It should be illegal to leave a recommended review with the argument "it will be good in the future let the devs cook"
That's more informative than shit like pic related but I don't see you making shit threads about reviews like this
>>743389682>I fucking hate this game, devs should fucking kill themselves >24,4 hours in game>thumbs up, recommended
>This game is 10/10 because...>...because it heped me during a really difficult time in my life!!
>>743389682Who care?We even let illegal migrante into our country
I always leave a positive review regardless.
>>743390087You ruin it for everyone. People who just leave positive reviews are not positive. Just because it says ""positive" or "10/10" doesn't mean its good. This applies to everything, not just games. Fuck you
It's not a positive or negative review; it's whether or not you recommend this game to others. Are you dyslexic?
>>743389682>There should be government regulations on speechWhy do rightards crave the boot so much?
>>743390352>You ruin it for everyone.Good.
>>743389682I mostly review stuff that has less than 100 reviews to help them out.
>>743390724Everyone but the developers, unless you leave negative, which you should.
>>743390352you are HIV positive
>>743389682>look at reviews of a game you like>review has dozens of hours in the game and still plays it>makes a joke about the game showing he clearly enjoys it>not recommended
It unironically, actually should be against the law for storefronts to remove or (by default) hide 'off-topic' reviews. Especially if it's exclusively done to negative ones; obvious shameless attempt to cover up product flaws in order to increase sales. Why is nobody pushing for consumer protections like this? Even on here I don't think I ever see it mentioned; people have just accepted that steam has a right to censor user feedback in a way that artificially enhances the likelihood of a sale.>>743390536Why do leftards crave corporate boot so much? You faggots are supposed to support policies like this but you oppose them to 'own the chuds.'
>review consists only of complaints and criticizing the games balance and the devs not having a handle on it>recommended
I said it before but the fact nobody really leave reviews when they don't like a game causes the general rating to be skewed upward. For one person actually making a negative review, there's 10k who don't, and a "Mixed" rating usually means "Very negative".
>>7433896823/5 of the last games I enjoyed had mixed reviews, reviews don't mean shit.In general, in life other people's opinions are worthless and you can only trust yourself
Games used to come fully cooked on purchase. Early Access is a blight on the video game industry after lazy devs realized they could sell a 20% finished game for 100% price. Whether they feel like finishing it up? Eh, whatever, maybe in 6 years we'll slap a "1.0" label on it despite only meeting 50% content that the initial pitch was promising.
>>743389682There should be a setting for something like "This review will not affect the games score" and its basically a neutral/"meh" one. Neither good nor bad.
>>743390858literally me with subnautica 2 because the devs are massive fags
