[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1766477492000282.jpg (140 KB, 1122x1361)
140 KB JPG
>1080p lacks sharpness
>1440p makes 1080p videos/games look blurry
>4k is too taxing
>>
File: Diana.jpg (477 KB, 1920x1620)
477 KB JPG
>>741929770
Games don't look good anymore for like 10 years at this point, don't know what the problem is but they aren't visually appealing even with high graphical fidelity and running on top tier system specs. Diana is cute though
>>
>>741929770
>>1440p makes 1080p videos/games look blurry
Use MPC with madvr for videos.
>>4k is too taxing
Use DLSS/FSR4 Performance mode
>>
>>741929770
so play in QHD+ or UWQHD
>>
>aquajeet can't afford 4k gaming
Such is life in India
>>
>>741931014
5090s cant do 4k, its all bullshit upscaling which is worse than playing at 1440p
>>
>>741931096
shut the fuck up retard
>>
>>741929770
but why are you playing 1080p games at 1440p? and why not just be an idort and watch your 1080p videos on a separate 4k tv if its really that much of a problem?
>>
File: 1782166754243198.jpg (203 KB, 1586x1595)
203 KB JPG
>>741929770
Should I upgrade to 4k? I'm still on 1440p
>>
1080p looks fine on my machine
>>
>>741929770
Dumbass jeet playing at 1440p on a 1080p monitor
>>
>>741931014
forced meme
>>
File: umamusume-tm-opera-o.gif (2.35 MB, 374x369)
2.35 MB GIF
>>741931430
>Sees computer
>Thinks of indians
>>
>>741931153
nah im smarter than you, anyone can watch an eceleb struggle to get 60 fps native 4k on a 10,000 dollar pc
as it has been for 10+ years now
>>
>>741931287
It is almost certainly not worth it for gaming
>>
File: 1665880531055.gif (3.41 MB, 498x350)
3.41 MB GIF
>>741929903
DLSS, DLAA, TAA, Frame Generation, "Realtime" raytracing (with DLSS ray reconstruction), all the bullshit tech meant to hide that high end GPUs and consoles can't actually render at 4k60fps so Nvidia just shrugs their shoulders, guesses, and gets to sell you upgrades to those guesses
>>
I just got a 32 inch 4K/240hz QD OLED monitor for $900
did I fuck up
>>
>>741931014
You cant buy 5090 with food stamp burgerman.
>>
>>741932759
you already have to compromise on graphics to get modern games to run @140 fps on a 5090 (with DLSS)
>>
>>741929770
I just hate the near sightedness filter of the last decade. Can they just quit using it, worst one yet. Games from 10 years ago mog current year releases.
>>
>>741931287
yes
>>
>>741933270
what about a 9070 XT
what about older games
>>
>>741929770
>1440p makes 1080p videos/games look blurry
1080p locked games are extremely rare and you will never notice the difference with videos as long as your player uses decent scalers.
>>
>>741933679
not really worth it, unless you REALLY hate aliasing
>>
>>741933305
How come olds games are sharp and visually pleasing at 800x600 while newer games have the blurry playdoh feel to it?
>>
File: Stellar Blade RTX 5070 Ti.jpg (302 KB, 1918x1079)
302 KB JPG
Playing on 5070 Ti at 4K, no problems.
Don't tell me you're on AMD garbage?
>>
>>741934596
Why is amd worse here?
>>
>>741929770
just get a 1080p/4k dual mode monitor
1440p is a gimmick
>>
>>741939948
>just get a 1080p/4k dual mode monitor
Any modern GPU supports integer scaling



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.