>GTA6 has better car models than dedicated racing gamesHow the fuck did R* manage this
with 6000 heads
test
>>741947182in racing games you get the actual car, in GTA you get a Frankenstein amalgamation.
Dedicated racing games are about performance, you're not staring at the car.GTA is the inverse, to some degree.
>>7419471825000 jeets vs 300 jeets
>>741947182What's the difference? They look identical, fidelity-wise. It's the finish and the lighting, not the quality of the models.
>>741947182>better car modelsThis is a lighting thing, nothing about models.
>>741947182$10 billion vs $10 million.
agreed fellow redditorhttps://www.reddit.com/r/GTA6/comments/1ufdr97/gta_6_compared_to_forza_horizon_6/
those are two different cars tho?what the fuck are you talking about, do you not see the differences?
>>741947602>>741947438the material rendering and reflections on the bottom are a lot more realistic
>>741947182I don't get the comparison. Those are two different cars? What am I meant to see here?
>>741947182Forza has always had garbage car modelsGran Turismo mogs them hard in this department as well as being an actual better racer
>>741947779>>741947705
>>741947705the bottom one comes from a trailer, not a screenshot from a user like the one on topthe lighting conditions are also completely different, what the fuck is even going on in that gta trailer? why is the sun shining yet the sky is so dark?doesn't matter, either way, if you're retarded enough to not wait for the game to actually be out before trying to compare what's being shown to you, you're either new, a retard, or a nigger
>>741947182Literally impossible, forza scans the actual car while gta makes the copyright free version
>they fell for the ENB memeoh nonononoabahahaahahaaa
>>741947182forza has like a thousand cars
It's called photo mode, where devs let you freeze all the action and bump the graphical detail to the max for beauty shots.We used to call these "bullshots" but now that every game has the ability to create them they've become accepted as actual footage of the game.
>>741947182>sun is out but the sky is pitch blackwhat?
>>741947182Bullshots
>>741947843ah yes because GTAV was downgraded from its reveal trailer, right?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkkoHAzjnUsThe final game easily looked on par with this if not better.
>>741947182retard
>>741947182those are raytraced bullshots rendered on a PC. on PS5 it's going to look a lot worse
>heh, GTA6 has the greatest graffix ever, peasant*sets everything to low at 1080[ with dlss*
>>741947967No, it did not. You can go back and check the archives if you want to review the threads on launch.
>>741947967>conveniently forgets that GTAV debuted on 360/PS3 and stayed there for over a year before it finally got the next-gen graphics that were promised
>>741947182Even if its in-game render they must've put it umder better lighting for the trailer, image above is just a random ass screenshot.
>>741948038>>741948074I fucking played it on PS3, it basically looked like the trailer
>>741947967I refuse to believe you're a real human beandelete system32 right now:4.1
>>741947837The bottom car has a cheap plastic looking grey bumper that extends to the sides and suddenly reflects light as if it was chrome? Also like the other anon mentioned why is there a sun at night?
>>741948095How old were you in 2013?
>>741947967Uh yeah it was
>>741948149about 14/15
>>741947705Made infinitely less impressive by being a hotwheels made up car.
>One pic is during the day>The other is at nightBrown thread
>>741948208Yeah alright, we're done here.
>>74194814918
>>741947857>forza scans the actual carSome scan are actually terrible. The AE86 on horizon 6 looks like shit.
>>741947182top: 300fpsbottom: 30fps
>>741948112>>741948175It looked good on PS3. Performance was ass during any gunfights but visually it looked great, only faces really stood out for the time. It even had better vehicle damage, something they took out for the first-person view of later releases.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRp3t8S5ELE
>>741948038>>741948175The burden of proof is on you. I remember all the trailers. It looked exactly like them once it launched on PS3/XBOX.
>>741948748Prove to me you were old enough to drink in 2013 and I'll consider proving you a retard.
>>741947182>in-game vs bullshotretardhttps://youtu.be/FcMRkyoHKeA?si=TH1B1AKrwDrowbJN&t=367
>>741948829>Let me prove you wrong by linking a video from another gameFucking genius.
>>741948621To date, I have yet to think any GTA game looks good.
>>741948824I know you want to be a fucking retarded ape but this was a pre release official screen on cockstars website before the PS3/XBOX versions and it looked exactly like this at launch. Cockstar might be greedy but they've never done bullshots.
>>741949002This.RDR2 actually looked BETTER on launch than the pre-release material
>>741949002Never mind then, you've done well enough to prove yourself to be quite retarded.
>>741948621Nigga, GTA5 on 7th gen consoles ran like shit. You'd get textured popins at the last second if you were driving too fast and the fps hit the teens. People just accepted it back then because it was GTA. 7 years later they put their foot down and said it was unacceptable when Cyberpunk pulled the same shit on 8th gen consoles.
>>741949128Cope, retarded spic cunt.
>>741949171and I just told you performance was ass, but the point being made was how it looked. You can even see in the trailer performance was ass so they weren't hiding anything.
>>741949002the 2011 trailer made promises that even the next-gen versions didnt keep. a lot of stuff in trailer 1 was nothing like the final game. rockstar have been bullshitting their promotional material for two decades
>>741949248Not the same house
>>741949231I'll do that. I'll cope with having superior taste and not engaging with normgroidslop such as Grand Theft Auto. Please pray for me.
>>741948992GTA always pushed performance to its absolute limits. Back when 3 came out, people's heads were exploding at the concept of open world and 3 didn't even look that good.
>>741948253R* having to pay for the rights of over 500 different cars is retarded. They already dump enough money on music licenses for the radio since it’s a lot harder to do 15 radio stations full of original music
>>741947182>Licensed model vs portmanteau Lolwut
>>741949342OP why aren't you answering this? >>741948146
>>741949248The left is how it looked on XBOX 360 at launch. Right is the PS4 version after the 1.08 downgrade for PS4/XBOX ONE for online heists and performance.
>>741947182GTA 6 doesn't exist
>>741949490because it's retarded>hurr durr chrome-finished plastic doesn't exist
>>741948146>Also like the other anon mentioned why is there a sun at night?It's a street lamp from the looks of it.
>>741948146>sun at night?>>741949562Thats the moon retards.
>>741949342>since it’s a lot harder to do 15 radio stations full of original musicIt would still cost less to hire a dozen artists than pay millions for one singular [popular nigger pop song]If CDPR can do it why Rockstar with their infinite money can't?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nxe_yjRdKA
>>741949490well that post wasn’t directed at me, but I’ll answer it, the game says the car is from 55 so I imagine all the chrome looking parts are metal and not plastic. Along with that there is no sun, it’s reflective because it’s on a bright artificially lit street. Those white shiny spots on the car are street lights being directly reflected
>>741949623>Thats the moon retards.Thisit's just moonlight, have you never been outside at night during full moon?
>>741949735because R* started a trend of putting popular music of the era in their game since vice city in 2002 and not a single person expects them to put real cars in the game with a couple thinking it’ll looks dumb. Me included since not only would all the cars be real brands but the game world advertising will have a bunch of fake products next to real car brands which would look stupid
>>741949118Top looks better. What the fuck are you people blind or something?
>>741949770The chrome looking parts are metal, yes. But the somewhat grainy gray plastic is not chrome and it's not chrome finished either yet it mirrors it's surroundings almost as much as the actual chrome parts.
>>741949526>>741949305neither of you are correct. its the same house and it was downgraded for the 2013 release and never matched trailer 1
I wonder how many GTA VI shills will play the game or just jerk off to the graphics like RDR2 shills.
>>741947182with AI
>>741949985>anti-soul fog>shittier trees>noticely less trees in the background>worse texture detail (note the clothes/saddle)nah
>GTAV was downgra-ACK
>/v/ is so br*wn and low iq they're earnestly discussing bullshotswhat went wrong?
>>741950370
>>741947705>"game" isnt realistic enoughOoh boy here we go, the realistic slope.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sazR4d1ABb4
>>741950035Again no answer...
>>741951024>>741950035have you never heard of gloss paint?
>>741950035Metalic grey paintjobs can still reflect you retarded ape
>>741951132>>741951151But it's not glossy and looks nothing like the car in the pic.
>>741951218anon...
>>741948295that's because it is a scan of an RC car
>>741951375Why are you showing me black metallic instead of cheap looking gray and grainy plastic?
>>741951375>>741951485anon.....
>>741951151What game?
>>741951538The Crew Motorfest
>>741951510What does this picture have to do with anything???
>>741951562anon.............
>>741951584None of this is the plastic in OP pic. Write a sentence. Verbalize your thoughts. Unless all you wanted to do was post some nice looking cars.
>>741951675I could post these all day my dude. You lost.
>>741951717First relevant pic but the resolution isn't great. Even with the low resolution it looks like a metallic finish instead of the grainy plastic in OP pic.
>>741951821Admittedly the same 2-tone finish in the exact colors as the made up GTA6 car is hard to find in high resolution. People don't take high res photos of 50s cars very often go figure. You can see the speckled gloss paint is still reflective
>>741947182Evil car GF ass...
>Microshart game is shitty
>>741951923>Admittedly the same 2-tone finish in the exact colors as the made up GTA6 car is hard to find in high resolution.I'm not asking for that. I don't need to see a car even. Just gray plastic mirroring its surroundings. The gray in OP pic looks like a slightly darker and less yellowish version of the old gray desktop monitors instead of the almost white of your car. I'm not even sure about my point because it's hard to make out exactly what the OP pic is but your pics are really really not helping in dispersing my doubts so far.
>>741952332OP doesn't look plastic to me at all, looks like gloss-paint metal just in a different color to the irl cars I've posted.
>>741952415I guess we're having a difference in opinion then.
>>741947182>How the fuck did R* manage thisBy employing almost 10k people over the span of 10 years to make the game, plus, the forza car looks like it could have existed, the bottom one if over engineered and wouldn't have been economically feasible to release to the public.
>>741952415Yeah, looking at it again, I really have to disagree. Maybe this is just limitations in hardware but light on metal glides along it, creating subtle patterns. Light on plastic is monotone because it's too grainy for the light to move along it.
>>741952591The Forza car does exist, it's a 1958 Plymouth Fury. GTA always uses fictional cars, usually amalgamations of existing ones
Jeez. This marketing is going to go on until November? Fug.
>>741952710The reflections aren't monotone though, what are you on about?In any case the material rendering/PBR of bottom is a hell of a lot more realistic than the top. Especially the chrome.
>>741952901>The reflections aren't monotone though, what are you on about?Of course they are on the backside which is still the same piece as the side one. >In any case the material rendering/PBR of bottom is a hell of a lot more realistic than the top.I don't know and I don't care. Top and bottom are impossible to properly compare as we are not given any information on the context as in how much light from where and such.
>>741953154>Of course they are on the backside which is still the same piece????It's literally the same piece like you said. What are you on about?>Top and bottom are impossible to properly comparetop game is already out, we already know what its vehicles look like and its material rendering is crap for current gen. Driveclub unironically looks better than Forza 6.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjQbiLk9GPQlol at how shit project CARS was
>>741953936>It's literally the same piece like you said. What are you on about?What I said from the first post. It behaves like grainy plastic on the backside and chrome/metallic like on the side.
>>741954063probably because illuminated buildings are to the left. Same reason the strongest reflections on the chrome materials are from the left.
>>741953936Also the vid is from Motorsport, not Horizon. There's 11 years between the two games.>>741954192The reflection is too clear imo. Should be much more washed out. Doesn't look like the grainy plastic should be reflecting that well.
>>741954362My bad I should have actually checked the video before posting
>>741954446>>741953936https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jAmSICi4q4
>>741952847kek, my thoughts exactly except also I realize this is one the first round and we will get hit again closer to the PC release. I mean just think of all the jeet marketers that Rockstar has hired, /v/ about to get even more brown than previously thought possible
>>741954607>All driveclub shilling is always in the rain
>>741955118>shillingthe game is dead anon. You literally cannot buy it anymore.
>>741954446>>741954607Really couldn't care less about the vid but good for you.
>>741955201Mearly commenting on the fact all videos/screens are always in low quality in the rain.
>>741955118>>741955269Because it looks like dogshit else.
>>741955269most of the video is showing clear skies and it still looks great, car interiors especially
>>741955345forza looks no better than this.
>>741955389Well year it's going to look good when you put everything behind motion blur.
>>741955496he's driving at 123km/h retard
Never got to play driveclub but if this ran at 4k60 it would blow forza out the fucking water and it's almost 12 years old apparently.Why did it even die?
>>741955897I think people look back on it through rose tinted glasses. The graphics were amazing, especially the weather effects, but that was a huge part of its appeal. Underneath, I found the game pretty shallow. Most events were just point to point races, circuit races, time trials, or drift challenges repeated across different tracks. The club system sounded ambitious but never really changed how I played. The disastrous launch didn't help either, server issues made the online focused features barely work, the PS Plus version got delayed and a lot of people moved on before the game was fixed. By the time it was actually in good shape, competitors had taken the spotlight. It's not a bad game, but I always felt it had the depth of a puddle wrapped in some of the best graphics the genre had ever seen.
>>741947182India is a massively underrated country. They have incredible creative and technical output, and their workers just work harder and better than any other ethnicity. The work ethic of Indian developers is unmatched.
>>741947182In what world is bottom better than top? Retarded op
>>741950374About a billion indians, brazillians, and eastern europeans getting internet connections.
GTA has never done bullshots. Rockstar doesn't need to because it's going to sell billions anyways.
>>741956131Like I said, I never got to play it, I'm not sure why I skipped on it but maybe someone told me the gameplay sucked, or maybe I heard about the launch issues at the time. Looking up gameplay now though it looks incredible for a 2014 game. It genuinely looks better than FH6 and I'm not exaggerating one bit. Materials, reflections, lighting is all way ahead of its time.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9pyihIoBd7YHow did sony fumble this so hard??
>>741949118at least post the full one >>741949985it really doesn't, if you're referring to the more gradient sky, that's still in the game it's just not a 1:1 weather match in the comparison.
>>741956481Well yeah it's going to look better because they only focused on the graphics. Everyone called it a tech demo. The car physics was shit, racing was shit. You just did point to point racing with the only changes being weather or time of day. It was the epitome of Sony games for that era. All style but no substance.
>>741956712They should've built on it then, make Driveclub 2 an actual game. Lord knows playstation needs more fucking games right now
>>741956826Why? It would just get brutally mogged by Forza and Gran Turismo again.
>>741956869Because the no games machine needs games
>>741956869Even more so now that Forza Horizon comes to PS too.
>>741956987Don't think that'll happen againas Xbox will shut down the studio before horizon 7 ever comes out lmao
>>741957059Forza Horizon 6 is the best selling entry, they're never going to touch that studio.
>>741947967Rockstar trailers are generally more reliable, their bullshots are absolutely not lmao. They did the same thing with RDR2 too. The only thing I would trust from Rockstar at this point is the gameplay trailer. We've already seen downgraded graphics
We share a board with people this stupid>>741947939>>741947843
>>741957457Not saying you're wrong but why would GTAV/RDR2 get upgraded from their trailers but GTA6 downgraded?
>>741947182yea but car control will be garbage like in every gta game
>>741947182What settings was that screenshot taken on?
>>741957812I deleted all that stuff way back but you can look at the RDR2 screenshots and compare it with the PS4 version of the game, the game doesn't look like that on PS4. If GTA 6 is anything like GTA 5 was, it'll take 2-3 console generations for consoles to catch up to PC. When GTA 6 comes out on PC they'll optimize it for the most popular and latest cards. I think the greater worry for console players shouldn't be over some worse graphics though but stability and the gameplay itself, if there's any improvements.
>>741959257Call it cope if you want but top right and middle right are likely in-engine cutscenes, compared to gameplay
>>741958609Kissing Christine's tailpipes.
>>741959257bottom left is the first screenshot ive seen that looks realistic to what i think this game will look like on ps5. i think the game will look great in 5 years post launch on their 10th re-release. I just cant imagine launch day ps5s being able to have the game look as good as the trailers especially with like the main rockstar team all being gone
