Now that Starfox remake is confirmed a critic failure, and it's not looking good for Zelda.
Why? Starfox 2026 was outsourced to an American developer run by Indians. OOT Remake is made by Nintendo.
would you like fries with that?
Let's be honest that is the worst Link has ever looked. Is he wearing overalls?
>>741788037>i trust video game journalists when they agree with the opinion I wanted to have
>>741788524joke's on you.i never play games lower than an MC score of 88
>>741788037>OoT - 99 Metacritic with 22 reviews>OoT 3DS - 94 Metacritic with 85 reviews>OoT:R - ???It'll score lower by virtue of the game's design becoming more antiquated over time, not necessarily by lack of effort.OoT's not even a top-5 Zelda game in modern day.
>>741788037>and it'sesl piece of shit
>>741788037>confirmed a critic failurewhere?
its going to be a 1:1 remake with some yellow paint type "accessibility features" added in to make it easier than original OoT because Nintendo thought original OoT was too hard because some people didnt finish the game.Im genuinely curious how people are going to react to it. what are the boomers who are buying it out of nostalgia going to think? many will think its an ok remake but many on /v/ will throw a fit. also zoomers will probably think the game is mid af because its not as novel a concept today as it once was.
>>741789946
>>741791724? That's a wildly good score.
>>741793919All the good scores are coming from people who also gave rave reviews to Mixtape and Highguard.
>critic failure
>>741788417Do we even know that for OoTR yet?
>>741794131no, I wouldn't be surprised if Monolith Soft is helping with it.
>>741790198If it's literally a 1:1 remake I'm not buying it, there's no point. I'll just use the models of the girls as reference images for pornographic commissions.
>>741793919cope
>>741794090>>741788976
>>741794131No, there's no clear indication of who's working on it. There's speculation that Monolith Soft might be involved because of an old recruitment ad they had for an unspecified Zelda project that they only took down a few months before the OOT remake announcement, but ultimately it's just speculation at the moment.
>>741791724Your point being?
>>741788037My hope is that goes through a bunch of changes, like how Twilight Princess 2004 and 2005 looked a lot different than Twilight Princess 2006.
>PLEASE, STOP MAKING NEGATIVE ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT NINTENDO>NINTENDO IS GOD AND YOU MUST WORSHIP IT
My main concern is the voice acting. The voice acting in starfox remake is awful.
>tfw might spend almost 600 bucks just to play a Zelda remake (500 bucks for switch 2, 80 bucks for Zelda)
>>741796175do you think the snoys feel sufficiently owned yet though?
>>741790198A.1:1 remake would be terrible, Link's N64 controls and handling did not age well
