[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Fallout_3_cover_art.png (1.06 MB, 668x838)
1.06 MB PNG
Was it a good RPG?
>>
>>741794664
no
1 and 2 are the only fallouts to hold that distinction
>>
File: fallout-3-fawkes_jpg.jpg (715 KB, 1600x1080)
715 KB JPG
>>741794664
not even close to a good rpg

it gets praised by /v/ only because it was their first fallout experience
>>
>>741794664
Yes. Even if you don't think it's good, it's still the best Bethesda rpg of all time
>>
>>741794757
Fallout 3 is better than 1 as an RPG but worse than 2
>>
Bethesda doesn't even know what RPGs are. They think it's as simple as letting the player choose knife or handgun and then just shooting everything without any superseding stat skill determining how effective they are.
>>
>>741794664
It was a polished American S.T.A.L.K.E.R. so yeah it was good
>>
>>741794664
No but it's a good atmospheric shooter with a novel gimmick, and that's enough.
>>
>>741794896
correct
>>
>>741794664
Yes it's good. It's just mediocre or flawed at worst.
>>
>>741794757
Fallout 1 is way too short to be good
>>
>>741794664
Its ok
>>
>>741794664
It's a good dungeon crawler and it has a lot of replay value in build variety. The open world is probably the best Bethesda ever designed if you can get past the story being retarded and a lot of the quests being insane.
>>
>>741794664
No. It's a competent action game
>>
Can someone explain what they actually like about this game? I've played 2, NV and 4 and cannot think of a single thing 3 does better than any of them.
>>
>>741799032
I think you're the first person I've seen that has played 2 but hasn't played 1. Anyway I guess 3 has better map design and exploration than 2/NV
>>
>>741799032
It has a better post-apoc feeling, way more sparse and dead, for the people who like that.
>>
Not particularly, no. Your only options for roleplaying is goody-two-shoes and kills people for fun. You can be "neutral" which just means sometimes you do perform actions of one and sometimes the other.
>>
>>741794757
2 also sucks. Obviously only 1 is good
>>
File: 336.jpg (33 KB, 700x438)
33 KB JPG
>>741796913
>open world is probably the best Bethesda ever designed

It's just shitty low res brown sludge
>>
>>741794664
>>741794757
It's unironically more of an RPG than 1 and 2.

In 3, if you dump points into a skill you see instant change the next you use it. Also, most quests have both a good and evil karma outcome. In 1 and 2, you're railroaded into being good karma for most of the content.

Neckbeards from NMA will claim that 1 and 2 are "true" RPGs when really it's just obtuse and confusing with the information given passed off as brainy and tactical.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.