[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
Should I play the AC3 remaster(...) No.743260791
File: maxresdefault.jpg (177 KB, 1280x720)
177 KB JPG
Should I play the AC3 remaster or the original?  No.743260791 Archived
>>
Anonymous
 No.743260973
 No.743260973
>>743260791
Always original retard how many times you we have to show you examples of demasters and demakes.

But AC3 is shit anyway so don't play it.
>>
Anonymous
 No.743260981
 No.743260981
The remaster probably has less issues on modern hardware. Game is dogshit either way.
>>
Anonymous
 No.743261064
 No.743261064
>>743260791
They didn't fix AC3's spaghetti code. They just slapped on a new lighting engine and some textures and called it good. Look up videos and pick whatever one you think looks better because they're both buggy pieces of shit under the hood.
>>
Anonymous
 No.743261278
 No.743261278
>>743260973

Every single time the remaster ends up being better than the original though?
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.