Let me guess. I need more?
You really want to get up to a stable 60 FPS. Anymore than that is kinda unnecessary.
>>743304070120 or bust
If it's 30 that never EVER dips, it can be somewhat acceptable. Ideally the perfect mean is stable 60.
>>74330407030 fps looks so bad I literally can't play on it anymore.
Playing at 30 inflicts real physical damage to my eyes, they can only see in 60
30 FPS with motion blur looks better than 60 FPS without it.there I said it
>>743304254I never understood the appeal of motion blur, it just looks like the screen is infused with slippery grease
>>743304070I'm 100% fine with locking fps at 60, but I can't do 30 any more, it gives me a headache. The lowest I can go is 45 fps, which is what I did with Cyberpunk 2077. Played thru it 1440p maxed out path-tracing DLSS quality and just locked the fps at 45.
>>743304254Is like you want to make me puke.
>>743304329>>743304353it looks more like real life to me. 60FPS looks weird
>>743304189>>743304206>>743304345pussy ass zoomers
>>743304070needing any more means you're a soulless realismtard and there's no hope for you
>>743304441I'm 34 retard. I've been over 60 fps for like 20 years. 30 looks like shit and feels unplayable.
>>743304070no i need less, 24 fps for cinematic feel
>>743304583>34not fooling me zoomshit
60 minimum unless it's something like a jrpg/vn. 120 is good. 180 preferred.
>>743304441I'm 33 thoughbeit.
Only time I prefer anything below 60 FPS is when I play the original DOOMs, since the game updates at 35 FPS
>>743304618People like you are an embarrassment to my age bracket. Profoundly retarded and can only think in terms of black and white
>>743304070The human eye literally CANNOT perceive more than 24 frames per second. This is a biological FACT. I do not care if you pretend to notice a difference between 30, 60, or 144 hz, it's all placebo.
>>74330407024 FPS is absolutely fine.
>>743304441>zoomers(console) zoomers who have to deal with 30fpsPC boomers got a solid 60+ fps in the mid to late 90s starting with quake
>>743304754>p-please stop c-calling me a z-z-zoomer!!
>>743304070I play a lot of Vanilla DOOM so I'm comfortable with anything above 35FPS>t. zoomer
>>743304906Same
>>743304070I made the mistake of getting a 120fps capable pc and tv and this has made anything below 90 frames almost unbearable.I get use to it but fuck
i typically shoot for 144fpsjust upgraded my 4080S to a 5090 for that reason. I don't particularly care about high-res with games, but it comes with the territory of ultrawide monitors. kind of annoying but oh well
My TV supports G-Sync at up to 144hz, so ideally I'd play games at 144hz, but depending on game and settings, anything over 100hz is fine.Feels completely smooth and responsive, and I've got a good enough PC that most games have maxed settings, so it looks great too.
>>743304754Ironically he's probably 16
>>743304070>>743304254>>743304419>>743304804bait thread
>>743305065He definitely acts like it. It gives off loser trying too hard to fit in energy.>>743304863Whatever you say fag
My monitor is 144 so I can never go backGet fucked plebs
>>743304070>he doesnt game on a 240hz oledngmi
120 FPS minimum60 FPS is almost unplayable, it's disgusting240fps is good320fps+ is ideal
>>743304070>30fps limit>1080 on a 30' television screen>old school Italian armchairYep, its gaming time
>>743305448They're the same picture
no one will ever know the secret heaven of 45 fps
>>743304441I fucking dare you to go back to a 60hz monitor, retard
anything under 80 fps is unacceptable to me
>>743304070You only need 24 fps actually, 30 is a meme
>>743304441Most games from the 80s and 90s were running at 60 fps you dumb retard. It's the introduction of 3d games that lowered the bar to 30 fps.
>>743304070Once I went 180hz I feel utter disgust with anything lower. Same happened to me with HDR and MiniLED/OLED. It's a drug. If you don't know 30+FPS don't expose yourself to it.
>>743304070I find it funny as fuck how many people on /v/ demand high FPS but you fucks still play on wifi. Like imagine claiming to see the difference between 60-120 fps but not noticing your game is lagging like crazy because your shit ass internet
I was raiding fine in vanilla wow with 7fps, 30 is entirely unnecessary
>>743304441You're not white.
>get a 4k 120hz monitor>don't notice a difference between 60 and 120 fpshigh refresh monitors are a meme.
>>743304583>30 looks like shit and feels unplayable.never got this mindset, if i play with a certain fps for like an hour my mind gets used to it and I stop caring.
>>743308720>anon has his monitor set to 60hz
>>743308720Maybe you should get your eyes tested
>>743308820>>743308850You know what I do notice though? the switch from 1080p to 4K.it's night and day and I'll never go back.
>>743308802I tried to play Bloodborne at a buddys house like 2 years ago and I couldn't stand how bad it looked.
>>743304174/thread
30fps feels disgusting on rhythm or racing games
>>743309019eh, I noticed 0 difference going from 1080p TN to 1440p IPS
why are you even replying to this dogshit bait thread is beyond me
>>743309094that's because you fell for the 1440p meme
>>743309186you fell for the 120hz meme when we're in 480hz era
>>743309094that’s because the real gamechanger is 4K/120hz on OLED
>>743309226>GPU goes BRRRRRRRRRRRRRI literally lock my fps to 120 even though I have a 240hz panel
Arma 3 player here, I can operate on 15 FPS even. If anything it helps make the milsimming more realistic.
>>74330407030fps was good enough for Miyazaki when he made Dark Souls and Bloodborne, so it's good enough for me
>>743305448All good but it doesn't matter when many games stutter every couple of seconds.The higher your FPS is the more noticeable it becomes. But if you get used to high FPS you can't go back. It's a curse. Keep using 60Hz garbage displays bros.
>>743309452>implying it was a design choice
>>743309297>nooo I dont want my gpu to work as it was designed to and throttle it so I get input lag insteadnice
>>743304070Let me guess, you play open world, UE realistic, movie slop?Nah, 30fps is fine for that
>>743309521I was referring to the inevitable coilwhine. how can you guys tolerate that shit
>>743304070Why do so few devs try to optimize their games these days?
>>743304254this is true but only because you're receiving half as much visual information at a time so there's less opportunity to notice imperfections. and motion blur further obscures the flaws.
>>743304070Yes 48fps
why the fuck would you need more than 60?
>>743309703Normalfags will buy garbage no matter the performance. So publishers will force devs to ship beta versions as a final product because it will significantly lower costs.
unless the game is really difficult like your average shmup people crying that 30 is unplayable just have skill issues
>>743310000VR
>>74330407030fps feels fine on my AYN thor. Unplayable on PC though.
>>743309919Nigga, 44-45 is the sweet spot. You're just being a greedy fuck.
>>743309019Now put 8k there. And 16k. And 32k. Oh wow it never ends and the difference keeps getting bigger and bigger! How am I supposed to have fun in my life when I can't play in 1024k!
I have sweetspot and gamechanger fatigue
>>743309094There is clear difference in desktop use but in games it's not thaat big + you just get used to it like everything => no point in buying better.
24 FPS and this
>>743311327Based.
>30fpsNah, I want "artistic" animations that are at 5 frames per second
Why do I have to download a mod to fix halo 1 animations being 5 FPS
as long as it's a stable rate, das all good
No game from the last few generations looks good enough to justify 30fps
>>743304070I'm good with anything over 30fps assuming it's stable.
>>743304585this
1080p60fps is the bare minimum to enjoy videogames properly
>>743304070just framegen to 60 lmao
>>743304070>PC mustardrace claim to need 30+ FPS at all times>constantly on a 1 FPS sitepathetic
>>743315336Even browsing and moving mouse on desktop is better in high fps.
>>743304070I think others have said it, but i aim for 60+ because if it dips to 45 or even 30 it honestly isnt a big deal, especially if the dip if for a second or two. I have issues when it dips below 30 because then it goes from I barely noticed to fuck me this is affecting the gameplay.Side note i do understand someone playing 60 then going to 30 can tell but like anything you get used to it. 30 is still playable, which is the point and what some people just want or all their machine/consoles do, which is playable. The people acting elitist are as if VR players come in and mock you for getting headaches or some shit just because they spent 1000s of hours playing in VR while you just play at 60fps.
I grew up happy that my shitty Dell could play BF2 sometimes with over 16fps. No modern game can make me suffer from dropped frames. I see between the refresh rate, my sight forever one with the ether(net)
>>743304070Yeah because I'm not a consolecuck or a boomerfaggot nostalgic for old games running like shit.
>>743304070depends
>>743304329It masks lower frame rates.
>>743304070Tbh above 60 fps doesn't make any different on controllers, only mouse and keyboard benefits from going up to 240hz
>>743304254Digital Foundry guy, is that you?
>>743304070>6 000 000let me guess, you need more?
>>743304070I unironically played some shit limited to 10 fps because my craptop at the time had a broken fan and would engage thermal shutdown with anything more than that. Wasn't that big a deal.
I get 30,000 FPS. Literally so fast I see the end credits during the first load screen.Goddamm I love being white
you get used to whatever framerate in like 10 minutes of playing. more important is that it's stable without stutters
>>743308316My motherboard doesn't even have wifi.
>>743319421When I was a poorfag I'd play skyrim at 20fps on a shitty laptop my mom gifted me for birthday I honestly miss those days, there was a certain charm to only being able to play older games, 90s RPGs and obscure japanese games.
>>743313049Because the Gearbox port SUCKS
>>743304254let me guess, you're a tendie troon
>>743304070I don't care what you need or want.I need more than 30 fps. I need 144 fps.
>>743304441You're white
>>743304121You can tell a difference up to 100 pretty easily. Supposedly there's a noticeable difference up to 2-300 but I haven't personally been able to test that. 60 can still be alright and not much to complain about like 30 or lower but there are still easily noticed benefits going above 60.
>>74330407090 fps is the absolute minimum serviceable frame rate but only with strobing enabled
Input delay is awful on 60fps. It's unironically not enough.Visually 60fps is fine if it's on CRT or strobed, but the input is just not there. 120fps starts feeling good, 180+ is excellent.
>>743304254You're not entirely wrong though, depends on the game. 30 FPS old movie feeling can't be denied, but it's true that perhaps for some games can feel too sluggish
>>743304070Nowadays I get people saying they get fine fps in modern games and when you grill them they are getting 30 to 80 fps with horrible lows and stutters. Too many shitskin ESLs have infiltrated this hobby. I blame the kikes at star link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yb29HUFseqwhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqOzm1a4E5I
>>74330407060 is the standard, because theres 60 minutes in an hour, and 60 seconds in a minute, it makes sense to have 60 frames per second. unless of course you are american and are used to putting the month before the date and before the year.
>>743304070Visual FPS isn't anywhere near as important as game logic FPS. For example, Cuphead's graphics run at 24 FPS to look like proper animation, but its gameplay actually runs at 60 FPS under the hood.
>>743304070Meh. 30 FPS is playable, but choppy. It's just there's absolutely no reason for a game to target it in current day and age, the hardware isn't a limiting factor like it was a few console generations ago, 30FPS simply means incompetent devs now.
>>743321082Did you niggers forget that games ran at 60fps before the transition to 3D?
>>74330480424fps was introduced during the silent film era as a way to give the illusion of continuous motion while saving money on film stock. that's where the number came from. there's nothing biologic about it. this can be looked up really easily, i'd be embarrassed personally spouting things that are so easily proven false but everyone's different i suppose. I guess we gotta have at least one guy swearing to people that there's a mew under the truck.
>>743304804Your throat can perceive more than 24 cock thrusts per second.
>>743304189It was never playable. 30 fps is a consolefag psyop to sell outdated garbage hardware to retards.
>>743322594Nta as a kid I remember the frametimes and drops going to shit in so many fucking games. Its also why I played fighters and some racers because 60fps was so good.
>>743306757I did. I went back from a 60hz to a 144hz back to a 60hz. You get used to it and 60hz isn't really that bad. Zoomers just want 500hz monitors that look like shit so they can slide cancel in apex slop.
>>743308802>If I eat shit for like an hour my mind gets used to it and I stop caring.
>>743304146/thread
>>743304070I don't need my car to go faster than 30 MPH but it sure is nice.
>1080p>DLSS>DLAA>120fpsyep it's gaming time
>>743304070Games like Silent Hill f are feeling incredibly smooth at 30 fps for some reason.
>>743323282must be your smooth brain
>>743304174This. It really depends on how good the frame pacing is for lower FPS at a 60hz+ refresh rate. Rockstar games are usually pretty tolerable at 30-40 FPS after a few . minutes. Bethesda game are borderline unplayable to me even at a constant 30.
>>743304070You literally cannot tell the difference, LARPers just pretend they do to seem smarter to justify their money wasted.
>>743304070depends on your monitor and the game desuwalocking to 40 or 48 with a VRR monitor is better though
>>743323585I love this bait kek
>>743321097can confirm, we did a test in electronics where we pulsed a LED at higher and higher frequencies until it looked stable. for me was about 45HZ (90 FPS if you count each on/off as different frames)
