When do you know you're playing indieslop?
When I'm having fun
>>743388834So slop is good?
>cool concept>one well made gameplay system with dogshit hollow excecution in everything else, like almost emptier than a ubislop openworld game
>>743388798when it's being spammed all across the board
>>743388907mods
>>743388870Always has been.
>>743388938Okay, and?
>>743388938there's not a single DR thread up right now
>>743388798>game made by a small team with a focused vision is slopHuh? Is this some 1984 shit?
>>743389868If they're not putting any effort in and just want to make a fast buck that could very well be slop.Just look at Air Control.
>>743388798You are AAA's strongest warrior. Unfortunately you were still too weak to prevent half a million layoffs
>>743388798schedule is kinoslop
>>743390427The term "indieslop" is an oxymoron. It makes no sense. It doesn't matter if it's low effort, it's not mass produced.
>>743390721Actually by that definition any developer with multiple concurrent Early Access projects is probably guilty of that.
>>743391016A single artisan making a few pieces is not producing slop. A factory with hundreds or thousands of workers churning out products for the masses is slop. Indieslop doesn't exist.
>>743389640>ermmm forget about the millions of threads for years! Focus on right now at this exact moment!Nice try tranny
>unity>physics-based>intentional low polygon aesthetic
>>743391016If he's asking people to buy into his projects but not committing to any one of them that's a problem. Early Access is not a free trial, it's asking for money in exchange for a (vague) promise of continued development.
>>743388798>youtube thumbnail threadKill yourself, zoomgroid.
>>743391202Sorry, meant for >>743391112.
>>743388798Schedule I is good slop though. Only needs faster updates. Or updates in general.
>>743388798Schedule 1 is great though. You can get the town addicted to meth that makes everyone shit themselves, glow, and explode. It's hilarious.
>>743388798when the game is fun and isn't wasting time and money on graphics but unfortunately updates and new features come at a snail's pace
>>743388798I haven't played this game just doesn't seem interesting to me. But why hate on it and he isn't making French slap and the game seems to have some sort of premise with an actual gameplay loop what's the issue here?
>>743388798Schedule I is good tho.
>>743390427Schedule I was literally made by a single Australian in college, minus the guy who made the music. Now the dev has an office with a whopping TWO devs.
>>743388798It was a fun game, beat it and moved on
>>743388798Type the name in YouTube. You see a dozen soi face retards it's slop.
>>743391929I wasn't correlating my post with the OP.I have a developer in mind when I made my post but I don't remember who they are now (just that they pissed me off and banned me from their Steam forum when I called them out on it).
>>743391997That doesn't explain why it's not worth playing if you're looking for quality.
>>743388798The only slop that's prevalent are survival crafting games or friendslopIf a game is just trying to be an honest game that's not trying to abuse tried and true methods that hook people (survival crafters with the resource grind, roguelikes with rarity tiered items/passives, etc) or appeal to the "it's fun with friends" crowd it's generally respectable in my eyes
>>743391140rent free
>>743391997if i look up any game on youtube i type 'game name no commentary'
>>743389383I have contamination of mutants in my brain.
Low effort visualsOne somewhat solid featureIm supposed to do it over and over again without being tired of itIts played by Youtubers who 12 year olds get their political beliefs from
>>743388834We don't use that word around here
>>743389640Thanks to the hard work of our dedicated janitors, every thread about video games has been deleted. /v/ is now clean.
