has this ever been proven false?
Seems pointless to call a game easy when nobody has trouble with it. Plus the hardest game you’ve ever played is easy you just have to git gud
>>743409914no, because all games can be solved as long as you understand the rule, take rubics for example, it's hard when you don't know the formula/cheese, but once you know it, it is literally piss easy, the problem is tedium, it's the only metric that matters.
>>743410140If something is hard to solve then it is hard. The fact that there is a solution doesn't make it easy
>>743410358no not really, are you confusing tedium with difficulty somehow? is dark souls hard for you? is online competitive games hard for you? if they are, you might be just not used to it yet or downright doesn't understand the objective of the game.anything else is just coping.
>>743410487>It's not hard, it's just tedious!This is what we call a cope. Why are you so afraid to call something difficult?Math is difficult. That doesn't make it easy once you find the solution. The learning process is part of what makes it hard.
>>743410574thanks for proving my point
>>743410574people conflate "being possible means it is easy" because they think in this abstract terms of >well if i dedicate an infinite number of unemployed hours to mastering it, then i will be able to do it flawlessly and it will have lost all difficultyand fail to realize the time sink IS the difficult part. necessarily, their logic dictates: perfect chess games are "easy" because you can theoretically memorize all possible outcomes in the same way you can theoretically memorize all possible moves in a video gamepeople who pride themselves on mastering difficult games will not touch pvp with a 100 foot pole because they know it cannot be overcome by simple rote memorization in the same way as a limited vs AI only game can.
>>743410487this was easy then?
>>743410753yeah I think it's part ego too.
>>743410862what the fuck does that supposed to represent withour any context? i can fogure out instantly that it relates to pythagorean theory somehow the moment i try to plug n=1, n=2,... , but this literally means nothing on it's own.are you dumb enough to not recognize incomplete piece?
>>743411328Fermats last theorem. Was unsolved for hundreds of years before that guy solved it. But since he solved it, it must have been easy right?
>>743411396yes the solution is in the fucking statement, that statement stand on it's own, the answer is there.for n=>3 you retard, go draw a on a xy grid, try plugging n=1,n=2,...what the fuck are you implying you absolute subhuman? there's no fucking question there, it's a fucking statement.
>>743411486The picture is just showing the conclusion, not the full solution you troglodyte. Anyways the point is, just because there is a solution to something, doesn't mean that makes it easy. Like the other anon said, a chess position might have a solution, yet it could be so complex that Magnus Carlsen would miss it. Or a playing a piece of music on an instrument, which has a solution (the right notes, tempo, dynamics, etc) yet it could be really fucking hard to play
>>743411675cope
>>743410753>people who pride themselves on mastering difficult games will not touch pvp with a 100 foot poleYeah I've noticed this too. Can disregard any of these faggots easily just by calling this out. Do you play serious pvp ranked games? Never? Oh yeah okay keep on talking about how great you are at rhythm games and bullet hell and souls shit, nobody gives a fuck.
