Game is good but the entire approach is a dark omen for the OOT remake. They clearly do not give a shit about preservation which they would need to in order for the OOT remake to succeed critically.
>>741900290>They clearly do not give a shit about preservationOh no, they might have to make Hyrule Fuled larger than a thumbtack with actual stuff to do in it.
>>741900290>They clearly do not give a shit about preservationYou can play the original versions of both Star Fox 64 and Ocarina of Time on Switch 2 right now. What would be the point of a remake that keeps everything identical when those are an option?
>>741900562>>741900610>any preservation = 100% preservedCome on anons use your brains
>>741900562oh boy I can't wait for Hyrule FIeld to have Ubisoft towers and 1000 useless collectables.
>>741900290if anything, Starfox makes me confident they will change Ocarina of Time enough to be relevant in modern day
>>741900290>They clearly do not give a shit about preservationgood. autists btfo.
>>741901035Yup, because that's clearly the only alternative. Less content = good!
>>741900290American Indian game
>>741900290I’m worried the OOT remake will have terrible voice acting
>>741900290>starfox literally gets a 4/10 from one site explicitly because it didnt change anything>THIS IS AN OMEN FOR PRESERVATIONalso>remake>preservationI hate /v/ so much now.
>>741902097This is kinda what I’m getting at. I personally have no problem with the VAs but I can understand why people don’t like them. There’s so much of this remake where they don’t give a fuck what made the source material special that they can’t possibly properly remake a game that is nearly 50% atmosphere properly.
>>741902362Anon you may find this hard to believe but every remake ever does feature some degree of preservation.
>>741902713It's hard to believe that you're this stupid lmao
>>741902097If it's anything like BotW, here's hoping it comes with a second, more bearable dub
