseI'm going to watch a playthrough on youtube this time
>>741800445That's exactly the point, it's already in the game when you download it, it is content already done and completely implemented in the base game, it's using space on your harddrive, simply made inaccessible behind a paywall.Again a fitting analogy would be that you're not allowed to touch or eat the strawberries that are already on the cake, even though you're paying premium prices well above the industry standard.So now the only question is>pic related
>>741792560Has FIFA, Madden or Call of Duty ever flopped? Legitimate question btw
>>741801231>it's already on the plate, it's already baked I should own it !!
>>741801481Grim.
>>741770580True, Mankind Divided was ruined because of something less awful than this. Surely gamers will act consistently and avoid the cognitive dissonance here by boycotting this game the same way, right?
>>741770610Have you faggots never seen a salon? I literally got my haircut done in one last month.
>>741792560/v/ in its hubris will rabidly push for GTAVI to be a TORtanic/Concord and when it sells millions of copies suddenly there was no push we were just non-buynary chuddhas ohmmmmm ohmmmmm stop looking at me actually GTAVI was a based chud game all along
>>741770508inb4 ultimate edition sells more than the poorfag onePeople CAN put out that kind of money for muh GTA.
>>741770797we're all having a laugh but this is the mentality that almost every single 'luxury' brand is built on - retards overspending on overpriced crap to brag about how rich they arejust in this case it's gun and ball gamers buying slop on some buy-now-pay-later scheme
>>741770921Based
>>741802125>$100 is luxury nowlmao I'm really surrounded by poor browns
>>741770797kek look at all the seethe you collected with this post
>>741796747>erm akshually, rich people dont spend their money at allA cope as old as time.
>>741800254I worked with an RPfag last year and it was insane the amount of time and effort he put into maintaining his RP biker gang, even constantly taking calls at work about it. Hopefully online is delayed enough and the base game is bad enough that some people can break that curse on themselves.
>get scammed by a literal indian company>"h-heh, I'm not poor, unlike YOU, chud!"
>>741791442which part of my post has anything to do with that you mouthbreathing fuckwit?I did not dispute the existence of unisex things, I said no salon advertises as unisex because it's a given you disgusting cretin
>>741770610Common term to differentiate from a lady's salon. The ones in GTA SA were also called unisex salons.
is there a source that it is confirmed locked to 30fps, even on the pro?
Remember when they made those 3 GTA games on ps2 in the span of 3 years that to this day are all iconic and beloved and now it takes them 15 years and 6 gorillion dollars to rape you and not even give you a physical game that you own
>>741770610>>741770508>>741770797the game is confirmed to have NTR with the fmc
>>741770508Genuinely not buying it now. Will just pirate it. Not going through this song and dance again. Best of luck fellas, genuinely hope it ends up being fun.
>>741770797My Schwab portfolio alone is worth more than everyone in this thread, and I wouldn’t be caught dead paying $100 for a videogame.
>>741770508not very surprising that the actual full game is 100, they'd probably make that the baseline if they could but figured they wouldn't get away with it, so they settled for cranking up the base price a little bit and calling the full release >the ultimate edition
>>741773763Just use pirate servers lol
>>741804694what do you spend your money on? traveling? Understanding that you need to save a lot to build up a portfolio like that, just curious what you intend to do with it other than just living well later in life.
>>741804028you must be seriously retarded if you think this game would be able to go past 30 FPS on any currently existing console
>>741770797Paying 10$ for an incomplete game or paying 100$ for an incomplete game is the same thing.You're still paying for an incomplete game, you fucking retard.
>>741804594Yeah I have zero desire for onlineslop anyways, GTA was never and should never be about that
>>741772529This is genuinely only an argument poor people make. You are limited by what you do and do not do by simple monetary constraints, so when someone says they don’t want to do something you simply imagine they must not have the money, like you.
>>741789532I hope I can still play the original GTA Online when this shitty new version comes out
>>741770508I found this to be a very lame way to announce the pre-orders >member vice city>member the 80s (except its not the 80s anymore but you get outfits!!) it's all very gay and too self referential
>>741804487Is this about the optional male strippers or the theory that their kid is not Jason's? A leaker came here a while back and said it would be their kid.Btw Paywalling in-game locations for a SP is absolute kvetchery. Idgaf about the cosmetics, but they did this shit with RDR2 with one mission.I'll just wait till it's 10$ on G2A
>Sara's Unisex Salonis that really necessaryI go to a chick that does both men and womens hair but she doesn't advertise it like MORGANS BISEXUAL UNISEXUAL OMNISEXUAL HAIR STYLING WE DO EVERY ONE COME ON IT ITS GAY AS FUCK GAY LOVE BLACKS TOO HEY HEY
>>741805401She should that would be a great sign
>>741805145>jeets and leaf devsanon is rightodds of the game not having cuckold shit are very lowwe will find out when the game release, but im 100% sure the FMC/MC won't have a vanilla romance.
>>741770508>unisex>facial hair for jason>nails and makeup for LuciaSounds kinda based theyre keeping masculine options for jason and feminine options for lucia exclusive to each one's genders. Also lucia in a denim skirt is doing things for me and I cant wait for the impending pantyshots that better be available from her wearing a skirt/dress.
>>741774045Are you indian?
editions are a downgrade from blimp
i aint buying this feminist nigger slop anyway.
>nails for luciadoes that just mean fingernails or are they gonna go all-in and allow toenails too
>>741770797That $100 is adding shitty cosmetics to your game. That $100 is adding value to my investment portfolio. You're poor because you blow away any extra money you have
>>741770508This game is literally everything wrong with the current games industry and its even trendsetting new vile things while keeping gameplay out of the publics eye, it has the makings of a flop but not just any flop a flop so massive that it actually destroys the gaming industry. GTA will be the straw that broke the camels back ET but tenfold. I cannot fucking wait to witness it.
>>741772167GTA VI Online will be a separate standalone game that will require a $80 purchase
R* should stop pretending they are a pg13 company and get back to their grimy, gritty roots
