According to Steam survey the 4060M is the most common GPU.
You literally do not need more
>>743738412is that good enough to play gzdoom?
>tfw i upgraded from an RTX 3060M to an RX 9070 XT
>>743738412The only problem I see with this is that it's too much. You should need less. Games should ne better optimized.
>>743738412Most people play at 1080p, no need for more, considering the framegen and dlss.
I use a gtx 1650 because nothing warrants more. Graphix whores deserve to have their heads violently bashed in.
>the game... it looked like ass... but the minimum requirement was a gtx 4070 *thunder cracks*
>>743738412Do you really need more than that when there's no new game good enough to justify a upgrade?
>>743738790your brown lol
>>>/g/
>>743739003oh look the spamming tendietranny woke up :DD
>>743738412>It looked no better than a game from 2016..but the minimum requirement was 16gs of ram and..a 4070!
>>743738480It's literally worse than a current gen consoles
the 4060m is a shockingly efficient GPU for that laptop price range so it's no big surprise, it can even push 60 FPS high setting 2K pretty comfortably in many games.8GB VRAM is still bullshit given the 3060 had a 12GB version but oh well.
>>743738412my tnt2 still rocks!
>>743739053>tendietrannyGo back to choking on Gabe Newell's dick, snoy.
>>743738412Yeah I could tell
>>743739091no it's not
>5080
>>743739195saar, gabe newell is associated with valve not with sony
>>743738412
>>743738480vram? don't need it I'll just download more online if I really need more.
>>743739292nvidia bvlls MOG
>>743739292
>>7437392928800 was a beast, I guess that's why both Nvidia and AMD skipped 8000/800 series with HD, RX and GTX line ups.
>>743738412Any games that can't be run on 4060m won't make enough money and the game studio will be shut down
>>743739475
>>743739515
>>743738983That's your mirror reflection Anon
>1080Forever winning
>>743739564>circa 2016 4core cpus become dominant on steam>china begins to emerge
>>743740313>2017
>>743740384>1060 was THAT massive, also 6 core cpus are at 7% at this point
>>743738569Is it worth it? I got a bunch of money to burn. I'll upgrading from a RX580 8GB to a RX 9070XT
I think my laptop has a Radeon 760M in it. wanted a chipset with the 780M, but all of models had dog shit screen brightness. the 760M has done 60 FPS easily in everything I've thrown at it. granted, settings are medium. but medium is kind of what most consoles run at, do I don't feel like I'm missing anything. since most games are trash and I pirate before buying anyway these days, it works out well for me.
>>743738532you might only get 4000 fps out of it. such a shame.
>>743738412>CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8650U (8) @ 4.20 GHz>GPU: Intel UHD Graphics 620 @ 1.15 GHz [Integrated]>Memory: 63.21 GiBam i gonna make it?
>>743741091>63 gigabytes for what can't even be considered a low tier laptopwtf
>>743740535hell yeah, at least when i bought it at the time. bought mine for $700 bucks along with 2x16 DDR5 RAM for $90i know shit costs a lot now probably would still be using a gaming laptop and a console if i didnt buy it then
