I've seen the sentiment thrown around that games, in particular valve games, should have in-game communication censored or monitored to prevent "abusive language" (calling people niggers, faggots, etc etc) even when there are features to mute people. I know what /v/'s opinion on this topic is, but my question is how do people genuinely believe that censorship over something so minor is a good thing? Genuinely what causes this sentiment?I posted it in a thread as a reply instead of on the catalog like a retard
>>743372973i was you on the faceless goon thread!
People can't tolerate random people on the internet saying mean words to them
>>743373230Nuh uh
Why anyone cares what some random on the internet says will never not amaze me.Literally just click the mute button and play the game.
>>743372973I love Silver Waifu
>>743372973I like hairy pussy but rainforest pussy is too much. the hair should enhance the vagina, not censor it
>>743372973The solution is clearly the banning of Valve games.
>>743374708How much do you love her huh?
>>743372973>mute someone>they can still say the forbidden wordsYou have to understand that these "people" don't really care about protecting the feelings of others or anything that resembles justice. They want to police people and their language, it's not enough for them to not see and hear it, they must know that others are not allowed to say it at all. "Moral" busybodies like them are always the primary destroyers of freedom and willing enforcers of authoritarianism.
