[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1782924591127469.jpg (33 KB, 696x628)
33 KB JPG
If the hardware already has the necessary architecture to support modern features and compute demand, what else is left to create a gap between the GPU and games that must be bridged by drivers?
>>
Please guys don't make me go to /g/ for answers I don't like it there
>>
gomen, wakannai desu
drivers are something nobody cares about except for like 10 people who work for khronos group, or linux/amd users mad that their drivers don't work.
>>
hardware talks to the kernel and the kernel talks to software
the kernel needs to know how to talk to the hardware, which is what drivers are for
>If the hardware already has the necessary architecture to support modern features and compute demand
nonsensical babble



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.