Which one should I play?
>>741786534what are you looking for? most grasp ck easily because you're essentially still playing characters in a semi-rpg fashion rather than being a nebulous country.
>>741786694I've played a lot of CK2 so 3 would be more natural but I love having an actual economy like EU does. Problem is, everyone says it's basically still in beta
>>741786534eu5 for the true autism experience
>>741786534They are both fairly different and yet good.CK3 is more finished and balanced though currently (as silly as that sounds for a game where you can lose everything to one event).
>>741787192>CK3 is more finished and balanced thoughdid they remove the conqueror trait? It was basically a cheat code
>>741787278No, this is actually a mechanic that adds some much needed challenge (mostly to tribal and nomadic areas, which otherwise are just effortless blobbing).I didn't end up having in on player characters too often and if I did it felt deserved.
>>741786534CK3 if you have enough money to buy all the dlcsEUV if you dont
>>741786534I only played CK2, tried a bit of EU3 and it was boring. CK2 at least you could roleplay a bit more.
>>741786534Ck3 mainly for the mods
>>741786534None of those. Play either Ck II or EU IV.
>>741788585>game of goyslop modbehead yourself
>>741788678Both worse.
>>741787278you can turn it off, make it rarer (or more common) and decide if it's inherited in game rules with no penalty
>>741788873Don't you have any goyslop DLC to buy?
>>741786534ck3 is a better game, it doesnt struggle with identity, it knows its an arcadeshame they are bloating it with dlcs same as they did stellaris tho
>>741788873eu4 is better, its smaller than 5 but better designed, doesnt take 100 hours to play, ai actually does what it supposed to.
>>741786534>Which one should I play? EU4. With the Anbennar mod, but wait until the Kaztubar MT is released.
Neither one is tactically difficult or engaging. Whether they realize it or not, most people play these games for the "emergent storytelling," or to larp as some grand tactician, even though these games are shallow. So if you want the former, CK3 is clearly the better vehicle for that. If you want the latter, look into something else.
>>741788991Seethe>>741789439EU4 basegame was trash, way too boardgamey and railroaded, only Anbennar was fun.EU5 basegame is actually fun.
>>741790179holy shityou must be a 40+ fat ugly virgin
>>741790452>you must be mehow are you doing
>>741790179based, i only have 270 hours on CK3 and 100 on CK2 >>741786534CK3 hands down. Easier to get into and much more fun. I have both and i have 180 hours on EUV and 270 on CK3. For now i'm sticking with EUIV because it's a finished project, EUV needs some more time to develop.
>>741790452>40+36 actually.>fatA bit, but it's not too bad.>uglyArguable, I'd say a solid 4/10.>virginAkshully been in a relationship for 8+ years.>>741790990The game still needs work, the endgame is still just pure tedium.It's better than CK2 at least.
>>741791061>Akshully been in a relationship for 8+ years.thats why you are playing 1400 hours in a game with pedo mods right?
>>741786534EUV has too many friction points and annoying mechanics. I dropped off of it after 20ish hours.
>>741791136>people are allowed to have hobbies in a relationship Whoa!I guess that's what having no relationship experience does to a MF.>pedo modsI've never been to Loverslab or wherever these are hosted.Erotic mods are cringe anyway.
>>741786534Better wait another year before playing EU5
>>741786534Problem with CK3 is that most of the time you just wait for something to happen
>>741791320That's grand strategy and simulation games in general.
>>741786534While there is a lot of content for a paracocks release game in EUV, it's all a numbers go up and most of the unique content is unfortunately CHINESE WINDMILLS +10% to rice production. CK3 is already more enjoyable with an amazing modding scene, and hopefully the theocracy and republic government DLCs fill the last few major holes the game has desperately needed
I just really want Stellaris 2 at this point
>>741791439I have high hopes for Princess of Darkness.Also if they ever manage to port Geheimnisnacht for CK3 it's gonna be amazing.
>>741791320thats your problemgo play a visual novel or somethingi meanwhile am bending the world to my will, converting, kidnapping, assassinating, enriching myself, developing the land
>>741791909you sound like a homosexual
>>741786534EU5 might maybe, if you're lucky, be a good game in 2 years.
>>741791841Yeah as long as they don't hard code a bunch of stuff, PoD is gonna be insane. Gonna have the government type that'll lend itself to plotting and evil machinations
>>741792129you sound like someone coping with being exposed
Stellaris
>>741794019too spaghetti coded in the endgame, and UI is trash on high res screens
>>741794079Fix'd by mods?
>>741786534CK3, only because it more or less works and eu5 is a complete dumpster fire. Either that or wait 2 more weeks for Gilded Destiny.
>>741794450>Gilded Destinyis this Victoria 3 but good?
>>741786534CK3
imagine being too stupid for a fucking ck3 that you need your tard wrangler mods for more random events sheeesh nigga
>>741794506It's a spiritual succesor to Victoria II. But I have to say, as a kickstarter backer, that I doubt it's ever releasing.
>>741794952what went wrong with Vicky 3 anyway? All I know is that warfare was completely cucked somehow but I never bothered to investigate
>>741795192You would fare better asking what went right.
>>741786534Crusader Kings 3 is better.
>>741786534if you have to ask, ck3 for sure
