>play PS5 Enhanced Edition >it's gay, soulless, and sterile>play the PS3 version>it's comfy and nostalgic>no online shit forced in your face on startup>artstyle and lighting is miles better>oozes style with saturated colors and sharp contrast>looks less overly busy>has actual vehicle deformations>car handling is far better and cars aren't glue to the road like formula 1>cars have a greater sense of speed>rain and weather effects are more satisfying>UI looks better>police are more aggressive>see more unique events and different types of trucksWhat the fuck did Rockstar do?
It's been along time, but if I remember right people at the time bitched the cops were waaay too aggressive in 5
>>743349598>Play ps5 edition>Piece of shit>Play ps3 version>Piece of shit>Play PC version>Piece of shit>Maybe the game is just a piece of shit
GTAV was never good, you were just 10 when it came out.Now GTAIV? It still holds up.(Both mogged by GTA2)
>>743349736>good game badGet new material fag
>>743349784I was 17 when I played GTAV, replayed it and IV many times, both are great but V is clearly better. Better map and environmental variety, way more fun and varied missions, 3 protag system works great, police actually pose a threat, more vehicles and they actually drive differently, way more aircraft/boats, better gunplay, more nuanced writing, etc
>>743349598I haven't played it but from screenshots and video that is what I concluded. PS3 did things better sometimes. It's AA mode quincunx, if it was used might have helped as well.High res disgusts me as I think of how many times the game would look and plqy better with performqnce used propperly.Desaturated colours and less contrast don't do it for me either.But GTA V was always downgraded. And anything that is should be forsaken. GTA is simply bad too and you should prevent the intrusion of bad things into you. Though I know saying it is bad isn't good enough and has to be proven before it has a chance of being taken as truth.
>>743349790Cope
>>743349897>more nuanced writing
>>743349790GTA V is easily the worst 3D GTA to date, a franchise that is already pretty samey and boring for anyone who isn't a normalfag or one of those unfortunate GTA autists
>>743349897I was 15 when I bought it on launch day and I thought it was the most dissapointing game I've ever been excited for as a fan of the series.>map sucks (dude mountains lmao), and the city isn't as fun to explore even if the driving is better and there's now planes>gunplay is worse, euphoria downgraded, gunshots sound like fucking ass, you die to easily to make rampaging fun.>story, characters and writing is way worse. Short and ends very abruptly. >some missions were cool but none that reached iconic status like three leaf clover for example, bad story and worse gameplay makes you not care as much either>really bad radio
>>743349598>another old good, new bad thread.
>>743351232It's GTA V vs GTA V so it's actually>old bad>new bad
>>743351098>muh war>muh mopey introspection faggotry>proceeds to be a mindless pushover cuck who spends the whole game mowing down innocentsNah, Niko's a fag
>>743351208GTAV map has a huge amount of variety and different environments and terrains and places to explore, the highway is really satisfying to drive and you can really get some speed, and there is tons of little nooks and crannies with a ton of detail. It actually feels like a real location and you learn the city like the back of your hand. GTAIV is basically just endless city blocks, and the cars all feel super slow and unsatisfying, and they somehow manage to make sports cars drive similar to a box truck. I mean I guess it does a good job at recreating NYC gridlock, but that's not exactly making for a fun gameplay experience...Also GTAV is longer than GTAIV so too short is just a nonsense complaint.And Three Leaf Clover is like the ONLY memorable mission in the entire fucking game. By FAR the biggest issue with GTAIV is every mission is incredibly samey, formulaic, and derivative. GTAV at least gave you some variety and gimmicks similar to older GTA games. GTA IV jsut seemed so afraid to break the mold for even a single mission.
>>743349784>Now GTAIV? It still holds uptry getting your opinions from actually playing games instead of some faggot youtuber, brownoid
>>743349790the brownoid you replied to doesn't even play games
>>743349598You forgot>runs at 480p 16fps
>>743351102Nah, I think each mainline game is actually an improvement from the last, very rare for a series.V > IV > SA > VC >= IIISA does do some things better than IV, and IV does do some things better than V, but overall each game really does just feel like a straight improvement from the last. SA is closer to the modern formula than the more arcadey III/VC style.
>>743351871Nothing more turd world brown coded than getting filtered by IV
>>743352094post your hand
>>743352094No one is filtered by IV. The vehicle handling is ass, because every vehicle controls the same and feels unsatisfying to drive with no sense of speed. It's not even realistic either: you constantly feather the accelerator, and your car's bumper scrapes the ground while making a turn at 5mph. Aside from that, the missions are super repetitive and almost every single one has the exact same formula, and the map is just endless skyraper filled city blocks with little variety.
>>743349598>>has actual vehicle deformationsYeah, what the fuck happened there? I used to spend a lot of time just deforming vehicles.
>>743352289Also, there is literally nothing to do outside the story unless you got the fag DLC
>>743352361They basically nuked it for the sake of first person. Very lame as it basically had the best vehicle destruction in the series
>>743352195>post your hand
>>743352289>No one is filtered by IV.>proceeds to admit he got filtered by the driving like every IV hater brainletKEK
>>743352494>God awful extremely unrealistic driving>hurr durr filteredI have brown fatigue...
>>743352494No one got filtered by the driving by saying it sucks. It's trivially easy once you understand to just feather the accelerator, but it's neither realistic nor satisfying. It's the easiest game in the series up to that point, and has the most laughable police that are so easy to evade Play GTAIII on OG PS2 if you want to see a filter.
>>743352525Filtered by the brake pedal + extremely brown
>>743352628>No one got filtered by the driving by saying it sucksClearly they do since every IV hater is always seething because they can't drive
>>743351808>GTAV map has a huge amount of variety and different environments and terrains and places to exploreYeah like: a City that's supposed to be a large metropolis but it still feels small, gta 4 did it better by making every island feel distinct so it actually felt like you traveled somewhere new when you crossed a bridge even if it all was just one big city, 5's city is also just filled with alot of filler areas that you would never wanna go explore or try to start a rampage in, doesn't help that it's not fun at all to explore it on foot like 4 was I get that LA is a car centered city but still doesn't make for good design.MountainsMore mountains with nothing fucking on themdesert and forest that are too small so they dont feel expansive like they shouldOne small fuck off town at the top of the mapMore fucking mountains.And yes that's more enviromental variety than 4's map but I would take a well designed map over a varied one. Also how the hell did anyone enjoy the highways? They just make it DONT actually explore the map because getting anywhere is a pain the ass because of the mountains so you just use the highways and drive on the sides of the map to get anywhere, the driving is better yeah but when getting anywhere is just a slog and the map isn't as well designed to drive on it doesn't matter much.It's not that I hate nature enviroments either, RDR 1's map is really fucking good so I'm suprised they dropped the ball on 5.
