Your GTA VI order sir…
uh... AI did this!
>>741839241wowee thank you! Time to insert it into my Playstation's disc drive
It's just something nice for people to have who want a physical object to hold. You want the game to leak weeks early? Don't like it, don't buy it chud. Rockstar doesn't need your money.
>>741839241where it be?
So what happens if your ps5 breaks? You have to buy another copy?
>>741839371What if the whole house shares the same console, how do you keep software out of your roommates hands?
>>741839371Or they could have just went the crimson desert route and required a day 1 patch to play off disc if they’re that paranoid about stupid leaks
>>741839443yes. they dont have to worry about used copies this way based lol
>>741839371>You want the game to leak weeks early?Yeah, sure. Why not?
KEEPIN’ IT DIGITAL AIN’T NOTHIN (hey)YOU AIN’T GOTTA LIKE IT CAUSE THE GOYS GONE LOVE IT (hey)YOU AIN’T GOTTA LIKE IT CAUSE THE GOYS GONE LOVE IT (hey)Watch as Rockstar make goys out the public.
>>741839241>rockdrone: you'll still buy it>went out of my way to put a disc drive on a PS5 proNo. It's not likely Rockstar will do a recall either so i will be sitting this one out. Yes i know the DRM stigma already with the drives but you can play a game from disc off the internet. For example i did this with Gravity Rush 2 when my ISP was knocked out.
>>741839821NIGGA I'M A FAKE ONEALL MY COPIES FRAUDWATCH ME SUCK THESE SWORDS
Jokes aside, the fact they are legally getting away with selling a literally titled "Physical Copy" that literally isn't a physical copy is the final nail in the coffin for consumer laws. They don't exist anymore.And of course kike lawyers are ignoring the blatant clear obvious deliberate false advertising. Nobody is touching it. It's over.
It already sold out on Amazon lol
N
>>741840850Most of them probably don't know yet
>>741839241You will own NOTHING and you will be HAPPY you STUPID CATTLE
>>741839460>sharing>roommatedon't be a commie
>>741839241Why do you hate games, anon?Didn't you know that making fun of GTA6 means hating on the very concept of games itself?Be better!
>>741839371Ackhually they do need your money, they're 2 billion dollars in the hole.
>>741843247>release day arrives>X/Twitter is flooded with black people posting pictures of empty game cases with a simple slip of paper with a code on it inside>10 minutes later those same people will again post saying the code doesn't work, because they showed the code to the whole world and someone claimed it
>>741839241>>741839335lol
>>741843539>10 minutes later those same people will again post saying the code doesn't work, because they showed the code to the whole world and someone claimed it
>>741843539balanced as all things should be
>>741843298How are her legs that thin
>>741843539That's why you redeem the code first, then post it online
>>741839241
>>741839241*sniffs*
>GTA6 is actually saving you money since you don't need a disc drive anymore
What would a disc being in there actually change? You'll still need to download the vast majority of the game, you still won't legally own it cos legal pedantry, you'll still be at the mercy of some online mechanisms that demand you have an account and sign in to play 'your' game
>>741839241I was going to buy it on disc for my PS5, now I won't. This game has been in development for so long that at this point I don't care about waiting another year or two. I'm pirating it when it comes out on PC, fuck jewstar.
Hmm...fellas, should I get the 1 year or two year extra insurance? Can never be too safe.
am I going insane or has this not been a standard practice for a few years now
>>741847254can u use the code and return it haha
>>741847186>What would a disc being in there actually change?That's not true. Rockstar have always upheld a two disc storage principle throughout all of their releases dating back to GTA IV and they never changed that. Every single one of their releases have had two discs to store the massive size of the games. And for the DLC the same was true so they had to make separate cases for them or bundle alternate versions of the games. But otherwise those disc were actually storing everything including for the latest of RDR2.
>>741847681I doubt two discs would be enough for GTA6 either
>>741847745PS5's discs would be unless it exceeds 200gb.I don't know what the specs are for the Xbox Series X disc drive though.
>>741847681>That's not true. Rockstar have always upheld a two disc storage principle throughout all of their releases dating back to GTA IV and they never changed that.False. PS3 GTA IV had just one disc.
>>741848646I have a PC copy so I'm looking at it what is actually on my shelf. I have both the console and PC releases but only still got my PC one.Was it different for PS3/X360?
>>741847186>What would a disc being in there actually change?It wouldn't be tied to my account I could buy a used copy or sell my copy.
>>741847745You think 2 discs is the maximum or something?
>it's okay when Nintendo does it
>>741839241Who still buys physical?
>>741848850Me
>>741848775one blueray for ps3
>>741839241LMAO
>>741848826Said no one ever
>>741848826It sucked then and it sucks now. At least back then it was made only for smaller games, as an experiment to try people to use their digital distribution stores.
>>741848775Oh they just added in the DLC for alt versions and that's why they became two discs editions. I might have it mixed up and gta V was the first for real first two disc release with no DLC. And the same was true for RDR2. So my mistake two disc non dlc principle started at GTA V.
>>741848775Yes, different for PS3/X360. This is because PS3 used Blu-Ray disc for storage, and PC and X360 used DVD. Fun fact: PS3 still featured games that required two discs or more
>>741849076Any examples?
>>741839241I asked for extra map, 'mam.
>>741849032It's weird i could have sworn there was heaps of discs for GTA V but my xbox 360 one only has two discs in the case. It's just disc 1 install and disc 2 play. I could have potentially lost the discs or something but I'm able to do a complete install with just the two discs I'm pretty sure.
>>741839241>you will own nothing and be happy
>>741843537But the money isn't physical either?
>>741848892You must be new here.
>>741849113FFXIV and if you wanna count it, God of War Saga has two. Not sure about the rest actually. I thought Gran Turismo 6 also has two but nope. Kind of impressive even though the PS3 wasn't a great console
>>741849302>projection
>>741839371I didn’t buy it nigger, and I’m not triple dipping like GTA V I’ll play it on PC in a year if they don’t want to ship a disc either. I’ll get it on PC FOR FREE since there’s no difference. >they don’t need your money…riiiight…It’s $80 for teh lulz and not because they need 3 trillion dollars to break even.
>>741849518>It’s $80$100 if you want the entire game.
>>741849179I was correct. So what was the deal with the PC version?>>741849032Why all of those discs?I don't have the PC version of the game because at the point i was just buying stuff on steam as physical was on it's way out in regards to pc gaming.
>>741848786Nah, these days all games have to be tied to accounts to work. You activate your copy and then its worthless to anyone else
>>741849626>Why all of those discs?Game data is actually on the discs.It's not a key to download/access downloaded data.
>>741849305>FFXIVI see only one disc in the redump database. But it seems it also had a physical expansion pack disc sold and a complete one disc version with the expansion built in.>God of War SagaIt shouldn't really count, because it's a compilation of multiple games thar were relased separatele before.
>>741839241where is my protein bugs bar ?
>>741849901You need to buy the $200 Klaus Edition
>>741849710Yeah but xbox 360 was the same and it only used two. It was game data because i remember putting them into my disc tray on launch night and it installed from the discs.
>>741849626PC version was ported from the Next Gen PS4 and Xbox One version, that's why it takes more space.
>>741850064>Yeah but xbox 360 was the sameNo, it wasn't. But for arguments sake let's play along.the 360 version only has to target the 360.The PC has to target much much MUCH higer specs with higher quality models, textures, etc...Obviously the file size is smaller on a a worse platform.
>>741846853Buy an ad, faggot.
>>741850149>No, it wasn't.Ah i misremembered it was really just the next gen version prior to the original releases. Why was it on so many discs? because most PC disc drives didn't have the same capacity as PS4 bluray discs? i don't think it was common to sell high storage bluray or anything with PCs. It was essentially just the Xbone/Ps4 version of the game.
>>741850487>Bigger files>More discsIt's that simple.
>>741850553Both Xbone and PS4 versions only have 1 disc.I'm assuming it's because they were unsure what kind of drives people were using and thus didn't want to do any guesswork and came up with a universal solution.
>>741850651>Both Xbone and PS4 versions only have 1 discDisc is a key to download the game from the servers.
They don't want anyone reselling or lending copies on launch, a true physical version probably won't happen until the PS6.
>>741850714I only have my old last gen original version so i can't test this. But generally if this website lists it requiring no downloads it's generally the case.Not the case of the disc is physical key.
>>741851084>GenerallySo it proves nothing...?
66% of ps5 games can be played completely offline with no download required
>>741851189RDR2's campaign was entirely on disc (2 disc install) and playable offline so they didn't randomly flip to no downloads after a specific period if that period was unaffected. At least thats my line of thinking. I'm not going to go out to EB games and pick up some used PS4 copy of GTA V to make a point though. It was likely on the disc.
>>741851381>they didn't randomly flip to no downloadsrandomly flip to downloads *typo
>>741839241R* support let it slip that proper physical copies with a disc are coming out in the future.https://www.ppe.pl/news/415732/gta-6-a-pudelko-z-plyta-na-ps5-i-xsx-zdradzamy-szczegoly-tej-wersji.htmlMaybe December according to this rumor.So the code in a box is just at launch to avoid leaks.
>>741851381Okay...?That proves nothing about GTA 5 tho.
>>741851525>Someone typed some text into gmail, so it must be true!!!:/
>>741851686I guess we'll see.I don't have a console, so I don't care wither way.
>>741851771Your PC can't read discs?
>>741851815chances are if you try to install a game disc on a modern OS, you will have to find fixes that would come with the pirated version anyway
>>741851815I haven't had a disc reader in my PC in 15 years probably.
>>741851852So can your PC read discs? Y/N
>>741851525they already lied once, why wouldn't they lie again?also not even sony was let on this fact and had to take down all the "best played on PS5" marketing to remove all the references to physical disks
>>741851643You also never proved it's a download. Which it's not, so i was correct.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dwUHYMxql0It's likely what i said about them not knowing what disc drives people were using and hence chopping the data up onto numerous discs to target a wider array of disc drives. It sounds like the more logical explanation to me.
>>741851525>>741851972
>the avg weight of playstation games on amazon is 80g>the weigh of gta vi is 150>MUHHH NO DISChow stupid are you guys?
>>741852006>You also never proved it's a downloadDid you ask me to?>likelyThat means you have no definitive evidence for your claim.
NO DISCNOT EVEN A DRIVEIT DOESN'T EVEN MATTER IF YOU RAISE THE PRICE
>>741852063>no defintive evidenceWhat else would explain something that can be put on one disc? the PC version is the next gen console version aka PS4/Xbone. They're practically identical aside from customization in the graphics settings. Same textures, lighting etc.
>>741852254>I can't think of another answer, therefore it must be true!Sounds like religious faith-based schizobabble to me.Why not deal in facts instead?
>>741852323Originally you tried to imply there was logic upon multiple discs and what sounds logical is that PCs all use different pieces of hardware in them. Therefore they had to make estimations of what hardware people had for a physical release in regards to the drives they were using.It's not faith based it's logical assumptions in regards to how you approach a platform that does not have uniform hardware and differing combinations of things. A guess like that is logical. And actually just doing a small google search on the issue i was right it was standard dual layer dvds. So there you go that's why they had to do it when you're targeting roughly a 65gb install. Are you retarded?
NO. FUCKING. DISC. NO BUYi spent extra money to get a disc drive ps5 like literally everyone else because i had like 8000 ps4 disc games and i wanted the backwards compatabilityI ALSO WANT THAT ON MY PS6which means i want a fucking disc of gtavi OBVIOUSLYWHEN CONSOLES BECOME DIGITAL ONLY I STOP BUYING CONSOLES AND STOP BUYING GAMESSIMPLE AS
>>741852576>No proof>Again>Just claims and blind faith in said claimsOk.So what do you want exactly? It seem like you're done here.
>>741852057All physical editions say “code in a box” on all retailers. You’re fucking stupid.
>>741852645Proof is that the disc storage did not match the capacity of the console version discs you idiot. It doesn't take a wild guess that it was a universal solution for guesstimates regarding drives. It was not standardized to have these Bluray disc drives in general in PC building as most people valued an SSD by that point. That was when digital was being widely adopted therefore the discs being dual layer DVD is somewhat of an afterthought because not many people were paying for physicals by that point.
>>741847482It's amazon, so yes. And then they will mail it out again to some retard.
>it's olay when nintendo does it
>>741852867>Proof is...>Posts no verifiable sources>AGAINSo....Can I see this "proof" or are you just going to pretend it exists for the entire thread?
>>741839371>Don't like it, don't buy it chud.Don't worry, i won't.
>Our source, who was the first to predict problems with the physical release of Grand Theft Auto VI , has now uncovered further information. Graczdari confirms to PPE.pl that codes for physical versions of Rockstar Games' hit will no longer be available for a maximum of several weeks after the game's release.>According to initial leaks, the disc edition is expected to be released in December 2026, just before the holidays. This would be a great way to maximize profits, as many parents will be rushing to stores to buy themselves a Christmas present.
>>741852952That's better than a code in a box.It's still cancer. But it's like, stage 2 cancer vs stage 3.
>>741852952Tendies have no dignity dunno why you fags obsess doing a comparison with keysloppers is beyond me
>>741852982Link?
>>741853038https://www.ppe.pl/news/415732/gta-6-a-pudelko-z-plyta-na-ps5-i-xsx-zdradzamy-szczegoly-tej-wersji.html
>>741853060>Not englishThen it's not real. thanks.
>>741852958I've already said something pretty defintive that you can't refute. 9GB of data is what you roughly get a disc. Therefore it's all chopped up and you get all those discs before you reach your target at 65gb. Physical was not valued at the point and not many people were buying blu ray drives in PC building, that is true it all shifted to SSD. It doesn't take a genius to figure it out and only an idiot to not notice that there was no reason but them targeting a bunch of old drives and it wasn't really that high of a priority for the physical release to be put on modern discs. I'm not going to reply to trolling at this point just accept that you're wrong and you tried to act smart over something that you didn't understand and thought there was a greater meaning to numerous discs.
>>741853151Wait until you find out who’s developing gta vi
>>741853246>Posts literally zero sources>for the 4th time in a rowI really don't understand what you are afraid of.You can't "prove" anything until you do this.
>>741853284What sources would you need other than it's a dual layer DVD? do you need some retard at kotaku to shit an article for you? that's why it was on 7 discs.
>>741839241Here is your pointless piece of plastic dear customer, also remember to drink using paper straws because the planet is dying!
>>741853461>What sources would you needMore than literally zero would be a great start, thanks.If you think it proves your claims true, post it.
>>741853767You just sound like a tech illiterate retard more than anything. Because it requires no sources and common sense. I don't have to be able to get into their heads and know how a studio operates on a topic like this. Only the logic that follows about how you do a release on a platform that had since abandoned physical drives and for the few that hadn't what they would be targeting because bluray drives with high capacity discs was just kind of irrelevant in the PC building space. That being said if they had bothered to target the few people that did buy them it would have looked like a 1 or 2 disc release. In any case it's an after thought and completely random. No sources need and fuck off.
>>741854010>No sources >Just claims>For the 100th timeIf you're refusing to participate in the discussion, then you are literally cedeing the argument.I accept your concession.
>>741850714Not it fucking isn't. You can install the game fully offline and even play the 1.00 version on PS4 if you want, as I've done many times. You play it off the disk, that's how physical on PS4 works. Why do PC niggers go online and just blatantly lie about disk games?
>>741854010>No sources need and fuck off.SAAAAAAAAARRRRRRR
>>741854098You are an utter fucking retard lol, see >>741854132
Smart of them to do this with a game that will sell like hotcakes regardless so they can get their foot in the door with the concept.
>>741854202>No sourceOk.I still accept your concession.
>>741854263NTA but I have GTA V on disc for PS4, the game installs and runs without an internet connection, that's the whole fucking point of discs.
>>741854306>Refuses to prove his claims true>Loses because of this fact>Cries until the thread 404'sKeep going anon, I can't wait to see you screech like an autist for another 4-5 hours.I'm in my garden enjoying the sun, so I can reply to you all day.
>>741839241I'll add it to my collection of ps5 games...
>>741854386>Refuses to prove his claims trueWhat would be considered proof you insufferable faggot? Do you want me to record a video and upload it to youtube or will that also not be good enough?Multiple people tell you you're wrong and you're just crying about it...
>>741854263>>741854386See >>741851084Kill yourself stubborn retard
>>741854454>What would be considered proof you insufferable faggot?Already told you.>Links to verifiable sources that demonstate your claims are true.You gonna stop crying and actually do it this time?>>741854469>GenerallyThat's why it's not definitive proof of anything lol
This is the most limpdicked 'outrage' I've ever seen in gaming.
>>741852952you can share or resell it tho
>>741854454>Do you want me to record a video and upload it to youtubeSure, do it.
>>741854545Sony requires publishers to put a disclaimer right on the cover if the game requires an internet connection. This is mandatory for PS4/5 games, there is no such disclaimer on GTA IV, as stated in the database anon posted and literally everywhere else. Looking forward to see how you try and squirm out of this. >>741854926Good news somebody already did:https://www.youtube.com/shorts/1dwUHYMxql0
>>741855163>ShortsNot watching that garbage lolHow about a real video? Thanks. One you uploaded to be specific.
>>741855163>game requires an internet connection.For gameplay or install? Be specific please.
>>741855238>give me a video>no not like this!lol, lmao>>741855273You could always install from a disc without an internet connection the question is whether you can play it like that or not. That's what the disclaimer is there for. Right now the only way to play The Last Guardian at 60fps is to find a version 1.0 (only the first version has an unlocked frame rate) PS4 disc, install and play offline on a PS5.I have no fucking idea how /v/ of all places is this clueless about how disc games work.
>>741839241That will be $100 plus tip
>>741855520>"Want me to upload a video to youtube?"Yes please>"Noooooo! I refuse!!!!!"Cowardly. Why offer if you were too scared to do it?>You could always install from a disc without an internet connectionOkay.So that disclaimer proves literally nothing in regards to your claim then.Better get recording!
There isnt a single PC game released on a fucking bluray disc because no one had a drive for it, so no shit it has heaps of discs. Anyone who doesnt know that doesnt have a place in whatever this dumb argument is actually about.
>>741855825Obvious samefag is obvious.
>>741854545>That's why it's not definitive proof of anything lolMotherfucker you were linked a youtube video of the game installing offline when you insisted it wasn't on the disc and that was the reason for 7 discs existed on the PC version. You also insisted the high number discs on the PC version was due to all the whole game being there and not the PS4 version when that is clearly not true and it was due to dual layer dvds being used. There's not much more i need to comment on. If you missed the video here it is again:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dwUHYMxql0It's only not tested with a base ps4 but that's irrelevant because it would be the exact same results if it installs no problem on a ps5.
>>741855873>Dodges the questionRude. I'll ask again...>"Want me to upload a video to youtube?"Yes please>"Noooooo! I refuse!!!!!"Cowardly. Why offer if you were too scared to do it?
>>741855238Pathetic reaction to getting btfo, god damn you're a fucking loser lmfao
>>741855654You know full well that was a rhetorical question, and that I was exaggerating because you're dismissing all the evidence proving you wrong.Besides we all know that even if I record a video you'll still say it's fake and find a reason to dismiss it, just like you did with the video someone already made.At this point the onus is on you, go out and but a PlayStation and a disc copy of GTA V.
>>741855941>You know full well that was a rhetorical question"Rhetorical questions" don't end with question marks lolLook it up, ESL.
>>741839371>You want the game to leak weeks early?Yes. I want to know if the story is worth to play and not a humiliation ritual.
>>741855997>Do you want me to record a video and upload it to youtube or will that also not be good enough?What are you talking about Pablo?
>>741855940>samefagginglol
>>741856063>Ends with a question markLike I said, Muhammed.Not rhetorical. Just a question.
>>741856117Learn the language of the country you're living in, before I call ICE on your ass. It's phrased as a rhetorical question, because we both know the answer, and of course as you've already proven in this thread. And yes, you can add a question mark to rhetorical questions.
>>741855859What the fuck, i was having a giggle at you retards arguing and decided to throw that comment in hoping someone would go off and find a niche PC game on a blu ray and this is the shitty response i get? Damn im actually annoyed now, you are good at this trolling. Im kind of impressed. Screw you though.
>>741856302>It's phrased as a rhetorical questionNot if it ends with a question mark, Muhammad. It's just a question, which I answered and you cried about.
>>741856302>And yes, you can add a question mark to rhetorical questions.No, you can't lolDo Indians really?
>i will buy physical for a mapLol, it's a card with a QR code to a PDF.
>>741856391>>741856559What do they teach you in schools exactly, aside from the holocaust and slavery? https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/rhetorical-question>"Why do these things always happen to me?" is a rhetorical question.https://www.writing.support/questionmark.htm>The question mark is used to end a direct question, and to end a rhetorical question.https://writing-center.phsc.edu/grammar/punctuation/end-punctuation/question-marks>Question marks can also be used for rhetorical questions – questions used for persuasion.
>>741857009Neat.Now record your footage like you said you would, or admit you are literally refusing to prove your claims true.
>>741857009>Why do these things always happen to me?"It can be, but isn't always.
>>741839460You install it to your profile only and put a pass code on it
>>741839241Great! Thank you!Let me download it... oh, wait. GTA+ costs $20 a month? Deep sigh. Fine, take my money.
>>741857127Sure, but with the necessary context you can make a judgement whether the question was asked in earnest or not, and we do have the context in this thread.Anon stubbornly refuses to acknowledge the mountain of evidence presented to him, so I asked him an overly dramatic rhetorical question.Now he's egging me on to waste even more time on his hopeless ass, and I know full well that if I did he will just dismiss the evidence yet again, because he's a moron.
>>741857545So you're admitting that you are refusing to prove your own claims true, correct?"Yes" or "No" answers only.
>>741855938Refer back to >>741855873
>>741843539lmao more free GTA6 for us. Stupids. Of course, Rockstar would revoke those keys, so chuds will never ever get it! Rockstar will give those poor, retarded negro pets other codes for the sake of diversity. :^)
>>741857545>he will just dismiss the evidenceWhat indian cope is this?I literally said I would accept a video you recorded as evidence and you cried for hours lol
>>741857651>Dodges the questionRefer back to>>741855938
>>741854545Anon was being generous, the site is completely accurate https://www.doesitplay.org/game/Grand%20Theft%20Auto%20V/ps4/Base%20PS4?region=UKNow fuck off
>>741857735The video evidence is here. Refer back to >>741855873
>>741857612>>741857682A video showing the exact same thing you asked was already given to you and you dismissed it. Presumably we've also cleared up your misunderstandings regarding rhetorical questions in the English language and whether my post contained such a question. No amount of of cope will change the fact that you've been proven wrong time and time again in this thread.
>>741852018topkek
>>741857796>The site is accurate >b-b-because I said so, okay????cute
>>741857526but think of how happy you'll be when you own nothing. oh and the next playstation is rent only
>>741857863>>741857930>Not your videoIt's like you can't read English or something...Hmm...You have to record it, why is this so hars for you to understand Rasheesh?
>>741852623PS6 would be digital only. :^)
>>741857796>the site is completely accurate lel
>>741858067>It's like you can't read English or somethingIronic coming from the mystery meat mutt that keeps trying to argue that I was posing a direct question and not a rhetorical one.You even tried to pull out the grammar cope and still got proven wrong, do you latinx have no sense of shame at all, I'm dying of second hand embarrassment over here.
>>741852952cuckcards literally were invented to kill code in box shityou're getting fucked over by code in box shitLMFAO
>>741858013>>741858067The video evidence is here. Refer back to >>741855873 #
>>741858346https://youtu.be/cRfYb1yTIGg?si=dhUxjL9OoE8i52T5&t=71You can install and play version 1.0 from disc, without any internet connection.Games that need a connection are required to have a disclaimer on the cover, as was already explained ITT.
>>741840456Cyberpunk did the same
>>741858368Seems like my prediction was correct...>>741854386>Refuses to prove his claims true>Cries until the thread 404'sKeep going!
>>741858584Not your video. My prediction was 100% correct.>>741854386>Refuses to prove his claims true>Cries until the thread 404'sReply again!
>>741858884Are you going to acknowledge your refusal to acknowledge that I asked you a rhetorical question and told you so 4-5 times already?"Yes" or "No" answers only.
>>741849675No?
>>741859081I'll answer you when you stop crying and answer my questions, I asked first so it's only fair.Or are you not interested in having a good faith discussion?
>>741859185It's like you can't read English or something...Hmm...I asked for a simple yes or no answer, or are you going to cry until the thread 404's?
>>741859285Thanks for confirming that you refuse to have a good faith discussion, which is by definition, cedeing the pointI accept your literal concession. You can keep replying if you like, but I've already won by your own actions.
>>741852623>WHEN CONSOLES BECOME DIGITAL ONLY I STOP BUYING CONSOLES AND STOP BUYING GAMESGuess you'll be getting an Xbox next generation, then?
>>741853263The eternal enemy of the English. The Scots.
>>741859538>Less than 5% of the population speaks native GaelicGrim.
>>741839371You can't argue with someone who doesn't even own anything in their name
>>741839371>You want the game to leak weeks early?Why would I care about that?
>>741859371>a good faith discussionYou never acted in good faith at any point in this entire, pathetic conversation. Even now you merely brought it up as a mere rhetorical device to try and pivot and paint yourself as "just asking honest questions". In this reply you can also see >>741858606 that disc games install and play without an internet connection, it's not even a short.So how will you dismiss it this time I wonder, "b-but you didn't record it yoursefl!" or will you yet again just pretend it's irrelevant and ignore it.
We went from Sony fanboys dunking on Nintendo for giving people download codes in the cases to: um Ackchyually you'll still buy it! Why do suddenly the standards change if it happens to be somewhat of a timed console exclusive? in which they know their console will be the most popular platform to play it on?Why did owning physical stop mattering when they deemed it appropriate? i just hate the lack of consistency since they're all always bashing PC for the same thing.
>>741859881Like I said;>>741854386>Refuses to prove his claims true>Cries until the thread 404'sReply again!
>>741859952>We went from Sony fanboys dunking on Nintendo for giving people download codes in the cases?Sony and Microsoft did it a whole console generation earlier than Nintendo did...
>>741859992Just like a rabbi you tried to pilpul your way out of this, you cry out in pain "you goym are not arguing in good faith" as you argue in bad faith, and when called out you pretended it never happened.
>>741860385>>741854386 >Refuses to prove his claims true>Cries until the thread 404'sReply again! You literally can't win until you record that footage.It's the only evidence I will accept, and you are refusing to provide it. Therefore you lose by default.Reply again if you're mad!
>>741854386>He's been replying to bait for over 2 hours4chan autists are next level...
>>741858981>>741860548The video evidence is here. Refer back to >>741855873 #
>>741860548I accused you of being unreasonable in your demands for evidence and you proved me correct. I accept your concession.
>>741860664Thanks for confirming your still mad by replying again!>You literally can't win until you record that footage.>It's the only evidence I will acceptLearn to read English Rashuulmed
>>741860715>He doesnt know what a "concession" isNo concession was offered to you.You just really, *really* wish it was, because you can't win anymore.
Why do newfags keep feeding the trolls? I thought everyone knew not to by now.
>>741839241I think the last time I bought a physical copy of a game was original vanilla WoW. Can’t say I’ve missed having a bunch of pointless plastic in my home.
>>741860837Nobody expected you to acknowledge you've lost the argument, badly, so I'm taking the liberty of accepting your implicit defeat. >>741860946I'm bored out of my mind at work
>>741861116>>741854386>Refuses to prove his claims true>Cries until the thread 404'sKeep spamming the thread, I'm sure that'll prove me wrong ;^)
>>741861276>Cries and refuses to accept the mountain of evidence presented to him>Calls others mad, but instantly replies to every post, just waiting for the thread to reach the bump limit
>>741861641Again!You've almost been here for 3 hours now, inpressive.I had to put more sun tan lotion on.
>>741839371good goy
I'm glad that retarded spammer finally realised he couldn't win and left.
>>741862236
>>741863745Good boy, keep doing exactly what I tell you to do.Again! I want you to waste 4 more hours of your life.
>>741839371>Rockstar doesn't need your money.Why else would they kill second hand copies?
>>741847186>What would a disc being in there actually change?Nothing, its just some bs for retards to cry about.
>>741847681How is any of what you wrote relevant to what he asked? Are you an LLM?
>>741863867>You're wasting your time replying to me, but I'm not wasting my time replying to your every postThanks for admitting your time is worthless.
>>741864024Jewish hands typed this post.
>>741864285I'm sat in the sun , getting paid and laughing at you while having a great time.Meanwhile you're "at work" lol.Why does this upset you, little guy?
>>741864406lmao he's literally doing the meme >little guyI concede Pablo, you being morbidly obese does make me a little guy in comparison...
>>741865227>Dodges the question >"I-I-I concede..."I accept your concession. Didn't read the rest of your post.Thanks for finally admitting you lost ;^)
>>741839241>stream game with gamepass>you don't own the game>buy the game digitally>you don't own the game>buy the physical edition>you still don't own the game>download the cracked version and store it on your backed-up HDD>you own the game
>>741865812But, Anon, pirating the game that cost $2 billion to make and will sell 200+ million copies is morally wrong!
>>741866149>Morally wrongMorals are a religious ideology. I'm not religious.Ain't no morals in pure science and facts
>>741849626the size of GTA ballooned with time. when it originally released it was made to fit on disk for the 360/ps3. when they rereleased it for next gen consoles they added on to it.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09lqWdLkVoQ
>>741866275How can I become as edgy as you?
>physical edition does not even exist in the physical realmHow is this now false advertising?
I literally do not give a fuck about GTA III fifth edition.
>>741839241My guess is that they don't want anyone playing the 1.0 version of the game. Because the version that ends up on the disc is an older build. The digital is going to have the "Day 1" patch by default and they want the disc version to also have that "patch" too.
That's what my Ghostwire Tokyo order looked like. I was shocked but I survived. It's going to be ok.
>>741847186a disc means i can use it on my ps6a disc means i can install gta on multiple accounts to get around the 2 character limit on gta onlinea disc means i can use it on multiple accounts so i can have multiple saves on top of the ones per accounta disc means there is no online checkit gives me access to the update and game download instantly without going on the storei can resell my disci can buy used discs from others on amazoni dont have to pay full price or wait till sony discounts gta (which has never ever happened by the way in 15 years)
>>741867686further what if i want to stream my gta gameplay on ps5 but dont want to use my real personal account in public?what if i have multiple accounts because i have different friends i dont want to know im online?there are infinity reasons why a piec eof shit psn code is bullshit and a disc that downloads teh game is better than a code even if the game isnt on the discfaggots on pc who never play on fucking console dont know shit
RIGHT NOWTHIS MOMEMENT gta is on psn store for £19.79that offer ends on 1st of julyit goes back to £59.99 there after untill they decide whenever to change it or never at allthe games a fucking ps3 game. 20 YEARS OLD! it shouldnt even be fucking £2 it should be fucking FREE at this point!THAT IS THE REASON FOR PHYSICAL GAMESim not fucking paying £20 MORE than launch price in 2012 or whateverREMEMBER GAMES USED TO BE £39 99 AT LAUNCHITS NOT A £70 GAME1!THAT IS WHY I WANT A FUCKING DISC
>>741868707>REMEMBER GAMES USED TO BE £39 99 AT LAUNCHAnd it was the equivalent of £70, if you account for inflation.
>>741869412WAGES HAVENT GONE UP IN THE UK IN 20 YEARS!!its exactly the same now as it was! games just doubled in price!
>>741869509>WAGES HAVENT GONE UP IN THE UK IN 20 YEARS!Yes they have, mong.
>>741869661ajusted to inflation its 10% so games should be 45 now not fucking 70!
>>741869765We have an inflationary economy Einstein, not a deflationary one.
>>741854397The pony-cord didn't like this one.
