Anniversaries/reskins/modernized graphics editions are worse than remakes because they replace the original
No, they don't. Stop being retarded.
Completely agree. But halo 2 is from 2004 and mcc is from 2014 so not sure what's up with that image.
>>743278213Yes they do retard, when newcomers boot up halo 2 on pc they are going to play the shitty anniversary edition because it is the default one
>>743278257Halo 2 isn't getting released anymore because H2A replaced it, see my point
>>743278295That's the case for remakes too.People will always play the most recently released version of the game, it doesn't matter its quality.
>>743278428The OG RE games just got ported to steam despite them having remakes, you're a retard and full of shit
>>743278129The collection lets you swap to original graphics on the fly, though. Faggot. Albeit with broken bump mapping, ifrc.
>>743278547You have to flip off like 3 settings in the menu just to play the original halo 2 retarded faggot, no newcomer is doing that so original halo 2 might as well be lost, the new graphics look like shit and all of the visual effects are broken because the devs didn't consider that they were texture swapping everything with lighting from 2004
>armor design peaked over a decade agolost technology, please understand
>>743278341I get that but I don't get why the dates are not the release dates. Also they're remaking 2 and 3 in the dogshit abomination style that they're doing CE.
>>743278808The dogshit remakes will be labeled as remakes and not the originals like the shit halo anniversaries, who cares
>>743278686>>743278875>>743278295>being this retardedIt's literally just the select button.>>743278547No, that's just CE. Halo 2's graphical issues stem from rushed development.
>>743278129Depends. 343 redesigns are generally shit, but Halo 2 was not a pretty game even for the time.>>743278547The worst of the baggage that CE got from Gearbox's shitty port was eventually fixed in MCC years ago.
