It wasn't that bad.
>>743268282After researching the production of this movie. What were they thinking? Lol
Best I can say is that it was nice to look at
>>743268282It killed Squaresoft and they never recovered
>kills Square>"it wasn't that bad"
my waifu
>We didn't get Xenogears 2 because of this bullshit
>>743268282The problem was slapping 'Final Fantasy' on it. But at least enough lessons were learned and tech developed that it led to Advent Children.
>>743268976Imagine you lose your modeling gig to a page that looks like this early 3d junk
They looked quite impressive in 2001
>>743268282Reminder that for some reason Roger Ebert was absolutely genuinely amazed by it to the point he used it as a point of reference for what a good film is for years afterwards
I remember reading in some computer magazine in 2001, maybe 2002 on how amazing the hair looks and how hard it was to make. Damn I'm old.
>>743269301advent ruined ff7 for me more than this film did. I dripped off of the entire library from square because advent was a bad fever dream
>>743269603That guy's brain and skull was also a giant tumor. Can't trust a tumor skull.
>>743268282I remember having a sleepover at my buddy's house and we rented this. We were very disappointed that non of the characters from the games were in it. We turned it off after about 30 minutes and played Perfect Dark until 7am.
i kind of liked advent children. it could have been much, much worse and vii was never my favorite anyways
>>743269603>Roger EbertThis smug retard had his head up his ass all the time. If you're using him as a point of reference for quality movie reviews, then you're a bigger imbecile than he ever was. I'm so glad he's dead.
>>743270456was Siskel that much different?
