[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


In case you didn't know, Project 360 was a ground-up project at IBM which sought to create a universal, cross-compatible line of computers that all ran the same programs. It started out OK and then, IBM started adding tons of people to the project and soon you had a couple thousand developers working on it, which meant that it was very late and the quality wasn't that great, so they had to delay it even more as they brought on more people and it became very very late in the end, but they just barely saved the project.

GTA6 has had more people working for much MUCH longer on it. It's been in development since before GTA5 released. 15 years. There is no way it hasn't cost a couple billion dollars now. It will never make the money back, especially because it's going to be woke and not-fun.

This might go down in history as the worst software flop in history, worse than Taligent.
>>
>/v/ is so out of touch they genuinely believe the next GTA will flop
this board is so dead only the retards remain I see
>>
>>741893116
By flop, I mean it will never make back the investment. But I also mean, it will fail to become culturally relevant.

It will flop both ways. It's going to take down AAA gaming too, the investors are already a bit nervous about making billion dollar games which never ever make their investment back.
>>
>>741893267
It hasn't been in development for 15 years you fucking moron, its development began after RDR2 released, and it's going to sell gangbusters as every normie and their grandma is talking about it.
>>
>>741893425
It has been in production since before GTA5 came out. I recall reading all about it at the time GTA5 was released.

>it's going to sell gangbusters
No it's not. Nobody even cares. I'm hearing a lot of fancy pre-order numbers, but it's impossible to believe they're real, and there is no independent accounting for these claimed presales.

Let's just wait and see. You also told /v/ that Concord was going to be "the only shooter anybody would play" but you were wrong, lol.
>>
File: file.png (411 KB, 800x450)
411 KB PNG
>>741893653
>It has been in production since before GTA5 came out.
No, it hadn't even entered pre-production until AFTER RDR2 released. All they would have done, if anything, prior to that is rough concept work.
>No it's not. Nobody even cares. I'm hearing a lot of fancy pre-order numbers, but it's impossible to believe they're real
pic related, it's (You)
>>
>>741893835
>No, it hadn't even entered pre-production until AFTER RDR2 released. All they would have done, if anything, prior to that is rough concept work.
That costs a lot of money, you need a whole army of DEI-hires and libtards to even just think of a new story.

Trust me it's going to flop. It's been in the works for 15+ years now, this is probably a record for game development. We won't have to wait long, either lol.
>>
I don't see how anybody could have faith in this game seeing as how they fucked up the San Andreas remake so badly. It's gonna be AIslop for sure lol.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.